Liu S, Feng M, Qiao T, Cai H, Xu K, Yu X, Jiang W, Lv Z, Wang Y, Li D. Deep Learning for the Automatic Diagnosis and Analysis of Bone Metastasis on Bone Scintigrams.
Cancer Manag Res 2022;
14:51-65. [PMID:
35018121 PMCID:
PMC8740774 DOI:
10.2147/cmar.s340114]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2021] [Accepted: 12/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
To develop an approach for automatically analyzing bone metastases (BMs) on bone scintigrams based on deep learning technology.
METHODS
This research included a bone scan classification model, a regional segmentation model, an assessment model for tumor burden and a diagnostic report generation model. Two hundred eighty patients with BMs and 341 patients with non-BMs were involved. Eighty percent of cases were randomly extracted from two groups as training set. Remaining cases were as testing set. A deep residual convolutional neural network with different structures was used to determine whether metastatic bone lesions existed, regions of lesions were automatically segmented. Bone scan tumor burden index (BSTBI) was calculated; finally, diagnostic report could be automatically generated. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of classification model were compared with three physicians with different clinical experience. The Dice coefficient evaluated the effect of segmentation model and compared to the result of nnU-Net model. The correlation between BSTBI and blood alkaline phosphatase (ALP) level was analyzed to verify the efficiency of BSTBI. The performance of report generation model was evaluated by the accuracy of interpretation of report.
RESULTS
In testing set, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of classification model were 92.59%, 85.51% and 88.62%, respectively. The accuracy showed no statistical difference with moderately and experienced physicians and obviously outperformed the inexperienced. The Dice coefficient of BMs area was 0.7387 in segmentation stage. Based on the whole model frame, our segmentation model outperformed the nnU-Net. BSTBI value changed as the BMs changed. There was a positive correlation between BSTBI and ALP level. The accuracy of report generation model was 78.05%.
CONCLUSION
Deep learning based on automatic analysis frameworks for BMs can accurately identify BMs, preliminarily realize a fully automatic analysis process from raw data to report generation. BSTBI can be used as a quantitative evaluation indicator to assess the effect of therapy on BMs in different patients or in the same patient before and after treatment.
Collapse