CAT score single item analysis in patients with COPD: Results from COSYCONET

Evidence Construction of Chuankezhi Injection Against Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review and Network Pharmacology

Objective

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a chronic respiratory disease with high prevalence, morbidity, and mortality. Chuankezhi (CKZ) injection, a Chinese patent medicine, has been commonly used for treating COPD. This study evaluated the clinical efficacy of CKZ injections in COPD patients and explored potential underlying mechanisms by integrating meta-analysis and network pharmacology.

Research Methods

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were search in database by Web of Science, Cochrane Library and PubMed as of November 2022 for literature collection, and the Review Manager 5.4 was used to analyze the data. Through the network pharmacology method, the chemical components and their targets, as well as the disease targets were further analyzed.

Results

A total of 15 RCTs including 1212 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that CKZ injection can significantly improve the clinical effective rate (RR = 1.25, 95% CI: 1.14 to 1.36), and the clinical advantage was that it can significantly reduced acute exacerbation rate (RR = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.12 to 0.70) and COPD assessment test (CAT) scores (MD =-4.62, 95% CI:-8.966 to-0.28). A total of 31 chemical compounds and 178 potential targets for CKZ injection were obtained from the online databases. Molecular docking revealed that most key components and targets could form stable structure.

Conclusion

This systematic review with meta-analysis and network pharmacology demonstrates that CKZ could effectively improve the clinical efficacy and safety in the treatment of COPD. Such efficacy may be related to an anti-inflammatory effect and immunoregulation of CKZ via multiple components, multiple targets and multiple pathways.

Components of the Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Assessment Test Associated with the Exacerbation of Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients

INTRODUCTION

The chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) Assessment Test (CAT) score is widely used for evaluating the health status of patients diagnosed with COPD. The aim of this study was to identify which components of the CAT are associated with exacerbations in severe COPD patients.

METHODS

Using data from the Korean COPD Subgroup Study (KOCOSS), we identified 3,440 COPD patients, among which 1,027 patients are classified as having severe COPD based on spirometry results. The CAT scores on 8 items were evaluated and classified into respiratory and non-respiratory categories. We analyzed the association between CAT item scores and moderate-to-severe exacerbations during study enrollment and the following years.

RESULTS

Patients with a history of moderate-to-severe exacerbations had higher scores on non-respiratory CAT components. Longitudinal CAT scores on all items after enrollment were higher in the moderate-to-severe exacerbation group. Additionally, the frequency of severe exacerbations was associated with specific CAT components related to limited activities, confidence leaving home, sleeplessness, and energy.

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed that the non-respiratory CAT component scores were statistically significant factors for predicting the moderate-to-severe exacerbation of severe COPD patients. Non-respiratory symptoms and functional limitations should be considered in patients with severe COPD. Interventions, such as pulmonary rehabilitation, may be needed to improve patients' overall well-being and prevent exacerbations.

Characteristics of Current Smokers versus Former Smokers with COPD and Their Associations with Smoking Cessation Within 4.5 Years: Results from COSYCONET

Background

Many patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) continue smoking. We used data from the "real-life" COSYCONET COPD cohort to evaluate whether these patients differed from patients with COPD who either had ceased smoking prior to inclusion or ceased during the follow-up time of the study.

Methods

The analysis was based on data from visits 1-5 (covering 4.5 years), including all patients with the diagnosis of COPD who were either ex-smokers or smokers and categorized as GOLD 1-4 or the former GOLD 0 category. We compared the characteristics of smokers and ex-smokers at baseline (visit 1), as well as the course of lung function in the follow-up of permanent ex-smokers, permanent smokers and incident ex-smokers (smokers at visit 1 who ceased smoking before visit 5). We also identified baseline factors associated with subsequent smoking cessation.

Results

Among 2500 patients who were ever-smokers, 660 were current smokers and 1840 ex-smokers at baseline. Smokers were younger than ex-smokers (mean 61.5 vs 66.0 y), had a longer duration of smoking but fewer pack-years, a lower frequency of asthma, higher forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1, 59.4 vs 55.2% predicted) and higher functional residual capacity (FRC, 147.7 vs 144.3% predicted). Similar results were obtained for the longitudinal subpopulation, comprising 713 permanent ex-smokers, 175 permanent smokers, and 55 incident ex-smokers. When analyzing the time course of lung function, higher FRC, lower FEV1 and the presence of asthma (p < 0.05 each) were associated with incident cessation prior to visit 5, while less airway obstruction was associated with smoking continuation.

