Optimal Choice of Dialysis Access for Chronic Kidney Disease Patients: Developing a Life Plan for Dialysis Access

Proposal of a classification of cannulation damage in vascular access grafts based on clinical, ultrasound, and microscopic observations

INTRODUCTION

Arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) serve as an alternative to native arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) in the context of hemodialysis patient life planning. AVGs are more susceptible to developing outflow stenosis (due to intimal hyperplasia), thrombosis, and infections. However, an often overlooked contributor to AVG failure is cannulation damage. The objective of this paper is to assess the impact of cannulations on AVGs. We aim to establish a classification of AVG damage by comparing clinical data and ultrasound images with microscopic morphological findings obtained from explanted grafts.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study is conducted at a single center. We included all patients who underwent AVG creation between 2011 and 2019. Comprehensive data on clinical history, follow-up, and complications were collected and reviewed. Duplex ultrasound (DUS) characteristics were documented, and all grafts explanted during the analysis period underwent optical microscopy evaluation. Finally, clinical data, along with DUS and microscopic findings, were integrated to derive a damage classification.

RESULTS

During the study period, 247 patients underwent 334 early cannulation AVGs. The median follow-up duration was 714 days (IQR 392, 1195). One hundred eleven (33%) grafts were explanted. Clinical data and DUS findings were utilized to formulate a four-grade classification system indicating increasing damage.

CONCLUSION

Cannulation damage alone does not solely account for AVG failure. It results from a biological host-mediated process that promotes the growth of intimal hyperplasia at the cannulation sites. This process is not clinically significant within the initial 2 years after AVG creation.

Frailty screening for determination of hemodialysis access placement

OBJECTIVE

Choosing the right hemodialysis vascular access for frail patients remains difficult because the patient's preferences and the likelihood of access function and survival must be considered. We hypothesize that patients identified before arteriovenous (AV) access as frail by the PRISMA-7 score may have worse outcomes, indicating that fistula creation may not be the most clinically beneficial option and it would be in the best interest of the patient to receive either AV graft (AVG) placement or dialysis through a percutaneous catheter. Our pilot study aims to determine whether an association exists between patient frailty as defined by PRISMA-7 and newly created AV fistula (AVF) and AVG access outcomes.

METHODS

This was a single institutional prospective cohort study of patients undergoing new AVF or AVG intervention from April 2021 to May 2023. Patients were assessed using the PRISMA-7 frailty questionnaire before their AV access surgery. Patients were grouped by frailty score and score groups were examined for trends. Univariable analysis was performed for baseline differences between frail and nonfrail patients. Failure to achieve maturation, postoperative infection, and 180-day mortality difference was also investigated for frail vs nonfrail patients. Univariable analysis was performed for nonmaturation using standard comorbidities, arterial and venous diameters, and frailty. Multivariable binary logistic regression was performed for the outcome of nonmaturation using frailty as one of the variables in conjunction with the univariable risks associated with nonmaturation.

RESULTS

A total of 40 patients undergoing new AV access placement were investigated, among whom 53% were designated as frail (PRISMA-7 score ≥3). When comparing the frail and nonfrail new AV access groups, the access (AVF and AVG combined) failed in 48% (10/21) of the frail patients, but only failed in 5% (1/19) of the nonfrail patients 1 (P = .012). When distinguishing between AV access types, AVF creations followed the overall trend with 60% of AVF access (9/15) sites in frail patients failing to mature when compared with nonfrail patients, who all had fistulas that matured to use (P = .049). Surgical site infection was absent in all frail patients and present in 5% of nonfrail patients (1/19). Both 30-day and 60-day readmission rates were higher in the frail group compared with the nonfrail group. There was 180-day mortality present in 5 of frail patients % (1/21) and absent in nonfrail patients. Multivariable analysis revealed that both frailty (adjusted odd ratio, 10.19; 95% confidence interval, 1.20-82.25); P = .033) and younger age (adjusted odd ratio, 0.953; 95% confidence interval, 0.923-0.983; P = .002) both had a significant association with nonmaturation. Power analysis revealed a power statistic of 0.898 indicating a probability of type 2 error of 10.02% with a P value of .002. Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit for the logistic regression had 75% overall accuracy for the model.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient frailty is significantly associated with an increased incidence of AV access failure to mature.

