The severity of acute exacerbations of COPD and the effectiveness of pulmonary rehabilitation

Content, uptake and adherence of exercise interventions after an acute exacerbation of COPD: a scoping review

INTRODUCTION

Pulmonary rehabilitation is underutilised in patients after an acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD). Retrieving information regarding the setting, training modalities and the uptake and adherence to exercise interventions for these individuals in a vulnerable state could potentially guide future research.

AIM

To provide a comprehensive review of the existing literature on the content, uptake and adherence of different exercise interventions for patients after an AECOPD.

METHODS

Eight different databases were searched for 1) patients experiencing an AECOPD and 2) performing any form of exercise intervention. Information on content, uptake and adherence was collected and the Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template (CERT) checklist was performed for each included record.

RESULTS

59 distinct interventions were identified between 1998 and 2023 including a total of 9238 patients. All studies included patients requiring hospitalisation for the AECOPD, four studies additionally included patients not requiring hospitalisation for the AECOPD. Nine different settings were identified, with the majority of studies conducted in an inpatient setting (n=26) and including whole-body and strength exercises. The overall uptake was mentioned in 38 (62%) studies and was 70% with a 13% dropout rate. No paper reported the full CERT checklist. Adherence was defined a priori in 16 (27%) studies, with the most common definition being attendance of >80% of sessions.

CONCLUSION

Studies properly reporting on the uptake and adherence of well-described interventions, including information regarding fidelity, are needed to further investigate suitable programmes for patients experiencing an AECOPD.

Clusters of individuals recovering from an exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and response to in-hospital pulmonary rehabilitation

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Due to the present low availability of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) for individuals recovering from a COPD exacerbation (ECOPD), we need admission priority criteria. We tested the hypothesis that these individuals might be clustered according to baseline characteristics to identify subpopulations with different responses to PR.

METHODS

Multicentric retrospective analysis of individuals undergone in-hospital PR. Baseline characteristics and outcome measures (six-minute walking test - 6MWT, Medical Research Council scale for dyspnoea -MRC, COPD assessment test -CAT) were used for clustering analysis.

RESULTS

Data analysis of 1159 individuals showed that after program, the proportion of individuals reaching the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was 85.0%, 86.3%, and 65.6% for CAT, MRC, and 6MWT respectively. Three clusters were found (C1-severe: 10.9%; C2-intermediate: 74.4%; C3-mild: 14.7% of cases respectively). Cluster C1-severe showed the worst conditions with the largest post PR improvements in outcome measures; C3-mild showed the least severe baseline conditions, but the smallest improvements. The proportion of participants reaching the MCID in ALL three outcome measures was significantly different among clusters, with C1-severe having the highest proportion of full success (69.0%) as compared to C2-intermediate (48.3%) and C3-mild (37.4%). Participants in C2-intermediate and C1-severe had 1.7- and 4.6-fold increases in the probability to reach the MCID in all three outcomes as compared to those in C3-mild (OR = 1.72, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 1.2 - 2.49, p = 0.0035 and OR = 4.57, 95% CI = 2.68 - 7.91, p < 0.0001 respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Clustering analysis can identify subpopulations of individuals recovering from ECOPD associated with different responses to PR. Our results may help in defining priority criteria based on the probability of success of PR.

Airflow grades, outcome measures and response to pulmonary rehabilitation in individuals after an exacerbation of severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

BACKGROUND

Individuals with COPD may be staged according to symptoms and exacerbation history (GOLD groups: A-D) and on airflow obstruction (GOLD grades: 1-4). Guidelines recommend pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) for these individuals, including those recovering from an exacerbation (ECOPD) OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether in individuals with clinically severe COPD, recovering from an ECOPD, the effect size of an in-hospital PR program would be affected by airflow severity grades and assessed outcome measures.

METHODS

Retrospective, multicentre study. Participants were compared according to different GOLD airflow grades. In addition to the MRC dyspnoea scale, six-minute walking distance test and COPD assessment test (CAT), Barthel dyspnoea index (Bid), and Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) were assessed, evaluating the proportion of individuals reaching the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) (responders).

RESULTS

Data of 479 individuals, completing the program were evaluated. Most of the participants were allocated in GOLD grades 4, (57.6%) and 3 (22.1%). All outcome measures significantly improved after PR (p < 0.05), without any significant difference in the proportion of responders in any measure.

CONCLUSIONS

in individuals with severe COPD, recovering from ECOPD the success rate of PR does not depend on airflow severity, or outcome measure assessed. In addition to the most used outcome measures, also Bid and SPPB are sensitive to PR.

Effects of full-body exercise-based pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

INTRODUCTION

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a chronic lung disease characterised by progressive and irreversible fibrosis of the lung parenchyma, resulting in reduced lung function. Since conventional medicines can be associated with low effective rates and adverse events, pulmonary rehabilitation may be a promising non-pharmacological therapy for IPF. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the effects of full-body exercise-based pulmonary rehabilitation on patients with IPF by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This systematic review and meta-analysis has been registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO). From inception to 31 August 2022, electronic databases in English and Chinese were searched, including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials among the English databases. China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Biomedical Literature, VIP Chinese Science and Technology Periodical, and Wan Fang Data were among the Chinese databases. Two independent reviewers then screened the potential RCT studies, which were analysed according to the Cochrane Handbook criteria. The efficacy and safety of full-body exercise pulmonary rehabilitation for IPF were evaluated based on outcomes, including exercise capacity measured by 6 min walking distance and quality of life measured by St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire. Lung function was measured based on the forced vital capacity, total lung capacity, diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide and dyspnoea assessed by the modified Medical Research Council scale.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval was not required for this systematic review and meta-analysis. Results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at conferences.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42021284293.

Factors associated with poor long-term adherence after completing a pulmonary rehabilitation programme in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

BACKGROUND: Although pulmonary rehabilitation programmes (PRPs) benefit patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), poor adherence to these programmes is common. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to analyse the factors associated with poor long-term adherence after completing a PRP. METHOD: We conducted a retrospective study of 70 patients with COPD who performed an 8-week outpatient PRP that included 24 sessions of aerobic training, skeletal muscle resistance exercises, physiotherapy and COPD education. The study classified the patients into 2 groups: (1) long-term adherence and (2) long-term non-adherence to the PRP. We considered long-term non-adherence when the patient did not attend the 32 weeks follow-up visit after beginning the PRP. We measured the degree of dyspnoea, quality of life, physical activity, anxiety-depression status, submaximal exercise capacity and COPD exacerbations in both groups. RESULTS: The patients’ median age was 69.6 [63.8–75.0] years, and 71.4% were men. The median forced expiratory volume in 1 second was 60.0 [47.7–68.0] % of that predicted. We observed total COPD exacerbations and severe COPD exacerbations in the last year in 32 (45.7%) and 22 (31.4%) patients, respectively. Dyspnoea, physical activity and quality of life significantly improved after completing the PRP. Long-term non-adherence to the PRP was observed in 32 (45.7%) patients. In the single regression model, severe COPD exacerbations (p = 0.04) and dyspnoea (p = 0.03) were associated with long-term non-adherence to the PRP. In the multiple regression model, only severe COPD exacerbations remained as an associated factor (OR 2.7; 95% CI 1.1–8,1; p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Approximately half of patients who complete PRPs present long-term non-adherence to the programme. Severe COPD exacerbations are associated with long-term non-adherence.