Scenarios to limit environmental nitrogen losses from dairy expansion

Difficulties in using land use pressure and soil quality indicators to predict water quality

Intensive agriculture can impair river water quality. Soil quality monitoring has been used to measure the effect of land use intensification on water quality at a point and field scales but not at the catchment scale. Other farm scale land use pressures, like stocking rate and the value of land, which relate to land use intensity are now publicly available, nationally. We therefore tested whether point scale soil quality measures, together with newly available farm scale land use pressures (land valuation and stocking rate) and existing catchment and climatic characteristics could help predict the behaviour of water quality data across 192 catchments in New Zealand. We used a generalised additive model to make predictions of the change in nitrogen fractions (r2 = 0.65-0.71), phosphorus fractions (r2 = 0.51-0.70), clarity and turbidity (r2 = 0.42-0.46), and E. coli (r2 = 0.35) over 15 years. The state and trend of water quality was strongly related to a refined farm scale land use classification, and to catchment and climatic characteristics (e.g. slope, elevation, and rainfall). Relationships with point scale soil quality measures and the land use pressures were weak. The weak relationship with land use pressures may be caused by using a single snapshot in time (2022), which cannot account for lag times in water quality response but leaves room for additional temporal data to improve predictive power. The weak relationship to soil quality measures was probably caused by limited data points (n = 667 sites) that were unrepresentative of land use, and areas of catchment subject to processes like runoff or leaching. While national soil quality measures might be useful for evaluating environmental risk at the field or farm scale, without a large increase in sampling, they were not relevant at the catchment scale. Additional analyses should be performed to determine how many samples would be needed to detect a change using an environmentally focused soil test that can guide water quality management.

Mitigation of gaseous emissions from dairy livestock: A farm-level method to examine the financial implications

Feeding the world's population while minimising the contribution of agriculture to climate change is one of the greatest challenges facing modern society. This challenge is particularly pronounced for dairy production where the carbon footprint of products and the mitigation costs are high, relative to other food stuffs. This paper reviews a number of mitigation measures that may be adopted by dairy farmers to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from their farms. A simulation model is developed to assess the cost-benefit of a range of mitigation measures. The model is applied to data from Ireland, a country with a large export-oriented dairy industry, for a range of farms including top, middle and bottom performing farms from a profitability perspective. The mitigation measures modelled included animal productivity, grass production and utilisation, better reproductive performance, early compact calving, reduced crude protein, decreased fertiliser N, protected urea, white clover, slurry tank cover and low emission slurry spreading (LESS). The results show that over half of the greenhouse gas abatement potential and most of the ammonia abatement potential were realised with cost-beneficial measures. Animal and feed-related measures that increased efficiency drove the abatement of GHG emissions. Low-emission slurry spreading was beneficial for the bottom and middle one-third of farms, while protected urea and reducing nitrogen use accounted for most of the ammonia abatement potential for the most profitable farms. Results showed that combining mitigation measures resulted in a decrease of 23%, 19%, and 12% in GHG emissions below 2020 levels for the bottom, middle, and top performing dairy farms, respectively. The findings imply that top dairy farms, that are already managed efficiently and optimally, may struggle to achieve the national and international GHG reduction targets with existing technologies and practices.

Linking the uptake of best management practices on dairy farms to catchment water quality improvement over a 20-year period