Role of Antiplatelet Therapy in Hemodialysis Arteriovenous Graft Secondary Patency Following Successful Percutaneous Thrombectomy

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to elicit the relationship of antiplatelet therapy (AP) in maintaining arteriovenous graft (AVG) patency after successful percutaneous pharmacomechanical thrombectomy ("declot").

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was an institutional review board-approved retrospective review of AVG declot procedures between July 2019 and August 2020. AVG characteristics, bleeding complications, anticoagulation and antiplatelet medication regimens, and thrombosis free survival were evaluated. Recurrent time-to-event analysis was performed using a Prentice-Williams-Peterson Gap time model was performed to evaluate AVG thrombosis free survival.

RESULTS

A total of 109 declots were technically successful and performed in 63 individual patients. The majority of procedures were performed in upper arm grafts (71%, n = 45). Dual antiplatelet (DAPT) was prescribed after 52 declots (48%), single antiplatelet was prescribed after 36 declots (33%), and anticoagulation was prescribed after 31 declots (28%). Median thrombosis free survival was 37 days (range 1-412 days) in the no antiplatelet group, 84 days (range 1-427 days) in the single antiplatelet group, and 93 days (range 3-407 days) in the DAPT group. Anti-platelet medications trended towards protective of AVG thrombosis in multivariate analysis (hazard ratio 0.84, 95% confidence interval 0.60-1.19); however, this did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.33). A total of 4 major and 5 minor bleeding events occurred.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study support further evaluation of AP therapy in preventing secondary rethrombosis of dialysis AVG.

Tunneled dialysis line-associated hemorrhagic shock following self-inflicted trauma in a hemodialysis patient: A case report

Complications of tunneled central venous catheters (CVCs) for hemodialysis are frequent, and most commonly include bacteremia, thrombosis, and stenosis. While bleeding is a relatively rare complication of dialysis lines overall, tunneled CVCs may present a unique bleeding risk given their ability to be displaced or damaged as patients have direct access to the equipment in place. Here, we describe the case of a 68-year-old man with end-stage renal disease and neurocognitive disorder, who developed hemorrhagic shock following self-inflicted laceration of his tunneled dialysis catheter proximal to the Y. Examination of the catheter tunnel revealed that the cuff was palpable proximal to the exit site, but the opening was well retracted. In such cases, hemorrhage is particularly difficult to control because the cuff is rigid and poorly amenable to compression, in addition to being difficult to access. This case demonstrates the risk of significant hemorrhage when a tunneled CVC is damaged at this location and the potential need for the urgent removal of the retained component to prevent recurrence of bleeding. It also highlights important patient safety considerations given the risk of self-inflicted trauma in patients with a neurocognitive disorder and a language barrier affecting communication.

The patient experience of hemodialysis vascular access decision-making

BACKGROUND

To describe vascular access (VA)-related decision-making from the patient perspective, in patients who have already chosen hemodialysis as their renal replacement modality, and identify areas where physicians can improve this experience.

METHODS

In-person, semi-structured interviews with 15 patients with end-stage kidney disease were systematically analyzed by two independent researchers using thematic analysis. Interviews were conducted until systematic analysis revealed no new themes.

