Comprehensive review of the research employing the schizophrenia cognition rating scale (SCoRS)

Assessing the inter-rater reliability of the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale: a non-interventional quantitative study

BACKGROUND

Cognitive impairment is a core feature of schizophrenia, profoundly impacting patients' functional abilities. As such, evaluating cognition-related functional activity/impairment is essential for identifying effective treatments. This study presents findings from a non-interventional quantitative study to assess the inter-rater reliability (IRR) of the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) with a sample representative of clinical trial populations.

METHODS

Structured, one-to-one, 10-15-minute live interviews with patients with schizophrenia were conducted by trained SCoRS interviewers (raters), and a separate interview was then conducted with the patient's study partner (informant). Both interviews were recorded so that each interview was assessed by three different SCoRS raters in total (one live, two via recording). IRR was assessed using interclass correlation (ICC) and categorized as low (<0.70), good (0.70-0.90), or excellent (>0.90).

RESULTS

A total of 44 patients with schizophrenia were evaluated by 12 raters (overall). The SCoRS Total Score (mean [SD]: 41.4 [10.2]) indicated moderate-to-moderately-severe impairment of cognition-related functioning, with high inter-patient variability. The SCoRS Total Score demonstrated excellent IRR, with an ICC of 0.91 (95% CI 0.88-0.95).

CONCLUSION

The 20-item SCoRS Total Score demonstrated excellent IRR in assessing cognition-related functional capacity in patients with schizophrenia, supporting its use as an endpoint in clinical studies.

Measuring Cognitive Impairments Associated With Schizophrenia in Clinical Practice: Overview of Current Challenges and Future Opportunities

BACKGROUND

Cognitive impairment associated with schizophrenia (CIAS) negatively impacts daily functioning, quality of life, and recovery, yet effective pharmacotherapies and practical assessments for clinical practice are lacking. Despite the pivotal progress made with establishment of the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) for clinical research, implementation of the full MCCB is too time-consuming and cost-ineffective for most clinicians in clinical practice.

STUDY DESIGN

Here we discuss current assessments in relation to delivery format (interview-based and performance-based), validity, ease of use for clinicians and patients, reliability/reproducibility, cost-effectiveness, and suitability for clinical implementation. Key challenges and future opportunities for improving cognitive assessments are also presented.

STUDY RESULTS

Current assessments that require 30 min to complete would have value in clinical settings, but the associated staff training and time required might preclude their application in most clinical settings. Initial profiling of cognitive deficits may require about 30 min to assist in the selection of evidence-based treatments; follow-up monitoring with brief assessments (10-15 min in duration) to detect treatment-related effects on global cognition may complement this approach. Guidance on validated brief cognitive tests for the strategic monitoring of treatment effects on CIAS is necessary.

CONCLUSIONS

With increased advancements in technology-based and remote assessments, development of validated formats of remote and in-person assessment, and the necessary training models and infrastructure required for implementation, are likely to be of increasing clinical relevance for future clinical practice.

Reliability and validity study of the Turkish version of the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS-TR)

BACKGROUND

Schizophrenia is characterized by significant dysfunction in cognitive domains. Despite its crucial role in prognosis, evaluating neurocognitive impairments is challenging in outpatient settings because of the time-consuming nature of neurocognitive assessments. SCoRS "Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale" is a scale that provides brief cognitive evaluation. This study aimed to establish the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the "Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale" (SCoRS-TR) in patients with schizophrenia and examine the correlation between SCoRS and cognitive tests.

METHODS

Data were collected from 130 patients with schizophrenia who met the DSM-5 criteria and 40 healthy controls. SCoRS rating, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), and a neurocognitive test battery were administered.

RESULTS

Findings indicated that SCoRS-TR is a reliable and valid scale for the Turkish population. The scale demonstrated strong internal consistency, with Cronbach's alpha values ranging from 0.937 to 0.940. High interrater reliability (ranging from 0.90 to 0.98) and test-retest reliability (ranging from 0.976 to 0.990) were observed. SCoRS-TR significantly discriminated patients from healthy controls (p<0.001). SCoRS-TR exhibited significant correlations to neurocognitive tests.

DISCUSSION

Results indicated that SCoRS-TR had significant reliability and validity scores that may be useful for evaluating daily life functioning related to cognitive dysfunction in patients with schizophrenia. This approach may be useful for neurocognitive evaluation and monitoring in clinical follow-up and outpatient settings.

