Postoperative exercise training improves the quality of life in patients receiving pulmonary resection: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials

Exercise medicine for individuals diagnosed with Lung Cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of health outcomes

Consensus exists regarding the need to provide exercise interventions to individuals diagnosed with lung cancer (LC). Exercise interventions for this populations usually include multidisciplinary approaches, making the attempt to understand the effects of exercise a real challenge. Therefore, we designed a systematic review to identify the effects of exercise interventions among individuals with a LC diagnosis. Following the PRISMA guidelines, studies across 5 different databases were systematically screened. Eligible studies were randomised and non-randomised trials, including individuals with a LC diagnosis, administering exercise-only interventions. Three-level meta-analyses were performed for cardiorespiratory fitness, strength, physical function, anxiety, depression, and health-related quality of life. Differences between exercise types were also explored. The Cochrane Risk of Bias (RoB) II tool for randomised controlled trials and the RoB in non-randomised studies - of interventions were used to assess study quality. A total of 36,304 records were screened and 13 studies, including 547 LC survivors, were considered eligible. Randomised and non-randomised trials were mainly judged as "some concern" and at "serious" RoB, respectively. Meta-analyses reported significant improvements on physical function among exercise groups compared to control (ES = 0.62; 95 % CI: 0.10 to 1.15; p = 0.03), and no significant changes for all other variables. There is moderate evidence that exercise interventions appear to be an effective tool to improve physical function among individuals diagnosed with LC. Further studies are still needed to determine exercise prescription effectiveness on health outcomes, differences across exercise types and enhance individualized interventions.

Exploration of symptom cluster patterns and their trajectory in esophageal cancer surgery patients

PURPOSE

To investigate symptom burden and symptom cluster trajectories in patients undergoing surgery for esophageal cancer.

METHODS

A convenience sample of 210 patients who underwent thoracoscopic surgery for esophageal cancer was included from July to December 2023. The symptoms of the patients were evaluated at the following time points: preoperatively (T0), 1-3 days postoperatively (T1), 7 days postoperatively (T2), 1 month postoperatively (T3), and 3 months postoperatively (T4). This was done via the Chinese version of the MD Anderson Symptom Scale and the Supplementary Questionnaire for Perioperative Esophageal Cancer Symptoms. Exploratory factor analysis was used to identify symptom clusters, and latent class growth modeling was used to analyze the trajectories of each different symptom cluster.

RESULTS

Exploratory factor analysis revealed the presence of four symptom clusters: mood-related symptom clusters (worst at T1, T2, and T4), gastrointestinal symptom clusters (worst at T0), fatigue-related symptom clusters (worst at T3), and surgery-related symptom clusters, with cumulative variance contribution rates of 64.34%, 62.29%, 68.23%, 70.29%, and 63.82%, respectively. The latent category growth model identified the existence of 2-3 distinct trajectories in each symptom cluster.

CONCLUSION

This study identified 4 distinct symptom clusters in patients undergoing esophageal cancer surgery. The mood-related and gastrointestinal symptom clusters exhibited worsening and recurrence within 7 days post-surgery, necessitating particular attention. A subset of patients in the fatigue-related symptom cluster showed a tendency for continued exacerbation, emphasizing the need for long-term monitoring. Furthermore, symptom management strategies can be prioritized based on the severity of the symptom clusters.

Efficacy of Chinese Medicine on Postoperative Rehabilitation of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), a Randomized Controlled Study

BACKGROUND

With an increasing number of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients being offered surgical treatment, postoperative rehabilitation is also being increasingly emphasized. Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) holds promise for enhancing postoperative recovery, with treatment methods still in refinement. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of Chinese herbal decoction and Liuzijue exercises in NSCLC patients during the rapid postoperative recovery period.

METHODS

A randomized, parallel-group clinical trial assigned 50 patients to receive Chinese herbal medicine and Liuzijue exercise plus symptomatic treatment, and 49 to symptomatic treatment alone. Treatment continued until postoperative complications resolved, chest tubes were removed, and no abnormal examination findings were reported. The primary outcome was Quality of Life Questionnare-Core 30 (QLQ-C30) score. Secondary outcomes included MOS item short form 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) score, rate of complications, six-minute walk test (6MWT) distance, Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) score, numerical rating scale (NRS) score, and functional activity score (FAS).

