Update in the evaluation of peripheral nerves by MRI, from morphological to functional neurography

Imaging diagnosis in peripheral nerve injury

Peripheral nerve injuries (PNIs) can be caused by various factors, ranging from penetrating injury to compression, stretch and ischemia, and can result in a range of clinical manifestations. Therapeutic interventions can vary depending on the severity, site, and cause of the injury. Imaging plays a crucial role in the precise orientation and planning of surgical interventions, as well as in monitoring the progression of the injury and evaluating treatment outcomes. PNIs can be categorized based on severity into neurapraxia, axonotmesis, and neurotmesis. While PNIs are more common in upper limbs, the localization of the injured site can be challenging. Currently, a variety of imaging modalities including ultrasound (US), computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) have been applied in detection and diagnosis of PNIs, and the imaging efficiency and accuracy many vary based on the nature of injuries and severity. This article provides an overview of the causes, severity, and clinical manifestations of PNIs and highlights the role of imaging in their management.

Technical Update on MR Neurography

Imaging evaluation of peripheral nerves (PNs) is challenging. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasonography are the modalities of choice in the imaging assessment of PNs. Both conventional MRI pulse sequences and advanced techniques have important roles. Routine MR sequences are the workhorse, with the main goal to provide superb anatomical definition and identify focal or diffuse nerve T2 signal abnormalities. Selective techniques, such as three-dimensional (3D) cranial nerve imaging (CRANI) or 3D NerveVIEW, allow for a more detailed evaluation of normal and pathologic states. These conventional pulse sequences have a limited role in the comprehensive assessment of pathophysiologic and ultrastructural abnormalities of PNs. Advanced functional MR neurography sequences, such as diffusion tensor imaging tractography or T2 mapping, provide useful and robust quantitative parameters that can be useful in the assessment of PNs on a microscopic level. This article offers an overview of various technical parameters, pulse sequences, and protocols available in the imaging of PNs and provides tips on avoiding potential pitfalls.

Methodologies and MR Parameters in Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Neurography: A Scoping Review Protocol

Magnetic resonance neurography (MRN), the MR imaging of peripheral nerves, is clinically used for assessing and monitoring peripheral neuropathies based on qualitative, weighted MR imaging. Recently, quantitative MRN has been increasingly reported with various MR parameters as potential biomarkers. An evidence synthesis mapping the available methodologies and normative values of quantitative MRN of human peripheral nerves, independent of the anatomical location and type of neuropathy, is currently unavailable and would likely benefit this young field of research. Therefore, the proposed scoping review will include peer-reviewed literature describing methodologies and normative values of quantitative MRN of human peripheral nerves. The literature search will include the databases MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE (Ovid), Web of Science, and Scopus. At least two independent reviewers will screen the titles and abstracts against the inclusion criteria. Potential studies will then be screened in full against the inclusion criteria by two or more independent reviewers. From all eligible studies, data will be extracted by two or more independent reviewers and presented in a diagrammatic or tabular form, separated by MR parameter and accompanied by a narrative summary. The reporting will follow the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). Upon completion, the scoping review will provide a map of the available literature, identify possible gaps, and inform on possible future research. SCOPING REVIEW REGISTRATION: Open Science Framework 9P3ZM.