Homeostatic interplay between FoxO proteins and ER proteostasis in cancer and other diseases

SMURF1 attenuates endoplasmic reticulum stress by promoting the degradation of KEAP1 to activate NRF2 antioxidant pathway

Cancer cells consistently utilize the unfolded protein response (UPR) to encounter the abnormal endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress induced by the accumulation of misfolded proteins. Extreme activation of the UPR could also provoke maladaptive cell death. Previous reports have shown that NRF2 antioxidant signaling is activated by UPR and serves as noncanonical pathway to defense and reduce excessive ROS levels during ER stress. However, the mechanisms of regulating NRF2 signaling upon ER stress in glioblastoma have not been fully elucidated. Here we identify that SMURF1 protects against ER stress and facilitates glioblastoma cell survival by rewiring KEAP1-NRF2 pathway. We show that ER stress induces SMURF1 degradation. Knockdown of SMURF1 upregulates IRE1 and PERK signaling in the UPR pathway and prevents ER-associated protein degradation (ERAD) activity, leading to cell apoptosis. Importantly, SMURF1 overexpression activates NRF2 signaling to reduce ROS levels and alleviate UPR-mediated cell death. Mechanistically, SMURF1 interacts with and ubiquitinates KEAP1 for its degradation (NRF2 negative regulator), resulting in NRF2 nuclear import. Moreover, SMURF1 loss reduces glioblastoma cell proliferation and growth in subcutaneously implanted nude mice xenografts. Taken together, SMURF1 rewires KEAP1-NRF2 pathway to confer resistance to ER stress inducers and protect glioblastoma cell survival. ER stress and SMURF1 modulation may provide promising therapeutic targets for the treatment of glioblastoma.

UPF1 regulates FOXO1 protein expression by promoting PBK transcription in non-small cell lung cancer

Up-frameshift protein 1 (UPF1) is essential for nonsense-mediated messenger RNA decay (NMD). It is best known for its cytoprotective role in degrading aberrant and specific RNAs. UPF1 is dysregulated in multiple tumors, which correlates with poor prognosis and low overall survival.However,the role of UPF1 in lung cancer remains unclear.Current study shows that UPF1 could be a potential target for oncology therapies. The results also demonstrated the potential efficiency of UPF1 in regulating the proliferation and metastasis of lung cancer. Our findings suggest that those functions can be attributed to the inhibition of the stability of FOXO1 protein. In addition, PBK participates in the regulation of FOXO1 by UPF1.This result provides a new therapeutic strategy for lung cancer patients.

The Impact of Oxidative Stress and AKT Pathway on Cancer Cell Functions and Its Application to Natural Products

Oxidative stress and AKT serine-threonine kinase (AKT) are responsible for regulating several cell functions of cancer cells. Several natural products modulate both oxidative stress and AKT for anticancer effects. However, the impact of natural product-modulating oxidative stress and AKT on cell functions lacks systemic understanding. Notably, the contribution of regulating cell functions by AKT downstream effectors is not yet well integrated. This review explores the role of oxidative stress and AKT pathway (AKT/AKT effectors) on ten cell functions, including apoptosis, autophagy, endoplasmic reticulum stress, mitochondrial morphogenesis, ferroptosis, necroptosis, DNA damage response, senescence, migration, and cell-cycle progression. The impact of oxidative stress and AKT are connected to these cell functions through cell function mediators. Moreover, the AKT effectors related to cell functions are integrated. Based on this rationale, natural products with the modulating abilities for oxidative stress and AKT pathway exhibit the potential to regulate these cell functions, but some were rarely reported, particularly for AKT effectors. This review sheds light on understanding the roles of oxidative stress and AKT pathway in regulating cell functions, providing future directions for natural products in cancer treatment.

When Endoplasmic Reticulum Proteostasis Meets the DNA Damage Response

Sustaining both proteome and genome integrity (GI) requires the integration of a wide range of mechanisms and signaling pathways. These comprise, in particular, the unfolded protein response (UPR) and the DNA damage response (DDR). These adaptive mechanisms take place respectively in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and in the nucleus. UPR and DDR alterations are associated with aging and with pathologies such as degenerative diseases, metabolic and inflammatory disorders, and cancer. We discuss the emerging signaling crosstalk between UPR stress sensors and the DDR, as well as their involvement in cancer biology.