RESULTS

Patients had mean age 57 (range 22-85), with seven males and diverse racial/ethnic/marital status. All (15/15) patients viewed VA as "intertwined and interrelated" with dialysis, prioritized the dialysis, described the VA merely as the "hookup" to life-preserving dialysis and gave it minimal consideration. Three themes were identified: consolidation of dialysis and VA, reliance on supportive advisors and communication with physicians. Although 14/15 patients described processes common to medical decision-making, including information seeking, learning from the experiences of others, and weighing risks and benefits, they did not apply these processes specifically to VA. While all participants took ownership of the VA decision, they lacked clear understanding about the different types of VA and their consequences. Most patients (14/15) depended on family and friends for reinforcement, motivation and advice. Patients all described physician characteristics they associated with trustworthiness, the most common being listening and explaining, demonstrating empathy and making an effort to meet the patient's individual needs. Perceived arrogance, unavailability and lack of expertise represented untrustworthiness. The majority (14/15) accepted VA recommendations from physicians they found trustworthy and authoritative.

CONCLUSIONS

The study participants were minimally engaged in VA decision-making. Educational aids and shared decision-making tools are needed to empower patients to make better-informed, self-efficacious VA decisions.

Interventional Nephrology: Opportunities and Challenges

The nephrologist has a pivotal role as the leader of multidisciplinary teams to optimize vascular access care of the patient on dialysis and to promote multidisciplinary collaboration in research, training, and education. The continued success of interventional nephrology as an independent discipline depends on harnessing these efforts to advance knowledge and encourage innovation. A comprehensive curriculum that encompasses research from bench to bedside coupled with standardized clinical training protocols are fundamental to this expansion. As we find ourselves on the threshold of a much-awaited revolution in nephrology, there is great opportunity but also formidable challenges in the field - it is up to us to work together to realize the enormous potential of our discipline.

Randomised clinical study of the impact of routine preoperative Doppler ultrasound for the outcome of autologous arteriovenous fistulas for haemodialysis

Background:

Arteriovenous fistulas are the gold standard of vascular accesses in haemodialysis; however, they have a considerable primary failure rate. This study evaluated the comparative reliability of routine preoperative Doppler ultrasound with an isolated physical examination of autologous arteriovenous fistulas within the Single Health System of Brazil and analysed the potential clinical benefit, improvement in primary failure rates and its economic impact.

Methods:

A non-blind randomised clinical study group of patients undergoing a vessel mapping with preoperative Doppler ultrasound (ultrasound group) and a control group who had undergone only a physical examination (clinical group) before the vascular procedures was performed. The role of the arteriovenous fistula in dialysis and possible alterations was evaluated in both the groups and followed up for 6 months.

Results:

Of the initial 248 eligible patients, there was a randomisation of 230 patients, 228 of whom were submitted for surgery, 114 in each group. In the clinical group, a significantly higher rate of primary failure was recorded, with 13.6% versus 4.4% in the ultrasound group (p = 0.002). The Kaplan–Meier curve with log-rank analysis showed a significantly higher primary patency in the ultrasound group (p = 0.042). Regarding the cost-effectiveness of the use of Doppler ultrasound, there was no increase in the final cost compared to the physical examination (US$1.28/fistula day × US$1.29/fistula day).

Conclusion:

It was concluded that Doppler ultrasound contributed to the reduction of primary failure, leading to a significantly superior primary patency of arteriovenous fistulas, and no increase in the final cost. This justifies its routine preoperative use in the Single Health System. Registration number RBR-474xhn (http://www.ensaiosclinicos.gov.br).

The influence of a doppler ultrasound in arteriovenous fistula for dialysis failure related to some risk factors

INTRODUCTION

The increasing prevalence of chronic kidney disease has increased the demand for arteriovenous fistula (AVF) care. The objective of this study was to assess the relationship between some risk factors for AVF failure (advanced age, female sex, diabetes, obesity, central venous catheter, previous fistula, and hospitalization) and having a Doppler ultrasound performed preoperatively.

METHODS

A prospective study was performed with 228 dialysis patients from Imperatriz, Maranhão. Half of the sample was randomly selected to receive preoperative Doppler ultrasound and the other half did not, from the period of October 2016 to September 2018.

