Evaluation of the first seizure patient: Key points in the history and physical examination

Seizure or syncope: Is the history-based scale feasible to use in an emergency department setting?

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to assess the efficacy of a screening questionnaire, based on historical criteria, in distinguishing between seizures and syncope in patients experiencing their first episode of transient loss of consciousness (TLOC) in a neurology emergency department.

METHODS

A prospective cohort of 159 patients with initial TLOC episodes underwent clinical observation and answered a nine-question screening questionnaire. The questionnaire's predictive ability was compared to final diagnoses determined through detailed neurology, electrophysiology, and cardiology assessments during a minimum 12-month follow-up. Logistic regression (LR) analysis was performed with final diagnosis as the outcome variable. The calibration and discrimination of the models were assessed.

RESULTS

revealed that the screening score accurately classified 72.33% of patients. Among those with positive screening scores, 65 (67.71%) had seizures compared to 31 (32.29%) with syncope. Introducing a novel risk-scoring model incorporating age and gender, in addition to the screening score, significantly improved performance achieving an accurate classification rate of 81.48%. Among patients with a positive prediction, 63 (80.77%) had seizure, whereas 15 (19.23%) had syncope.

CONCLUSIONS

Employing a structured questionnaire based on common historical criteria is a valuable tool for distinguishing between seizure and syncope in the dynamic setting of the emergency department.

Role of Potassium Ion Channels in Epilepsy: Focus on Current Therapeutic Strategies

BACKGROUND

Epilepsy is one of the prevalent neurological disorders characterized by disrupted synchronization between inhibitory and excitatory neurons. Disturbed membrane potential due to abnormal regulation of neurotransmitters and ion transport across the neural cell membrane significantly contributes to the pathophysiology of epilepsy. Potassium ion channels (KCN) regulate the resting membrane potential and are involved in neuronal excitability. Genetic alterations in the potassium ion channels (KCN) have been reported to result in the enhancement of the release of neurotransmitters, the excitability of neurons, and abnormal rapid firing rate, which lead to epileptic phenotypes, making these ion channels a potential therapeutic target for epilepsy. The aim of this study is to explore the variations reported in different classes of potassium ion channels (KCN) in epilepsy patients, their functional evaluation, and therapeutic strategies to treat epilepsy targeting KCN.

METHODOLOGY

A review of all the relevant literature was carried out to compile this article.

RESULTS

A large number of variations have been reported in different genes encoding various classes of KCN. These genetic alterations in KCN have been shown to be responsible for disrupted firing properties of neurons. Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are the main therapeutic strategy to treat epilepsy. Some patients do not respond favorably to the AEDs treatment, resulting in pharmacoresistant epilepsy.

CONCLUSION

Further to address the challenges faced in treating epilepsy, recent approaches like optogenetics, chemogenetics, and genome editing, such as clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR), are emerging as target-specific therapeutic strategies.

Adapted Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Diagnosis and Treatment of Epilepsies in Children: A Tertiary Children's Hospital Update

HYPOTHESIS AND/OR BACKGROUND

We recently updated and merged the adapted clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for the diagnosis and treatment of children with epilepsy of a tertiary-level hospital. Medical knowledge is always evolving. As a result, it is critical to revisit the clinical standards on a frequent basis to ensure that the best services are offered to the target receivers. The purpose of this article was to update and merge the CPGs at Alexandria University Children Hospital (AUCH) for the diagnosis (2014) and treatment (2016) of children with epilepsy to unify and standardize the practice for better care and outcome.

METHODS

This review and update CPG project was initiated by assembling a Guideline Review Group (GRG). The GRG conducted focus group discussions and decided to search any published updates of the recommendations of the previously identified high-quality and evidence-based CPG developed by the SIGN (Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network) and to merge the two previous local CPGs under one comprehensive CPG for full management of epilepsy in children. The high quality of the selected source CPG from SIGN was based on quality assessment of CPGs undertaken previously using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II Instrument. The GRG followed the Checklist for the Reporting of Updated Guidelines (CheckUp), which is the CPG tool recommended by the Enhancing the Quality and Transparency of health Research Network for reporting of updated CPGs in addition to the RIGHT-Ad@pt Checklist for Adapted CPGs. The finalized updated CPG draft was sent to the external reviewer group topic experts.