Intensive land use, such as dairying, can impair water quality. Although many guidelines exist on how to mitigate the loss of dairy-associated contaminants from land to water through best management practices (BMPs), few datasets exist on the success of implementation on-farm. Five dairy-dominated catchments (from 598 to 2480 ha) in New Zealand were studied from 2001 to 2020. The first period, from 2001 to 2010, involved comprehensive "extension" advice to farmers consisting of workshops, stream water quality and flow monitoring, farm practice surveys, and identified solutions to address site-specific contaminant losses. In the second period (2011-2020), termed "post-extension", only water quality monitoring and farm practice surveys were continued. Of the water quality contaminants (including dissolved reactive phosphorus (DRP), total phosphorus (TP), ammoniacal-nitrogen, nitrate-nitrite-nitrogen [NNN], suspended sediment and E. coli), 83 % of water quality trend directions were either improving (n = 16) or showed no change (n = 9) during the extension period. Over the 20-year dataset, which included the post-extension period, 20 out of 30 contaminant-catchment combinations (67 %) were improving, but nine were degrading, dominated by NNN (n = 4), DRP (n = 2) and E. coli (n = 2). Abrupt decreases in contaminant concentrations, were correlated with on-farm practice changes mainly associated with transition from direct discharge of farm dairy shed effluent to waterways to land application, and the capture of effluent from off-paddock facilities (like stand off or feed pads). Best management practices reduced phosphorus (P) forms, E. coli and sediment concentrations. Increase in NNN concentrations was caused by transitioning from flood to spray irrigation and a commensurate increase in cow numbers and NNN leaching. These data indicate that extension advice and on-farm practice change have helped to improve overall water quality over time. Nevertheless, recent regulatory threshold values for some contaminant concentrations are not being met, meaning that more actions are required, over and above the BMPs implemented.

Limiting grazing periods combined with proper housing can reduce nutrient losses from dairy systems

Pasture-based and grass-fed branding are often associated with consumer perceptions of improved human health, environmental performance and animal welfare. Here, to examine the impacts of dairy production in detail, we contrasted global observational (n = 156) data for nitrogen and phosphorus losses from land by the duration of outdoor livestock grazing in confined, grazed and hybrid systems. Observational nitrogen losses for confined systems were lowest on a productivity-but not area-basis. No differences were noted for phosphorus losses between the systems. Modelling of the three dairy systems in New Zealand, the United States and the Netherlands yielded similar results. We found insufficient evidence that grazed dairy systems have lower nutrient losses than confined ones, but trade-offs exist between systems at farm scale. The use of a hybrid system may allow for uniform distribution of stored excreta, controlled dietary intake, high productivity and mitigation of animal welfare issues arising from climatic extremes.

Effects of dietary crude protein concentration on animal performance and nitrogen utilisation efficiency at different stages of lactation in Holstein-Friesian dairy cows

Nitrogen (N) excretion from livestock production systems is of significant environmental concern; however, few studies have investigated the effect of dietary CP concentration on N utilisation efficiency at different stages of lactation, and the interaction between dietary CP levels and stages of lactation on N utilisation. Holstein-Friesian dairy cows (12 primiparous and 12 multiparous) used in the present study were selected from a larger group of cows involved in a whole-lactation study designed to examine the effect of dietary CP concentration on milk production and N excretion rates at different stages of lactation. The total diet CP concentrations evaluated were 114 (low CP), 144 (medium CP) and 173 (high CP) g/kg DM, with diets containing (g/kg DM) 550 concentrates, 270 grass silage and 180 maize silage. During early (70-80 days), mid- (150-160 days) and late (230-240 days) lactation, the same 24 animals were transferred from the main cow house to metabolism units for measurements of feed intake, milk production and faeces and urine outputs. Diet had no effect on BW, body condition score, or milk fat, protein or lactose concentration, but DM intake, milk yield and digestibilities of DM, energy and N increased with increasing diet CP concentration. The effect of diet on milk yield was largely due to differences between the low and medium CP diets. Increasing dietary CP concentration significantly increased urine N/N intake and urine N/manure N, and decreased faecal N/N intake, milk N/N intake and manure N/N intake. Although increasing dietary CP level significantly increased urine N/milk yield and manure N/milk yield, differences in these two variables between low and medium CP diets were not significant. There was no significant interaction between CP level and stage of lactation on any N utilisation variable, indicating that the effects of CP concentration on these variables were similar between stages of lactation. These results demonstrated that a decrease in dietary CP concentration from high (173 g/kg DM) to medium level (144 g/kg DM) may be appropriate for Holstein-Friesian dairy cow to maintain milk production efficiency, whilst reducing both urine N and manure N as a proportion of N intake or milk production.