RESULTS

There were 53 total failures corresponding to 23.2% of our sample, which is almost double that of the patients in the clinical group. Considering the failures and risk factors associated with the overall sample, there was a statistically significant association between a central venous catheter on the same side of the AVF with P = 0.04 (Odds Ratio 1.24) and obesity with P = 0.05 (Odds Ratio 1.36), which was not repeated in the Doppler ultrasound group individually. There was no statistically significant difference between the Doppler group and clinical group with respect to the amount of days of previous AVF hospitalization and failure.

CONCLUSIONS

We concluded that the reduction of failures with an introduction of the Doppler was statistically significant in the overall sample, but establishing a relationship between specific risk factors and failure was only possible with two of the risk factors in the study - obesity and central venous catheter on the same side of the AVF.

KDOQI Clinical Practice Guideline for Vascular Access: 2019 Update

The National Kidney Foundation's Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI) has provided evidence-based guidelines for hemodialysis vascular access since 1996. Since the last update in 2006, there has been a great accumulation of new evidence and sophistication in the guidelines process. The 2019 update to the KDOQI Clinical Practice Guideline for Vascular Access is a comprehensive document intended to assist multidisciplinary practitioners care for chronic kidney disease patients and their vascular access. New topics include the end-stage kidney disease "Life-Plan" and related concepts, guidance on vascular access choice, new targets for arteriovenous access (fistulas and grafts) and central venous catheters, management of specific complications, and renewed approaches to some older topics. Appraisal of the quality of the evidence was independently conducted by using a Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, and interpretation and application followed the GRADE Evidence to Decision frameworks. As applicable, each guideline statement is accompanied by rationale/background information, a detailed justification, monitoring and evaluation guidance, implementation considerations, special discussions, and recommendations for future research.

Hemodialysis vascular access in the elderly-getting it right

Choosing the optimal hemodialysis vascular access for the elderly patient is best achieved by a patient-centered coordinated multidisciplinary team approach that aligns the patient's end-stage kidney disease Life-Plan, i.e., the individual treatment approach (supportive care, time-limited or long-term kidney replacement therapy, or combination thereof) and selection of dialysis modality (peritoneal dialysis versus hemodialysis) with the most suitable dialysis access. Finding the right balance between the patient's preferences, the likelihood of access function and survival, and potential complications in the context of available resources and limited patient survival can be extremely challenging. The framework for choosing the most appropriate vascular access for the elderly presented in this review considers the individual end-stage kidney disease Life-Plan, the patient life expectancy, the likelihood of access function and survival, the timing of dialysis relative to access placement, prior access history, and patient preference. This complex decision-making process should be dynamic in order to accommodate patients' changing needs and life and health circumstances. Effective and timely communication between the patient, their caregivers, and treating team is key to delivering truly patient-centered care. Delivering this care also requires overcoming the limitations of the currently available evidence that is predominantly based on observational data with its inherent risks of bias. While challenging, future randomized controlled studies exploring the risks, benefits, costs, and timing of placement of available access types in the elderly are required to help us "get it right" for our patients.

Identifying critically important vascular access outcomes for trials in haemodialysis: an international survey with patients, caregivers and health professionals

Background

Vascular access outcomes reported across haemodialysis (HD) trials are numerous, heterogeneous and not always relevant to patients and clinicians. This study aimed to identify critically important vascular access outcomes.

Method

Outcomes derived from a systematic review, multi-disciplinary expert panel and patient input were included in a multilanguage online survey. Participants rated the absolute importance of outcomes using a 9-point Likert scale (7–9 being critically important). The relative importance was determined by a best–worst scale using multinomial logistic regression. Open text responses were analysed thematically.

Results

The survey was completed by 873 participants [224 (26%) patients/caregivers and 649 (74%) health professionals] from 58 countries. Vascular access function was considered the most important outcome (mean score 7.8 for patients and caregivers/8.5 for health professionals, with 85%/95% rating it critically important, and top ranked on best–worst scale), followed by infection (mean 7.4/8.2, 79%/92% rating it critically important, second rank on best–worst scale). Health professionals rated all outcomes of equal or higher importance than patients/caregivers, except for aneurysms. We identified six themes: necessity for HD, applicability across vascular access types, frequency and severity of debilitation, minimizing the risk of hospitalization and death, optimizing technical competence and adherence to best practice and direct impact on appearance and lifestyle.

