Status epilepticus in the elderly: Comparison with younger adults in a comprehensive community hospital

EEG and semiology in the elderly: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

The prevalence and incidence of epileptic seizures and epilepsy increases among the elderly. Epileptic seizures in older people remain often unreported and undiagnosed, contributing to incorrect or delayed treatment. The goal of our review paper is to increase awareness of seizures in the elderly, to improve the diagnostic process in this growing population.

METHODS

We present a systematic review of the literature on EEG findings and seizure semiology among the elderly according to the PRISMA statement. One hundred and two original studies were included and findings were divided in four groups: EEG among elderly without seizures, EEG among elderly with seizures or epilepsy, semiology, and status epilepticus.

CONCLUSIONS

EEG abnormalities are found in approximately half of the geriatric population referred to routine EEG. Slowing (both focal and diffuse) is the most common finding among seniors with and without seizures. Interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) are likewise seen among healthy seniors, which reduces their specificity as biomarker for epilepsy. Focal onset seizures prevail among the aged. Generalized seizures are uncommon, starting usually earlier in life but exacerbating in later years. Motor phenomena are less frequently seen than among younger individuals. Seizures are mainly characterized by impairment of awareness, disturbed cognition and confusion, both ictally and postictally. Unresponsiveness may occur during non-epileptic events too, which further challenges seizure recognition. Epilepsy and dementia are bi-directionally related: dementia carries an increased risk of developing epilepsy and vice versa. Up to 45 % of the aged with new onset seizures present with status epilepticus (SE). SE among the elderly is more often focal motor; non-convulsive status epilepticus (NSCE) constitutes 10-25 %.

Status Epilepticus in Older Adults: Diagnostic and Treatment Considerations

Status epilepticus (SE) is one of the leading life-threatening neurological emergencies in the elderly population, with significant morbidity and mortality. SE presents unique diagnostic and therapeutic challenges in the older population given overlap with other causes of encephalopathy, complicating diagnosis, and the common occurrence of multiple comorbid diseases complicates treatment. First-line therapy involves the use of rescue benzodiazepine in the form of intravenous lorazepam or diazepam, intramuscular or intranasal midazolam and rectal diazepam. Second-line therapies include parenteral levetiracetam, fosphenytoin, valproate and lacosamide, and underlying comorbidities guide the choice of appropriate medication, while third-line therapies may be influenced by the patient's code status as well as the cause and type of SE. The standard of care for convulsive SE is treatment with an intravenous anesthetic, including midazolam, propofol, ketamine and pentobarbital. There is currently limited evidence guiding appropriate therapy in patients failing third-line therapies. Adjunctive strategies may include immunomodulatory treatments, non-pharmacological strategies such as ketogenic diet, neuromodulation therapies and surgery in select cases. Surrogate decision makers should be updated early and often in refractory episodes of SE and informed of the high morbidity and mortality associated with the disease as well as the high probability of subsequent epilepsy among survivors.

Predictive factors of Status Epilepticus and its recurrence in patients with adult-onset seizures: A multicenter, long follow-up cohort study

PURPOSE

Status epilepticus (SE) is associated with high morbidity and mortality. This multicenter retrospective cohort study aims to identify the factors associated with the occurrence of SE and the predictors of its recurrence in patients with adult-onset seizures.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data of 1115 patients with seizure onset>18 years, observed from 1983 to 2020 in 7 Italian Centers (median follow-up 2.1 years). Data were collected from the databases of the Centers. Patients with SE were consecutively recruited, and patients without SE history were randomly selected in a 2:1 ratio. To assess determinants of SE, different clinical-demographic variables were evaluated and included in univariate and multivariate logistic regression model.

RESULTS

Three hundred forty-seven patients had a SE history, whereas the remaining 768 patients had either isolated seizures or epilepsy without SE history. The occurrence of SE was independently associated with increasing age at onset of disease (OR 1.02, 95% CI 1.01--1.03, p<0.001), female sex (OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.05--1.83, p=0.02) and known etiology (OR 3.58, 95% CI 2.61--4.93, p<0.001). SE recurred in 21% of patients with adult-onset SE and recurrence was associated with increasing number of anti-seizure medications taken at last follow-up (OR 1.88, 95% CI 1.31--2.71, p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with adult-onset seizures, SE occurrence is associated with known etiologies, advanced age and female sex. Patients with recurrent SE are likely to have a refractory epilepsy, deserving careful treatment to prevent potentially fatal events.

Prediction of in-hospital mortality in status epilepticus: Evaluation of four scoring tools in younger and older adult patients

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to evaluate the predictive capacity of four scoring tools: the Status Epilepticus Severity Score (STESS), the Encephalitis-NCSE-Diazepam resistance-Image abnormalities-Tracheal intubation (END-IT) score, and two variable combinations of the Epidemiology-based Mortality Score in Status Epilepticus (EMSE) in younger and older adult patients with status epilepticus (SE).

METHODS

We present a retrospective hospital-based analysis with a focus on adult patients with SE at three tertiary care hospitals in the Zhejiang province of China. Data were collected from January 2013 to December 2018. The patients were divided into two groups: younger adult patients (18-64 years old) and older adult patients (≥65 years old). Clinical outcomes (dead or alive) were assessed at hospital discharge. The four scoring tools were used to predict in-hospital mortality in both younger and older adult patients.

