Exploring the patient experience of digital ulcers in systemic sclerosis

Patients' unmet needs and treatment preferences concerning digital ulcers in systemic sclerosis

OBJECTIVE

Digital ulcers (DUs) significantly impact on quality of life and function in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). The aim of our survey was to explore patients' perspectives and their unmet needs concerning SSc-DUs.

METHODS

SSc patients were invited through international patient associations and social media to participate in an online survey.

RESULTS

A total of 358 responses were obtained from 34 countries: US (65.6%), UK (11.5%) and Canada (4.5%). Recurrent DUs were found to be common: >10 DUs (46.1%), 5-10 DUs (21.5%), 1-5 DUs (28.5%), 1 DU (3.9%). Fingertip DUs were most frequent (84.9%), followed by those overlying the IP joints (50.8%). The impact of DUs on patients is considerable, from broad-ranging emotional impacts to impact on activities of daily living, and on personal relationships. Around half of the respondents (51.7%) reported that they received wound/ulcer care, most often provided by non-specialist wound care clinics (63.8%). There was significant variation in local (wound) DU care, in particular regarding the use of debridement and pain management. DU-related education was only provided to one-third of patients. One-quarter of the patients (24.6%) were 'very satisfied' or 'satisfied' that the provided DU treatment(s) relieved their DU symptoms. Pain, limited hand function, and ulcer duration/chronicity were the main reasons for patients to consider changing DU treatment.

CONCLUSION

Our data show that there is a large variation in DU treatment between countries. Patient access to specialist wound-care services is limited, and only a small proportion of patients had their DU needs met. Moreover, patient education is often neglected. Evidence-based treatment pathways are urgently needed for DU management.

Proposed Response Parameters for Twelve-Month Drug Trial in Juvenile Systemic Sclerosis: Results of the Hamburg International Consensus Meetings

OBJECTIVE

Juvenile systemic sclerosis (SSc) is an orphan disease, associated with high morbidity and mortality. New treatment strategies are much needed, but clearly defining appropriate outcomes is necessary if successful therapies are to be developed. Our objective here was to propose such outcomes.

METHODS

This proposal is the result of 4 face-to-face consensus meetings with a 27-member multidisciplinary team of pediatric rheumatologists, adult rheumatologists, dermatologists, pediatric cardiologists, pulmonologists, gastroenterologists, a statistician, and patients. Throughout the process, we reviewed the existing adult data in this field, the more limited pediatric literature for juvenile SSc outcomes, and data from 2 juvenile SSc patient cohorts to assist in making informed, data-driven decisions. The use of items for each domain as an outcome measure in an open label 12-month clinical trial of juvenile SSc was voted and agreed upon using a nominal group technique.

RESULTS

After voting, the domains agreed on were global disease activity, skin, Raynaud's phenomenon, digital ulcers, musculoskeletal, cardiac, pulmonary, renal, and gastrointestinal involvement, and quality of life. Fourteen outcome measures had 100% agreement, 1 item had 91% agreement, and 1 item had 86% agreement. The domains of biomarkers and growth/development were moved to the research agenda.

CONCLUSION

We reached consensus on multiple domains and items that should be assessed in an open label, 12-month clinical juvenile SSc trial as well as a research agenda for future development.

Surgical management of digital ulcers in systemic sclerosis: A systematic literature review

BACKGROUND

There is a strong rationale to develop locally-acting surgical treatments for digital ulcers (DUs) in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). Our aim was to examine the safety and efficacy of local surgical management for SSc-DU.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was carried out until to August 2022 using 7 different databases. Original research studies concerning adult patients with SSc-DUs, and local surgical treatments were analysed using the PICO framework. We included randomized controlled trials, prospective/retrospective studies, and case series (minimum of 3 patients) References were independently screened by two reviewers including assessment of the risk of bias using validated tools.

RESULTS

Out of 899, 13eligible articles were included. Autologous fat (adipose tissue AT) grafting was the surgical modality most identified (7 studies, 1 randomized controlled double blinded trial and 6 prospective open-label single arm studies). The healing rate (HR) with autologous fat grafting (4 studies) was 66-100 %. Three studies reported autologous adipose-derived stromal vascular fraction grafting: HR of 32-60 %. Bone marrow derived cell transplantation in a single study showed 100 % healing rate over 4-24 weeks. Surgical sympathectomy was examined in 3 studies, prospective without comparator with a median healing rate of 81 %. Two surgical studies (of direct microsurgical revascularisation and microsurgical arteriolysis) showed 100 % healing of ulcers, with no complications.