The effect of concentrate supplement type on milk production, nutrient intake, and total-tract nutrient digestion in mid-lactation, spring-calving dairy cows grazing perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) pasture

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of concentrate supplement type on milk production, nutrient intake, and total-tract nutrient digestion in lactating dairy cows grazing mid-season perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.; PRG) pasture. Twelve primiparous (mean ± standard deviation; 95 ± 30 d in milk and 470 ± 43 kg of body weight) and 68 multiparous (99 ± 24 d in milk and 527 ± 64 kg of body weight) lactating dairy cows were blocked based on pre-study milk yield and parity and randomly assigned to 1 of 4 dietary treatments. The 4 dietary treatments were a non-supplemented PRG control (PRG); PRG supplemented with 4.4 kg of dry matter (DM) per cow per day of citrus pulp and 0.067 kg of DM/cow per day of urea (PRG+C); PRG supplemented with 0.8 kg of DM/cow per day of heat-treated soybean meal (PRG+PP); and PRG supplemented with 3.1 kg of DM/cow per day of a combination of heat-treated soybean meal and citrus pulp (PRG+C+PP). The study consisted of a 2-wk adaptation period and a 10-wk period of data collection. Weekly measurements of milk yield, body weight, body condition score, and feeding and rumination time were made. Nutrient intake and total-tract digestibility were measured during wk 6 of the study. A large soil moisture deficit was experienced during the study that probably reduced herbage growth rate and likely altered the chemical composition of the PRG offered when compared with typical mid-season PRG. Total dry matter intake was increased in cows fed PRG+C compared with cows fed PRG and PRG+PP and was similar to cows fed PRG+C+PP (18.0, 15.9, 16.4, and 17.2 ± 0.41 kg of DM/d, respectively). The apparent total-tract neutral detergent fiber digestibility of cows fed the PRG+C diet was lower compared with the PRG and PRG+PP diets and was similar to the PRG+C+PP diet (0.67, 0.70, 0.70, and 0.69 ± 0.01 g/g, respectively). The energy-corrected milk (ECM) yield of cows fed PRG+C+PP was highest (23.7 kg/d), PRG+C was intermediate (22.2 kg/d), and PRG was lowest (20.8 kg/d). Cows fed PRG+PP produced more ECM (22.9 kg/d) compared with cows fed PRG and produced similar ECM compared with cows fed PRG+C and PRG+C+PP diets. The PRG+PP diet increased milk protein yield compared with the PRG diet, tended to increase milk protein yield compared with the PRG+C diet, and was similar to the PRG+C+PP diet. Milk fat concentration and the composition of milk fat were not influenced by treatment. The results demonstrated that, for cows consuming pasture-based diets, increasing metabolizable protein supply allowed higher milk yield as metabolizable protein was more limiting than metabolizable energy. However, due to the large soil moisture deficit experienced during this experiment, caution is recommended when extrapolating these results to cows consuming typical mid-season PRG herbage.

Virome studies of food production systems: time for 'farm to fork' analyses

The food industry is under increasing pressure to produce high quality, traceable and minimally processed foods that are produced using sustainable approaches and ingredients. In line with the latter, there is an increased pressure for plant-based products to replace animal-derived products. Until recently, research efforts have mainly focused on dairy and meat products owing to their economic importance. The shift towards plant-based diets and food production requires a corresponding shift in research efforts to define the microbial requirements for and composition of (novel) plant-based foods, the (micro)organisms that are beneficial to such production systems, and the abundance and role of (bacterio)phages in shaping the microbial landscape of these foods. In this review, we explore current efforts in the area of virome analysis of foods and food production environments and highlight the need for more unified approaches to understand the contribution of phages in food safety and quality, and to develop novel tools to enhance the traceability of foods.

