Randomised, placebo-controlled trial of dexamethasone for quality of life in pulmonary sarcoidosis

Anti-TL1A monoclonal antibody modulates the dysregulation of Th1/Th17 cells and attenuates granuloma formation in sarcoidosis by inhibiting the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway

Sarcoidosis is a systemic granulomatous disease characterized by non-caseating epithelioid cell granulomas. One of its immunological hallmarks is the differentiation of CD4 + naïve T cells into Th1/Th17 cells, accompanied by the release of numerous pro-inflammatory cytokines. The TL1A/DR3 signaling pathway plays a crucial role in activating effector lymphocytes, thereby triggering pro-inflammatory responses. The primary aim of this investigation was to scrutinize the impact of anti-TL1A monoclonal antibody on the dysregulation of Th1/Th17 cells and granuloma formation in sarcoidosis. Initially, the abnormal activation of the TL1A/DR3 signaling pathway in pulmonary tissues of sarcoidosis patients was confirmed using qPCR and immunohistochemistry techniques. Subsequently, employing a murine model of sarcoidosis, the inhibitory effects of anti-TL1A monoclonal antibody on the TL1A/DR3 signaling pathway in sarcoidosis were investigated through qPCR, immunohistochemistry, and Western blot experiments. The influence of anti-TL1A monoclonal antibody on granulomas was assessed through HE staining, while their effects on sarcoidosis Th1/Th17 cells and associated cytokine mRNA levels were evaluated using flow cytometry and qPCR, respectively. Immunofluorescence and Western blot experiments corroborated the inhibitory effects of anti-TL1A monoclonal antibody on the aberrant activation of the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway in sarcoidosis. The findings of this study indicate that the TL1A/DR3 signaling pathway is excessively activated in sarcoidosis. Anti-TL1A monoclonal antibody effectively inhibit this abnormal activation in sarcoidosis, thereby alleviating the dysregulation of Th1/Th17 cells and reducing the formation of pulmonary granulomas. This effect may be associated with the inhibition of the downstream PI3K/AKT signaling pathway. Anti-TL1A monoclonal antibody hold promise as a potential novel therapeutic intervention for sarcoidosis.

Anti-inflammatory Therapy for Sarcoidosis

Over 50% of patients with sarcoidosis will require anti-inflammatory therapy at some point in their disease course. Indications for therapy are to improve health-related quality of life, prevent or arrest organ dysfunction (or organ failure) or avoid death. Recently published treatment guidelines recommended a stepwise approach to therapy however there are some patients for whom up front combination or more intense therapy maybe reasonable. The last decade has seen an explosion of studies and trials evaluating novel therapeutic agents and treatment strategies. Currently available anti-inflammatory therapies and several novel therapies are discussed here.

Health-Related Quality of Life Assessment in Sarcoidosis

Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is of major concern to patients with sarcoidosis. HRQoL impairment is the most common reason to treat the disease. Advances in patient-reported outcome (PRO) methodology offer the promise to use these instruments to follow quality of life in individual patients with sarcoidosis over time. Several HRQoL issues will be highlighted including their clinical importance, common causes in patients with sarcoidosis, the construction and use of PROs in clinical sarcoidosis trials, methods to adapt PROs to monitor HRQoL in individual patients with sarcoidosis, and the approach to improving HRQoL in this disease.