Functioning in schizophrenia: Recommendations of an expert panel

Functioning is a fundamental dimension across all aspects of life, frequently compromised or reduced in individuals with schizophrenia. However, the lack of a commonly agreed definition of functioning in schizophrenia makes it difficult to apply this concept in clinical practice. In this document, we make a detailed analysis of the literature to identify and define functioning and describe how it can be used in clinical practice today. We performed a preliminary literature search in the MEDLINE database (via PubMed) for articles discussing functioning in schizophrenia. The articles retrieved were then read and discussed by a panel of psychiatrists specialising in schizophrenia. The conclusions reached in this meeting formed the basis for a new exhaustive literature search for the purpose of synthesising the evidence published in the past 5 years. In this article, we show the importance a comprehensive, modern, homogeneous definition of functioning in schizophrenia, propose a definition of functioning, and put forward a series of recommendations for assessing functioning in clinical practice. We also review current unmet needs and highlight the need for a standardised tool for evaluating functioning.

Interview Versus Performance Assessment of Cognition as Predictors of Real-World Outcomes in a Large-Scale Cross-Sectional Study in Schizophrenia

The Cognitive Assessment Interview (CAI) is an interview-based scale measuring cognitive impairment and its impact on functioning in subjects with schizophrenia (SCZ). It is approved as a coprimary measure of performance-based instruments, such as the Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB). Recent research highlights negative symptoms, social cognition, and functional capacity as mediators of cognitive impairment's impact on functioning. This study compared mediation analysis outcomes using CAI or MCCB scores, providing insights into the utility of interview-based tools in research and clinical practice. The study included 618 individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia, recruited from 24 Italian psychiatric clinics. Neurocognitive assessments utilized both CAI and MCCB. Mediation analyses explored negative symptoms, social cognition, and functional capacity as mediators of the impact of neurocognition on real-life functioning domains. The study's results extend the validation of the CAI as a coprimary measure that provides valid information on the impact of cognitive impairment on real-life functioning and its possible mediators, complementing the information obtained using the MCCB. Interview-based cognitive assessment might be essential for understanding schizophrenia complexity and its impact on various cognitive and functional domains for clinicians, patients, and caregivers.

Measuring functional outcomes in schizophrenia in an increasingly digital world

With an unmet clinical need for effective interventions for cognitive and negative symptoms in patients with schizophrenia, measures of functional status (often a co-primary endpoint) remain key clinical trial outcomes. This review aims to give an overview of the different types of functional assessments commonly used in clinical trials and research involving patients with schizophrenia and highlight pertinent challenges surrounding the use of these as reliable, sensitive, and specific assessments in intervention trials. We provide examples of commonly used functional measures and highlight emerging real-time digital assessment tools. Informant- and clinician-rated functional outcome measures and functional capacity assessments are valid, commonly used measures of functional status that try to overcome the need for often overly ambitious and insensitive ‘real world’ milestones. The wide range of scientific and practical challenges associated with these different tools leave room for the development of improved functional outcome measures for use in clinical trials. In particular, many existing measures fail to capture small, but meaningful, functional changes that may occur over the course of typically short intervention trials. Adding passive digital data collection and short active real-time digital assessments whilst patients go about their day offers the opportunity to build a more fine-grained picture of functional improvements that, if thoughtfully developed and carefully applied, could provide the sensitivity needed to accurately evaluate functional status in intervention studies, aiding the development of desperately needed treatments.

•

Functional outcome measures are important for evaluating the efficacy of treatments.

•

A variety of these are available, each with their own strengths and limitations.

•

However, consensus on the optimal functional outcome measure(s) is lacking.

•

Digital measures may enhance the assessment of associated functional constructs.

Validation of the Chinese Version of the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale

OBJECTIVE

The Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) is an interview-based assessment tool for evaluating the cognitive deficit and daily functioning of patients with schizophrenia.

METHODS

Sixty-eight patients with schizophrenia and 68 age- and sex-matched healthy individuals were recruited to validate the Chinese version of SCoRS in this study. All participants underwent cognitive assessment using the SCoRS, which was verified by the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS), and the UCSD Performance-based Skills Assessment, Brief Version (UPSA-B). Patients with schizophrenia were additionally assessed using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS).

