Evaluation of pollution swapping phenomena from a woodchip denitrification wall targetting removal of nitrate in a shallow gravel aquifer

Dissolved organic matter characteristics linked to bacterial community succession and nitrogen removal performance in woodchip bioreactors

Woodchip bioreactors are an eco-friendly technology for removing nitrogen (N) pollution. However, there needs to be more clarity regarding the dissolved organic matter (DOM) characteristics and bacterial community succession mechanisms and their association with the N removal performance of bioreactors. The laboratory woodchip bioreactors were continuously operated for 360 days under three influent N level treatments, and the results showed that the average removal rate of TN was 45.80 g N/(m3·day) when the influent N level was 100 mg N/L, which was better than 10 mg N/L and 50 mg N/L. Dynamic succession of bacterial communities in response to influent N levels and DOM characteristics was an important driver of TN removal rates. Medium to high N levels enriched a copiotroph bacterial module (Module 1) detected by network analysis, including Phenylobacterium, Xanthobacteraceae, Burkholderiaceae, Pseudomonas, and Magnetospirillaceae, carrying N-cycle related genes for denitrification and ammonia assimilation by the rapid consumption of DOM. Such a process can increase carbon limitation to stimulate local organic carbon decomposition to enrich oligotrophs with fewer N-cycle potentials (Module 2). Together, this study reveals that the compositional change of DOM and bacterial community succession are closely related to N removal performance, providing an ecological basis for developing techniques for N-rich effluent treatment.

Baseflow and Coupled Nitrification-Denitrification Processes Jointly Dominate Nitrate Dynamics in a Watershed Impacted by Rare Earth Mining

Mining activities cause severe nitrogen pollution in watersheds, yet our understanding of the transport pathways, transformation processes, and control mechanisms of nitrate (NO3-) in these areas is limited. Based on nearly 4-year observations of groundwater and river in China's largest ion-adsorption rare earth mining watershed, we revealed the dynamics of NO3- and its drivers using stoichiometry-based load model, molecular biological, and multi-isotope approaches. Results indicated that the NO3- dynamics were jointly controlled by sources (precipitation, terrestrial inputs, and sediment supply) and processes (hydrological and biological). The monthly NO3- export load from the 444.4 km2 watershed was 3.72 × 105 kg. Groundwater (36 ± 26%) and soil nitrogen (25 ± 17%) were the primary exogenous sources of NO3-. Baseflow was the main hydrological pathway for legacy nitrogen into the river, contributing 66.8% of the NO3- load. Coupled nitrification-denitrification were key biological processes affecting the NO3- transformation, with denitrification contributing 58%. Burkholderia were most associated with NO3- transformation. Dissolved organic carbon and oxygen were major drivers affecting the NO3- production and consumption. This study highlights effective control and management strategies for nitrogen pollution in mining-affected watersheds, considering not only reducing nitrogen inputs but also integrating hydrological pathways and nitrogen transformation mechanisms.

Denitrifying bioreactors and dissolved phosphorus: Net source or sink?

Understanding the world through a lens of phosphorus (P), as Dr. Andrew Sharpley aimed to do, adds a deeper dimension for water quality work in the heavily tile-drained US Midwest where nitrate is often the nutrient of biggest concern. Denitrifying woodchip bioreactors reduce nitrate pollution in drainage water, but dissolved phosphorus leached from the organic fill is a possible pollution tradeoff. Recent work by Dr. Sharpley and others defined such tradeoffs as strategic decisions in which a negative outcome is accepted with prior knowledge of the risk. In this vein, we assessed 23 site-years from full-size bioreactors in Illinois to determine if bioreactors were a net dissolved reactive phosphorus (DRP) source and, if so, to determine flow-related correlation agents (1904 sample events; 10 bioreactors). DRP was removed across the bioreactors in 15 of 23 site-years. The 23 site-years provided a median annual DRP removal efficiency of 12% and a median annual DRP removal rate of 7.1 mg DRP/m3 bioreactor per day, but the ranges of all removal metrics overlapped zero. The highest daily bioreactor DRP removal rates occurred with high inflow concentrations and under low hydraulic retention times (i.e., under higher loading). Dr. Sharpley was one of the first to explore losses of DRP in subsurface drainage and performed decades of useful applied studies that inspired approaches to management of P loss on both drained and undrained land. We seek to honor this legacy with this practical study of the DRP benefits and tradeoffs of denitrifying bioreactors.