Dexamethasone alleviates pulmonary sarcoidosis by regulating the TGF-β/Smad3 signaling to promote Th17/Treg cell rebalance

Pulmonary sarcoidosis is an immune-mediated disorder closely related to Th17/Treg cell imbalance. Dexamethasone has been shown to regulate inflammation and immune responses in sarcoidosis patients. However, the underlying mechanisms of dexamethasone regulating Th17/Treg balance in sarcoidosis remain elusive. Herein, we elucidated the function role of TGF-β/Smad3 signaling in pulmonary sarcoidosis development and explored the underlying mechanism of dexamethasone in treating pulmonary sarcoidosis. We found that the TGF-β/Smad3 pathway was inactivated in pulmonary sarcoidosis patients. Propionibacterium acnes (PA) induced mouse model was generated to investigate the function of TGF-β/Smad3 signaling in vivo. Data indicated that IL17A inhibition with neutralizing antibody and activation of TGF-β/Smad3 signaling with SRI-011381 alleviated granuloma formation in the sarcoidosis mouse model. Moreover, we revealed that the Th17/Treg cell ratio was increased with PA treatment in mouse bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) and peripheral blood. The concentration of cytokines produced by Th17 cells (IL-17A, IL-23) was up-regulated in the BALF of PA-treated mice, while those produced by Tregs (IL-10, TGF-β1) presented significant reduction. The treatment of IL-17A neutralizing antibody or SRI-011381 was demonstrated to rescue the PA-induced changes in the concentration of IL-17A, IL-23, IL-10, and TGF-β1. Additionally, we demonstrated that dexamethasone treatment activated the TGF-β/Smad3 signaling in the lung tissues of pulmonary sarcoidosis mice. Dexamethasone was also revealed to promote the rebalancing of the Th17/Treg ratio and attenuated the granuloma formation in pulmonary sarcoidosis. In conclusion, dexamethasone activates the TGF-β/Smad3 signaling and induces Th17/Treg rebalance, alleviating pulmonary sarcoidosis, which suggests the potential of dexamethasone in treating pulmonary sarcoidosis.

Adverse cognitive effects of glucocorticoids: A systematic review of the literature

OBJECTIVES

Glucocorticoids as a drug class are widely used in the treatment of many conditions including more recently as one of the mainstay treatments for the SARS-CoV-2 infection. The physiological adverse effects are well described. However, less is known and understood about the potentially deleterious neuro-cognitive effects of this class of medication.

METHODS

We carried out a systematic review of the literature using two separate search strategies. The first focussed on the rates of reporting of adverse cognitive effects of glucocorticoid use in randomised controlled trials. The second looked at those studies focussing directly on adverse cognitive effects associated with the use of glucocorticoids. MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library was searched for randomised controlled trials utilising glucocorticoids as a part of a treatment regimen. Additionally, these databases were also used to search for articles looking directly at the adverse cognitive effects of glucocorticoids.

RESULTS

Of the forty-three RCTs included as a part of the first search strategy, only one (2.3%) included specific documentation pertaining to cognitive side effects. As a part of the twenty studies included in the second search strategy, eleven of the included studies (55%) were able to demonstrate a correlation between glucocorticoid use and decreased cognition. Most studies within this strategy showed that GCs predominately affected hippocampus-dependent functions such as memory, while sparing executive function and attention.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the data reporting of adverse clinical effects of glucocorticoid use is poor in recent RCTs. Given the demonstrable effect on predominately hippocampal-dependent cognitive functions evident within the literature, more thorough documentation is needed within clinical research to fully appreciate the potentially widespread nature of these effects.

Quality of life in sarcoidosis

Having sarcoidosis often has a major impact on quality of life of patients and their families. Improving quality of life is prioritized as most important treatment aim by many patients with sarcoidosis, but current evidence and treatment options are limited. In this narrative review, we describe the impact of sarcoidosis on various aspects of daily life, evaluate determinants of health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and provide an overview of the different patient-reported outcome measures to assess HRQoL in sarcoidosis. Moreover, we review the current evidence for pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions to improve quality of life for people with sarcoidosis.

Online mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for fatigue in patients with sarcoidosis (TIRED): a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Sarcoidosis-associated fatigue is highly prevalent and is often reported as the most burdensome symptom of sarcoidosis. Management of fatigue is challenging, and evidence-based therapies are lacking. In this TIRED trial, we aimed to assess the effects of a 12-week online mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (eMBCT) on fatigue.

