Quantifying the relationship between symptoms at presentation and the prognosis of sarcoidosis

Interstitial lung disease: a review of classification, etiology, epidemiology, clinical diagnosis, pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment

Interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) refer to a heterogeneous and complex group of conditions characterized by inflammation, fibrosis, or both, in the interstitium of the lungs. This results in impaired gas exchange, leading to a worsening of respiratory symptoms and a decline in lung function. While the etiology of some ILDs is unclear, most cases can be traced back to factors such as genetic predispositions, environmental exposures (including allergens, toxins, and air pollution), underlying autoimmune diseases, or the use of certain medications. There has been an increase in research and evidence aimed at identifying etiology, understanding epidemiology, improving clinical diagnosis, and developing both pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the current state of knowledge in the field of interstitial lung diseases.

Predictors of Mortality in Sarcoidosis

Sarcoidosis is a systemic granulomatous disorder that affects individuals of all racial/ethnic origins and occurs at any time of life. Spontaneous remission is frequent and may occur in 2 of 3 patients, while the remaining cases have chronic, progressive disease, with some patients presenting with organ- and life-threatening involvements. Many reports have investigated which features may be related to poor outcomes in patients with sarcoidosis. Pulmonary hypertension and respiratory failure from pulmonary fibrosis are the most common complications associated with the cause of death in sarcoidosis. Other major causes of death include cardiac, neurologic, hepatic involvement, and hemoptysis from aspergilloma.

FOXP3+ regulatory T cells are associated with the severity and prognosis of sarcoidosis

Rationale

Sarcoidosis is an inflammatory granulomatous disease of unknown etiology with predominant lung involvement. Organ involvement and disease severity, as well as the nature of immune alterations, vary among patients leading to a range of clinical phenotypes and outcomes. Our objective was to evaluate the association of disease course and immune responses in pulmonary sarcoidosis.

Methods

In this prospective cohort study of 30 subjects, most of whom were followed for one year, we evaluated 14 inflammatory markers in plasma, 13 Treg/T cell flow cytometry markers and 8 parameters of FOXP3+ Treg biology, including suppressive function, epigenetic features and stability.

Results

We identified a set of 13 immunological parameters that differ in sarcoidosis subjects in comparison with healthy donors. Five of those were inversely correlated with suppressive function of Tregs in sarcoidosis, and six (TNFα, TNFR I and II, sCD25, Ki-67 and number of Tregs) were particularly upregulated or increased in subjects with thoracic lymphadenopathy. Treg suppressive function was significantly lower in patients with thoracic lymphadenopathy, and in patients with higher burdens of pulmonary and systemic symptoms. A combination of five inflammatory markers, Ki-67 expression, Treg function, and lung diffusion capacity evaluated at study entry predicted need for therapy at one year follow-up in 90% of cases.

Conclusion

Tregs may suppress ongoing inflammation at local and systemic levels, and TNFα, TNFR I and II, sCD25 and Ki-67 emerge as attractive biomarkers for in vivo sarcoid inflammatory activity.

Quality of life in sarcoidosis

Having sarcoidosis often has a major impact on quality of life of patients and their families. Improving quality of life is prioritized as most important treatment aim by many patients with sarcoidosis, but current evidence and treatment options are limited. In this narrative review, we describe the impact of sarcoidosis on various aspects of daily life, evaluate determinants of health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and provide an overview of the different patient-reported outcome measures to assess HRQoL in sarcoidosis. Moreover, we review the current evidence for pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions to improve quality of life for people with sarcoidosis.

