The role of evaluating inspiratory constraints and ventilatory inefficiency in the investigation of dyspnea of unclear etiology

Sex- and age-adjusted reference values for dynamic inspiratory constraints during incremental cycle ergometry

Activity-related dyspnea in chronic lung disease is centrally related to dynamic (dyn) inspiratory constraints to tidal volume expansion. Lack of reference values for exertional inspiratory reserve (IR) has limited the yield of cardiopulmonary exercise testing in exposing the underpinnings of this disabling symptom. One hundred fifty apparently healthy subjects (82 males) aged 40-85 underwent incremental cycle ergometry. Based on exercise inspiratory capacity (ICdyn), we generated centile-based reference values for the following metrics of IR as a function of absolute ventilation: IRdyn1 ([1-(tidal volume/ICdyn)] x 100) and IRdyn2 ([1-(end-inspiratory lung volume/total lung capacity] x 100). IRdyn1 and IRdyn2 standards were typically lower in females and older subjects (p<0.05 for sex and age versus ventilation interactions). Low IRdyn1 and IRdyn2 significantly predicted the burden of exertional dyspnea in both sexes (p<0.01). Using these sex and age-adjusted limits of reference, the clinician can adequately judge the presence and severity of abnormally low inspiratory reserves in dyspneic subjects undergoing cardiopulmonary exercise testing.

Dynamic Ventilatory Reserve During Incremental Exercise: Reference Values and Clinical Validation in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Rationale: Ventilatory demand-capacity imbalance, as inferred based on a low ventilatory reserve, is currently assessed only at peak cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). Peak ventilatory reserve, however, is poorly sensitive to the submaximal, dynamic mechanical ventilatory abnormalities that are key to dyspnea genesis and exercise intolerance. Objectives: After establishing sex- and age-corrected norms for dynamic ventilatory reserve at progressively higher work rates, we compared peak and dynamic ventilatory reserve for their ability to expose increased exertional dyspnea and poor exercise tolerance in mild to very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Methods: We analyzed resting functional and incremental CPET data from 275 controls (130 men, aged 19-85 yr) and 359 Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease patients with stage 1-4 obstruction (203 men) who were prospectively recruited for previous ethically approved studies in three research centers. In addition to peak and dynamic ventilatory reserve (1 - [ventilation / estimated maximal voluntary ventilation] × 100), operating lung volumes and dyspnea scores (0-10 on the Borg scale) were obtained. Results: Dynamic ventilatory reserve was asymmetrically distributed in controls; thus, we calculated its centile distribution at every 20 W. The lower limit of normal (lower than the fifth centile) was consistently lower in women and older subjects. Peak and dynamic ventilatory reserve disagreed significantly in indicating an abnormally low test result in patients: whereas approximately 50% of those with a normal peak ventilatory reserve showed a reduced dynamic ventilatory reserve, the opposite was found in approximately 15% (P < 0.001). Irrespective of peak ventilatory reserve and COPD severity, patients who had a dynamic ventilatory reserve below the lower limit of normal at an isowork rate of 40 W had greater ventilatory requirements, prompting earlier attainment of critically low inspiratory reserve. Consequently, they reported higher dyspnea scores, showing poorer exercise tolerance compared with those with preserved dynamic ventilatory reserve. Conversely, patients with preserved dynamic ventilatory reserve but reduced peak ventilatory reserve reported the lowest dyspnea scores, showing the best exercise tolerance. Conclusions: Reduced submaximal dynamic ventilatory reserve, even in the setting of preserved peak ventilatory reserve, is a powerful predictor of exertional dyspnea and exercise intolerance in COPD. This new parameter of ventilatory demand-capacity mismatch may enhance the yield of clinical CPET in the investigation of activity-related breathlessness in individual patients with COPD and other prevalent cardiopulmonary diseases.

ERS International Congress 2022: highlights from the Respiratory Clinical Care and Physiology Assembly

It is a challenge to keep abreast of all the clinical and scientific advances in the field of respiratory medicine. This article contains an overview of the laboratory-based science, clinical trials and qualitative research that were presented during the 2022 European Respiratory Society International Congress within the sessions from the five groups of Assembly 1 (Respiratory Clinical Care and Physiology). Selected presentations are summarised from a wide range of topics: clinical problems, rehabilitation and chronic care, general practice and primary care, mobile/electronic health (m-health/e-health), clinical respiratory physiology, exercise and functional imaging.

