Opportunistic infections associated with Janus kinase inhibitor treatment for rheumatoid arthritis: A structured literature review

Expert consensus statement on the treatment of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases with Janus kinase inhibitors: 2024 update

In light of the introduction of new Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi), new indications for JAKi and recent safety considerations that have arisen since the preceding consensus statement on JAKi therapy, a multidisciplinary taskforce was assembled, encompassing patients, health care professionals, and clinicians with expertise in JAKi therapy across specialties. This taskforce, informed by two comprehensive systematic literature reviews, undertook the objective to update the previous expert consensus for using JAKi developed in 2019. The taskforce deliberated on overarching principles, indications, dosage and comedication strategies, warnings and contraindications, screening protocols, monitoring recommendations, and adverse effect profiles. The methodology was based on the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology standard operating procedures, with voting on these important elements. Furthermore, an updated research agenda was proposed. The task force did not address when a JAKi should be prescribed but rather considerations once this decision has been made. This update aimed to equip clinicians with the necessary knowledge and guidance for the efficient and safe administration of this expanding and significant class of drugs.

A real-world pharmacovigilance study of FDA Adverse Event Reporting System events for pralsetinib

Background

Pralsetinib, a selective oral inhibitor of rearranged during transfection (RET) fusion proteins and oncogenic RET mutants, has shown significant efficacy in treating RET fusion-positive non-small cell lung cancer and thyroid cancer. However, since pralsetinib was approved in the United States in September 2020, there have been limited reports of post-marketing adverse events (AEs). In this study, we aimed to analyze the AE signals with pralsetinib on the basis of the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) to provide instructions in clinical practice.

Methods

All AE reports were obtained from the FAERS database from the first quarter (Q3) of 2020 to the second quarter (Q2) of 2024. Various signal quantification techniques were used for analysis, including reporting odds ratios, proportional reporting ratios, Bayesian confidence propagation neural network, and multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS)-based empirical Bayesian geometric mean.

Results

Out of 8,341,673 case reports in the FAERS database, 1,064 reports of pralsetinib as the "primary suspected (PS)" AEs were recorded, covering 26 system organ classes and 256 preferred terms. Of the reports, 62.5% were from consumers rather than healthcare professionals. The most common systems were general disorders and administration site conditions (n = 704), investigations (n = 516), and gastrointestinal disorders (n = 405). A total of 95 significant disproportionality preferred terms (PTs) conformed to the four algorithms simultaneously. AEs that ranked the top three at the PT level were hypertension (n = 80), asthenia (n = 79), and anemia (n = 65). Of the 95 PTs with significant disproportionation, unexpected significant AEs such as increased blood calcitonin, increased myocardial necrosis marker, and bacterial cystitis were observed, which were not mentioned in the drug's instructions. The median onset time of pralsetinib-associated AEs was 41 days [interquartile range (IQR) 14-86 days]. The majority of the AEs occurred in 30 days (42.86%).

Conclusion

Our pharmacovigilance analysis of real-world data from the FEARS database revealed the safety signals and potential risks of pralsetinib usage. These results can provide valuable evidence for further clinical application of pralsetinib and are important in enhancing clinical medication safety.

Cumulative incidence and risk of infection in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated with janus kinase inhibitors: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who receive immunosuppressive medications have a heightened risk of infection. The goal of our study was to calculate the pooled cumulative incidence and risk of infection in patients with RA treated with Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi). The PubMed and EMBASE databases were queried for randomized controlled trials comparing patients with RA treated with JAKi (upadacitinib, baricitinib, tofacitinib, peficitinib, or filgotinib), defined as the treatment group, compared with control subjects, defined as participants receiving placebo or treatment regimen that was similar to that of participants in the treatment group, with the exception of JAKi. The primary study endpoint was the relative risk (RR) of any-grade and severe infection. The secondary endpoints were RR and cumulative incidence of opportunistic infections, herpes zoster, and pneumonia. The Stata v17 software was used for all data analysis. Results showed that treatment with baricitinib was associated with an increased risk of any-grade (RR 1.34; 95% CI: 1.19-1.52) and opportunistic (RR 2.69; 95% CI: 1.22-5.94) infection, whereas treatment with filgotinib (RR 1.21; 95% CI: 1.05-1.39), peficitinib (RR 1.40; 95% CI: 1.05-1.86) and upadacitinib (RR 1.30; 95% CI: 1.09-1.56) was associated with increased risk of any-grade infection only. Analysis based on type of infection showed a pooled cumulative incidence of 32.44% for any-grade infections, 2.02% for severe infections, 1.74% for opportunistic infections, 1.56% for herpes zoster, and 0.49% for pneumonia in patients treated with any JAKi during the follow-up period. Treatment with specific JAKi in patients with RA is associated with an increased risk of any-grade and opportunistic infections but not severe infection. Close clinical monitoring of patients with RA treated with JAKi is required to establish the long-term infection risk profile of these agents.