Conclusion

These findings, which were consistent in the cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses, suggest that lung hyperinflation was associated with being or becoming ex-smoker. Possibly, it is perceived by patients as one of the factors motivating their attempts to quit smoking, independent from airway obstruction.

The COPD Assessment Test (CAT) and Depression: A Longitudinal Analysis During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Purpose

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is multifaceted, with some patients experiencing anxiety and depression. Depression in COPD has been associated with worse total scores for the COPD assessment test (CAT). Also, CAT score worsening has been observed during the COVID-19 pandemic. The relationship between the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) score and CAT sub-component scores has not been evaluated. We investigated the relationship between CES-D score and CAT component scores during the COVD-19 pandemic.

Patients and Methods

Sixty-five patients were recruited. Pre-pandemic (baseline) was defined as 23rd March 2019-23rd March 2020, CAT scores and information related to exacerbations were collected via telephone at 8-week intervals between 23rd March 2020-23rd March 2021.

Results

There were no differences in CAT scores pre- compared to during the pandemic (ANOVA p = 0.97). Total CAT scores were higher in patients with symptoms of depression compared to those without both pre- (p < 0.001) and during-pandemic (eg, at 12 months 21.2 versus 12.9, mean difference = 8.3 (95% CI = 2.3-14.2), p = 0.02). Individual CAT component scores showed significantly higher chest tightness, breathlessness, activity limitation, confidence, sleep and energy scores in patients with symptoms of depression at most time points (p < 0.05). Significantly fewer exacerbations were observed during- compared to pre-pandemic (p = 0.04). We observed that COPD patients with symptoms of depression had higher CAT scores both pre- and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Conclusion

Presence of depressive symptoms was selectively associated with individual component scores. Symptoms of depression may potentially influence total CAT scores.

Impulse Oscillometry as a Diagnostic Test for Pulmonary Emphysema in a Clinical Setting

Body plethysmography (BP) is the standard pulmonary function test (PFT) in pulmonary emphysema diagnosis, but not all patients can cooperate to this procedure. An alternative PFT, impulse oscillometry (IOS), has not been investigated in emphysema diagnosis. We investigated the diagnostic accuracy of IOS in the diagnosis of emphysema. Eighty-eight patients from the pulmonary outpatient clinic at Lillebaelt Hospital, Vejle, Denmark, were included in this cross-sectional study. A BP and an IOS were performed in all patients. Computed tomography scan verified presence of emphysema in 20 patients. The diagnostic accuracy of BP and IOS for emphysema was evaluated with two multivariable logistic regression models: Model 1 (BP variables) and Model 2 (IOS variables). Model 1 had a cross-validated area under the ROC curve (CV-AUC) = 0.892 (95% CI: 0.654-0.943), a positive predictive value (PPV) = 59.3%, and a negative predictive value (NPV) = 95.0%. Model 2 had a CV-AUC = 0.839 (95% CI: 0.688-0.931), a PPV = 55.2%, and an NPV = 93.7%. We found no statistically significant difference between the AUC of the two models. IOS is quick and easy to perform, and it can be used as a reliable rule-out method for emphysema.

Gender-specific differences in COPD symptoms and their impact for the diagnosis of cardiac comorbidities

BACKGROUND

In chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), gender-specific differences in the prevalence of symptoms and comorbidity are known.

RESEARCH QUESTION

We studied whether the relationship between these characteristics depended on gender and carried diagnostic information regarding cardiac comorbidities.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

The analysis was based on 2046 patients (GOLD grades 1-4, 795 women; 38.8%) from the COSYCONET COPD cohort. Assessments comprised the determination of clinical history, comorbidities, lung function, COPD Assessment Test (CAT) and modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale (mMRC). Using multivariate regression analyses, gender-specific differences in the relationship between symptoms, single CAT items, comorbidities and functional alterations were determined. To reveal the relationship to cardiac disease (myocardial infarction, or heart failure, or coronary artery disease) logistic regression analysis was performed separately in men and women.

RESULTS

Most functional parameters and comorbidities, as well as CAT items 1 (cough), 2 (phlegm) and 5 (activities), differed significantly (p < 0.05) between men and women. Beyond this, the relationship between functional parameters and comorbidities versus symptoms showed gender-specific differences, especially for single CAT items. In men, item 8 (energy), mMRC, smoking status, BMI, age and spirometric lung function was related to cardiac disease, while in women primarily age was predictive.