Role of small airway dysfunction in unexplained exertional dyspnoea

Background

Isolated small airway abnormalities may be demonstrable at rest in patients with normal spirometry; however, the relationship of these abnormalities to exertional symptoms remains uncertain. This study uses an augmented cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) to include evaluation of small airway function during and following exercise to unmask abnormalities not evident with standard testing in individuals with dyspnoea and normal spirometry.

Methods

Three groups of subjects were studied: 1) World Trade Center (WTC) dust exposure (n=20); 2) Clinical Referral (n=15); and Control (n=13). Baseline evaluation included respiratory oscillometry. Airway function during an incremental workload CPET was assessed by: 1) tidal flow versus volume curves during exercise to assess for dynamic hyperinflation and expiratory flow limitation; and 2) post-exercise spirometry and oscillometry to evaluate for airway hyperreactivity.

Results

All subjects demonstrated normal baseline forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1)/forced vital capacity (FVC). Dyspnoea was reproduced during CPET in WTC and Clinical Referral groups versus Control without abnormality in respiratory pattern and minute ventilation. Tidal flow-volume curves uncovered expiratory flow limitation and/or dynamic hyperinflation with increased prevalence in WTC and Clinical Referral versus Control (55%, 87% versus 15%; p<0.001). Post-exercise oscillometry uncovered small airway hyperreactivity with increased prevalence in WTC and Clinical Referral versus Control (40%, 47% versus 0%, p<0.05).

Conclusions

We uncovered mechanisms for exertional dyspnoea in subject with normal spirometry that was attributable to either small airway dysfunction during exercise and/or small airway hyperreactivity following exercise. The similarity of findings in WTC environmentally exposed and clinically referred cohorts suggests broad relevance for these evaluations.

Cardiopulmonary exercise testing applied to respiratory medicine: Myths and facts

Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) remains poorly understood and, consequently, largely underused in respiratory medicine. In addition to a widespread lack of knowledge of integrative physiology, several tenets of CPET interpretation have relevant controversies and limitations which should be appropriately recognized. With the intent to provide a roadmap for the pulmonologist to realistically calibrate their expectations towards CPET, a collection of deeply entrenched beliefs is critically discussed. They include a) the actual role of CPET in uncovering the cause(s) of dyspnoea of unknown origin, b) peak O₂ uptake as the key metric of cardiorespiratory capacity, c) the value of low lactate ("anaerobic") threshold to differentiate cardiocirculatory from respiratory causes of exercise limitation, d) the challenges of interpreting heart rate-based indexes of cardiovascular performance, e) the meaning of peak breathing reserve in dyspnoeic patients, f) the merits and drawbacks of measuring operating lung volumes during exercise, g) how best interpret the metrics of gas exchange inefficiency such as the ventilation-CO₂ output relationship, h) when (and why) measurements of arterial blood gases are required, and i) the advantages of recording submaximal dyspnoea "quantity" and "quality". Based on a conceptual framework that links exertional dyspnoea to "excessive" and/or "restrained" breathing, I outline the approaches to CPET performance and interpretation that proved clinically more helpful in each of these scenarios. CPET to answer clinically relevant questions in pulmonology is a largely uncharted research field: I, therefore, finalize by highlighting some lines of inquiry to improve its diagnostic and prognostic yield.

Evidence of ventilatory constraints during exercise in hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome

PURPOSE

Hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (hEDS) is a connective tissue disorder with many different symptoms such as pain, fatigue, dysautonomia, or respiratory symptoms. Among the respiratory manifestations described, the most frequent are exertional dyspnea and breathing difficulties. Mechanical ventilatory constraints during exercise could participate in these respiratory manifestations. The objective of this study was to explore the response of pulmonary flow-volume loops to exercise in patients with hEDS and to look for dynamic hyperinflation and expiratory flow limitation during exercise.

METHODS

For this purpose, breathing pattern and tidal exercise flow-volume loops were recorded at two workloads (30% and 80% of the peak power output) of a constant load exercise test.

