1
|
Stewart V, McMillan SS, Hu J, Collins JC, El-Den S, O’Reilly CL, Wheeler AJ. Are SMART goals fit-for-purpose? Goal planning with mental health service-users in Australian community pharmacies. Int J Qual Health Care 2024; 36:mzae009. [PMID: 38381655 PMCID: PMC10880889 DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzae009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Revised: 11/15/2023] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 02/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Goal planning is an important element in brief health interventions provided in primary healthcare settings, with specific, measurable, achievable, realistic/relevant, and timed (SMART) goals recommended as best practice. This study examined the use of SMART goals by Australian community pharmacists providing a brief goal-oriented wellbeing intervention with service-users experiencing severe and persistent mental illnesses (SPMIs), in particular, which aspects of SMART goal planning were incorporated into the documented goals. Goal data from the PharMIbridge Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) were used to investigate how community pharmacists operationalized SMART goals, goal quality, and which SMART goal planning format aspects were most utilized. Goals were evaluated using the SMART Goal Evaluation Method (SMART-GEM) tool to determine how closely each documented goal met the SMART criteria. Goals were also categorized into five domains describing their content or purpose. Descriptive analysis was used to describe the SMART-GEM evaluation results, and the Kruskal-Wallis H test was used to compare the evaluation results across the goal domains. All goals (n = 512) co-designed with service-users (n = 156) were classified as poor quality when assessed against the SMART guidelines for goal statements, although most goals contained information regarding a specific behaviour and/or action (71.3% and 86.3%, respectively). Less than 25% of goals identified how goal achievement would be measured, with those related to lifestyle and wellbeing behaviours most likely to include measurement information. Additionally, the majority (93.5%) of goals lacked details regarding monitoring goal progress. Study findings raise questions regarding the applicability of the SMART goal format in brief health interventions provided in primary healthcare settings, particularly for service-users experiencing SPMIs. Further research is recommended to identify which elements of SMART goals are most relevant for brief interventions. Additionally, further investigation is needed regarding the impact of SMART goal training or support tools on goal quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria Stewart
- Centre for Mental Health, Griffith University, Mt Gravatt, QLD 4122, Australia
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD 4222, Australia
- School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD 4222, Australia
| | - Sara S McMillan
- Centre for Mental Health, Griffith University, Mt Gravatt, QLD 4122, Australia
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD 4222, Australia
- School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD 4222, Australia
| | - Jie Hu
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD 4222, Australia
- School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD 4222, Australia
| | - Jack C Collins
- The University of Sydney School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - Sarira El-Den
- The University of Sydney School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - Claire L O’Reilly
- The University of Sydney School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - Amanda J Wheeler
- Centre for Mental Health, Griffith University, Mt Gravatt, QLD 4122, Australia
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD 4222, Australia
- School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD 4222, Australia
- Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Stewart V, McMillan SS, Hu J, Collins JC, El-Den S, O'Reilly C, Wheeler AJ. Refining a taxonomy of goals planned between mental health consumers and community pharmacists. Res Social Adm Pharm 2023; 19:1391-1397. [PMID: 37468372 DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2023.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2023] [Revised: 06/13/2023] [Accepted: 07/12/2023] [Indexed: 07/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND People living with severe and persistent mental illnesses are more likely to experience co-morbid health conditions. Health-related behavior change can be promoted by the use of goal planning within community pharmacy settings. OBJECTIVES To trial and refine a recently developed taxonomy to categorize goals co-designed between community pharmacists and people living with severe and persistent mental illnesses. This study also compared the data to the previously published taxonomy data to determine if the taxonomy could be applied across a range of mental health conditions. METHODS The published goal taxonomy was refined using data from a cluster randomized controlled trial (PharMIbridge). Community pharmacists provided an individualized support service using goal planning with people living with severe and persistent mental illnesses. Goals were categorized using the existing taxonomy and inconsistencies were used to modify and refine the taxonomy. Additionally, participant characteristics and categorization of goals were compared with results from the previous study. RESULTS 512 goals were reported by 158 consumer participants and categorized into five domains that included a diverse range of health behaviors (e.g., relationships, diet). Minor refinements to the taxonomy were made by replacing, adding or removing categories/descriptors. CONCLUSIONS Significant overlap between the goals of participants and the existing taxonomy was found, supporting the application of the taxonomy across different mental health conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria Stewart
- Centre for Mental Health, Griffith University, Australia; Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Australia; School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, Griffith University, Australia.
| | - Sara S McMillan
- Centre for Mental Health, Griffith University, Australia; Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Australia; School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, Griffith University, Australia
| | - Jie Hu
- Centre for Mental Health, Griffith University, Australia; Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Australia; School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, Griffith University, Australia
| | - Jack C Collins
- The University of Sydney School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Sarira El-Den
- The University of Sydney School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Claire O'Reilly
- The University of Sydney School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Amanda J Wheeler
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Australia; School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, Griffith University, Australia; Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, University of Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|