RESULTS

SCoRS ratings reported by patients (SCoRS-S), those reported by the interviewer (SCoRS-I), and SCoRS global scores (SCoRS-G) showed significant correlation with all subscales of the BACS and the UPSA-B. On receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, SCoRS-S, SCoRS-I, and SCoRS-G significantly differentiated patients with schizophrenia from healthy controls. Moreover, SCoRS-S and SCoRS-I ratings showed positive correlation with the negative symptoms and general symptoms of PANSS.

CONCLUSION

The Chinese version of SCoRS showed good discriminant, concurrent, and external validity, suggesting that it is a useful and convenient tool for assessment of cognitive function among Mandarin-speaking patients with schizophrenia in clinical practice.

Subjectively-assessed cognitive impairment and neurocognition associations in schizophrenia inpatients

Cognitive impairment affects real-world functioning in people with schizophrenia who often face difficulties in their activities of daily living. Subjectively-assessed cognitive impairment can be evaluated through data on the patient's daily difficulties, as reported by the patient. However, the specific neurocognitive functions responsible for these cognitive impairments have not been clarified. We examined cognitive functioning in patients with schizophrenia using the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale Japanese version (SCoRS-J) and the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia Japanese version (BACS-J). This study aimed to investigate the relationship between subjectively-assessed cognitive impairment and objectively assessed neurocognition in patients with schizophrenia. The results showed that patients' global rating scores of the SCoRS-J were significantly correlated with the BACS-J attention scores (r = −0.376, p < 0.008), which indicates that the difficulties patients perceived in their daily lives are due to deficits in attentional functioning, as measured by neurocognitive testing. Thus, our findings indicate that improving attentional functioning may also alleviate difficulties in patients' daily lives.

European Psychiatric Association guidance on assessment of cognitive impairment in schizophrenia

Background

Impairment in a wide range of cognitive abilities has been consistently reported in individuals with schizophrenia. Both neurocognitive and social cognitive deficits are thought to underlie severe functional disabilities associated with schizophrenia. Despite the key role in schizophrenia outcome, cognition is still poorly assessed in both research and clinical settings.

Methods

In this guidance paper, we provide a systematic review of the scientific literature and elaborate several recommendations for the assessment of cognitive functions in schizophrenia both in research settings and in real-world clinical practice.

Results

Expert consensus and systematic reviews provided guidance for the optimal assessment of cognitive functions in schizophrenia. Based on the reviewed evidence, we recommend a comprehensive and systematic assessment of neurocognitive and social cognitive domains in schizophrenia, in all phases of the disorder, as well as in subjects at risk to develop psychosis. This European Psychiatric Association guidance recommends not only the use of observer reports but also self-reports and interview-based cognitive assessment tools. The guidance also provides a systematic review of the state of the art of assessment in the first episode of psychosis patients and in individuals at risk for psychosis.

Conclusion

The comprehensive review of the evidence and the recommendations might contribute to advance the field, allowing a better cognitive assessment, and avoiding overlaps with other psychopathological dimensions. The dissemination of this guidance paper may promote the development of shared guidelines concerning the assessment of cognitive functions in schizophrenia, with the purpose to improve the quality of care and to obtain recovery.

Validity and utility of a set of clinical criteria for cognitive impairment associated with psychosis (CIAPs)

Schizophrenia and other psychoses display a common profile of mild to moderate cognitive deficits that are associated with poor functional outcomes. Cognitive impairment is usually evaluated by neuropsychological assessment, and interview-based measures with good psychometric properties and high utility for clinical practice are now available. However, the extent to which a set of clinical criteria can be used as proxy measures of cognitive deficits in this population has not been tested. This study aimed to examine the empirical validity of a set of clinical criteria for cognitive impairment associated with psychosis (CIAPs). Ninety-eight patients with non-pure affective psychosis and 50 healthy-matched controls were included. The CIAPs criteria were empirically tested against antecedent, concurrent and outcome validators and by means of a neuropsychological evaluation based on MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB). The CIAPs criteria showed strong associations with outcomes and certain antecedent validators and moderate associations with concurrent validators. The CIAPs criteria achieved superior neuropsychological validity compared to current DSM 5 criteria for schizophrenia, the B-criterion of DSM 5 schizophrenia or a combination of both criteria. Cognitive impairment associated with psychosis can be clinically assessed and is a useful tool for clinical practice and predicting outcomes of schizophrenia and related psychosis.