CONCLUSION

Several surgical approaches for SSc-DUs have demonstrated some degree of safety and effectiveness for DU healing. However, there are significant methodological issues. Future studies are warranted to rigorously investigate surgical interventions for SSc-DUs.

'It's just not the same… I am just a spectator': A qualitative study on changes in leisure participation experienced by people with scleroderma

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this qualitative study was to provide insight into the changes and barriers to leisure experienced by people with scleroderma.

METHOD

Twenty-five people with scleroderma consented to be interviewed via telephone using a semi-structured interview. The conversations were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Thorne's Interpretive Description informed the analysis process.

RESULTS

Three themes emerged from the analysis: barriers to leisure participation (impact of Raynaud's Phenomenon symptoms, fatigue, changes in body structures and functions, unpredictability of daily symptoms and selection of leisure activities), decreases in leisure participation (less time outdoors, reduction in time spent in active leisure, more time spent in passive leisure) and experiences of losing a valued leisure activity (depressed mood, identity change, fear of loss and sense of isolation).

CONCLUSIONS

The changes in leisure participation found in this study were reported to be due to the rate of disease progression and the severity of disease symptoms, particularly, Raynaud symptoms and fatigue. Health professionals should work with people with SSc to facilitate participation in valued leisure activities.

Domain reporting in Systemic Sclerosis-Related Digital Ulcers: An OMERACT Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

Digital ulcers (DUs) are a major cause of pain and disability in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). The aim of this scoping review was to evaluate the outcome domains used in studies of SSc-associated DUs.

METHODS

Electronic databases (EMBASE, MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library) were searched for articles written (1947 onwards) in English relating to SSc-DUs. A minimum of 15 participants for studies of imaging and 25 participants for questionnaire-based studies was required for inclusion. Information on all primary and secondary domains was extracted.

RESULTS

4869 manuscripts were identified, of which 40 met the eligibility criteria and were included in the synthesis. Most studies were randomized controlled trials (n=13), or prospective (n=12)/retrospective (n=8) observational studies. Interventions included oral or intravenous drugs (n=25), topical/local treatments (n=5), and surgical interventions (n=2). Approximately half the studies assessed either the count/number of DUs (n=23) and/or improvement in DUs (n=20). Functional impact of DUs was examined in 25% (n=10) of studies. Other domains were related to complications of DUs (n=7), pain (n=6), health-related quality of life (n=4), microvascular assessment/pathophysiology (n=4), global assessment of DUs (n=2), and histopathology (n=1).

CONCLUSION

This scoping review identified a broad range of disease-related domains used to study SSc-DUs. There is significant heterogeneity in these domains. These data will inform the ongoing work of the OMERACT Vascular Disease in Systemic Sclerosis Working Group to define a core set of disease broad domains to capture the burden of DUs in SSc.

Multi-Organ System Screening, Care, and Patient Support in Systemic Sclerosis

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a heterogenous systemic autoimmune disease of complex multi-organ manifestations with a disease-specific mortality of >50%. The patient journey is fraught with severe, diverse, and diffuse physical impairment, psychological burden, and diminishing health-related quality of life. SSc remains unfamiliar to many clinicians. Delayed/misdiagnosis, inadequate screening, and attention for common complications with potentially preventable disability/death contribute to patients feeling isolated and unsupported. We present actionable standards including screening, anticipatory guidance, and counseling in patient-centered SSc-care emphasizing psycho-social health as the central goal, whereas robust vigilance and efforts to improve biophysical health and survival are imperatives that support this goal.

Association of pain and clinical factors on disability and quality of life in systemic sclerosis: A cross-sectional study from Turkish League Against Rheumatism Network

Objectives

In this study, we aimed to evaluate the factors associated with disability and quality of life (QoL) in Turkish patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc).

Patients and methods

Between January 2018 and January 2019, a total of 256 SSc patients (20 males, 236 females; mean age: 50.9±12.4 years; range, 19 to 87 years) who were diagnosed with SSc were included in the study. Disability and health-related QoL (HRQoL) were evaluated by the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), scleroderma HAQ (SHAQ), Duruöz Hand Index (DHI), and Short Form-36 (SF-36). Linear regression analysis methods were used to describe factors associated with disability and QoL of the patients.