INTERPRETATION

Gender-specific differences in COPD not only comprised differences in symptoms, comorbidities and functional alterations, but also differences in their mutual relationships. This was reflected in different determinants linked to cardiac disease, thereby indicating that simple diagnostic information might be used differently in men and women.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

The cohort study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov with identifier NCT01245933 and on GermanCTR.de with identifier DRKS00000284, date of registration November 23, 2010. Further information can be obtained on the website http://www.asconet.net .

Clinical factors linked to the type of respiratory medication in COPD: results from the COSYCONET cohort

BACKGROUND

The use of maintenance medication in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in real life is known to deviate from recommendations in guidelines, which are largely based on randomized controlled trials and selected populations.

OBJECTIVES

We used the COSYCONET (COPD and Systemic Consequences - Comorbidities Network) cohort to analyze factors linked to the use of COPD drugs under non-interventional circumstances.

DESIGN

COSYCONET is an ongoing, multi-center, non-interventional cohort of patients with COPD.

METHODS

Patients with COPD of Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) grades 0-4 participating in visits 1-5 were included. Data covered the period from 2010 to 2018. Generalized linear models were used to examine the relation of COPD characteristics to different types of respiratory medication.

RESULTS

A total of 1043 patients were included. The duration of observation was 4.5 years. Use of respiratory medication depended on GOLD grades 0-4 and groups A-D. Long-acting muscarinic antagonist therapy increased over time, and was associated with low carbon monoxide (CO) diffusing capacity, while inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) use decreased. Active smoking was associated with less maintenance therapy in general, and female sex with less ICS use. From the eight items of the COPD Assessment Test, only hill and stair climbing were consistently linked to treatment.

CONCLUSION

Using data from a large, close to real-life observational cohort, we identified factors linked to the use of various types of respiratory COPD medication. Overall, use was consistent with GOLD recommendations. Beyond this, we identified other correlates of medication use that may help us to understand and improve therapy decisions in clinical practice.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01245933.

Standardized airway wall thickness Pi10 from routine CT scans of COPD patients as imaging biomarker for disease severity, lung function decline, and mortality

BACKGROUND

Chest computed tomography (CT) is increasingly used for phenotyping and monitoring of patients with COPD. The aim of this work was to evaluate the association of Pi10 as a measure of standardized airway wall thickness on CT with exacerbations, mortality, and response to triple therapy.

METHODS

Patients of GOLD grades 1-4 of the COSYCONET cohort with prospective CT scans were included. Pi10 was automatically computed and analyzed for its relationship to COPD severity, comorbidities, lung function, respiratory therapy, and mortality over a 6-year period, using univariate and multivariate comparisons.

RESULTS

We included n = 433 patients (61%male). Pi10 was dependent on both GOLD grades 1-4 (p = 0.009) and GOLD groups A-D (p = 0.008); it was particularly elevated in group D, and ROC analysis yielded a cut-off of 0.26 cm. Higher Pi10 was associated to lower FEV₁ % predicted and higher RV/TLC, moreover the annual changes of lung function parameters (p < 0.05), as well as to an airway-dominated phenotype and a history of myocardial infarction (p = 0.001). These associations were confirmed in multivariate analyses. Pi10 was lower in patients receiving triple therapy, in particular in patients of GOLD groups C and D. Pi10 was also a significant predictor for mortality (p = 0.006), even after including multiple other predictors.

CONCLUSION

In summary, Pi10 was found to be predictive for the course of the disease in COPD, in particular mortality. The fact that Pi10 was lower in patients with severe COPD receiving triple therapy might hint toward additional effects of this functional therapy on airway remodeling.

REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier: NCT01245933.

[What have we learned from the German COPD cohort COSYCONET and where do we go from here?]

COSYCONET 1 is the only German COPD cohort which is large enough to be internationally comparable. The recruitment, which started in 2010 and ended in December 2013, comprised 2741 patients with the diagnosis of COPD who were subsequently investigated in regular follow-up visits. All visits included a comprehensive functional and clinical characterisation. On the basis of this detailed data set, it was possible to address a large number of clinical questions. These questions ranged from the prescription of medication, the detailed analysis of comorbidities, in particular cardiovascular disease, and biomarker assessment to radiological and health-economic aspects. Currently, more than 60 publications of COSYCONET data are internationally available. The present overview provides a description of all the results that were obtained, focussing on the relationship between different clinical and functional aspects as well as their potential practical consequences. In addition, information on the follow-up study COSYCONET 2 is given.

