Incidencia de nefropatía inducida por contraste tras una tomografía computarizada

The Crucial Question About Contrast-Induced Nephropathy (CIN): Should It Affect Clinical Practice?

The phenomenon of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) and contrast-associated nephropathy (CAN) has been acknowledged for an extensive duration. Recently, there has been a significant rise in research on the topic due to the enhanced availability of imaging investigations. This theory has been thoroughly validated and extensively reported in the scholarly literature. The primary risk factors are chronic kidney disease, diabetes, sepsis, critical illness, circulatory shock, anemia, advanced age, inadequate hydration, and the use of nephrotoxic medications. The principal preventive strategies are the use of iso-osmolar contrast agents and sufficient hydration, which includes the use of intravenous isotonic saline. The administration of N-acetylcysteine has been shown to decrease the occurrence of CIN without impacting outcomes like mortality or the need for dialysis. Recently, a growing number of scholarly studies have contested this phenomenon, or at least, questioned its clinical significance, rendering it primarily a biochemical occurrence. This review aims to evaluate the previously listed studies. Overestimating the possible dangers of post-contrast nephropathy may diminish the sensitivity of imaging tests that may otherwise utilize contrast, so substantially lowering their clinical relevance. This hypothesis is critically significant to science, medicine, and patients, warranting attention despite the necessity for additional research to validate it. The present study demonstrates that the frequency and importance of CIN may be overestimated.

Feasibility of a single-phase portal venous CT protocol using bolus tracking technique and lean body weight-based contrast media dose

PURPOSE

To evaluate the impact of the use of lean body weight (LBW)-based contrast material (CM) dose and bolus tracking technique on portal venous phase abdominal CT image quality.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

IRB-approved prospective study; informed consent was acquired. In the period July-November 2023, we randomly selected 105 oncologic patients scheduled for a portal venous phase abdominal CT to undergo our experimental protocol (i.e., 0.7 gI/Kg of LBW CM administration and bolus tracking on the liver). Included patients had performed a "standard" portal venous phase abdominal CT (i.e., 0.6 gI/Kg of total body weight (TBW) contrast material administration and 70 s fixed delay) on the same scanner within the previous 12 months. One reader evaluated CT images measuring liver, portal vein, kidney cortex, and spleen attenuation; values were normalized to paraspinal muscles.

RESULTS

Median administered contrast dose (350 mgI/mL CM) was 99 mL (IQR: 81-115 mL) using the experimental protocol and 110 mL (IQR: 100-120 mL) using the standard one (p < 0.0001). Median acquisition delay using the experimental protocol was 65" (IQR 59-73"). Median normalized hepatic enhancement was significantly higher using the experimental protocol (1.97, IQR: 1.83-2.47 vs. 1.86, IQR: 1.58-2.11; p < 0.0001). Median normalized portal vein enhancement was significantly higher using the experimental protocol (3.43, IQR: 2.73-4.04 vs. 2.91, IQR: 2.58-3.41; p < 0.0001). No statistically significant differences were found in the kidneys' cortex and aorta normalized enhancement (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The combination of LBW-based CM dose administration and bolus tracking allows a significant CM dose reduction and a significant liver and portal vein enhancement increase.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Lean body weight-based contrast material (CM) dose administration and bolus tracking technique in portal venous phase CT scans overcome differences in body composition and hemodynamics, improving reproducibility. It allows a significant CM dose reduction with increased liver and portal vein enhancement.

KEY POINTS

Lean body weight (LBW)-based contrast material (CM) dosing could be superior to total body weight dosing. Portal venous phase CT with a liver bolus tracking technique improved liver and spleen enhancement with a reduced contrast dose. The combination of LBW-based CM dosing and liver bolus tracking technique enables more "customized" CT examinations.

Negative effects of iodine-based contrast agent on renal function in patients with moderate reduced renal function hospitalized for COVID-19

BACKGROUND

Kidney disease and renal failure are associated with hospital deaths in patients with COVID - 19. We aimed to test if contrast enhancement affects short-term renal function in hospitalized COVID - 19 patients.

METHODS

Plasma creatinine (P-creatinine) was measured on the day of computed tomography (CT) and 24 h, 48 h, and 4-10 days after CT. Contrast-enhanced (n = 142) and unenhanced (n = 24) groups were subdivided, based on estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFR), > 60 and ≤ 60 ml/min/1.73 m2. Contrast-induced acute renal failure (CI-AKI) was defined as ≥27 μmol/L increase or a > 50% rise in P-creatinine from CT or initiation of renal replacement therapy during follow-up. Patients with renal replacement therapy were studied separately. We evaluated factors associated with a > 50% rise in P-creatinine at 48 h and at 4-10 days after contrast-enhanced CT.

RESULTS

Median P-creatinine at 24-48 h and days 4-10 post-CT in patients with eGFR> 60 and eGFR≥30-60 in contrast-enhanced and unenhanced groups did not differ from basal values. CI-AKI was observed at 48 h and at 4-10 days post contrast administration in 24 and 36% (n = 5/14) of patients with eGFR≥30-60. Corresponding figures in the eGFR> 60 contrast-enhanced CT group were 5 and 5% respectively, (p < 0.037 and p < 0.001, Pearson χ2 test). In the former group, four of the five patients died within 30 days. Odds ratio analysis showed that an eGFR≥30-60 and 30-day mortality were associated with CK-AKI both at 48 h and 4-10 days after contrast-enhanced CT.

CONCLUSION

Patients with COVID - 19 and eGFR≥30-60 had a high frequency of CK-AKI at 48 h and at 4-10 days after contrast administration, which was associated with increased 30-day mortality. For patients with eGFR≥30-60, we recommend strict indications are practiced for contrast-enhanced CT. Contrast-enhanced CT had a modest effect in patients with eGFR> 60.

Determining the Diagnostic Utility of Lumbar Punctures in Computed Tomography Negative Suspected Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

While headache is a common neurologic symptom, subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is a rare and potentially catastrophic cause of sudden-onset severe headache. The utility of the imaging modalities and interventional procedures are central to the investigation of the causes of headache; however, they are not without their limitations, risks, and complications.

METHODS

A meta-analysis in accordance with the Preferred Reporting for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines was conducted searching PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar. Patients investigated for suspected subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) with a negative computed tomography (CT) and positive lumbar puncture (LP) and final diagnosis of SAH were included. The sensitivity of LP in the context of a negative CT and vsubsequent imaging confirming the cause of SAH (computed tomography angiography, magnetic resonance angiography, digital subtraction angiography [DSA]) was quantified. The pooled data were analyzed using the DerSimonian-Laid random effects model.

RESULTS

Four studies with 2782 patients who presented with headache suspicious for SAH were included with an initial negative CT report and a subsequent LP to rule out SAH. All included studies had an observational prospective cohort design. A combined pooled proportion of 0.383 (0.077, 0.756); 0.086 (0.007, 0.238); and 0.22 (0.04, 0.49) for LP+, DSA+, and DSA/computed tomography angiography+ investigations were estimated with a 95% confidence interval.

CONCLUSIONS

The current clinical workflow of an LP after a negative CT head for a patient presenting with a sudden-onset severe headache is observed to have a high enough proportion to warrant its continued use despite the sensitivity of modern CT scanners of ≥97%.