Symptoms in patients with asthma infected by SARS-CoV-2

Management of patients with allergic diseases in the era of COVID-19

In the early days of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, allergic diseases, especially asthma, were considered to be risk factors for severe COVID-19 infection, hospitalization, and death. These concerns stemmed from the idea that individuals with allergic diseases are generally more susceptible to respiratory virus infections, which are major causes of exacerbation of allergic diseases. However, epidemiologic data with mechanistic studies showed that the associations between severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and clinical outcomes of allergic diseases are complex and affected by diverse factors such as allergic disease severity, phenotypes, and control status with current medications. In addition, children generally have less severe clinical outcomes of COVID-19 than those of adults, which complicates the association between allergic diseases and COVID-19-related outcomes among them. The present review summarizes the potential association between allergic diseases and COVID-19-related outcomes and discusses the factors requiring consideration. The findings viewed herein will aid the management of allergic diseases in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection and the establishment of medical polices for managing patients with allergic diseases.

Bioinformatics and systems-biology analysis to determine the effects of Coronavirus disease 2019 on patients with allergic asthma

Background

The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has posed a significant challenge for global health systems. Increasing evidence shows that asthma phenotypes and comorbidities are major risk factors for COVID-19 symptom severity. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying the association between COVID-19 and asthma are poorly understood. Therefore, we conducted bioinformatics and systems biology analysis to identify common pathways and molecular biomarkers in patients with COVID-19 and asthma, as well as potential molecular mechanisms and candidate drugs for treating patients with both COVID-19 and asthma.

Methods

Two sets of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) from the GSE171110 and GSE143192 datasets were intersected to identify common hub genes, shared pathways, and candidate drugs. In addition, murine models were utilized to explore the expression levels and associations of the hub genes in asthma and lung inflammation/injury.

Results

We discovered 157 common DEGs between the asthma and COVID-19 datasets. A protein–protein-interaction network was built using various combinatorial statistical approaches and bioinformatics tools, which revealed several hub genes and critical modules. Six of the hub genes were markedly elevated in murine asthmatic lungs and were positively associated with IL-5, IL-13 and MUC5AC, which are the key mediators of allergic asthma. Gene Ontology and pathway analysis revealed common associations between asthma and COVID-19 progression. Finally, we identified transcription factor–gene interactions, DEG–microRNA coregulatory networks, and potential drug and chemical-compound interactions using the hub genes.

Conclusion

We identified the top 15 hub genes that can be used as novel biomarkers of COVID-19 and asthma and discovered several promising candidate drugs that might be helpful for treating patients with COVID-19 and asthma.

Lung function before and after COVID-19 in young adults: A population-based study

Background

There is limited evidence on the long-term impact of mild-to-moderate coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on lung function among young adults.

Objectives

We aimed to assess whether COVID-19 has a negative impact on lung function in young adults and whether asthma, allergic sensitization, or use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) modifies a potential association.

Methods

Participants from the population-based BAMSE (Barn, Allergi, Miljö, Stockholm, Epidemiologi) cohort with spirometry assessed before (2016-2019) and after onset of the COVID-19 pandemic (2020-2021) were included. Serum levels of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) receptor-binding domain-specific IgG, IgM, and/or IgA (determined with ELISA) defined seropositivity. Mean change in lung function (ie, change in FEV₁, forced vital capacity [FVC], and FEV₁/FVC ratio expressed as percent of predicted [pp]) from before to after onset of the pandemic were compared between the seronegative and seropositive participants. In seropositive participants, change in lung function was assessed in relation to allergic sensitization and self-reported ICS use.

Results

Of the 853 included participants, 29% (n = 243) were seropositive. There were no differences in change in lung function between the seronegative and seropositive participants (for mean change in FEV₁ pp [SD], seropositivity = 0.87% [4.79%] and seronegativity = 1.03% (4.76%) [P = .66] for difference using a t test; FVC pp (SD), seropositivity = 1.34% (4.44%) and seronegativity = 1.29% (4.27%) [P = .87]; and for FEV₁/FVC pp (SD), seropositivity = -0.25% (3.13%) and seronegativity = -0.13% (3.15%) [P = .61]). Similar results were observed among participants with asthma (n = 147 [17%]). Among seropositive participants, allergic sensitization or ICS use did not influence lung function.

Conclusion

We found no evidence of mild-to-moderate COVID-19 affecting lung function long term in a population-based cohort of young adults. Moreover, neither asthma nor allergic sensitization nor ICS use affected the results.

Asthma as a risk factor for hospitalization in children with COVID-19: A nested case-control study

BACKGROUND

Most pediatric studies of asthma and COVID-19 to date have been ecological, which offer limited insight. We evaluated the association between asthma and COVID-19 at an individual level.

METHODS

Using data from prospective clinical registries, we conducted a nested case-control study comparing three groups: children with COVID-19 and underlying asthma ("A+C" cases); children with COVID-19 without underlying disease ("C+" controls); and children with asthma without COVID-19 ("A+" controls).

RESULTS

The cohort included 142 A+C cases, 1110 C+ controls, and 140 A+ controls. A+C cases were more likely than C+ controls to present with dyspnea and wheezing, to receive pharmacologic treatment including systemic steroids (all p < .01), and to be hospitalized (4.9% vs. 1.7%, p = .01). In the adjusted analysis, A+C cases were nearly 4 times more likely to be hospitalized than C+ controls (adjusted OR = 3.95 [95%CI = 1.4-10.9]); however, length of stay and respiratory support level did not differ between groups. Among A+C cases, 8.5% presented with an asthma exacerbation and another 6.3% developed acute exacerbation symptoms shortly after testing positive for SARS-CoV-2. Compared to historic A+ controls, A+C cases had less severe asthma, were less likely to be on controller medications, and had better asthma symptom control (all p < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

In our cohort, asthma was a risk factor for hospitalization in children with COVID-19, but not for worse COVID-19 outcomes. SARS-CoV-2 does not seem to be a strong trigger for pediatric asthma exacerbations. Asthma severity was not associated with higher risk of COVID-19.