Results

All disability scores were higher and HRQoL scores were lower in diffuse cutaneous SSc patients compared limited cutaneous SSc, and differentiations were significant (p=0.001 and p=0.007). In multiple regression, pain (VAS) was the strongest predictor for high disability and low QoL scores (p<0.001) as HAQ (β=0.397, 0.386, 0.452), SHAQ (β=0.397, 0.448, 0.372), DHI (β=0.446, 0.536, 0.389), PCS (β=-0.417,-0.499, -0.408) and MCS (β=-0.478, -0.441, -0.370) in combined, lcSSc and dcSSc patients respectively. The factors associated with high disability and low QoL scores were forced vital capacity for HAQ (β=-0.172, p=0.002) and SF-36 PCS (β=0.187, p=0.001); disease duration for HAQ (β=0.208, p<0.001), DHI (β=0.147, p=0.006), and SF-36 PCS (β=-0.134, p=0.014); 6-minute walk test for HAQ (β=-0.161, p=0.005) and SF-36 PCS (β=0.153, p=0.009); and modified Rodnan skin score for SHAQ (β=0.250, p<0.001) and DHI (β=0.233, p<0.001) in SSc patients. Diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide for HAQ (β=-0.189, p=0.010) and SHAQ (β=-0.247, p=0.002); erythrocyte sedimentation rate for DHI (β=0.322, p<0.001); age for SF-36 PCS (β=-0.221, p=0.003) and body mass index for SF-36 PCS (β=-0.200, p=0.008) and MCS (β=-0.175, p=0.034) were the other variables associated with high disability or low QoL scores in SSc subsets.

Conclusion

Clinicians should consider the management of the pain and its sources as a key to improve better functional state and quality of daily life in SSc.

Diagnosis and management of systemic sclerosis-related calcinosis

INTRODUCTION

Calcinosis is common in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) and refers to the sub-epidermal deposition of calcium salts in the skin. SSc-related calcinosis is associated with significant morbidity, including through cutaneous ulceration and predisposition to become infected.

AREAS COVERED

After briefly addressing aetiopathogenesis, we describe the clinical burden of SSc-associated calcinosis and provide a structured and practical clinical approach to diagnosis and assessment, including discussion of the role of different imaging modalities. The multi-faceted treatment of SSc-associated calcinosis is presented under three broad headings of 'general measures,' and 'medical treatment' and 'surgical treatment.' We adopted a narrative approach to identify relevant manuscripts to inform our review.

EXPERT OPINION

SSc-related calcinosis is an area of major unmet clinical need and for too long has been a neglected area of research. Safe and effective treatments are badly needed to improve patient quality of life and outcomes. To facilitate future clinical trials, we require increased understanding of pathogenesis (to inform selection of potential targeted therapies) and reliable outcome measures, including those which will measure the impact and severity of calcinosis from the patient perspective. International collaborative research is ongoing to develop outcome measures and treatments for this potentially devastating complication of SSc.

Considerations for Hand Surgery in Patients With Scleroderma

Systemic sclerosis (scleroderma, SSc) is an autoimmune disease that causes significant dysfunction to multiple organ systems, including the musculoskeletal system. It poses significant challenges to the hand surgeon, including calcinosis, ischemic changes, Raynaud phenomenon, tendinopathies, synovitis, and joint contractures. Patients with SSc also suffer from multiorgan dysfunction, which makes them high-risk surgical patients. The hand surgeon must understand the pathophysiology, treatment strategies, and special operative considerations required in this population to avoid complications and help maintain or improve hand function.

The association between hand disease severity and fatigue in individuals with systemic sclerosis: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Hand disease severity in people with systemic sclerosis (SSc) arises from connective tissue and vascular changes causing functional limitations, pain, and disability. Fatigue is not well-understood in SSc and reported to be highly distressing. It is not known how fatigue relates to these disease changes. The objective of this study was to identify which elements of hand disease severity contribute to fatigue in individuals with SSc.

METHODS

Five online databases and Google Scholar were searched to identify publications through 2021 presenting data related to hand disease severity and fatigue.

