Direct and indirect costs for adverse drug events identified in medical records across care levels, and their distribution among payers

Evaluating the costs of adverse drug events in hospitalized patients: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Adverse drug events (ADEs) are not only a safety and quality of care issue for patients, but also an economic issue with significant costs. Because they often occur during hospital stays, it is necessary to accurately quantify the costs of ADEs. This review aimed to investigate the methods to calculate these costs, and to characterize their nature.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted to identify methods used to assess the cost of ADEs on Medline, Web of Science and Google Scholar. Original articles published from 2017 to 2022 in English and French were included. Economic evaluations were included if they concerned inpatients.

RESULTS

From 127 studies screened, 20 studies were analyzed. There was a high heterogeneity in nature of costs, methods used, values obtained, and time horizon chosen. A small number of studies considered non-medical (10%), indirect (20%) and opportunity costs (5%). Ten different methods for assessing the cost of ADEs have been reported and nine studies did not explain how they obtained their values.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no consensus in the literature on how to assess the costs of ADEs, due to the heterogeneity of contexts and the choice of different economic perspectives. Our study adds a well-deserved overview of the existing literature that can be a solid lead for future studies and method implementation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO registration CRD42023413071.

Evaluation of Pharmacovigilance System in Iran

BACKGROUND

Evaluating a pharmacovigilance system helps identify its deficiencies and could facilitate measures to remedy and improve the quantity and quality of adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports and other opportunities for pharmacovigilance systems strengthening. This study aimed to evaluate the status of pharmacovigilance in Iran using the World Health Organization (WHO) pharmacovigilance indicators with the prospect of identifying the gaps and areas for improvement.

METHODS

This study was conducted in 2 parts. The first part included a secondary analysis of the national data obtained from the Iranian National Pharmacovigilance Center (PVC) using a structured data collection form based on WHO core pharmacovigilance indicators. In the second part, a 3-month prospective study was carried out to investigate 2 outcome indicators, ie, length of stay and costs of medicine-related hospitalization in all patients of 2 main referral hospitals in the southeast and north of Iran.

RESULTS

Iran has a PVC with national policy, trained staff, and a statutory budget. In 2017, the number of ADR reports was 15.0 per 100 000 population, and 262 signals were detected during the preceding 5 years. The average length of stay and costs of medicine-related hospitalization were 5 days and US$817.2 in Afzalipour hospital and 6.6 days and US$306.7 in Razi hospital, respectively. The status of pharmacovigilance in the Iranian public health programs (PHPs) is unknown, and most of the indicators could not be assessed.

CONCLUSION

A robust pharmacovigilance system is a pivotal part of the overall medicines regulatory system. The Iranian pharmacovigilance system has relatively the proper structural condition. Though the underreporting of ADRs, especially medicine-related deaths, is an important issue, and some indicators' status was unclear. The Iranian pharmacovigilance program requires a higher prioritization, particularly in the PHPs, a greater allocation of resources, and cross-sectoral cooperation to bolster and achieve the pharmacovigilance objectives.

ADR databases for on-site clinical use: Potentials of summary of products characteristics

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) for all drugs in Europe are described in the legally approved Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC). An overview of all ADRs of the patients' drug list can support healthcare staff to link patient symptoms to possible ADRs. We review the possibilities and challenges to extract ADR information from SmPCs or American Structured Product Labels and present the development of our semi-automated procedure for extraction of ADRs from the tabulated section in the SmPCs to create a database, named Bikt, which is regularly updated and used at point of care in Sweden. The existence of five major table formats for ADRs used in the SmPCs required the development of different parsing scripts. Manual checks for correctness for all content have to be performed. The quality of extraction was investigated for all SmPCs by measuring precision, recall and F1 scores and compared with other methods published. We conclude that it is possible to semi-automatically extract ADR information from SmPCs. However, clear technical and content guidelines and standards for ADR tables and terms from drug registration authorities would lead to improved extraction and usability of ADR information at point of care.