Water use intensity of Canadian beef production in 1981 as compared to 2011

Environmental performance of commercial beef production systems utilizing conventional productivity-enhancing technologies

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of using conventional productivity-enhancing technologies (PETs) with or without other natural PETs on the growth performance, carcass traits and environmental impacts of feedlot cattle. A total of 768 cross-bred yearling steers (499 ± 28.6 kg; n = 384) and heifers (390 ± 34.9 kg; n = 384) were offered a barley grain-based basal diet and divided into implanted or non-implanted groups. Steers were then allocated to diets that contained either: (i) no additive (control); natural feed additives including (ii) fibrolytic enzymes (Enz), (iii) essential oil (Oleo), (iv) direct fed microbial (DFM), (v) DFM + Enz + Oleo combination; conventional feed additives including (vi) Conv (monensin, tylosin, and beta-adrenergic agonists [βAA]); or Conv with the natural feed additives including (vii) Conv + DFM + Enz; (viii) Conv + DFM + Enz + Oleo. Heifers received one of the first three dietary treatments or the following: (iv) probiotic (Citr); (v) Oleo + Citr; (vi) Melengesterol acetate (MGA) + Oleo + βAA; (vii) Conv (monensin, tylosine, βAA, and MGA); or (viii) Conv + Oleo (ConvOleo). Data were used to estimate greenhouse gas (GHG) and ammonia (NH3) emissions, as well as land and water use. Implant and Conv-treated cattle exhibited improvements in growth and carcass traits as compared to the other treatments (P < 0.05). Improvements in the performance of Conv-cattle illustrated that replacing conventional feed additives with natural feed additives would increase both the land and water required to satisfy the feed demand of steers and heifers by 7.9% and 10.5%, respectively. Further, GHG emission intensity for steers and heifers increased by 5.8% and 6.7%, and NH3 emission intensity by 4.3% and 6.7%, respectively. Eliminating the use of implants in cattle increased both land and water use by 14.6% and 19.5%, GHG emission intensity by 10.5% and 15.8%, and NH3 emission intensity by 3.4% and 11.0% for heifers and steers, respectively. These results demonstrate that use of conventional PETs increased animal performance while reducing environmental impacts of beef production. Restricting use would increase the environmental footprint of beef produced for both domestic and international markets.

The role of livestock in sustainable food production systems in Canada

Global drivers such as the growing human population, evolving consumer preferences, globalization, and climate change have put pressure on the agri-food sector to produce more livestock products with less land, feed, and water. Taste, nutritional value, cost, convenience, source, animal welfare, and environmental sustainability of food are criteria upon which purchasing decisions are made. In response, an environmental footprint analysis composed of greenhouse gas emissions, nutrient and water use efficiency, water quality, carbon storage, and biodiversity has been completed for many commodities. However, as livestock production systems occur within complex agro-ecosystems, it is extremely challenging to formulate a single overall sustainability metric. There is no “silver bullet” to solve the environmental concerns of all livestock production systems as they operate under different constraints on different landscapes, with different water and nutrient cycles, and soil types. Furthermore, the lack of scientific evidence regarding the interactions between livestock production, human nutritional adequacy, and the health of our environment makes it difficult for consumers to interpret this information and make informed food choices. This review examines these complex interactions and trade-offs, as well as the potential impacts of changes in consumer dietary choice on environmental sustainability, nutritional adequacy, and land use.

Strategies to limit meat wastage: Focus on meat discoloration

Limiting meat waste is a significant factor that can help meet future needs to provide high-quality animal protein while maximizing the utilization of natural resources. Fresh meat waste occurs during production, processing, distribution, and marketing to various points of consumption. Consumers' expectation for muscle food quality is often associated with its appearance, and a bright-red color of red meat is an indicator of freshness and wholesomeness. Meat discoloration is a natural process resulting from interactions between the physical structure of meat and the oxidation of the ferrous forms of myoglobin. Understanding the biochemical processes that influence discoloration such as oxygen consumption, metmyoglobin reducing activity, lipid oxidation, and microbial growth help to develop innovative strategies to limit meat waste. The focus of this chapter is to discuss the factors involved in meat discoloration and any other color deviations that may lead to discounted pricing and/or meat loss. The impact of meat waste, economic loss, the role of packaging, and the application of high-throughput techniques to understand the biochemical basis of meat discoloration are also discussed.

Dynamic Evaluation and Internal Driving Factors of Water Resources Green Efficiency in China

High-quality economic development and the realization of ecological civilization have become the main goals of China’s economic development. This study constructed a global reference Malmquist–Luenberger productivity index model of directional distance function from the perspective of mixed disposability and divided water resources green efficiency into pure technical efficiency change (PEC) index, scale efficiency change (SEC) index, pure technology change (PTC) index and scale technology change (STC) index. The results show the following: (1) The value of China’s water resources green efficiency increased by 1.1% from 2000 to 2016. The central region improved the most (1.4%), followed by the western (1%) and eastern (0.9%) regions. The water resources green efficiency improved in all provinces except Guangxi and Yunnan. (2) The water resources green efficiency is significantly affected by national policies, and there may not be a significant positive correlation with economic development. At present, the water resources green efficiency in most provinces still needs to be improved. (3) From 2000 to 2016, China’s water resources green efficiency decomposition index showed an upward trend except for SEC, and PTC was the main driving force for improving China’s water resources green efficiency. (4) The variation of PEC among provinces showed an inverted “N” trend, while the differences of SEC and STC showed an ascending trend, and PTC showed an inverted “U” trend. The proportions of provinces in which PEC, SEC, and STC indices improved were 40%, 46.67%, and 60%, respectively.