Effectiveness of Extrafine Single Inhaler Triple Therapy in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) in Germany - The TriOptimize Study

Purpose

Real-word evidence on the effectiveness of switching from dual therapies or triple therapies (multiple inhalers) to extrafine single-inhaler triple therapy (efSITT), which consists of the inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) beclomethasone, the long-acting β₂-agonist (LABA) formoterol and the long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) glycopyrronium, in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is limited. The impact of switching to efSITT on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), COPD specific symptoms, lung function and treatment adherence were assessed in routine clinical care.

Patients and Methods

Patients were recruited at 148 sites in Germany between 2017 and 2020 in this multicenter, non-interventional observational study. Demographics, clinical data and treatment history were collected at baseline. HRQoL (measured by COPD Assessment Test [CAT]), lung function and adherence (measured by Test of Adherence to Inhalers [TAI]) were assessed at baseline and after six months. Descriptive analyses were conducted by prior treatment and GOLD groups as well as for the overall population.

Results

55.1% of the 2623 included patients were male. Mean age was 65.8 years. 57.5% of the patients were previously treated with ICS+LABA+LAMA (multiple inhalers), 23.9% with ICS/LABA (single or two inhalers) and 18.6% with LAMA/LABA (single or two inhalers). After six months, largest mean improvements in the total CAT score were observed in the ICS/LABA (-3.9) and LAMA/LABA (-3.9) prior treatment groups as well as in patients in GOLD group B (-2.9). In the overall population, the CAT items for cough, phlegm, and dyspnea decreased on average by -0.4 points each. After six months, FEV₁ increased by 2.0 percentage points in relation to predicted values. The percentages of measured sRtot and RV of predicted values decreased by 24.5 and 4.4 percentage points, respectively. The percentage of patients with good adherence increased from 67.8% to 76.5%.

Conclusion

Treatment switch to efSITT resulted in an improvement of HRQoL, COPD specific symptoms, lung function parameters and adherence under real-world conditions.

Change in individual chronic obstructive pulmonary disease assessment test item scores after short-term bronchodilator therapy and its impact on exacerbation in treatment-naïve patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Background:

The chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) assessment test (CAT) measures the health status of patients with COPD. We aimed to investigate the change in individual CAT scores after short-term bronchodilator therapy among treatment-naïve patients with COPD.

Methods:

Data from 148 patients newly diagnosed with COPD between January 2016 and April 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. We compared the CAT score, modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea grade, and forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) before and after short-term (6 ± 2 months) bronchodilator therapy. We analyzed the change trends using generalized estimating equations.

Results:

The mean patient age was 70.9 years, and 92.6% were male. The total CAT score did not significantly improve. However, among the CAT items, phlegm [adjusted difference: –0.22 (–0.48, –0.002)], chest tightness [–0.30 (–0.56, –0.05)], and breathlessness [–0.45 (–0.66, –0.23)] scores significantly improved after bronchodilator therapy. The patients were divided into two groups: CAT score improved ( n = 69) and not improved group ( n = 79). The development of moderate-to-severe exacerbations during follow-up was significantly lower (2.9% versus 17.7%, p = 0.004) in the CAT score improved group.

Conclusion:

The improvement in CAT items indicating respiratory symptoms was more evident than the CAT total score after short-term bronchodilator therapy. Despite the significant increase in FEV1 after bronchodilator therapy, fewer than half of the patients achieved meaningful improvement in CAT, and this group showed significantly lower development of exacerbation during follow-up.

Prediction of lung emphysema in COPD by spirometry and clinical symptoms: results from COSYCONET

Background

Lung emphysema is an important phenotype of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and CT scanning is strongly recommended to establish the diagnosis. This study aimed to identify criteria by which physicians with limited technical resources can improve the diagnosis of emphysema.

Methods

We studied 436 COPD patients with prospective CT scans from the COSYCONET cohort. All items of the COPD Assessment Test (CAT) and the St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) scale, as well as data from spirometry and CO diffusing capacity, were used to construct binary decision trees. The importance of parameters was checked by the Random Forest and AdaBoost machine learning algorithms.

Results

When relying on questionnaires only, items CAT 1 & 7 and SGRQ 8 & 12 sub-item 3 were most important for the emphysema- versus airway-dominated phenotype, and among the spirometric measures FEV₁/FVC. The combination of CAT item 1 (≤ 2) with mMRC (> 1) and FEV₁/FVC, could raise the odds for emphysema by factor 7.7. About 50% of patients showed combinations of values that did not markedly alter the likelihood for the phenotypes, and these could be easily identified in the trees. Inclusion of CO diffusing capacity revealed the transfer coefficient as dominant measure. The results of machine learning were consistent with those of the single trees.

