1
|
Waller JH, van Kessel CS, Solomon MJ, Lee PJ, Austin KKS, Steffens D. Outcomes Following Pelvic Exenteration for Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer With and Without En Bloc Sacrectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 2024; 67:796-804. [PMID: 38408876 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000003154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Extended radical resection is often the only chance of cure for locally recurrent rectal cancer. Recurrence in the posterior compartment often necessitates en bloc sacrectomy as part of pelvic exenteration to obtain clear resection margins and provide survival benefit. OBJECTIVE To compare oncological outcomes, morbidity, and quality-of-life outcomes following pelvic exenteration with and without en bloc sacrectomy for recurrent rectal cancer. DESIGN Comparative cohort study with retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. SETTING This study was conducted at a high-volume pelvic exenteration center. PATIENTS Patients who underwent pelvic exenteration for locally recurrent rectal cancer between 1994 and 2022. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Overall survival, postoperative morbidity, R0 resection margin, and quality-of-life outcomes. RESULTS Of 965 patients, 305 (31.6%) underwent pelvic exenteration for locally recurrent rectal cancer. Among these patients, 64.3% were men and the median age was 62 years (range, 29-86). One hundred eighty-five patients (60.7%) underwent en bloc sacrectomy, 65 (35.1%) underwent high transection, and 119 (64.3%) had sacrectomy below S2. R0 resection was achieved in 80% of patients with sacrectomy and 72.5% of patients without sacrectomy. Sacrectomy patients experienced more postoperative complications without increased mortality. The median overall survival was 52 months; median survival was 47 months with sacrectomy and 73 months without ( p = 0.059). Quality-of-life scores were not significantly different across physical component ( p = 0.346), mental component ( p = 0.787), or Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Colorectal ( p = 0.679) scores at 24-month follow-up. LIMITATIONS The generalizability of these findings may be limited outside of subspecialist exenteration units. Selection bias exists in a retrospective analysis. CONCLUSIONS Patients undergoing pelvic exenteration with and without en bloc sacrectomy for locally recurrent rectal cancer experience similar rates of R0 resection, survival, and quality-of-life outcomes. As R0 remains the most important predictor of survival, the requirement of sacral resection should prompt referral to a subspecialist center that performs sacrectomy routinely. See Video Abstract . RESULTADOS DESPUS DE LA EXENTERACIN PLVICA PARA EL CNCER DE RECTO CON RECURRENCIA LOCAL, CON Y SIN SACRECTOMA EN BLOQUE ANTECEDENTES:La resección radical ampliada es generalmente la única posibilidad de curación para el cáncer de recto con recurrencia local. La recurrencia en el compartimento posterior generalmente requiere sacrectomía en bloque como parte de la exenteración pélvica para obtener márgenes de resección claros y proporcionar un beneficio de supervivencia.OBJETIVO:Comparar los resultados oncológicos, de morbilidad y de calidad de vida después de la exenteración pélvica con y sin sacrectomía en bloque para el cáncer de recto recurrente.DISEÑO:Estudio de cohorte comparativo con análisis retrospectivo de datos recopilados prospectivamente.AMBIENTE AJUSTE:Estudio realizado en un centro de exenteración pélvica de alto volumen.PACIENTES:Aquellos sometidos a exenteración pélvica por cáncer de recto con recurrencia local entre 1994 y 2022.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Supervivencia general, morbilidad posoperatoria, margen de resección R0 y resultados de calidad de vida.RESULTADOS:305 (31,6%) de 965 pacientes se sometieron a exenteración pélvica por cáncer de recto con recurrencia local. El 64,3% de los pacientes eran hombres con una mediana de edad de 62 años (rango 29-86). 185 pacientes (60,7%) fueron sometidos a sacrectomía en bloque, 65 (35,1%) fueron sometidos a transección alta, 119 (64,3%) tuvieron sacrectomía por debajo de S2. La resección R0 se logró en el 80% de los pacientes con sacrectomía y en el 72,5% sin ella. Los pacientes de sacrectomía experimentaron más complicaciones postoperatorias sin aumento de la mortalidad. La mediana de supervivencia global fue de 52 meses, 47 meses con sacrectomía y 73 meses sin sacrectomía ( p = 0,059). Las puntuaciones de calidad de vida no fueron significativamente diferentes entre las puntuaciones del componente físico ( p = 0,346), componente mental ( p = 0,787) o la evaluación funcional de la terapia contra el cáncer - colorrectal ( p = 0,679) a los 24 meses de seguimiento.LIMITACIONES:La generalización de estos hallazgos puede estar limitada fuera de las unidades de exenteración de subespecialistas. Existe un sesgo de selección en un análisis retrospectivo.CONCLUSIONES:Los pacientes sometidos a exenteración pélvica con y sin sacrectomía en bloque por cáncer de recto con recurrencia local experimentan tasas similares de resección R0, supervivencia y resultados de calidad de vida. Como R0 sigue siendo el predictor más importante de supervivencia, la necesidad de resección sacra debe provocar la derivación a un centro subespecialista que realice sacrectomía de forma rutinaria. (Traducción-Dr. Fidel Ruiz Healy ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob H Waller
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Charlotte S van Kessel
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Michael J Solomon
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Peter J Lee
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kirk K S Austin