RESULTS

Twelve patients were included (11 women, mean age 41 ± 14 years). The results showed a decrease (p = 0.028) in the inspiratory capacity (from 3.12 ± 0.49 L to 2.97 ± 0.52 L), an increase (p = 0.025) in the end-expiratory lung volume (from 0.73 ± 0.68 L to 0.88 ± 0.66 L, i.e., from EELV comprising 17 ± 12% to 21 ± 12% of forced vital capacity) between the two workloads in favor of dynamic hyperinflation, and half of the patients had expiratory flow limitations.

CONCLUSION

This exploratory study provides evidence for mechanical ventilatory constraints during exercise in patients with hEDS, which may induce discomfort during exercise and could contribute to the respiratory symptomatology.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

This study is part of a larger clinical trial (ID: NCT04680793, December 2020).

Using Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing to Understand Dyspnea and Exercise Intolerance in Respiratory Disease

A cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) is ideally suited to quantify exercise tolerance and evaluate the pathophysiological mechanism(s) of dyspnea and exercise limitation in people with chronic respiratory disease. Although there are several statements on CPET and many outstanding resources detailing the cardiorespiratory and perceptual responses to exercise, limited information is available to support the health care provider in conducting a practical CPET evaluation. This article provides the health care provider with practical and timely information on how to use CPET data to understand dyspnea and exercise intolerance in people with chronic respiratory diseases. Information on CPET protocol, as well as how to evaluate maximal patient effort, peak rate of oxygen consumption, ventilatory demand, pulmonary gas exchange, ventilatory reserve, operating lung volumes, and exertional dyspnea, is presented. Two case examples are also described to highlight how these parameters are evaluated to provide a clinical interpretation of CPET data.

Pathophysiology and clinical evaluation of the patient with unexplained persistent dyspnea

INTRODUCTION

Dyspnea is a complex symptom, which largely results from an imbalance between an afferent sensory stimulus and the corresponding efferent respiratory neuromuscular response. In addition, it is heavily influenced by the patient's prior experiences and sociocultural factors.

AREAS COVERED

The diagnostic approach to these patients requires a graded, systematic, and often multidisciplinary approach to determine what is the underlying pathophysiologic process. Utilization of objective data obtained through lab testing, imaging, and advanced testing, such as cardiopulmonary exercise testing, is often required to help identify underlying pathology contributing to a patient's symptoms. This article will review dyspnea's underlying pathophysiological mechanisms and standardized approaches to diagnoses. In the expert opinion section, we will discuss our own clinical approach to evaluating patients with persistent dyspnea.

EXPERT OPINION

Unexplained dyspnea is a challenging diagnosis that occurs in patients with and without underlying cardiopulmonary diseases. It requires a systematic approach, which initially uses clinical evaluation in addition to standard imaging and clinical biomarkers. When diagnoses are not made during the initial evaluation, subsequent tests can include cardiopulmonary exercise test and methacholine challenge. To be certain of the correct diagnosis, It is imperative that the clinician determines dyspnea's response to a particular therapeutic intervention.

Clinical Interpretation of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing: Current Pitfalls and Limitations

Several shortcomings on cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) interpretation have shed a negative light on the test as a clinically useful tool. For instance, the reader should recognize patterns of dysfunction based on clusters of variables rather than relying on rigid interpretative algorithms. Correct display of key graphical data is of foremost relevance: prolixity and redundancy should be avoided. Submaximal dyspnea ratings should be plotted as a function of work rate (WR) and ventilatory demand. Increased work of breathing and/or obesity may normalize peak oxygen uptake (V̇O₂) despite a low peak WR. Among the determinants of V̇O₂, only heart rate is measured during non-invasive CPET. It follows that in the absence of findings suggestive of severe impairment in O₂ delivery, the boundaries between inactivity and early cardiovascular disease are blurred in individual subjects. A preserved breathing reserve should not be viewed as evidence that "the lungs" are not limiting the subject. In this context, measurements of dynamic inspiratory capacity are key to uncover abnormalities germane to exertional dyspnea. A low end-tidal partial pressure for carbon dioxide may indicate either increased "wasted" ventilation or alveolar hyperventilation; thus, direct measurements of arterial (or arterialized) PO₂ might be warranted. Differentiating a chaotic breathing pattern from the normal breath-by-breath noise might be complex if the plotted data are not adequately smoothed. A sober recognition of these limitations, associated with an interpretation report free from technicalities and convoluted terminology, is crucial to enhance the credibility of CPET in the eyes of the practicing physician.