METHODS

This study was a prospective, open-label, multicentre randomised controlled trial, conducted at three centres in the Netherlands. Eligible patients were 18 years or older, had stable sarcoidosis, and a score of more than 21 points on the Fatigue Assessment Scale (FAS). Patients were randomised into either the eMBCT or the control group. Participants completed patient-reported outcome measures at baseline, after intervention (T1), and 12 weeks after completion of eMBCT (T2). The primary outcome was the change in FAS score at T1 in the eMBCT group compared with the control group, assessed with the independent students't test in all patients who started the study. Secondary outcomes included within-group difference in FAS score at T1 and T2, between-group difference in FAS score at T2, and changes in the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory-Short Form, and the Kings Sarcoidosis Questionnaire. The study was registered at the Netherlands Trial Register, NL7816.

FINDINGS

Between June 5, 2019, and Oct 28, 2021, 99 patients were randomly assigned to the eMBCT (n=52) or the control (n=47) groups. Six patients withdrew consent after psychological screening before the start of eMBCT. Baseline FAS score was similar in both groups (34·57 [SD 6·07] for 46 patients in the eMBCT group and 35·51 [4·65] for 47 patients in the control group). Mean change in FAS score at T1 was -4·53 (SD 5·77; p<0·0001) in the eMBCT group and -1·28 (3·80; p=0·026) in the control group (between-group difference 3·26 [95% CI 1·18 to 5·33; p=0·0025]). Furthermore, the eMBCT group had a significant improvement in anxiety (mean between-group difference 1·69, 95% CI 0·22-3·16; p=0·025), depressive symptoms (1·52, 0·08-2·95; p=0·039), mindfulness (3·1, 0·70-5·49; p=0·022), and general health status (6·28, 2·51-10·06; p=0·002) at T1, compared with the control group.

INTERPRETATION

12 week eMBCT improves fatigue, anxiety, depression, mindfulness, and health status in patients with sarcoidosis-associated fatigue.

FUNDING

Dutch Sarcoidosis Patient Association (Sarcoidose.nl).

TRANSLATION

For the Dutch translation of the summary see Supplementary Materials section.

The treatment of sarcoidosis: translating the European respiratory guidelines into clinical practice

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Recently, the European Respiratory Society (ERS) developed new international guidelines for the treatment of sarcoidosis. This manuscript attempts to distill the ERS Sarcoidosis Treatment Guidelines to a manageable format that can be easily used by practitioners.

RECENT FINDINGS

The ERS Sarcoidosis Treatment Guidelines addressed the treatment of pulmonary, skin, cardiac, neurologic, and sarcoidosis-associated fatigue. Therapeutic drug dosing and treatment algorithms for these conditions were also addressed. Glucocorticoids were the initial recommended treatment for these conditions except for sarcoidosis-associated fatigue where a pulmonary exercise program or a neurostimulant was initially suggested. Because of the risk of glucocorticoid side-effects, the Guidelines recommended early consideration of glucocorticoid-sparing therapy including certain antimetabolites and two specific tumor necrosis alpha antagonists: infliximab and adalimumab.

SUMMARY

The ERS Sarcoidosis Treatment Guidelines used a rigorous GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations) methodology to update treatment recommendations for this condition. This manuscript summarizes the Guideline findings in practical terms for clinicians. Suggested algorithms and treatment dosing recommendations are provided.

State-of-the-Art Treatments for Sarcoidosis

Sarcoidosis is a heterogeneous disease with various treatment indications. Although it affects mainly the lungs, sarcoidosis can affect every organ, especially when the disease course is chronic and protracted. Regular patient follow-up is recommended for early recognition of active, ongoing organ-specific granulomatous inflammation to avoid progression to irreversible fibrosis. In this review, we elaborate on treatment indications and various anti-sarcoidosis regimens proven useful in clinical trials. We also review specialized treatment of specific disease manifestations, with a focus on cardiac sarcoidosis. We also report on treatment for special conditions such as fatigue and small fiber neuropathy. Treatment for sarcoidosis is an emerging landscape, with new data complementing the existing knowledge.

