Response to a letter to editor regarding Kotta et al. 2020: Cleaning up seas using blue growth initiatives: Mussel farming for eutrophication control in the Baltic Sea

Optimizing the Processing of Shellfish (Mytilus edulis and M. trossulus Hybrid) Biomass Cultivated in the Low Salinity Region of the Baltic Sea for the Extraction of Meat and Proteins

Mussel farming is a novel and growing aquaculture field in the Baltic Sea. Nevertheless, there is very little published evidence on the processing of shellfish biomass in the region. The aim of this study is to develop a methodology for the extraction of organic-rich fractions from small-sized blue mussels of the Baltic Sea region that is applicable and economically viable for the feed and food industry. The efficiency of mussel meat separation was evaluated using different processing, drying, and filtration techniques. The laboratory experiments have succeeded in finding a method that is operationally feasible and does not require overly complex and expensive laboratory settings. These trials also showed that the separation of meat from fresh or frozen mussels can be achieved by simple crushing and sedimentation methods and the extraction yielded a significant amount of mussel meat (7.6%) with a high protein content (3.2%, i.e., half of the total protein found in the used mussel-mass). It also appeared that the use of filtration is not practical because the protein loss was extremely high. In addition, filtration makes the process of dry-matter separation more complex, and costs are unlikely to be compensated by the energy saved in drying.

-Blue mussel (Mytilus spp.) cultivation in mesohaline eutrophied inner coastal waters: mitigation potential, threats and cost effectiveness

The EU-water framework directive (WFD) focuses on nutrient reductions to return coastal waters to the good ecological status. As of today, many coastal waters have reached a steady state of insufficient water quality due to continuous external nutrient inputs and internal loadings. This study focuses first on the current environmental status of mesohaline inner coastal waters to illustrate their needs of internal measures to reach demanded nutrient reductions and secondly, if mussel cultivation can be a suitable strategy to improve water quality. Therefore, nitrogen, phosphorus, chlorophyll a, and Secchi depth of nine mesohaline inner coastal waters in north east Germany were analyzed from 1990 to 2018. Two pilot mussel farms were used to evaluate their effectiveness as a mitigation measure and to estimate potential environmental risks, including the interactions with pathogenic vibrio bacteria. Further, estimated production and mitigation potential were used to assess economic profitability based on the sale of small sized mussels for animal feed and a compensation for nutrient mitigation. The compensation costs were derived from nutrient removal costs of a waste water treatment plant (WWTP). Results show that currently all nine water bodies do not reach the nutrient thresholds demanded by the WFD. However, coastal waters differ in nutrient pollution, indicating that some can reach the desired threshold values if internal measures are applied. The mitigation potential of mussel cultivation depends on the amount of biomass that is cultivated and harvested. However, since mussel growth is closely coupled to the salinity level, mussel cultivation in low saline environments leads to lower biomass production and inevitably to larger cultivation areas. If 50% of the case study area Greifswald Bay was covered with mussel farms the resulting nitrogen reduction would increase Secchi depth by 7.8 cm. However, high chlorophyll a values can hamper clearance rates (<20 mg m⁻³ = 0.43 l h⁻¹ dry weight g⁻¹) and therefore the mitigation potential. Also, the risk of mussel stock loss due to high summer water temperatures might affect the mitigation potential. The pilot farms had no significant effect on the total organic content of sediments beneath. However, increased values of Vibrio spp. in bio deposits within the pilot farm (1.43 10⁶ ± 1.10 10⁶CFU 100 ml⁻¹ (reference site: 1.04 10⁶ ± 1.45 10⁶ CFU 100 ml⁻¹) were measured with sediment traps. Hence, mussel farms might act as a sink for Vibrio spp. in systems with already high vibrio concentrations. However, more research is required to investigate the risks of Vibrio occurrence coupled to mussel farming. The economic model showed that mussel cultivation in environments below 12 PSU cannot be economic at current market prices for small size mussels and compensations based on nutrient removal cost of WWTPs.