RESULTS

The group updated 10 main categories of recommendations from one source CPG (SIGN). The recommendations included (1) epilepsy diagnosis; (2) recognition, identification, and referral; (3) pharmacological treatment of epilepsy and epilepsy syndromes; (4) nonpharmacological treatment of epilepsy and epilepsy syndromes; (5) managing pharmacoresistant epilepsy; (6) management of epilepsy in special groups; (7) medications; (8) children and caregiver education and support; (9) comorbidities and mortality; and (10) transitional care from pediatric to adult care services.

CONCLUSIONS

The finalized CPG provides evidence-based guidance to health care providers in AUCH for the diagnosis and management of epilepsy in children. The study also established the significance of a collaborative clinical and methodological expert group for the update of CPGs, as well as the usability of the "CheckUp" and "RIGHT-Ad@pt" CPG Tools.

Risk Factors and Prognostic Follow-Up of Vasovagal Syncope Children With Seizure-Like Activities During Head-Up Tilt Test Induced-Syncope

Objectives

To analyze the risk factors associated with seizure-like activities during head up tilt test (HUTT)-induced syncope in children with vasovagal syncope (VVS) and assess the prognosis of these patients.

Methods

This is a retrospective study. VVS children with or without seizure-like activities during HUTT-induced syncope were included in convulsive or non-convulsive group. The clinical characteristics, hemodynamic parameters during HUTT-induced syncope and follow-up data were reviewed from the HUTT case report form and analyzed.

Results

68 cases (25 males, mean age 11.86 ± 3.35 years) were enrolled in convulsive group and 65 cases in non-convulsive group (24 males, mean age 11.64 ± 2.11 years). There were statistical differences in history duration, response type, and asystole between the two groups (all P < 0.05). Fully adjusted logistic regression showed that the risk of seizure-like activities was increased by 37.18 folds for patients with asystole compared with those without asystole (P = 0.005), by 308.25 and 6.08 folds for patients with cardioinhibitory type or mixed type compared with vasoinhibitory type (P < 0.01). No significant difference was exhibited in negative HUTT conversion rate and the proportion of re-syncope patients between the two groups at follow-up (both P > 0.05). None of these convulsive patients underwent pacemaker implantation during follow-up.

Conclusions

Asystole and response type were independent risk factors associated with seizure-like activities. Patients with asystole and mixed or cardioinhibitory responses to HUTT should be closely concerned. However, VVS children with seizure-like activities did not have a poor prognosis at follow-up.

The language of seizure identification: A qualitative investigation

OBJECTIVE

Clinical history taking is often the most important factor in seizure recognition and the diagnosis of epilepsy. Apart from subspecialist evaluation, patients frequently present for initial evaluation of seizures in emergency departments, urgent care clinics, and primary care clinics. We utilized qualitative methods to assess the current approaches and language used by both subspecialist and non-specialist physicians when interviewing adult patients with suspected seizures to create a clinical tool to aid in seizure diagnosis.

METHODS

We carried out semi- structured interviews with 10 physicians spanning a range of specialties, practice locations, and clinical experience. This included epilepsy specialists and non-specialists in fields where evaluation of new-onset seizures is common: emergency medicine, internal medicine, and family medicine. Thematic analysis was used to develop a "Seizure Identifier" questionnaire, which was subsequently reviewed by five independent experts for content and face validity.

RESULTS

Our analysis revealed that across specialties and practice settings, physicians have a structured approach in evaluating patients who present with suspected seizures. Five key characteristics important for identifying seizures emerged across interviews: sudden-onset unprovoked symptoms, short-lasting symptoms, strange or difficult-to-describe symptoms, highly stereotyped symptoms, and postictal symptoms. After independent review, these were translated into an eight-question "Seizure Identifier" tool.

SIGNIFICANCE

This study highlights important concepts for clinical practice regarding seizure identification. Using themes from our analysis, we were able to create a tool that may aid non-specialists in the approach to history taking for adult patients who present with suspected seizures and may help improve time to subspecialist evaluation. Importantly, this tool can be tested in future research for improving seizure recognition and improving timely epilepsy diagnosis.