RESULTS

Significant improvements in role (MD: 12.15, 95%CI: 2.99-21.32, P < .05) and social functioning (MD: 10.25, 95%CI: 1.72-18.78, P < .05) were observed in the intervention group vs. controls, as measured by QLQ-C30. The intervention group showed better post-treatment SF-36 scores in Role-Physical (RP), Social Function (SF), Role-Emotional (RE), and Mental Health Summary (MCS) (P < .05). The complication rate was lower in the intervention (20.00%) than the control group (44.44%) (P < .05). The intervention group also had a significant increase in FAS scores (P < .05) and covered a better 6MWT distance (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Chinese herbal decoction and Liuzijue exercises during the rapid recovery period after lung cancer surgery enhanced patients' QoL and physical endurance, and mitigated complications.Trial registration: This tial was registered with chictr.org.cn (Registration number:ChiCTR2100044776).

Effect of exercise on postoperative recovery of patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the postoperative recovery period often experience reduced exercise capacity and impaired lung function, which affects their overall quality of life. This paper investigated the effect of exercise interventions on exercise capacity, lung function, quality of life, and symptoms in these patients.

METHODS

We performed a literature search across Cochrane, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and EBSCO databases were comprehensively searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from inception to September 2023, all English RCTs were eligible if they assessed the effects of exercise interventions on postoperative NSCLC patients.

RESULTS

Twelve articles met our inclusion criteria, evidencing that exercise interventions could significantly improve the functional capacity of NSCLC patients in postoperative recovery. Notably, Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 s (FEV1) was improved, indicating enhanced lung function. Furthermore, exercise improved the physical and mental health scores of SF-36, along with increased quadriceps strength and relieved dyspnea. However, fatigue levels were not significantly changed.

CONCLUSIONS

Exercise interventions of NSCLC patients in the postoperative recovery are associated with improved functional capacity, lung function, quality of life, and quadriceps strength, as well as alleviated symptoms of dyspnea. These findings underscore the potential benefits of incorporating exercise into postoperative care for NSCLC patients. Nonetheless, further large-scale RCTs are required to solidify the evidence base on the clinical outcomes of exercise following pneumonectomy.

Network evolution of core symptoms after lung cancer thoracoscopic surgery:A dynamic network analysis

OBJECTIVES

To investigate relationships between various symptoms occurring 1-2 and 5-6 days following days after thoracoscopic surgery, to identify core symptoms, and to monitor changes in core symptoms over time following lung cancer thoracoscopic surgery.

METHODS

We evaluated symptoms using the Anderson Symptom Scale (Chinese version) and the Lung Cancer-Specific Symptoms Template in 214 lung cancer patients hospitalized in the Department of Thoracic Surgery of a provincial hospital in Jiangsu Province from March 2023 to September 2023. Data was collected at 1-2 days and 5-6 days postoperatively. Symptom networks were constructed for each time point, and centrality indicators were analyzed to identify core symptoms while controlling for influencing factors.

RESULTS

According to the network analysis, fatigue (rs = 26.00、rc = 0.05、rb = 1.02) had the highest strength, closeness, and betweenness in the symptom network 1-2 days after lung cancer surgery. At 5-6 days after surgery, shortness of breath (rs = 27.00) emerged as the symptom with the highest strength, fatigue (rc = 0.04) had the highest closeness, and cough (rb = 1.08) ranked highest in betweenness within the symptom network.

CONCLUSION

Fatigue stands out as the most core symptom in the network 1-2 days after lung cancer surgery. Shortness of breath, fatigue and cough are the most core symptoms in the symptom network 5-6 days after surgery. Therefore, clinical staff can improve the postoperative symptom experience of lung cancer patients by developing symptom management programmes tailored to these core symptoms.

Resectable non-stage IV nonsmall cell lung cancer: the surgical perspective

Surgery remains an essential element of the multimodality radical treatment of patients with early-stage nonsmall cell lung cancer. In addition, thoracic surgery is one of the key specialties involved in the lung cancer tumour board. The importance of the surgeon in the setting of a multidisciplinary panel is ever-increasing in light of the crucial concept of resectability, which is at the base of patient selection for neoadjuvant/adjuvant treatments within trials and in real-world practice. This review covers some of the topics which are relevant in the daily practice of a thoracic oncological surgeon and should also be known by the nonsurgical members of the tumour board. It covers the following topics: the pre-operative selection of the surgical candidate in terms of fitness in light of the ever-improving nonsurgical treatment alternatives unfit patients may benefit from; the definition of resectability, which is so important to include patients into trials and to select the most appropriate radical treatment; the impact of surgical access and surgical extension with the evolving role of minimally invasive surgery, sublobar resections and parenchymal-sparing sleeve resections to avoid pneumonectomy.