Conclusions

Selected items (cough, sleep, breathlessness, chest condition, slow walking) from comprehensive COPD questionnaires in combination with FEV₁/FVC could raise or lower the likelihood for lung emphysema in patients with COPD. The simple, parsimonious approach proposed by us might help if diagnostic resources regarding respiratory diseases are limited.

Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier: NCT01245933, registered 18 November 2010, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/record/NCT01245933.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12931-021-01837-2.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the behaviour and health status of patients with COPD: results from the German COPD cohort COSYCONET

Background:

Infection control measures for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) might have affected management and clinical state of patients with COPD. We analysed to which extent this common notion is fact-based.

Methods:

Patients of the COSYCONET cohort were contacted with three recurring surveys (COVID1, 2 and 3 at 0, 3 and 6 months, respectively). The questionnaires comprised behaviour, clinical and functional state, and medical treatment. The responses to the questionnaires were compared amongst themselves and with pre-COVID information from the last visit of COSYCONET.

Results:

Overall, 594 patients were contacted and 375 patients (58% males, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV₁) 61±22% predicted) provided valid data in COVID1 and COVID2. Five patients reported infections with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Most patients – except for patients with higher education – reported compliance with recommended protective measures, whereby compliance to hygiene, contact and access to physicians slightly improved between COVID1 and COVID2. Also, patients obtained more information from physicians than from public media. In the majority of cases, the personal physician could not be substituted by remote consultation. Over time, symptoms slightly increased and self-assessed physical capacity decreased. Results of COVID3 were similar. Women and patients with more exacerbations and dyspnoea avoided medical consultations, whereas Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) D patients were more amenable to tele-consultation.

Conclusion:

In well-characterised COPD patients, we observed on average slight deteriorations of clinical state during the period of COVID-19 restrictions, with high and partially increasing adherence to protective measures. The data suggest that in particular, women and GOLD D patients should be actively contacted by physicians to identify deteriorations.

During the period of #COVID19 restrictions, slight deteriorations of clinical state with increasing adherence to protective measures were observed. In particular, women and GOLD D patients are at risk of deterioration.https://bit.ly/2S7fhEo

How to Assess Breathlessness in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Activity-related breathlessness is the most problematic symptom of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), arising from complex interactions between peripheral pathophysiology (both pulmonary and non-pulmonary) and central perceptual processing. To capture information on the breathlessness experienced by people with COPD, many different instruments exist, which vary in applicability depending on the purpose and context of assessment. We reviewed common breathlessness assessment instruments, providing recommendations around how to assess the severity of, or change in, breathlessness in people with COPD in daily life or in response to exercise provocation. A summary of 14 instruments for the assessment of breathlessness severity in daily life is presented, with 11/14 (79%) instruments having established minimal clinically importance differences (MCIDs) to assess and interpret breathlessness change. Instruments varied in their scope of assessment (functional impact of breathlessness or the severity of breathlessness during different activities, focal periods, or alongside other common COPD symptoms), dimensions of breathlessness assessed (uni-/multidimensional), rating scale properties and intended method of administration (self-administered versus interviewer led). Assessing breathlessness in response to an acute exercise provocation overcomes some limitations of daily life assessment, such as recall bias and lack of standardized exertional stimulus. To assess the severity of breathlessness in response to an acute exercise provocation, unidimensional or multidimensional instruments are available. Borg's 0-10 category rating scale is the most widely used instrument and has estimates for a MCID during exercise. When assessing the severity of breathlessness during exercise, measures should be taken at a standardized submaximal point, whether during laboratory-based tests like cardiopulmonary exercise testing or field-based tests, such as the 3-min constant rate stair stepping or shuttle walking tests. Recommendations are provided around which instruments to use for breathlessness assessment in daily life and in relation to exertion in people with COPD.