The role of fundoscopy in pediatric seizures

Fundoscopy can guide clinicians in the decision to perform neuroimaging. Our aim was to evaluate the rate of abnormal neuroimaging following fundoscopy in children presenting with seizures to the pediatric emergency department (PED). This was a retrospective single-center study. Patients with a discharge diagnosis of seizures were evaluated. Outcome measures were the rate of abnormal brain imaging following a finding of papilledema, and the rate of repeat fundoscopies due to an inconclusive initial examination. A total of 646 patients with seizures underwent fundoscopy. Out of 3 patients who were diagnosed initially with papilledema, only one patient had an abnormal brain CT. He was diagnosed with papilledema previously, and neuroimaging was previously recommended. A total of 7.6% (49/646) of patients underwent a second fundoscopic evaluation. In view of the limited yield and accuracy of fundoscopy in the PED, its role in the clinical decision making in children with seizures is questionable. What is Known: • Seizures are not described as an isolated presenting symptom of increased ICP. • Fundoscopy in children requires skill, time, cooperation. What is New: • Papilledema was found in only one patient who presented with seizures. • Fundoscopy in the PED has limited yield and accuracy in children with seizures.

Is a separate clinical pathway for first seizures justified? Appraisal of the first seizure pathway at a tertiary neuroscience centre

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the clinical characteristics, final diagnosis, investigation results, management, response to anti-seizure medications (ASMs) and clinical outcomes of individuals assessed in a First Seizure service over a 5-year period.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 772 individuals who were clinically assessed in a dedicated First Seizure service at National Hospital for Neurology & Neurosurgery (NHNN), Queen Square over a 5-year period.

RESULTS

772 individuals were assessed following a suspected or reported first seizure (median age of 54, average age of 39.4, range 16-96). 393 (50.9 %) were ultimately diagnosed with a definite seizure of which 183 (46.5 %) had experienced seizures previously which had not been recognised or diagnosed. 250 (32 %) had vasovagal syncope and 69 (18.2 %) were diagnosed with psychogenic non-epileptic seizures. EEGs in 16.6 % of individuals who had a first unprovoked seizure demonstrated epileptiform discharges, whilst 33.6 % had abnormal MRI findings felt to be clinically relevant.

CONCLUSIONS

Seizure mimics represent a significant proportion of attendees to a 'first seizure' service. Improved recognition and more education of this issue could facilitate earlier management of these other diagnostic entities and ensure that only appropriate cases are referred to the first seizure service. Almost half of 'first seizure' cases had previous seizures, highlighting the importance of obtaining this relevant history and in reviewing ASM-naive individuals in a timely manner with the primary aim of preventing further recurrences.

Telehealth in pediatric epilepsy care: A rapid transition during the COVID-19 pandemic

Telehealth's first literature reference is an article in 1879 in the Lancet about using the telephone to reduce unnecessary office visits (Institute of Medicine & Board on Health Care Services, 2012). However, providers have been slow to adopt telehealth into their clinical practice secondary to barriers such as cost and reimbursement (Kane and Gillis, 2018) [2]. The advent of shelter in place orders combined with the ongoing need defined by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Administrator Seema Verma "for all Americans, and particularly vulnerable populations who are at heightened risk, to be able to access their providers" has resulted in the rapid implementation of telehealth across multiple specialties. The goal of this paper is to provide a practical framework for translating quality care in epilepsy as defined by the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) guidelines into a virtual care environment. We will also discuss the use and limitations of point of care testing in epilepsy management.