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Daniel Steffens
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Brown KGM, Risbey C, Solomon MJ, Austin KKS, Lee PJ, Byrne CM. Pelvic exenteration for chronic fistulating pelvic sepsis after multimodal treatment of pelvic malignancy. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2023; 49:107124. [PMID: 37879161 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.107124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2023] [Revised: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 10/20/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic fistulating pelvic sepsis is an uncommon complication of multimodal treatment of visceral pelvic tumours. Radical multi-visceral resection is reserved for patients with persistent, debilitating symptoms despite less invasive treatments and for which there is minimal published data. This study aimed to report the rates of morbidity and long-term sepsis control after pelvic exenteration for chronic fistulating pelvic sepsis. METHODS This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a high-volume pelvic exenteration referral centre. Patients who underwent pelvic exenteration for chronic fistulating pelvic sepsis between September 1994 and January 2023 after previous treatment for pelvic malignancy were included. Data relating to postoperative morbidity, mortality and the rate of recurrent pelvic sepsis or fistulae were retrospectively collected. RESULTS 19 patients who underwent radical resection for chronic fistulating pelvic sepsis after previous pelvic cancer treatment were included. 11 patients were male (58 %) and median age was 62 years (range 42-79). Previously treated rectal (8 patients, 42 %), prostate (5, 26 %) and cervical cancer (5, 26 %) were most common. 18 patients (95 %) had previously received high-dose pelvic radiotherapy, and 14 (74 %) had required surgical resection. Total pelvic exenteration was performed in 47 % of patients, total cystectomy in 68 % and major pubic bone resection in 37 %. There was no intraoperative or postoperative mortality. Major complication rate was 32 %. 12-month readmission rate was 42 %. At last follow up, 74 % had no signs or symptoms of persisting pelvic sepsis. CONCLUSIONS Pelvic exenteration for refractory pelvic sepsis following treatment of malignancy is safe and effective in selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kilian G M Brown
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia; Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia; Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Charles Risbey
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia; Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Michael J Solomon
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia; Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia; Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
| | - Kirk K S Austin
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia; Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia; Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Peter J Lee
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia; Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia; Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Christopher M Byrne
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia; Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia; Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Brown KGM, Solomon MJ, Steffens D, Ng KS, Byrne CM, Austin KKS, Lee PJ. Pelvic Exenteration for Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anus: Oncological, Morbidity, and Quality-of-Life Outcomes. Dis Colon Rectum 2023; 66:1427-1434. [PMID: 37493254 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000002919] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Salvage surgery is the only potentially curative treatment option for recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the anus. Where adjacent pelvic viscera, soft tissues, and bone are involved, pelvic exenteration with a wide perineal excision may be required to ensure clear surgical margins and increase the likelihood of long-term survival. OBJECTIVE To report oncological, morbidity, and quality-of-life outcomes of pelvic exenteration for anal squamous cell carcinoma. DESIGN Cohort study with retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. SETTINGS This study was conducted at a high-volume pelvic exenteration center. PATIENTS Those who underwent pelvic exenteration for anal squamous cell carcinoma between 1994 and 2022. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Local recurrence-free and overall survival, intraoperative and postoperative complication rates, R0 resection rate, and long-term quality-of-life outcomes. RESULTS Of 958 patients who underwent pelvic exenteration, 66 (6.9%) had anal squamous cell carcinoma. Thirty-two patients (48.5%) were male and the median age was 57 years (range, 31-79). Ten patients (15%) had primary anal squamous cell carcinoma, 49 (74%) had a recurrent tumor, and 7 (11%) had a re-recurrent tumor. Twenty-two patients (33%) and 16 patients (24%) had a major complication and unplanned return to the operating theater, respectively. Of the 62 patients who underwent pelvic exenteration with curative intent, 50 (81%) had R0 resection, and the 5-year overall and local recurrence-free survival rates were 41% and 37%, respectively. R0 resection was associated with a higher 5-year overall survival (50% vs 8%, p < 0.001). The mental health component scores and several individual quality-of-life domains presented improved trajectories postoperatively (all p values <0.05). LIMITATIONS The generalizability of the findings outside