RESULTS

Five articles met the inclusion criteria. The samples were 72-91% female, and 35-100% with diffuse SSc. Measures of disease severity included skin thickening (modified Rodnan score), joint involvement (mobility, tenderness, swelling), and digital ulcers. Fatigue was measured by various self-report. Joint involvement was strongly associated with fatigue. Skin thickening weakly associated with fatigue. The perceived interference of digital ulcers in daily activities was related to fatigue.

CONCLUSIONS

Few studies have examined how fatigue relates to hand disease severity. While joint involvement was associated with fatigue over time and in cross-sectional studies, digital ulcers may be associated with fatigue indirectly. A conceptual model is proposed with implications for future research.Implications for RehabilitationStructural disease changes that manifest in the hands, is often associated with pain, disability, and fatigue in SSc.Fatigue is one of the most distressing symptoms of SSc and reported by 61-90% of individuals with SSc, but is not well characterized.Of measures of hand disease severity, joint involvement (contractures, swollen and tender joints) is most associated with fatigue in individuals with SSc and more so if pain is involved.A better understanding of the physiological features of disease and fatigue could provide insight into development of fatigue management interventions and help rheumatology providers work with patients to manage their fatigue.Rehabilitation assessments and interventions for hand disability need to be considered as important elements in improving all elements of quality of life for individuals with systemic sclerosis.

The relationship of nailfold capillaroscopy patterns with clinical features, functional status, pain and fatigue in patients with systemic sclerosis

Aim: To identify the frequency of scleroderma-type capillaroscopic patterns and evaluate the association of capillaroscopic patterns with clinical parameters, functional status, fatigue, and pain in systemic sclerosis (SSc). Material and Method: This cross-sectional study included SSc patients consecutively between January 2017 and January 2019. Cutaneous involvement was evaluated with the modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS). The presence of digital ulcers, Raynaud phenomenon, interstitial lung disease, pulmonary hypertension, cardiac, gastrointestinal system (GIS), renal, joint and muscle involvement were recorded. The severity of the Raynaud phenomenon, fatigue, pain, and patient global assessment (PGA) was assessed on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) and the Duruoz Hand Index (DHI) were used to assess physical disability and hand function, respectively. Nailfold videocapillaroscopic examinations of the patients were performed, and they were classified into four groups, including normal/non-specific, early, active, and late scleroderma patterns. Results: The mean age of 32 patients with SSc (31 female, one male) was 48.93±12.77. Anormal capillaroscopic examination findings were detected in 93.7% of the patients, and the most common capillaroscopic pattern was the active pattern. The comparison of scleroderma pattern groups revealed no difference in age (p=0.224), but disease duration was shorter in the early pattern group (p=0.005). The duration and severity of the Raynaud phenomenon, and mean mRSS were lower in the early pattern group (p=0.004, p=0.009, and p=0.001, respectively). The digital ulcer (p=0.011) and diffuse cutaneous SSc (p=0.016) were more common in the late pattern group. The percentage of pulmonary hypertension (p=0.011), GIS involvement (p

Development and validation of a Patient-Reported Outcome in systemic sclerosis: the Hand scleroDerma lived Experience Scale (HAnDE Scale)

OBJECTIVES

to develop and validate a Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) scale-the HAnDE (Hand-ScleroDerma Disease lived Experience) scale-assessing the lived experience of hand involvement in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc).

METHODS

explanatory sequential mixed-method study with two phases: 1) PRO development through an Inductive Process to analyze the Structure of lived Experience approach, involving 21 SSc patients, 2) PRO validation by assessing the psychometric properties of the scale among 105 SSc patients.

RESULTS

1) Phase-1 enabled to generate the 18-item provisional scale. 2) The mean total score of the scale was 29,16 (SD 16,15). The item reduction process retained 16 items with 5 levels of answers (range 0-64). Internal consistency of the 16-item version was excellent (Cronbach-alpha coefficient=0,946). Construct validity was very good, the Principal Component Analysis being in favour of a unidimensional instrument, with one factor explaining 56% of the variance, and concurrent validity being confirmed: Cochin Hand Function Scale r=0,66; Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability index r=0.58; Hospital Anxiety Depression, anxiety r=0,51, depression r=0,4; Mouth Handicap in Systemic Sclerosis r=0,61; SF-36, physical component r=-0,48, mental component r=-0,46; and Kapandji score r=-0,46. The correlations were statistically significant (p<0,05).