Seizure-like activities in patients with head-up tilt test-induced syncope

The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence and the characteristics of seizure-like activities during head-up tilt test (HUT)-induced syncope, in patients with suspected vasovagal syncope (VVS). We also evaluated the differences in hemodynamic parameters between patients with and without seizure-like activities.A total of 71 patients with suspected VVS, who showed syncope during HUT between October 2010 and May 2013, were analyzed. Electrocardiogram and hemodynamic parameters were continuously monitored during HUT. We also performed video recording of patients during HUT to identify eyeball deviation or seizure-like limb movements.In all, 47 patients (66.2%) showed seizure-like activities at the time of syncope during HUT, 14 patients presented eyeball deviation, without abnormal limb movements, and 33 patients showed abnormal limb movements, such as myoclonic or tonic-clonic activities, as well as eyeball deviation. Upon comparison of the 2 groups with or without seizure-like activities, patients showing seizure-like activities presented a significantly lower heart rate at the time of syncope in HUT (38.51 ± 16.81 vs 49.67 ± 20.12, P < .05). Also, upon comparison within patients showing seizure-like activities, the patients who showed abnormal limb movements with eyeball deviation demonstrated a significantly lower systolic blood pressure and cardiac output at the time of syncope (34.30 ± 12.24 vs 49.00 ± 14.14, P < .05; 0.58 ± 0.40 vs 1.32 ± 0.97, P < .05).Seizure-like activities were observed in high percentage in about 66% of patients during HUT-induced syncope. The occurrence of seizure-like activities was associated with more severe transient hemodynamic changes, such as lower heart rate, systolic blood pressure, and cardiac output at the time of the HUT-induced syncope.

Accuracy of seizure semiology obtained from first-time seizure witnesses

Background

Little is known of how accurately a first-time seizure witness can provide reliable details of a semiology. Our goal was to determine how accurately first-time seizure witnesses could identify key elements of an epileptic event that would aid the clinician in diagnosing a seizure.

Methods

A total of 172 participants over 17 years of age, with a mean (sd) of 33.12 (13.2) years and 49.4% female, composed of two groups of community dwelling volunteers, were shown two different seizure videos; one with a focal seizure that generalized (GSV), and the other with a partial seizure that did not generalize (PSV). Participants were first asked about what they thought was the event that had occurred. They then went through a history-taking scenario by an assessor using a battery of pre-determined questions about involvement of major regions: the head, eyes, mouth, upper limbs, lower limbs, or change in consciousness. Further details were then sought about direction of movement in the eyes, upper and lower limbs, the side of limb movements and the type of movements in the upper and lower limbs. Analysis was with descriptive statistics and logistic regression.

Results

One hundred twenty-two (71.4%) identified the events as seizure or epilepsy. The accuracy of identifying major areas of involvement ranged from 60 to 89.5%. Horizontal head movements were significantly more recognized in the PSV, while involvement of the eyes, lateralization of arm movement, type of left arm movement, leg involvement, and lateralization of leg movement were significantly more recognized in the GSV. Those shown the GSV were more likely to recognize the event as "seizure" or "epilepsy" than those shown the PSV; 78 (84.8%) vs 44 (55.7%), (OR 0.22, p < 0.0001). Younger age was also associated with correct recognition (OR 0.96, P 0.049). False positive responses ranged from 2.5 to 32.5%.

Conclusion

First-time witnesses can identify important elements more than by chance alone, and are more likely to associate generalized semiologies with seizures or epilepsy than partial semiologies. However, clinicians still need to navigate the witness’s account carefully for additional information since routine questioning could result in a misleading false positive answer.

The first seizure as an indicator of epilepsy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Optimal treatment of a possible first seizure depends on the determination if the paroxysmal event was an epileptic seizure and was on an accurate assessment of the recurrence risk. This review summarizes evidence from the last 5 years addressing the following questions: Is it an epileptic seizure? Is it a first seizure? When does a first seizure indicate epilepsy?

RECENT FINDINGS

The acts of taking and interpreting the history from patients and witnesses continue to be the most important tools in the diagnosis of first seizures. Assessment tools based on factual questions and the observation of patients' conversational behaviour can contribute to the differentiation of patients with epileptic seizures from those who have experienced other types of transient loss of consciousness (TLOC). At present, only about 40% of patients are seen after their very first seizure. Tests have a limited role in the initial diagnosis of a seizure but help to determine the recurrence risk based on the cause. A remote symptomatic cause and detection of epileptiform discharges are associated with a recurrence risk of at least 60% and allow a diagnosis of epilepsy after a first seizure. The risk of recurrence after an acute symptomatic first seizure is well below 60%.

SUMMARY

Expert history-taking continues to be the most important tool in the diagnosis of a first seizure. Cause is the most important determinant of the recurrence risk. Unfortunately, there is currently no formula enabling a precise calculation of an individualized recurrence risk.