Dual role of Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress-Mediated Unfolded Protein Response Signaling Pathway in Carcinogenesis

Cancer constitutes a grave problem nowadays in view of the fact that it has become one of the main causes of death worldwide. Poor clinical prognosis is presumably due to cancer cells metabolism as tumor microenvironment is affected by oxidative stress. This event triggers adequate cellular response and thereby creates appropriate conditions for further cancer progression. Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress occurs when the balance between an ability of the ER to fold and transfer proteins and the degradation of the misfolded ones become distorted. Since ER is an organelle relatively sensitive to oxidative damage, aforementioned conditions swiftly cause the activation of the unfolded protein response (UPR) signaling pathway. The output of the UPR, depending on numerous factors, may vary and switch between the pro-survival and the pro-apoptotic branch, and hence it displays opposing effects in deciding the fate of the cancer cell. The role of UPR-related proteins in tumorigenesis, such as binding the immunoglobulin protein (BiP) and inositol-requiring enzyme-1α (IRE1α), activating transcription factor 6 (ATF6) or the protein kinase R (PKR)-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK), has already been specifically described so far. Nevertheless, due to the paradoxical outcomes of the UPR activation as well as gaps in current knowledge, it still needs to be further investigated. Herein we would like to elicit the actual link between neoplastic diseases and the UPR signaling pathway, considering its major branches and discussing its potential use in the development of a novel, anti-cancer, targeted therapy.

The forkhead-box family of transcription factors: key molecular players in colorectal cancer pathogenesis

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most commonly occurring cancer worldwide and the fourth most frequent cause of death having an oncological origin. It has been found that transcription factors (TF) dysregulation, leading to the significant expression modifications of genes, is a widely distributed phenomenon regarding human malignant neoplasias. These changes are key determinants regarding tumour’s behaviour as they contribute to cell differentiation/proliferation, migration and metastasis, as well as resistance to chemotherapeutic agents. The forkhead box (FOX) transcription factor family consists of an evolutionarily conserved group of transcriptional regulators engaged in numerous functions during development and adult life. Their dysfunction has been associated with human diseases. Several FOX gene subgroup transcriptional disturbances, affecting numerous complex molecular cascades, have been linked to a wide range of cancer types highlighting their potential usefulness as molecular biomarkers. At least 14 FOX subgroups have been related to CRC pathogenesis, thereby underlining their role for diagnosis, prognosis and treatment purposes.

This manuscript aims to provide, for the first time, a comprehensive review of FOX genes’ roles during CRC pathogenesis. The molecular and functional characteristics of most relevant FOX molecules (FOXO, FOXM1, FOXP3) have been described within the context of CRC biology, including their usefulness regarding diagnosis and prognosis. Potential CRC therapeutics (including genome-editing approaches) involving FOX regulation have also been included. Taken together, the information provided here should enable a better understanding of FOX genes’ function in CRC pathogenesis for basic science researchers and clinicians.

The endoplasmic reticulum co-chaperone ERdj3/DNAJB11 promotes hepatocellular carcinoma progression through suppressing AATZ degradation

AIM

The co-chaperone ERdj3/DNAJB11 is involved in the endoplasmic reticulum stress response observed in cancer cells. We hypothesized that ERdj3 functions as a hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) oncogene by inhibiting AATZ degradation.

MATERIALS & METHODS

ERdj3 and AATZ expressions were analyzed in 84 HCC patients. Cell proliferation, epithelial-mesenchymal transition marker expression, migration and invasiveness were assessed in HepG2 and Huh-7 cells. A murine xenograft tumor model was constructed.

RESULTS

ERdj3 is upregulated in HCC tumors and cell lines. Tumor ERdj3 levels are positively associated with cirrhosis, enhanced HCC status, inferior survival outcomes and AATZ levels. ERdj3 suppresses AATZ degradation. ERdj3 overexpression enhances proliferation, epithelial-mesenchymal transition marker expression, migration, invasiveness and xenograft tumor growth in an AATZ-dependent manner.

CONCLUSION

ERdj3 enhances HCC progression through suppressing AATZ degradation.