RESULTS

The mortality rate in older adult patients (25.4%) was higher than in younger adult patients (12.9%). Compared with the elderly, the younger adult patients had a higher proportion of encephalitis, while acute cerebrovascular disease and Charlson Complications Index (CCI) were lower. For the younger adult patients, END-IT had the largest area under the curve (AUC) of 0.843 (95% CI, 0.772-0.899), which was higher than the EMSE-EAL value of 0.687 (95% CI, 0.603-0.763, p < 0.05) and EMSE-EAC of 0.646 (95% CI, 0.561-0.725, p < 0.05). For the older adult patients, EMSE-EAL had the largest AUC of 0.843 (95% CI, 0.738-0.919), which was significantly higher than STESS with an AUC of 0.676 (95% CI, 0.554-0.782, p < 0.05). Moreover, the AUC of EMSE-EAL in the elderly was larger than in younger adult patients. The cutoffs in younger adult patients were STESS ≥ 4 (sensitivity 0.444, specificity 0.951), END-IT ≥ 3 (sensitivity 0.833, specificity 0.672), EMSE-EAL ≥ 31 (sensitivity 0.778, specificity 0.566), and EMSE-EAC ≥ 33 (sensitivity 0.833, specificity 0.492). However, the cutoffs in older adult patients were STESS ≥ 5 (sensitivity 0.500, specificity 0.925), END-IT ≥ 2 (sensitivity 0.944, specificity 0.547), EMSE-EAL ≥ 30 (sensitivity 0.944, specificity 0.623), and EMSE-EAC ≥ 31 (sensitivity 0.944, specificity 0.415).

CONCLUSION

Our results indicated that the STESS, END-IT, EMSE-EAC, and EMSE-EAL scores have excellent capacity to predict in-hospital mortality in both younger and older adult patients with SE. Our study supports the use of END-IT in patients under 65 years of age and suggests that EMSE-EAL is the most suitable scoring tool for patients over 65.

Status Epilepticus among Older Adults in the United States

Objective: This study aimed to identify temporal time trends and risk factors associated with mortality for hospitalized older adults with status epilepticus (SE). Design: A retrospective study was performed. Setting: Hospitalized patients were identified utilizing an administrative database—The Nationwide Inpatient Sample database from 1998 through September 2015. Patients: Patients were older adults 65 years and older with SE. Interventions: No interventions were undertaken. Measurements and Main Results: Demographic, temporal trends, clinical characteristics, and outcome data were abstracted. The results indicated that hospitalized elderly Americans with SE increased over the 11-year study period. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate risk factors associated with mortality in the study cohort. From the weighted sample, 130,109 subjects were included. Overall mortality was 19%. For age subgroups, the mortality was highest for the >85 years age group (24.1%) compared to the 65–75 years (19%) and 75–85 years (23%) age groups. Among investigated etiologies, the three most common causes of SE were acute ischemic stroke (11.2% of total) followed by non-traumatic brain hemorrhage (5.4%) and malignant brain lesions (4.9%). The highest mortality by etiology was noted for acute traumatic brain injury (TBI) (31.5%), non-traumatic brain hemorrhage (31%), and acute ischemic stroke (AIS) (30.1%). Multivariate analysis indicated that non-survivors when compared to survivors were more like to have the following characteristics: older age group, acute TBI, brain neoplasms, non-traumatic brain hemorrhage, AIS and central nervous system (CNS) infections, and utilization of mechanical ventilation. Associated conditions significantly increasing risk of mortality were sodium imbalance, cardiac arrest, anoxic brain injury, pneumonia, and sepsis. Comorbidities associated with increased risk of mortality included valvular heart disease, renal failure, liver disease, and neoplasms. Conclusions: The number of hospitalized elderly Americans with SE increased over the 11-year study period. Overall mortality was 19%, with even higher mortality among various patient subsets. Several demographic and co-morbid factors are associated with increased mortality in this age group.

Frequency and Stratification of Epileptogenic Lesions in Elderly With New Onset Seizures

Objective: To evaluate prospectively the frequency of epileptogenic lesions in a consecutive cohort of elderly patients presenting with new onset unprovoked seizures, and who underwent a complete evaluation including dedicated epilepsy protocol MRI.

Methods and materials: We included all consecutive patients 60 years or older who participated in a prospective study on new onset epilepsy. The work-up included the acquisition of a dedicated epilepsy protocol MRI and a 3 h video/EEG recording. We evaluated the frequency and types of epileptogenic lesions in the whole cohort and stratified those variables by age, gender, types and number of seizures at presentation. We also correlated the EEG findings with the clinical characteristics and neuroimaging results.

Results: Of the 101 patients enrolled in the study and who underwent an epilepsy protocol MRI, an epileptogenic lesion was identified in 67% of cases. The most common etiologies were vascular events, followed by tumoral causes and traumatic brain injuries. Epileptogenic lesions were more likely to be identified in patients who presented with only focal aware and impaired awareness seizures. In addition, patients with tumoral epilepsy were significantly more likely to only experience those seizure types compared to patients with other pathological substrates. Interictal/ictal discharges were detected in the EEG of 21% of patients. Epileptiform discharges were significantly more frequent in patients with an epileptogenic lesion on brain MRI, especially in those with a brain tumor.

Conclusions: Our results stress the importance of obtaining a dedicated epilepsy protocol MRI in elderly patients with new onset seizures. An epileptogenic lesion will be identified in approximately two thirds of patients with important implications regarding initiation of treatment. In addition, the data underscore the value of distinguishing the types of seizures experienced at presentation as this will apprise the treating physician on the likelihood of identifying an epileptogenic lesion and on the probable etiologies.