specialist pelvic exenteration centers may be limited. CONCLUSIONS Morbidity, long-term survival, and quality-of-life outcomes after pelvic exenteration for anal squamous cell carcinoma are comparable to published outcomes of pelvic exenteration for other tumor types. EXENTERACIN PLVICA POR CARCINOMA EPIDERMOIDE DE ANO RESULTADOS ONCOLGICOS, DE MORBILIDAD Y DE CALIDAD DE VIDA ANTECEDENTES:La cirugía de rescate es la única opción de tratamiento potencialmente curativa para el carcinoma de células escamosas del ano recurrente. Cuando están involucradas vísceras pélvicas, tejidos blandos y huesos adyacentes, puede ser necesaria una exenteración pélvica con una escisión perineal amplia para asegurar márgenes quirúrgicos claros y aumentar la probabilidad de supervivencia a largo plazo.OBJETIVO:Informar sobre los resultados oncológicos, de morbilidad y de calidad de vida de la exenteración pélvica por carcinoma anal de células escamosas.DISEÑO:Estudio de cohortes con análisis retrospectivo de datos recogidos prospectivamente.ENTORNO CLINICO:Este estudio se realizó en un centro de exenteración pélvica de alto volumen.PACIENTES:Aquellos que se sometieron a exenteración pélvica por carcinoma anal de células escamosas entre 1994 y 2022.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE VALORACIÓN:Supervivencia global y libre de recidiva local, tasas de complicaciones intraoperatorias y posoperatorias, tasa de resección R0 y resultados de calidad de vida a largo plazo.RESULTADOS:De 958 pacientes que se sometieron a exenteración pélvica, 66 (6,9%) tenían carcinoma anal de células escamosas. 32 pacientes (48,5%) eran varones y la mediana de edad fue de 57 años (rango 31-79). 10 pacientes (15%) tenían carcinoma anal primario de células escamosas, 49 (74%) tenían un tumor recurrente y 7 (11%) tenían una segunda recurrencia. 22 (33%) y 16 pacientes (24%) tuvieron una complicación mayor y regreso no planificado al quirófano, respectivamente. De los 62 pacientes que se sometieron a una exenteración pélvica con intención curativa, 50 (81%) tuvieron una resección R0, las tasas de supervivencia global y libre de recidiva local a los 5 años fueron del 41% y el 37%, respectivamente. La resección R0 se asoció con una mayor supervivencia general a los 5 años (50% frente a 8%, p < 0,001). Las puntuaciones del componente de salud mental y varios dominios de calidad de vida individuales presentaron trayectorias mejoradas después de la operación (todos los valores de p < 0,05).LIMITACIONES:La generalización de los hallazgos fuera de los centros especializados en exenteración pélvica puede ser limitada.CONCLUSIONES:Los resultados de morbilidad, supervivencia a largo plazo y calidad de vida después de la EP para el carcinoma anal de células escamosas son comparables a los resultados publicados de la exenteración pélvica para otros tipos de tumores. (Traducción-Dr. Ingrid Melo ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kilian G M Brown
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Michael J Solomon
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Daniel Steffens
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kheng-Seong Ng
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Christopher M Byrne
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Kirk K S Austin
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Peter J Lee
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia
- Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rajendran S, Brown KGM, Solomon MJ. Oncovascular surgery for advanced pelvic malignancy. Br J Surg 2023; 110:144-149. [PMID: 36427187 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2022] [Revised: 10/22/2022] [Accepted: 11/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The number of units with experience in extended radical resections for advanced pelvic tumours has grown substantially in recent years. The use of complex vascular resections and reconstructive techniques in these units is expected to increase with experience. This review aimed to provide a cutting-edge overview of this evolving surgical approach to complex pelvic tumours with vascular involvement. METHODS This was a narrative review of published data on major vascular resection and reconstruction for advanced pelvic tumours, including preoperative evaluation, techniques used, and outcomes. Advice for treatment decisions is provided, and based on current literature and the personal experience of the authors. Current controversies and future directions are discussed. RESULTS Major vascular resection and reconstruction during surgery for advanced pelvic tumours is associated with prolonged operating time (510-678 min) and significant blood loss (median 2-5 l). R0 resection can be achieved in 58-82 per cent at contemporary specialist units. The risk of major complications is similar to that of extended pelvic resection without vascular involvement (30-40 per cent) and perioperative mortality is acceptable (0-4 per cent). Long-term survival is achievable in approximately 50 per cent of patients. CONCLUSION En bloc resection of the common or external iliac vessels during exenterative pelvic surgery is a feasible strategy for patients with advanced tumours which infiltrate major pelvic vascular structures. Oncological, morbidity, and survival outcomes appear comparable to more central pelvic tumours. These encouraging outcomes, combined with an increasing interest in extended pelvic resections globally, will likely lead to more exenteration units developing oncovascular experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saissan Rajendran
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, Australia.,Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Sydney, Australia.,The Institute of Academic Surgery at RPA, Sydney, Australia