A double-edged sword: unusual multiple severe infections with pralsetinib: a case report and literature review

Selective rearranged during transfection (RET) tyrosine kinase inhibitor, pralsetinib, demonstrated clinical efficacy and was well tolerated in lung and thyroid cancers with RET gene mutations or fusions in clinical trials. While the latter focused on the risk of pneumonitis, there is a lack of data regarding other types of infectious risks associated with pralsetinib. Herein, we report the case of a 53-year-old patient with a CCDC6-RET fusion neuroendocrine tumor, who achieved a partial response with pralsetinib as the fifth-line therapy. Of particular note, during pralsetinib therapy, the clinical course was complicated by five severe infectious events, namely, two oxygen-requiring pneumonias, two distinct spondylodiscitis, and one pneumocystis. Our study highlights the increased risk of any type of opportunistic infectious event with pralsetinib, but not selpercatinib, which is probably caused by off-target JAK1/2 inhibition.

Safety of the JAK and TNF inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis: real world data from the Hong Kong Biologics Registry

OBJECTIVES

To compare the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), cancer and infective complications in RA patients using Janus kinase (JAKis) and TNF (TNFis) inhibitors.

METHOD

A retrospective analysis of data from the Hong Kong Biologics Registry 2008-2021 was performed. RA patients who had ever used JAKis or TNFis were included. The incidence of MACEs, cancer and infections were compared between the two groups, with adjustment for confounding factors.

RESULTS

A total of 2471 courses of JAKis (n = 551) and TNFis (n = 1920) were used in 1732 RA patients (83.7% women, age 53.8 [12.5] years; follow-up 6431 patient-years). JAKi users had significantly older age, more atherosclerotic risk factors and higher frequency of past malignancies. A total of 15 and 40 MACEs developed in the JAKi and TNFi users, respectively (incidence 1.34 vs 0.75 per 100 patient-years; P = 0.22). There was no significant difference in the incidence of cancers between the two groups (0.81 [JAKi] vs 0.85 [TNFi] per 100 patient-years; P = 0.25). The adjusted hazard ratios of MACE and cancer in the JAKi users were 1.36 (95% CI: 0.62, 2.96) (P = 0.44) and 0.87 (95% CI: 0.39, 1.95) (P = 0.74), respectively. Rates of infections were significantly higher in the JAKi than TNFi users (16.3 vs 9.9 per 100 patient-years; P = 0.02), particularly herpes zoster (3.49 vs 0.94 per 100 patient-years; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In a real-life setting, there is no increase in MACEs or cancers in users of JAKis compared with TNFis. However, the incidence of non-serious infections, including herpes zoster, was increased in users of JAKis.

Drug Retention Rates of Janus Kinase Inhibitors in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients with Therapy-Induced Lymphopenia

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether drug-induced lymphocytopenia is associated with drug retention rates of JAKi (tofacitinib or baricitinib) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients.

METHODS

Patients with RA who were initiated with tofacitinib (n = 38) or baricitinib (n = 74) between July 2015 and July 2022 and continued for at least 4 months were enrolled in this study. Absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) value was obtained pre-treatment and monthly after initiation of JAKi (up to 4 months). Associations between ALC nadir at an early phase (up to 4 months) from JAKi initiation and drug retention rates were analysed.

RESULTS

112 patients (87 females; age, 71.2 ± 14.0 years; disease duration, 9.2 ± 10.5 months; DAS28-CRP, 3.60 ± 1.12; DAS28-ESR, 4.43 ± 1.29; CDAI, 17.9 ± 12.9; C-reactive protein, 3.07 ± 3.43 mg/dL; and lymphocyte count, 1361.9 ± 538.7 per μL) treated with tofacitinib or baricitinib were retrospectively analysed. Lymphocytopenia (>10% decline in lymphocyte count to pre-treatment basal levels) was observed in a quarter of RA patients treated with JAKi (tofacitinib; 16 baricitinib; 14). RA patients with lymphopenia were associated with the lower drug retention rates of tofacitinib compared to those without lymphocytopenia. The reduced drug retention rates in patients with lymphocytopenia were attributed to the discontinuation of tofacitinib due to AEs. Whereas lymphocytopenia was not associated with lower drug retention rates of baricitinib. Pre-treatment absolute lymphocyte counts did not affect the drug retention rates of JAKi in patients with RA.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that lymphopenia during the first 4 months from the initiation of JAKi is associated with reduced drug retention rates in patients with RA due to AEs, which is exclusively associated with the use of tofacitinib.