The Symptoms of Pulmonary Sarcoidosis

The aim of this manuscript is to provide a comprehensive review of the etiology, measurement, and treatment of common pulmonary symptoms associated with sarcoidosis. The assessment of symptoms associated with pulmonary sarcoidosis is an important component of disease management. Some symptoms of pulmonary sarcoidosis are sensitive but nonspecific markers of disease activity, and the absence of such symptoms provides evidence that the disease is quiescent. Although quantifiable objective measurements of pulmonary physiology and chest imaging are important in the assessment of pulmonary sarcoidosis, they correlate poorly with the patient's quality of life. Because the symptoms of pulmonary sarcoidosis directly relate to how the patient feels, they are reasonable endpoints in terms of clinical research and individual patient care. Recently, the symptoms of pulmonary sarcoidosis are capable of being quantified via patient-reported outcome measures and electronic devices. We conclude that a thorough assessment of the symptoms associated with pulmonary sarcoidosis improves patient care because it is a useful screen for manifestations of the disease, provides insight into the pathophysiology of manifestations of sarcoidosis, and may assist in optimizing treatment.

Organ involvement and assessment in sarcoidosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In recent years new recommendations have been published about organ assessment in the diagnosis of sarcoidosis.

RECENT FINDINGS

Screening for pulmonary, cardiac, ocular, neurologic and renal involvement and hypercalcemia is recommended in the work-up for sarcoidosis, additionally, screening for hypercalciuria at the time of the diagnosis might be beneficial.

SUMMARY

One of the goals in the work-up of sarcoidosis is to assess the extent and severity of organ involvement. Timely and accurate assessment leads to determination of treatment indication. Screening for pulmonary involvement should include pulmonary imaging and pulmonary function tests. Screening for cardiac involvement should include a clear history including palpitations and collapse and a baseline electrocardiogram or 24-h Holter monitoring. At diagnosis, ophthalmological assessment is recommended. Furthermore, serum calcium level and serum creatinine level should be obtained. Although routine 24-h urinary calcium excretion is not included in the guidelines, performing this test routinely can be considered. On indication, neurologic, rheumatologic or dermatologic assessment can be performed.

Health-related quality of life in cardiac sarcoidosis: a systematic review

People living with cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) are likely to have worse clinical outcomes and greater impairment on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) than other sarcoidosis manifestations. CS can result in a constellation of intrusive symptoms (such as palpitations, dizziness, syncope/pre-syncope, chest pain, dyspnoea, orthopnoea, or peripheral oedema) and/or life-threatening episodes, requiring consideration of invasive cardiac procedures for diagnosis and for the management of acute events. Additionally, the presence of multisystemic involvement and persistent non-specific sarcoidosis symptoms negatively affect HRQoL. A systematic review was undertaken to explore the impact of CS on HRQoL in adults with CS. Multiple bibliographic databases were searched for studies with HRQoL as primary or secondary outcomes in CS (PROSPERO registration: CRD42019119752). Data extraction and quality assessments were undertaken independently by two authors. From the initial 1609 identified records, only 11 studies included CS patients but none specifically reported HRQoL scores for CS patients. The average representation of CS patients was 14.5% within these cohorts (range 2-22%). The majority (73%) was conducted in single-centre tertiary care settings, and only one study (9%) included longitudinal HRQoL data. CS patients were among those sarcoidosis patients with impaired HRQoL and worse outcomes, requiring higher doses of sarcoidosis-specific therapy which contribute to further deterioration of HRQoL. Sarcoidosis studies do not incorporate stratified HRQoL scores for CS patients. While there is a need for longitudinal and multicentre studies assessing HRQoL outcomes in CS cohorts, the development of CS-specific tools is also needed.

Nonlife-Threatening Sarcoidosis

Sarcoidosis is a systemic granulomatous disease of unknown etiology. The outcome is quite variable and is mainly related to persistent inflammatory processes and the development of fibrosis. Many prognostic factors have been described, but the disease evolution is not yet entirely known. The nonthreatening course is characterized by spontaneous involution or stability after treatment withdrawal. Löfgren's syndrome is a subset within the spectrum of sarcoidosis phenotypes, composed of acute onset of fever, bilateral hilar lymphadenopathy, erythema nodosum and/or bilateral ankle periarticular inflammation/arthritis, specifically characterized by a self-limiting disease course. In contrast, advanced fibrotic sarcoidosis with pulmonary hypertension phenotype is correlated with a poor prognosis. Further studies are necessary to detail phenotypes to better understand the mechanisms of the disease and plan future clinical therapeutic studies.