Nitrous oxide and methane production and consumption at five full-size denitrifying bioreactors treating subsurface drainage water

Nitrate (NO3-) removal in denitrifying bioreactors is influenced by flow, water chemistry, and design, but it is not known how these widely varying factors impact the production of nitrous oxide (N2O) or methane (CH4) across sites. Woodchip bioreactors link the hydrosphere and atmosphere in this respect, so five full-size bioreactors in Illinois, USA, were monitored for NO3-, N2O, and CH4 to better document where this water treatment technology resides along the pollution swapping to climate smart spectrum. Both surface fluxes and dissolved forms of N2O and CH4 were measured (n = 7-11 sampling campaigns per site) at bioreactors ranging from <1 to nearly 5 years old and treating subsurface drainage areas from between 6.9 and 29 ha. Across all sites, N2O surface and dissolved volumetric production rates averaged 1.0 ± 1.6 mg N2O-N/m3-d and 24 ± 62 mg dN2O-N/m3-d, respectively, and CH4 production rates averaged 6.0 ± 26 mg CH4-C/m3-d and 310 ± 520 mg dCH4-C/m3-d for surface and dissolved, respectively. However, N2O was consistently consumed at one bioreactor, and only three of the five sites produced notable CH4. Surface fluxes of CH4 were significantly reduced by the presence of a soil cover. Bioreactor denitrification was relatively efficient, with only 0.51 ± 3.5 % of removed nitrate emitted as N2O (n = 48). Modeled indirect N2O emissions factors were significantly lower when a bioreactor was present versus absent (EF5: 0.0055 versus 0.0062 kg N2O-N/kg NO3-N; p = 0.0011). While further greenhouse gas research on bioreactors is recommended, this should not be used as an excuse to slow adoption efforts. Bioreactors provide a practical option for voluntary water quality improvement in the heavily tile-drained US Midwest and elsewhere.

Removal of nitrate and pesticides from groundwater by nano zero-valent iron injection pulses under biostimulation and bioaugmentation scenarios in continuous-flow packed soil columns

This study evaluates the NO₃^- removal from groundwater through Heterotrophic Denitrification (HDN) (promoted by the addition of acetate and/or an inoculum rich in denitrifiers) and Abiotic Chemical Nitrate Reduction (ACNR) (promoted by pulse injection of zerovalent iron nanoparticles (nZVI)). HDN and ACNR were applied, separately or combined, in packed soil column experiments to complement the scarce research on pulse-injected nZVI in continuous-flow systems mimicking a Well-based Denitrification Barrier. Together with NO₃^-, the removal of two common pesticides (dieldrin and lindane) was evaluated. Results showed that total NO₃^- removal (>97%) could be achieved by either bioestimulation with acetate (converting NO₃^- to N₂(g) via HDN) or by injecting nZVI (removing NO₃^- via ACNR). In the presence of nZVI, NO₃^- was partially converted to N₂(g) and to a lower extent NO₂^-, with unreacted NO₃^- being likely adsorbed onto Fe-(oxy)hydroxides. Combination of both HDN and ACNR resulted in even a higher NO₃^- removal (>99%). Interestingly, nZVI did not seem to pose any toxic effect on denitrifiers. These results showed that both processes can be alterned or combined to take advantage of the benefits of each individual process while overcoming their disadvantages if applied alone. With regard to the target pesticides, the removal was high for dieldrin (>93%) and moderate for lindane (38%), and it was not due to biodegradation but to adsorption onto soil. When nZVI was applied, the removal increased (generally >91%) due to chemical degradation by nZVI and/or adsorption onto formed Fe-(oxy)hydroxides.