Pulmonology approach in the investigation of chronic unexplained dyspnea

Chronic unexplained dyspnea and exercise intolerance represent common, distressing symptoms in outpatients. Clinical history taking and physical examination are the mainstays for diagnostic evaluation. However, the cause of dyspnea may remain elusive even after comprehensive diagnostic evaluation-basic laboratory analyses; chest imaging; pulmonary function testing; and cardiac testing. At that point (and frequently before), patients are usually referred to a pulmonologist, who is expected to be the main physician to solve this conundrum. In this context, cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), to assess physiological and sensory responses from rest to peak exercise, provides a unique opportunity to unmask the mechanisms of the underlying dyspnea and their interactions with a broad spectrum of disorders. However, CPET is underused in clinical practice, possibly due to operational issues (equipment costs, limited availability, and poor remuneration) and limited medical education regarding the method. To counter the latter shortcoming, we aspire to provide a pragmatic strategy for interpreting CPET results. Clustering findings of exercise response allows the characterization of patterns that permit the clinician to narrow the list of possible diagnoses rather than pinpointing a specific etiology. We present a proposal for a diagnostic workup and some illustrative cases assessed by CPET. Given that airway hyperresponsiveness and pulmonary vascular disorders, which are within the purview of pulmonology, are common causes of chronic unexplained dyspnea, we also aim to describe the role of bronchial challenge tests and the diagnostic reasoning for investigating the pulmonary circulation in this context.

Residual Exertional Dyspnea in Cardiopulmonary Disease

In cardiopulmonary medicine, residual exertional dyspnea (RED) can be defined by the persistence of limiting breathlessness in a patient who is already under the best available therapy for the underlying heart and/or lung disease. RED is a challenge to the pulmonologist because the patient (and the referring physician) assumes that the "lung doctor" should invariably provide a successful plan to fight the symptom. After presenting a simplified framework to understand the neurobiological underpinnings of dyspnea in cardiorespiratory disease, I discuss the seeds of RED associated with 1) increased metabolic cost of work, 2) increased inspiratory constraints, 3) diaphragm dysfunction, 4) impaired right ventricle preload, 5) increased central and/or peripheral chemosensitivity, 6) increased physiological dead space, 7) increased pulmonary venous and/or high left ventricle filling pressures, 8) impaired chronotropic response to exertion, and 9) increased activation of the cortical-limbic circuits. I finalize by outlining the following two common coexistence of diseases in which these multiple mechanisms interact to produce severe RED: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease-heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and chronic pulmonary fibrosis-emphysema. RED exposes the important limitations of the current reductionist approach focused only on the (over)treatment of the poorly reversible cardiopulmonary disease(s). Conversely, recognizing the existence of RED sets the stage for a more holistic approach toward one of the most devastating symptoms known to man.

Lung Function Testing in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Lung function testing has undisputed value in the comprehensive assessment and individualized management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, a pathologic condition in which a functional abnormality, poorly reversible expiratory airway obstruction, is at the core of its definition. After an overview of the physiologic underpinnings of the disease, the authors outline the role of lung function testing in this disease, including diagnosis, assessment of severity, and indication for and responses to pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions. They discuss the current controversies surrounding test interpretation with these purposes in mind and provide balanced recommendations to optimize their usefulness in different clinical scenarios.

Assessing Static Lung Hyperinflation by Whole-Body Plethysmography, Helium Dilution, and Impulse Oscillometry System (IOS) in Patients with COPD

Purpose

Lung hyperinflation is a feature of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and can determine pivotal consequence on symptoms, exercise tolerance and quality of life. Despite the relevance of assessing lung hyperinflation, there is still no single consensus as to what volume should be taken into account. We investigate which spirometric measurement is more reliable in assessing static lung hyperinflation and which is more related with impulse oscillometry system (IOS) measurements in COPD.