Clinical characteristics and organ system involvement in sarcoidosis: comparison of the University of Minnesota Cohort with other cohorts

BACKGROUND

Sarcoidosis is a systemic granulomatous disease of unknown etiology. Clinical cohort studies of different populations are important to understand the high variability in clinical presentation and disease course of sarcoidosis. The aim of the study is to evaluate clinical characteristics, including organ involvement, pulmonary function tests, and laboratory parameters, in a sarcoidosis cohort at the University of Minnesota. We compare the organ system involvement of this cohort with other available cohorts.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective data collection and analysis of 187 subjects with biopsy-proven sarcoidosis seen at a tertiary center. Organ system involvement was determined using the WASOG sarcoidosis organ assessment instrument. Clinical phenotype groups were classified using the Genomic Research in Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency and Sarcoidosis criteria.

RESULTS

Mean subject age at diagnosis was 45.8 ± 12.4, with a higher proportion of males (55.1%), and a higher proportion of blacks (17.1%) compared to the racial distribution of Minnesota residents (5.95%). The majority (71.1%) of subjects required anti-inflammatory therapy for at least 1 month. Compared to the A Case Control Etiologic Study of Sarcoidosis cohort, there was a higher frequency of extra-thoracic lymph node (34.2% vs. 15.2%), eye (20.9% vs. 11.8%), liver (17.6% vs. 11.5%), spleen (20.9% vs. 6.7%), musculoskeletal (9.6% vs. 0.5%), and cardiac (10.7% vs. 2.3%) involvement in our cohort. A multisystem disease with at least five different organs involved was identified in 13.4% of subjects. A restrictive physiological pattern was observed in 21.6% of subjects, followed by an obstructive pattern in 17.3% and mixed obstructive and restrictive pattern in 2.2%. Almost half (49.2%) were Scadding stages II/III. Commonly employed disease activity markers, including soluble interleukin-2 receptor and angiotensin-converting enzyme, did not differ between treated and untreated groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This cohort features a relatively high frequency of high-risk sarcoidosis phenotypes including cardiac and multiorgan disease. Commonly-utilized serum biomarkers do not identify subpopulations that require or do better with treatment. Findings from this study further highlight the high-variability nature of sarcoidosis and the need for a more reliable biomarker to predict and measure disease severity and outcomes for better clinical management of sarcoidosis patients.

Clinical features and outcomes of asymptomatic pulmonary sarcoidosis. A comparative cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with asymptomatic pulmonary sarcoidosis (APS) detected incidentally and compare them with symptomatic non-Löfgren sarcoidosis (SnLS) patients.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed as having APS at a University hospital in Barcelona, Spain, followed prospectively from 1976 to 2018. APS was defined as the presence of bilateral hilar lymphadenopathy (BHL) with or without lung parenchymal involvement discovered incidentally on chest radiograph or CT scan. APS was compared with SnLS.

RESULTS

APS was diagnosed in 50 (13.6%) and SnLS in 317 (86.4%) patients. At diagnosis, stage I chest radiograph was significantly more frequent in APS than in SnLS (p < 0.001) and there were no asymptomatic patients with stages III and IV. SnLS showed more severe impairment in FVC (p = 0.009) and forced expiratory volume in 1st second (FEV1) (p = 0.003) than APS, while DLco was similar in both groups. Extrathoracic involvement at diagnosis and during the follow up was less frequent in APS than in SnLS patients (p < 0.005). Endobronchial ultrasonography-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS) was the most used diagnostic tool. Treatment was more frequently required in the SnLS than in APS (p < 0.001). At five years, APS patients showed less presence of active disease than SnLS (p = 0.054).

CONCLUSIONS

APS showed earlier radiological stages, lesser impairment in lung function, extrapulmonary organ involvement and need for treatment than SnLS. EBUS was the most useful diagnostic tool. In spite of its benign presentation, around one third of patients evolved to persistent disease but usually with mild clinical and functional impairment.