How to Tackle the Diagnosis and Treatment in the Diverse Scenarios of Extrapulmonary Sarcoidosis

Extrapulmonary sarcoidosis occurs in 30–50% of cases of sarcoidosis, most often in association with pulmonary involvement, and virtually any organ can be involved. Its incidence depends according to the organs considered, clinical phenotype, and history of sarcoidosis, but also on epidemiological factors like age, sex, geographic ancestry, and socio-professional factors. The presentation, symptomatology, organ dysfunction, severity, and lethal risk vary from and to patient even at the level of the same organ. The presentation may be specific or not, and its occurrence is at variable times in the history of sarcoidosis from initial to delayed. There are schematically two types of presentation, one when pulmonary sarcoidosis is first discovered, the problem is then to detect extrapulmonary localizations and to assess their link with sarcoidosis, while the other presentation is when extrapulmonary manifestations are indicative of the disease with the need to promptly make the diagnosis of sarcoidosis. To improve diagnosis accuracy, extrapulmonary manifestations need to be known and a medical strategy is warranted to avoid both under- and over-diagnosis. An accurate estimation of impairment and risk linked to extrapulmonary sarcoidosis is essential to offer the best treatment. Most frequent extrapulmonary localizations are skin lesions, arthritis, uveitis, peripheral lymphadenopathy, and hepatic involvement. Potentially severe involvement may stem from the heart, nervous system, kidney, eye and larynx. There is a lack of randomized trials to support recommendations which are often derived from what is known for lung sarcoidosis and from the natural history of the disease at the level of the respective organ. The treatment needs to be holistic and personalized, taking into account not only extrapulmonary localizations but also lung involvement, parasarcoidosis syndrome if any, symptoms, quality of life, medical history, drugs contra-indications, and potential adverse events and patient preferences. The treatment is based on the use of anti-sarcoidosis drugs, on treatments related to organ dysfunction and supportive treatments. Multidisciplinary discussions and referral to sarcoidosis centers of excellence may be helpful for difficult diagnosis and treatment decisions.

ERS clinical practice guidelines on treatment of sarcoidosis

BACKGROUND

The major reasons to treat sarcoidosis are to lower the morbidity and mortality risk or to improve quality of life (QoL). The indication for treatment varies depending on which manifestation is the cause of symptoms: lungs, heart, brain, skin, or other manifestations. While glucocorticoids (GC) remain the first choice for initial treatment of symptomatic disease, prolonged use is associated with significant toxicity. GC-sparing alternatives are available. The presented treatment guideline aims to provide guidance to physicians treating the very heterogenous sarcoidosis manifestations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A European Respiratory Society Task Force (TF) committee composed of clinicians, methodologists, and patients with experience in sarcoidosis developed recommendations based on the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations) methodology. The committee developed eight PICO (Patients, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes) questions and these were used to make specific evidence-based recommendations.

RESULTS

The TF committee delivered twelve recommendations for seven PICOs. These included treatment of pulmonary, cutaneous, cardiac, and neurologic disease as well as fatigue. One PICO question regarding small fiber neuropathy had insufficient evidence to support a recommendation. In addition to the recommendations, the committee provided information on how they use alternative treatments, when there was insufficient evidence to support a recommendation.

CONCLUSIONS

There are many treatments available to treat sarcoidosis. Given the diverse nature of the disease, treatment decisions require an assessment of organ involvement, risk for significant morbidity, and impact on QoL of the disease and treatment.

MESSAGE

An evidence based guideline for treatment of sarcoidosis is presented. The panel used the GRADE approach and specific recommendations are made. A major factor in treating patients is the risk of loss of organ function or impairment of quality of life.