Saleh DA, Hassan A. Clinical profile, treatment modalities, and outcomes in patients with infantile spasms: A retrospective study from the United Arab of Emirates (UAE).
Epilepsy Behav 2022;
127:108519. [PMID:
34999500 DOI:
10.1016/j.yebeh.2021.108519]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2021] [Revised: 12/18/2021] [Accepted: 12/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Infantile spasms (IS) are an epileptic encephalopathy where the prognosis is generally poor, with most patients exhibiting psychomotor retardation or intractable epilepsy. However, it is claimed that early and aggressive treatment is related to better response rate and outcome, especially in patients with idiopathic IS.
OBJECTIVE
To investigate different treatment modalities and outcomes in patients with IS attending a pediatric neurology clinic at a specialized neurology center in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
METHODS
Retrospective chart review was done for detailed history, demographic data, etiology, neuro-diagnostic workup, treatment modalities, and the outcomes for all patients diagnosed with IS from September 2014 to September 2019.
RESULTS
Three treatment modalities were identified as 1st line- Prednisolone United Kingdom Infantile Spasms Study (UKISS) (N = 15, 46.8%), Anti-Seizure Medications (ASMs) (N = 12, 37.5%), and Vigabatrin (N = 5, 15.6%). The complete response rate to Vigabatrin as a 1st line treatment showed the highest statistical significance (X2 = 7.34, p = 0.007). Patients with idiopathic IS showed a comparable response to treatment to those with symptomatic IS. Additional response to 2nd line treatment with Prednisolone UKISS protocol (25%) and Vigabatrin (15%) was noted in patients who showed partial or no response to the 1st line treatment. None of our patients received Adrenocorticotropic Hormone as treatment. All patients with desirable final outcomes were with idiopathic IS and none were symptomatic.
CONCLUSION
More than a third of our patients showed poor treatment response whenever they were not offered treatment according to the current available protocols. This indicates an urgent need for having a unified treatment protocol that takes into consideration the availability of medications, professional expertise as well as diagnostic workup outside major tertiary care centers in our region.
Collapse