Mobile facial affect recognition and real-time social experiences in serious mental illness

Integration of sex/gender and utilization of ecological Momentary assessment of cognition in clinical populations: A scoping review

Objectives: We aimed to describe the methods of smartphone-based cognitive ecological momentary assessment designs in clinical populations, with an intention to evaluate how the role of sex and/or gender has been considered in the design and analyses, particularly including female-specific physiology. Methods: This scoping review was conducted based on JBI scoping review methodology. On March 2nd, 2023, we searched for literature across four databases. Screening of the results and data extraction were conducted in duplicate according to the a priori methods in the pre-registered protocol. Results: 31 articles were included in this review. Participants ranged in age from 15-85 years old with various clinical disorders. Prompts were given between 1-7 times per day for 7-84 days. Executive function was the most frequently assessed cognitive domain. Over half the studies (n = 17, 55%) did not investigate the effects of sex and/or gender, and only one study considered the impact of hormonal therapy. Many studies (n = 14, 45%) used sex and gender interchangeably or incorrectly. Conclusions: Studies varied in design, with heterogeneity in the reporting of methodological information. The lack of attention to sex/gender on neuropsychological outcomes can lead to confusion and contradiction regarding its potential impact on cognition in clinical populations. This may hinder the identification of effective interventions for those assigned female at birth who have been overlooked or considered indistinguishable from their male counterparts. Given the well-documented impact of sex/gender on cognition, it is essential that future neuropsychological research, especially EMA-based studies, prioritize investigating sex/gender to ensure better outcomes for all.

Utilizing Technology to Enhance the Ecological Validity of Cognitive and Functional Assessments in Schizophrenia: An Overview of the State-of-the-Art

Cognitive impairment is a core feature of schizophrenia and a key determinant of functional outcome. Although conventional paper-and-pencil based cognitive assessments used in schizophrenia remained relatively static during most of the 20th century, this century has witnessed the emergence of innovative digital technologies that aim to enhance the ecological validity of performance-based assessments. This narrative review provides an overview of new technologies that show promise for enhancing the ecological validity of cognitive and functional assessments. We focus on 2 approaches that are particularly relevant for schizophrenia research: (1) digital functional capacity tasks, which use simulations to measure performance of important daily life activities (e.g., virtual shopping tasks), delivered both in-person and remotely, and (2) remote device-based assessments, which include self-administered cognitive tasks (e.g., processing speed test) or functionally-focused surveys regarding momentary activities and experiences (e.g., location, social context), as well as passive sensor-based metrics (e.g., actigraphy measures of activity), during daily life. For each approach, we describe the potential for enhancing ecological validity, provide examples of select measures that have been used in schizophrenia research, summarize available data on their feasibility and validity, and consider remaining challenges. Rapidly growing evidence indicates that digital technologies have the potential to enhance the ecological validity of cognitive and functional outcome assessments, and thereby advance research into the causes of, and treatments for, functional disability in schizophrenia.