Patients and Methods

Fifty-five COPD patients were enrolled. TLC, RV and RV:TLC ratio were obtained both with helium and plethysmography techniques. IOS measurements (X5, Fres and R5-R20) were performed. Pearson and Spearman correlation determined the relationships between the functional parameters that evaluate static hyperinflation (RV: TLC, TLC, RV) and IOS measurements.

Results

As expected, we reported a statistically significant difference between these two techniques in terms of mean percentage values of TLC (7.57 ± 3.26 L; p= 0.02) and RV (15.24 ± 7.51 L; p=0.04), while RV:TLC measured with the two methods was similar (5.21 ± 4.69%; p=0.27). The correlation analysis showed that IOS parameters, such as difference in resistance between 5 Hz and 20 Hz (R(5–20)) and resonant frequency (Fres), were positively correlated with RV:TLC ratio, while reactance at 5 Hz (X(5)) was negatively correlated with it. In particular, we pointed out a weak correlation between RV:TLC (%) (Pleth) and R(5–20) (r=0.3, p=0.04), Fres (r=0.3; p=0.03), while X5 had a mild correlation with RV:TLC (%) (r=−0.5;p<0.0001). Moreover, we noticed a strong relationship between RV:TLC (%)(He) and X5 (r=−0.7; p=0.0001) and a mild correlation between RV:TLC (%) (He) and Fres (r=0.4; p=0.003). Between R5-R20 and RV:TLC, there was a weak correlation (r=0.3; p=0.001). No correlation between TLC, RV (L,%) (both helium and Pleth derived) and IOS parameters (R(5–20), X5, Fres) was found.

Conclusion

RV:TLC can represent the most reliable parameter in the assessment of hyperinflation, considering the absence of significant difference in its measurement between the two techniques. IOS provides supplementary information in the assessment of static hyperinflation.

Normative Peak Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test Responses in Canadian Adults Aged ≥40 Years

BACKGROUND

Up-to-date normative reference sets for cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) are important to aid in the accurate interpretation of CPET in clinical or research settings.

RESEARCH QUESTION

This study aimed to (1) develop and externally validate a contemporary reference set for peak CPET responses in Canadian adults identified with population-based sampling; and (2) evaluate previously recommended reference equations for predicting peak CPET responses.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Participants were healthy adults who were ≥40 years old from the Canadian Cohort Obstructive Lung Disease who completed an incremental cycle CPET. Prediction models for peak CPET responses were estimated from readily available participant characteristics (age, sex, height, body mass) with the use of quantile regression. External validation was performed with a second convenience sample of healthy adults. Peak CPET parameters that were measured and predicted in the validation cohort were assessed for equivalence (two one-sided tests of equivalence for paired-samples and level of agreement (Bland-Altman analyses). Two one-sided tests of equivalence for paired samples assessed differences between responses in the derivation cohort using previously recommended reference equations.

RESULTS

Normative reference ranges (5th-95th percentiles) for 28 peak CPET parameters and prediction models for 8 peak CPET parameters were based on 173 participants (47% male) who were 64 ± 10 years old. In the validation cohort (n = 84), peak CPET responses that were predicted with the newly generated models were equivalent to the measured values. Peak cardiac parameters predicted by the previously recommended reference equations by Jones and colleagues and Hansen and colleagues were significantly higher.

INTERPRETATION

This study provides reference ranges and prediction models for peak cardiac, ventilatory, operating lung volume, gas exchange, and symptom responses to incremental CPET and presents the most comprehensive reference set to date in Canadian adults who were ≥40 years old to be identified with population-based sampling.

Are the “critical” inspiratory constraints actually decisive to limit exercise tolerance in COPD?

Exercise intolerance is characteristically multi-factorial in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) [1]. At least in symptomatic patients with moderate-to-severe airflow limitation, higher operating lung volumes assume a relevant role in decreasing patients’ tolerance to sustain “prolonged” exercise. As a consequence of the dynamic increase in the end-expiratory lung volume, tidal volume (VT) occurs close to total lung capacity (TLC), thereby reducing the room for further lung–chest wall expansion. The combination of low dynamic lung compliance and a severely reduced inspiratory reserve volume causes a mismatch between a growing respiratory neural drive and the resulting lung–chest wall displacement [2]. It has been postulated that such critical inspiratory constraints (CIC) lead to a plateau in VT, and a concomitant increase in dyspnoea as a function of ventilation (V′_E) [3]. Accordingly, patients change their perception of the uncomfortable respiratory sensations from “laboured breathing” to “insufficient inspiration”, prompting early exercise termination [4].