Modern Holstein-origin dairy cows within grassland-based systems partition more feed nitrogen into milk and excrete less in manure

The objective was to determine whether modern Holstein-origin dairy cows, when managed within grassland-based systems, partitioned more feed nitrogen (N) into milk and excreted less in manure, in comparison to an earlier population of Holstein-origin dairy cows. Data used were collated from total diet digestibility studies undertaken in Northern Ireland from 1990 to 2002 (old dataset, n = 538) and from 2005 to 2019 (new dataset, n = 476), respectively. An analysis of variance indicated that cows in the new dataset partitioned a significantly higher proportion of consumed N into milk and excreted a lower proportion in urine and total manure, compared to cows in the old dataset. A second analysis using the linear regression revealed that in comparison to the old dataset, the new dataset had a lower slope in the relationship between N intake and N excretion in urine or total manure, while a higher slope in the relationship between N intake and milk N output. A third analysis used the combined data from both datasets to examine if there was a relationship between experimental year and N utilization efficiency. Across the period from 1990 to 2019, urine N/N intake and manure N/N intake significantly decreased, while milk N/N intake increased. These results indicate that modern Holstein-origin dairy cows utilize consumed N more efficiently than earlier populations. Thus, N excretion is likely to be overestimated if models developed from the old data are used to predict N excretion for modern dairy herds. Therefore, the final part of analysis involved using the new dataset to develop prediction models for N excretion based on N intake and farm level data (milk yield, live weight and dietary N concentration). These updated models can be used to estimate N excretion from modern Holstein-origin dairy cows within grassland-based dairy systems.

Nitrogen fertilisers with urease inhibitors reduce nitrous oxide and ammonia losses, while retaining yield in temperate grassland

Nitrogen fertilisation, although a cornerstone of modern agricultural production, negatively impacts the environment through gaseous losses of nitrous oxide (N₂O), a potent greenhouse gas (GHG), and ammonia (NH₃), a known air pollutant. The aim of this work was to assess the feasibility of urea treated with urease inhibitors to reduce gaseous N losses in temperate grassland, while maintaining or improving productivity compared to conventional fertiliser formulations. Urease inhibitors were N-(n-butyl)-thiophosphoric triamide (NBPT) (urea + NBPT) and N-(n-propyl)-thiophosphoric triamide (NPPT) (urea+ NBPT + NPPT), while conventional fertilisers were urea and calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN). N₂O emission factors were 0.06%, 0.07%, 0.09% and 0.58% from urea + NBPT, urea, urea + NBPT + NPPT and CAN, respectively, with CAN significantly higher than all the urea formulations, which were not significantly different from each other. Ammonia loss measured over one fertiliser application was significantly larger from urea, at 43%, compared with other formulations at 13.9%, 13.8% and 5.2% from urea + NBPT, urea + NBPT + NPPT and CAN, respectively. Changing fertiliser formulation had no significant impact on grass yield or N uptake in four out of five harvests. In the last harvest urea + NBPT significantly out-yielded urea, but not CAN or urea + NBPT + NPPT. Overall, urea treated with either one or both urease inhibitors significantly reduced emissions of N₂O and NH₃, while preserving yield quantity and quality. Therefore, changing fertiliser formulation to these products should be encouraged as a strategy to reduce GHG and air pollution from agricultural practices in temperate climate.

Increasing Grazing in Dairy Cow Milk Production Systems in Europe

In temperate regions of Europe where grass grows for most of the year, grazed pasture is the lowest cost feed for milk production. Grazed pasture can make a contribution to dairy cow feeding systems in other parts of Europe, but is less important. While there are many challenges to maintaining or increasing the proportion of grazed grass in dairy cow diets, there are also opportunities to increase its contribution. Grass use and quality can be challenging for several reasons, including the cow and sward interaction, and factors influencing dry matter intake. Adapting grazing management strategies can provide opportunities for incorporating grazing and perhaps increase grazing in dairy cow milk production systems. Pasture management tools and techniques offer the opportunity to increase herbage use at grazing. While there are many benefits of grazing including economic, environmental, animal welfare and social, there are also the challenges to maintaining grazed pasture in dairy cow diets. The objective of this paper is to present an overview of the challenges and opportunities for grazing in dairy milk production systems.