CONCLUSION

We propose, for future trials and clinical practice in SSc, a new PRO the HAnDE scale, that assesses all the dimensions -functional, aesthetic, relational, existential, and emotional- of the lived experience of hand involvement.

Factors influencing patient decision-making concerning treatment escalation in Raynaud's phenomenon secondary to systemic sclerosis

OBJECTIVE

To explore patient priorities and ranking of factors influencing patient decision-making concerning treatment escalation in the management of Raynaud's phenomenon (RP) secondary to systemic sclerosis (SSc).

METHODS

SSc patients were invited to participate in an online survey disseminated through patient-led organisations and social media platforms.

RESULTS

Responses from 747 people with self-reported SSc-RP were evaluable with broad international representation. The mean age (54.7years, SD 12.1), clinical phenotype and disease subsets distribution (limited [402/747, 53.8%], diffuse [260/747, 34.8%] and overlap disease, 85/747 [11.4%]) were consistent with expected demographics. Around half (56.3%) of patients reported their SSc-RP symptoms were adequately controlled. The 5 highest-ranked (out of 13) factors that would prompt treatment escalation for SSc-RP were; 1) inability to use the fingers properly 2) emergence of new digital ulcer (DU) on one or more fingers, 3) worsening pain or discomfort of Raynaud's, 4) more severe attacks, and 5) if it may help with internal problems. Despite symptoms not being adequately controlled, 47.1% were concerned about potential treatment side effects and were more likely to accept 'mild' (~20-40%) vs. 'severe' (2%) side effects. Patients were open to different management strategies for uncontrolled Raynaud's that included adding new treatment in combination to existing (52.8%), drug substitution (40.9%), increasing the current dose (28.8%), or focussing on non-pharmacological approaches (29.7%).

CONCLUSION

We have identified the relative importance of different factors influencing patient-preferences for treatment decision-making for SSc-RP. Side-effects profiles influence acceptability of drug treatments and many patients report a preference for non-pharmacological management of SSc-RP.

Developing a core set of outcome measure domains to study Raynaud's phenomenon and digital ulcers in systemic sclerosis: Report from OMERACT 2020

Raynaud's phenomenon (RP) and digital ulcers (DUs) are important disease manifestations of systemic sclerosis (SSc) that can lead to significant pain and disability. It is essential when studying these disease features to utilize outcome measures that fully evaluate the complexities of RP and DUs . The Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) Vascular Disease in SSc Working Group is applying the OMERACT filter 2.1 to identify a core set of disease domains that encompass the full burden of SSc-related RP and DUs. Progress to date and future research plans were presented during a Special Interest Group held in December 2020.

What narrative devices do people with systemic sclerosis use to describe the experience of pain from digital ulcers: a multicentre focus group study at UK scleroderma centres

OBJECTIVES

Digital ulcers (DUs) are a common complication in systemic sclerosis (SSc). No existing studies have specifically reported on the qualitative patient experience of DU pain, and our current patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) does not capture the multifaceted painful experience of SSc-DU. Our aim was to examine the patient experience of SSc-DU pain.

DESIGN

Focus groups with people diagnosed with SSc who had experienced DUs were conducted using a topic guide developed by people with SSc, experts in SSc and experienced qualitative researchers. Focus groups were continued until data saturation had been reached. The focus groups were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, anonymised and analysed using inductive thematic analysis. Our current study is an integration of the data from these focus groups to specifically examine the patient experience of DU pain.

SETTING

Three specialist scleroderma units across the UK (Bath, Manchester and London).

PARTICIPANTS

Four focus groups were undertaken; 29 adults (20 women, 9 men) with SSc and a spectrum of historical DUs participated. We included participants with a diverse demographic (including ethnic) background and disease-related characteristics.

RESULTS

Five narrative devices were identified, which encompass how people describe the pain from SSc-DUs: 'Words to express DU-associated pain', 'Descriptions of physical and psychological reactions to pain', 'Comparisons with other painful events', 'Descriptions of factors that exacerbate pain' and 'Descriptions of strategies for coping with the pain'.

