Scaling dictates the decoder structure

Scale invariance in early embryonic development

The expression of a few key genes determines the body plan of the fruit fly. We show that the spatial expression patterns for several of these genes scale precisely with embryo size. Discrete positional markers such as the peaks in striped patterns or the boundaries of expression domains have positions along the embryo's major axis proportional to embryo length, accurate to within 1%. Further, the information (in bits) that graded patterns of expression provide about a cell's position can be decomposed into information about fractional or scaled position and information about absolute position or embryo length; all information available is about scaled position, with [Formula: see text]2% error. These findings imply that the underlying genetic network's behavior exhibits scale invariance in a more precise mathematical sense. We argue that models that can explain this scale invariance also have a "zero mode" in the dynamics of gene expression, and this connects to observations on the spatial correlation of fluctuations in expression levels.

Deduction of signaling mechanisms from cellular responses to multiple cues

Cell signaling networks are complex and often incompletely characterized, making it difficult to obtain a comprehensive picture of the mechanisms they encode. Mathematical modeling of these networks provides important clues, but the models themselves are often complex, and it is not always clear how to extract falsifiable predictions. Here we take an inverse approach, using experimental data at the cell level to deduce the minimal signaling network. We focus on cells' response to multiple cues, specifically on the surprising case in which the response is antagonistic: the response to multiple cues is weaker than the response to the individual cues. We systematically build candidate signaling networks one node at a time, using the ubiquitous ingredients of (i) up- or down-regulation, (ii) molecular conversion, or (iii) reversible binding. In each case, our method reveals a minimal, interpretable signaling mechanism that explains the antagonistic response. Our work provides a systematic way to deduce molecular mechanisms from cell-level data.