Determination of boundaries between ranges of high and low gradient of beam profile

Optimal values of the Electron Monte Carlo dose engine parameters

Background

The aim of this study was to indicate the most favorable - in terms of to the time of calculation and the uncertainty of determining the dose distribution - values of the parameters for the Electron Monte Carlo (eMC) algorithm in the Eclipse treatment planning system.

Materials and methods

Using the eMC algorithm and the variability of the values of its individual parameters, calculations of the electron dose distribution in the full-scattering virtual water phantom were performed, obtaining percentage depth doses, beam profiles, absolute dose values in points and calculation times. The reference data included water tank measurements such as relative dose distributions and absolute point doses.

Results

For 63 sets of calculation data created from selected values of the parameters for the eMC algorithm, calculation times were analyzed and the absolute calculated and measured doses were compared. Performing a statistical analysis made it possible to determine whether the differences in the values of deviations between the actual dose and the calculated dose in individual regions of the percentage depth dose curve and the beam profile are statistically significant between the analyzed sets of parameters.

Conclusions

Taking into account obtained results from the analysis of the discrepancy between the distribution of the calculated and measured dose, the correspondence of the absolute value of the calculated and measured dose and the duration of the calculation of the dose distribution, the optimal set of parameters was indicated for the eMC algorithm which allows obtaining the dose distribution and the number of monitor units in an acceptable time.

Using beam profile inflection point in process of treatment planning system verification

Background

The comparison between profiles during the commissioning of the treatment planning system is an essential procedure. It is impossible to designate a field size for off-axis, wedged, and FFF beams directly by using the definition of the on-axis symmetric field size. This work proposes the use of different characteristic points as indicators of the field size for commissioning and QA purposes. This work aimed to search for the beam profile's characteristic points and use them for the TPS commissioning purposes.

Materials and methods

The proposal is to use profile inflection points as the beam profile characteristic points. The usage of dedicated software allowed for comparing distances between inflection points and between points of 50% intensity. For the off-axis, wedged, and FFF fields, comparisons were made to the nominal field sizes.

Results

Distances between inflection points proved to be different by less than 1 mm from nominal field sizes for all kinds of investigated beams.

Conclusions

Inflection points are convenient for comparing the off-axis, wedged, and FFF field sizes because of their independence from profile normalization. With finite accuracy, the inflection points could be used for the above kind of beam sizes designation.