CONCLUSION

The experience of SSc-DU pain leads to the use of graphic language and rich description by participants in the focus group setting. Existing SSc-DU outcomes do not adequately capture the patient experiences of SSc-DU pain. Our findings further highlight the multifaceted nature of SSc-DUs and will hopefully support the development of a novel PROM to assess the severity and impact of SSc-DUs.

Patient-reported outcome instruments in clinical trials of systemic sclerosis

Patient-reported outcome instruments provide valuable insight into disease-related morbidity known only to the patient and complement more objective outcome tools in the clinical trial setting. They are of particular importance in systemic sclerosis owing to the challenges around defining disease activity, the episodic nature of many disease-specific manifestations and the paucity of validated objective surrogate outcome measures for use in clinical trials. Early clinical trials of systemic sclerosis often incorporated legacy patient-reported outcome instruments, but the last 20 years has witnessed the emergence of several scleroderma-specific instruments that are now being routinely used alongside other outcomes in systemic sclerosis clinical trials. More recently, the value of patient-reported outcomes has been highlighted by their prominence in the American College of Rheumatology Combined Response Index for Systemic Sclerosis that has been utilized as the primary endpoint of recent clinical trials of early diffuse systemic sclerosis. This review considers the role and performance of the various patient-reported outcome instruments utilized in systemic sclerosis clinical trials, the current positioning of patient-reported outcome instruments within clinical trial endpoint models across the range of systemic sclerosis disease manifestations and, where applicable, we shall highlight areas for future research.

Digital ulcers: should debridement be a standard of care in systemic sclerosis?

Digital ulcers are a serious, recurrent complication in patients with systemic sclerosis. They are often slow to heal and exquisitely painful. Local wound care, such as debridement of the wound bed, is an essential component in the management of digital ulcers in systemic sclerosis. However, digital ulcer debridement is not a standard of care, and there is substantial international variation in the use of this approach. In this Viewpoint, we discuss the assessment of the wound bed and different methods of debridement using the model of tissue management, infection and inflammation, moisture control, and wound edge or epidermal advancement, known as TIME. We highlight the challenges in standard practice and the need for research into local wound care for this type of ulceration, before suggesting a potential roadmap to develop a standardised approach to support ulcer debridement in systemic sclerosis. Debridement might be the missing component in optimising the management of digital ulcers and we propose that the approach should be rigorously investigated as a standard of care in this common complication of systemic sclerosis.

Differing commissioning arrangements may contribute to geographic variation in clinical management of digital ulcers in systemic sclerosis

Phosphodiesterase inhibitors (such as sildenafil) and endothelin receptor antagonist, bosentan, are effective for digital ulcer disease in systemic sclerosis (SSc-DU) and are endorsed in international treatment recommendations. Commissioning of high-cost drugs, such as bosentan, however, differs across devolved nations of the UK. We report a multicentre service evaluation project to examine 'real world' management of SSc-DU before and following the 2015 UK Scleroderma Study Group (UKSSG) guidance, across south-west (SW) England and Wales. Results showed that iloprost and sildenafil use for SSc-DU was higher in patients in Wales prior to 2015. Between 2015-2017, sildenafil use for SSc-DU increased in SW England while remaining stable in Wales. Bosentan use for SSc-DU after 2015 in SW England increased, while remaining stable and proportionately lower in Wales. These findings demonstrate that differing commissioning guidance across devolved nations of the UK seems to contribute to geographic variation in patient care.

Raynaud phenomenon and digital ulcers in systemic sclerosis

Raynaud phenomenon is a symptom complex caused by impaired digital perfusion and can occur as a primary phenomenon or secondary to a wide range of underlying causes. Raynaud phenomenon occurs in virtually all patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) and is often the earliest clinical manifestation to occur. Careful assessment is required in patients with Raynaud phenomenon to avoid missing secondary causes such as SSc. Digital ulcers are a painful and disabling visible manifestation of digital vascular injury in patients with SSc. Progress has been made in the classification and assessment of digital ulcers and in understanding ulcer pathogenesis, and there are a wide range of treatments available to both prevent and heal digital ulcers, some of which are also used in Raynaud phenomenon management. In this Review, the assessment of patients with Raynaud phenomenon is discussed, including 'red flags' that are suggestive of SSc. The pathogenesis, classification and assessment of SSc-associated digital ulcers are also covered, alongside an overview of management approaches for SSc-associated Raynaud phenomenon and digital ulcers. Finally, unmet needs are discussed and the concept of a unified vascular phenotype in which therapies that affect the vasculature to support disease modification strategies is introduced.