The concept of critical inspiratory constraints is key to the modern understanding of exercise pathophysiology in patients with moderate-to-severe COPDhttps://bit.ly/2A6bCxD

The Lung Function Laboratory to Assist Clinical Decision-making in Pulmonology: Evolving Challenges to an Old Issue

The lung function laboratory frequently provides relevant information to the practice of pulmonology. Clinical interpretation of pulmonary function and exercise tests, however, has been complicated more recently by temporal changes in demographic characteristics (higher life expectancy), anthropometric attributes (increased obesity prevalence), and the surge of polypharmacy in a sedentary population with multiple chronic degenerative diseases. In this narrative review, we concisely discuss some key challenges to test interpretation that have been affected by these epidemiologic shifts: (a) the confounding effects of advanced age and severe obesity, (b) the contemporary controversies in the diagnosis of obstruction (including asthma and/or COPD), (c) the importance of considering the diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (Dlco)/"accessible" alveolar volume (carbon monoxide transfer coefficient) in association with Dlco to uncover the causes of impaired gas exchange, and (d) the modern role of the pulmonary function laboratory (including cardiopulmonary exercise testing) in the investigation of undetermined dyspnea. Following a Bayesian perspective, we suggest interpretative algorithms that consider the pretest probability of abnormalities as indicated by additional clinical information. We, therefore, adopt a pragmatic approach to help the practicing pulmonologist to apply the information provided by the lung function laboratory to the care of individual patients.

ERS International Congress, Madrid, 2019: highlights from the Sleep and Clinical Physiology Assembly

The 2019 European Respiratory Society (ERS) International Congress took place in Madrid, Spain, and served as a platform to find out the latest advances in respiratory diseases research. The research aims are to understand the physiology and consequences of those diseases, as well as the improvement in their diagnoses, treatments and patient care. In particular, the scientific sessions arranged by ERS Assembly 4 provided novel insights into sleep-disordered breathing and new knowledge in respiratory physiology. This article, divided by session, will summarise the most relevant studies presented at the ERS International Congress. Each section has been written by Early Career Members specialising in the different fields of this interdisciplinary assembly.

Prevalence and prognosis of respiratory muscle weakness in heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction

BACKGROUND

Although respiratory muscle weakness (RMW) is known to predict prognosis in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), RMW prevalence and its prognosis in those with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remain unknown. We aimed to investigate whether the RMW predicted mortality in HFpEF patients.

METHODS

We conducted a single-centre observational study with consecutive 1023 heart failure patients (445 in HFrEF and 578 in HFpEF). Maximal inspiratory pressure (PI_max) was measured to assess respiratory muscle strength at hospital discharge, and RMW was defined as PI_max <70% of predicted value. Endpoint was all-cause mortality after hospital discharge, and we examined the influence of RMW on the endpoint.

RESULTS

Over a median follow-up of 1.8 years, 134 patients (13.1%) died; of these 53 (11.9%) were in HFrEF and 81 (14.0%) in HFpEF. RMW was evident in 190 (42.7%) HFrEF and 226 (39.1%) HFpEF patients and was independently associated with all-cause mortality in both HFrEF (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]: 2.13, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.17-3.88) and HFpEF (adjusted HR: 2.85, 95% CI: 1.74-4.67) patients. Adding RMW to the multivariate logistic regression model significantly increased area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) for all-cause mortality in HFpEF (AUC including RMW: 0.78, not including RMW: 0.74, P = 0.026) but not in HFrEF (AUC including RMW: 0.84, not including RMW: 0.82, P = 0.132).

CONCLUSIONS

RMW was observed in 39% of HFpEF patients, which was independently associated with poor prognosis. The additive effect of RMW on prognosis was detected only in HFpEF but not in HFrEF.