Clinical Characteristics of COPD Patients According to COPD Assessment Test (CAT) Score Level: Cross-Sectional Study

PURPOSE

The chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) assessment test (CAT) is widely used to assess the impact of COPD symptoms on health status. Whilst the CAT consists of eight different items, details on the distribution of each item are limited. This study aimed to investigate the distribution and clinical implication of each CAT item, stratified by CAT severity group, in stable COPD patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study at a single referral hospital in South Korea. Spirometry confirmed COPD patients with CAT measured at the first clinical visit were retrospectively identified. Patients were categorized into three groups: low (0 ≤ CAT < 10), medium (10 ≤ CAT < 20), and high (20 ≤ CAT ≤ 40) impact group. For the purpose of this analysis, the first four items (cough, sputum, chest tightness, and dyspnea) and the remaining four items (activities, confidence, sleep and energy) were also grouped as "pulmonary" and "extra-pulmonary", respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 815 patients were included, and mean (SD) forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) was 62.8 (17.4) % pred. Among them, 300 patients (36.8%) were in the high impact group and had a greater exacerbation history and lower lung function. The proportion of "extra-pulmonary" items score was greater in patients with higher total CAT scores, with the activity and confidence items showing higher scores.

CONCLUSION

In our study, in addition to dyspnea, activity limitation is a particular problem in individual patients with higher CAT total scores, for which physicians need to pay more attention. Our study suggests that whilst CAT total score captures the overall impact of COPD, each item of the CAT contains potentially useful information in understanding the patient's symptom burden.

Benefits of pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD patients with mild cognitive impairment - A pilot study

BACKGROUND

Cognitive impairment might interfere with the efficacy of Pulmonary Rehabilitation (PR) in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). We aimed to identify differential responses to PR between cognitively impaired (CI) and cognitively normal (CN) COPD patients by assessing health status and exercise capacity.

METHODS

Sixty patients (FEV₁: 47 ± 15%) were classified as CI or CN according to the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA ≤25points) and completed a 3-week inpatient PR program. Cognitive function (neuropsychological battery), health-status (36-Item Short Form Survey [SF-36]), and exercise capacity (6-min walk test [6MWT], cycle-endurance test [CET]) were assessed before and after PR. Responsiveness to PR was estimated by mean change (delta-value [Δ]) and the d-Effect Size (ES).

RESULTS

Twenty-five COPD patients (42%) presented evidence of mild CI prior to PR. Both, CI and CN patients significantly improved global cognitive function, health status (the majority of SF-36 components), and exercise capacity (6MWT and cycle endurance) in response to PR. Compared to CN, CI patients did not improve SF-36 subdomains of "role emotional" and "bodily pain", and demonstrated a lower magnitude of improvement in 6MWT ([Δ]: 25 m; ES: 0.21) compared to CN ([Δ]: 46 m; ES: 0.54).

CONCLUSIONS

PR has favorable effects on global cognitive function, health status, and exercise capacity in both CI and CN COPD patients. There was no concrete evidence to indicate interference of cognitive impairment to PR effectiveness.

Treatment of COPD Groups GOLD A and B with Inhaled Corticosteroids in the COSYCONET Cohort - Determinants and Consequences

Background

In COPD patients of GOLD groups A and B, a high degree of treatment with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) has been reported, which is regarded as overtreatment according to GOLD recommendations. We investigated which factors predict ICS use and which relationship it has to clinical and functional outcomes, or healthcare costs.

Methods

We used pooled data from visits 1 and 3 of the COSYCONET cohort (n=2741, n=2053, interval 1.5 years) including patients categorized as GOLD grades 1-4 and GOLD group A or B at both visits (n=1080). Comparisons were performed using ANOVA, and regression analyses using propensity matching and inverse probability weighting to adjust for differences between ICS groups. These were defined as having ICS at both visits (always) vs no ICS at both visits (never). Measures were divided into predictors of ICS treatment and outcomes.

Results

Among 1080 patients, 608 patients were eligible for ICS groups (n=297 never, n=311 always). Prior to matching, patients with ICS showed significantly (p<0.05 each) impaired lung function, symptoms and exacerbation history. After matching, the outcomes generic quality of life and CO diffusing capacity were increased in ICS patients (p<0.05 each). Moreover, costs for respiratory medication, but not total health care costs, were significantly elevated in the ICS group by 780€ per year.

Conclusion

ICS therapy in COPD GOLD A/B patients can have small positive and negative effects on clinical outcomes and health care costs, indicating that the clinical evaluation of ICS over-therapy in COPD requires a multi-dimensional approach.

Assessing Symptom Burden

Evaluating symptoms is a central part of the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) assessment system as suggested by the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD). Considering the pros and cons of all currently available tests, GOLD suggests using primarily the modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale or the COPD Assessment Test. Based on the test results, patients are categorized as having a low or high level of symptoms. This level then becomes one of the 2 dimensions of the ABCD grading system, which was designed to match the best initial treatment option to the individual patient's needs.