Establishment and Clinical Application of the General Comfort Scale for Postoperative Lung Cancer Patients

Background and purpose The concept of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) not only reflects rapid perioperative recovery but also focuses on the comfort experience of inpatients. This study intends to establish a clinically applicable general comfort questionnaire (GCQ) for patients with lung cancer after surgery and verify its clinical application effect. Methods The comfort index items for postoperative lung cancer were formed by combining previous research and literature, clinically applied comfort scales, and expert interviews. The Delphi method was used to conduct two rounds of expert consultations to determine the final index and establish a postoperative comfort scale for lung cancer patients. This scale was used to conduct a questionnaire survey on 200 patients to test the reliability and validity of the scale. Results The comfort scale contains 3 dimensions and 10 items and is easy to operate and evaluate in clinical applications. The Cronbach's α coefficient of the comfort scale is 0.801, and the scale content validity index (SCVI/ave) is 0.97. The common factor 1 and 2 characteristic roots of scale structural validity evaluation are 3.257 and 1.352 respectively, both greater than 1, with cumulative variance contribution rates of 32.57% and 13.52%. Pain and getting out of bed are the main factors influencing patient comfort. Conclusion The postoperative comfort scale for lung cancer patients has high clinical application reliability and validity. This study identified pain and mobility (early ambulation or getting out of bed) as the primary factors influencing the postoperative comfort of lung cancer patients.

Clinical outcome and risk factors for subcutaneous emphysema in patients with lung cancer after video-assisted thorascopic surgery

Background and purpose

With the clinical application of minimally invasive surgery and concept of enhanced recovery after surgery, the incidence of postoperative complications in lung cancer patients has been significantly reduced. However, postoperative subcutaneous emphysema (SE) becomes the main factor affecting the early discharge of patients. The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical outcome and risk factors for postoperative SE in lung cancer patients.

Methods

The clinical data of 414 lung cancer patients who were admitted to the Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University from September 2021 to December 2021 were prospectively collected. The incidence, severity and treatment of patients who had SE, surgery approach, application of drainage tube and clinical information were analyzed.

Results

The incidence rate of postoperative SE in patients with lung cancer was 33.09% (137/414) and mild cases accounted for the vast majority (30.19%, 125/414). Multivariate analysis indicated that male [odds ratio (OR) = 2.247, P = .014] and advanced age (OR = 1.021, P = .043) were main risk factors for postoperative SE in patients with lung cancer. Conservative treatment was the main treatment option for SE (98.5%, 135/137). The average hospital stay in the subcutaneous emphysema group (5.49 ± 4.41 days) was significantly longer than that in the non-subcutaneous emphysema group (4.44 ± 3.32 days) (P = .014) and no significant statistical difference in the average total hospital cost between the two groups (7,798.31 ± 1,414.85$ vs. 7,501.14 ± 1,605.18$, P = .072).

Conclusion

Postoperative SE in patients with minimally invasive lung cancer is mainly mild, and conservative treatment is appropriate for most cases.

[Variation of Main Postoperative Symptoms in Lung Cancer Patients Undergoing Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery]

BACKGROUND

Patients with pulmonary nodules are treated by minimally invasive surgery, and postoperative symptoms have become the main factors affecting patients' emotion and quality of life. This study aimed to analyze the changes of postoperative symptoms in lung cancer patients with pulmonary nodules.

METHODS

The clinical data of eighty-eight lung cancer patients admitted to the same medical group of Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University from June 2021 to September 2021 were prospectively collected and analyzed. The types and severity of clinical symptoms before operation, on discharge day, 30-day and 90-day after operation were analyzed.

RESULTS

The incidence of postoperative symptoms in lung cancer patients was 79.5%, and most patients suffered from mild (54.3%) and moderate (32.9%) symptoms. The main postoperative symptoms of lung cancer patients were pain (55.7%) and cough (37.2%). The incidence of pain at discharge (55.7%) was significantly higher than that at 30-day (23.7%, P=0.01) and 90-day (12.0%, P=0.01) after discharge. The incidence of cough was significantly higher at 30-day (66.1%) and 90-day (66.0%) than that at discharge (37.2%) (P=0.01, P=0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

The main postoperative symptoms of lung cancer patients with pulmonary nodules are pain and cough. The incidence and severity of pain decreases with time, and the incidence of cough increases but the severity decreased gradually.