| | - Kilian G M Brown
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Sydney, Australia.,The Institute of Academic Surgery at RPA, Sydney, Australia.,Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Michael J Solomon
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Sydney, Australia.,The Institute of Academic Surgery at RPA, Sydney, Australia.,Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sutton PA, Brown KGM, Ebrahimi N, Solomon MJ, Austin KKS, Lee PJ. Long-term surgical complications following pelvic exenteration: Operative management of the empty pelvis syndrome. Colorectal Dis 2022; 24:1491-1497. [PMID: 35766998 DOI: 10.1111/codi.16238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2022] [Revised: 06/16/2022] [Accepted: 06/24/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
AIM Pelvic exenteration (PE) has become the standard of care for locally advanced and recurrent rectal cancer. The high short-term morbidity reported from this procedure is well established; however, longer term complications of such radical surgery and their management have not been fully addressed. This study aimed to investigate the incidence, indications and outcomes of long-term (more than 90-day) reoperative surgery in this group of patients, with a focus on the empty pelvis syndrome (EPS). METHODS Clinical data were extracted from a prospectively maintained database, with additional data pertaining to indications, operative details and outcomes of reoperative surgery obtained from electronic medical records. Patients were excluded if reoperative surgery was endoscopic or radiologically guided, was for the investigation or treatment of recurrent disease, or was clearly unrelated to previous surgery. RESULTS Of 716 patients who underwent PE, 75 (11%) required 101 reoperative abdominal or perineal procedures, 52 (51%) of which were in 40 (6%) patients for complications of EPS. This group were more likely to have undergone a total PE (65% vs. 43%; P < 0.01) with either major bony (70% vs. 50%; P < 0.01) and/or nerve (40% vs. 25%; P = 0.03) resections at index exenteration. The patho-anatomy, surgical management and outcomes of these patients are described herein, considering separately complications of entero-cutaneous fistula, entero-perineal fistula, small bowel obstruction and local management of perineal wound complications. CONCLUSION Six per cent of PE patients will require re-intervention for the management of EPS. Reliable strategies for preventing EPS remain elusive; however, surgical management is feasible with acceptable short-term outcomes with the optimum strategy to be selected on an individual patient basis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul A Sutton
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Institute of Academic Surgery at RPA, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Colorectal and Peritoneal Oncology Centre, The Christie Hospital, Manchester, UK.,Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Kilian G M Brown
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Institute of Academic Surgery at RPA, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Nargus Ebrahimi
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Institute of Academic Surgery at RPA, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Michael J Solomon
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Institute of Academic Surgery at RPA, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kirk K S Austin
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Institute of Academic Surgery at RPA, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Peter J Lee
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Institute of Academic Surgery at RPA, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rajendran S, Brown KGM, Solomon MJ, Austin KKS, Lee PJ, Robinson D, Steffens D. Complete resection of the iliac vascular system during pelvic exenteration: an evolving surgical approach to lateral compartment excision. Br J Surg 2021; 108:885-887. [PMID: 33824959 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znab070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2021] [Accepted: 01/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
Tumour infiltration of the lateral pelvic compartment has previously been associated with the highest rate of involved resection margins and carries significant risk of morbidity. In this study, consecutive patients undergoing pelvic exenteration at a single centre between 1994 and 2019 who required en bloc resection of the common or external iliac artery or vein were included.The results demonstrate that complete resection of the iliac vascular system, including resection and reconstruction of the common and external iliac vessels, can be performed safely during pelvic exenteration with oncological outcomes comparable to more central tumours.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Rajendran
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,The Institute of Academic Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - K G M Brown
- The Institute of Academic Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - M J Solomon
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,The Institute of Academic Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - K K S Austin
- The Institute of Academic Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - P J Lee
- The Institute of Academic Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - D Robinson
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,The Institute of Academic Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - D Steffens
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|