Digital ulcer debridement in systemic sclerosis: a systematic literature review

Optimal wound care is an essential component in the management of systemic sclerosis (SSc) digital ulcers (DUs). DU debridement has been suggested to reduce ulcer-related pain and improve tissue healing. However, only a minority of rheumatologists perform DU debridement, and there is no standard of care/protocol. Our objectives were to (i) evaluate the current evidence for the use of debridement in DU management and (ii) assess whether there are any specific protocols. A systematic literature review was performed searching the PubMed database (between 01/01/1950-01/03/2019) in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Two independent reviewers screened and extracted the abstracts/full manuscripts. Articles in English, which focussed on SSc-DU debridement/curettage, were included. Exclusion criteria included studies of juvenile/paediatric patients and basic/non-clinical research. Our search identified 1497 studies of which 4 studies were included in our final analysis. Three studies used scalpel debridement, and one study used this in combination with autolytic debridement. No studies specifically reported the effect on DU healing from debridement. Autolytic debridement with hyaluronate-based products was associated with significant ulcer pain and inflammation. Local anaesthetic significantly reduces pain both during and after debridement. Combined local and oral analgesia is often required for more severe or infected DUs. DU (scalpel and autolytic) debridement is being used by some clinicians in rheumatology; however, there are no standardised protocols. To improve wound care for SSc-DUs, future research should focus on developing a standardised protocol for SSc-DU debridement, with a view to facilitate randomised controlled trials to demonstrate safety and treatment efficacy.Key Points• Optimal wound care is an essential component in the management of systemic sclerosis-digital ulcers.• 'Sharp' debridement uses a scalpel, whereas 'autolytic' debridement uses dressings to optimize endogenous tissue lysis.• There is significant variation in the use of digital ulcer debridement in systemic sclerosis.• A standardized protocol and randomized controlled trials are needed to demonstrate debridement the safety and efficacy of digital ulcer debridement in systemic sclerosis.

A multicenter randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study to assess the efficacy and safety of riociguat in systemic sclerosis-associated digital ulcers

Background

To determine the effect of riociguat, an oral, selective soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator, on the net digital ulcer (DU) burden in systemic sclerosis (SSc).

Methods

Participants with SSc-related active or painful indeterminate DUs were recruited in a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, proof-of-concept trial. Eligible participants were required to have at least one visible, active ischemic DU or painful indeterminate DU at screening, located at or distal to the proximal interphalangeal joint and that developed or worsened within 8 weeks prior to screening. Participants were randomized 1:1 to placebo or riociguat in individualized doses (maximum of 2.5 mg three times daily) during an 8-week titration period, followed by an 8-week stable dosing period. This was followed by an optional 16-week open-label extension phase for participants with active DU/reoccurrence of DUs within 1 month of the end of the main treatment phase. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline to week 16 in net ulcer burden (NUB), analyzed using ANCOVA. Other endpoints included plasma biomarkers and proportion of participants with treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs).

Results

Seventeen participants (eight placebo, nine riociguat) were randomized at five centers. Six participants in each group transitioned to the open-label extension. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the treatment groups, except participants randomized to placebo were older and had longer disease duration (p < 0.05). At baseline, the mean (SD) NUB was 2.5 (2.0) in the placebo and 2.4 (1.4) in the riociguat. No significant treatment difference was observed in the change from baseline to 16 weeks in NUB (adjusted mean treatment difference − 0.24, 95% CI (− 1.46, 0.99), p = 0.70). Four participants experienced five serious AE (four in riociguat and one in placebo); none was considered related to study medication. Statistically significant elevation of cGMP was observed at 16 weeks in the riociguat group (p = 0.05); no other biomarkers showed significant changes. In the open-label extension, participants in the riociguat-riociguat arm had complete healing of their DUs.

Conclusion

In participants with SSc-DU, treatment with riociguat did not reduce the number of DU net burden compared with placebo at 16 weeks. Open-label extension suggests that longer duration is needed to promote DU healing, which needs to be confirmed in a new trial.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02915835. Registered on September 27, 2016.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13075-019-1979-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.