Conclusions

Vascular access function was the most critically important outcome among patients/caregivers and health professionals. Consistent reporting of this outcome across trials in HD will strengthen their value in supporting vascular access practice and shared decision making in patients requiring HD.

Establishing patient-specific criteria for selecting the optimal upper extremity vascular access procedure

OBJECTIVE

The Kidney Disease Outcome Quality Initiative and Fistula First Breakthrough Initiative call for the indiscriminate creation of arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) over arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) without providing patient-specific criteria for vascular access selection. Although the U.S. AVF rate has increased dramatically, several reports have found that this singular focus on increasing AVFs has resulted in increased AVF nonmaturation/early failure and a high prevalence of catheter dependence. The objective of this study was to determine the appropriateness of vascular access procedures in clinical scenarios constructed with combinations of relevant factors potentially influencing outcomes.

METHODS

The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method was used. Accordingly, a comprehensive literature search was performed and a synthesis of results compiled. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method was applied to 2088 AVF and 1728 AVG clinical scenarios with varying patient characteristics. Eleven international vascular access experts rated the appropriateness of each scenario in two rounds. On the basis of the distribution of the panelists' scores, each scenario was determined to be appropriate, inappropriate, or indeterminate.

RESULTS

Panelists achieved agreement in 2964 (77.7%) scenarios; 860 (41%) AVF and 588 (34%) AVG scenarios were scored appropriate, 686 (33%) AVF and 480 (28%) AVG scenarios were scored inappropriate, and 542 (26%) AVF and 660 (38%) AVG scenarios were indeterminate. Younger age, larger outflow vein diameter, normal or obese body mass index (vs morbidly obese), larger inflow artery diameter, and higher patient functional status were associated with appropriateness of AVF creation. Older age, dialysis dependence, and smaller vein size were associated with appropriateness of AVG creation. Gender, diabetes, and coronary artery disease were not associated with AVF or AVG appropriateness. Dialysis status was not associated with AVF appropriateness. Body mass index and functional status were not associated with AVG appropriateness. To simulate the surgeon's decision-making, scenarios were combined to create situations with the same patient characteristics and both AVF and AVG options for access. Of these 864 clinical situations, 311 (36%) were rated appropriate for AVG but inappropriate or indeterminate for AVF.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study indicate that patient-specific situations exist wherein AVG is as appropriate as or more appropriate than AVF. These results provide patient-specific recommendations for clinicians to optimize vascular access selection criteria, to standardize care, and to inform payers and policy. Indeterminate scenarios will guide future research.

New Insights into Dialysis Vascular Access: What Is the Optimal Vascular Access Type and Timing of Access Creation in CKD and Dialysis Patients?

Optimal vascular access planning begins when the patient is in the predialysis stages of CKD. The choice of optimal vascular access for an individual patient and determining timing of access creation are dependent on a multitude of factors that can vary widely with each patient, including demographics, comorbidities, anatomy, and personal preferences. It is important to consider every patient's ESRD life plan (hence, their overall dialysis access life plan for every vascular access creation or placement). Optimal access type and timing of access creation are also influenced by factors external to the patient, such as surgeon experience and processes of care. In this review, we will discuss the key determinants in optimal access type and timing of access creation for upper extremity arteriovenous fistulas and grafts.

A Patient-Centered Approach to Hemodialysis Vascular Access in the Era of Fistula First

The primary vascular access options for the hemodialysis population are arteriovenous fistulas (AVF), arteriovenous grafts, and cuffed central venous catheters (CVC). AVFs are associated with the most favorable outcomes with respect to complications, interventions required to maintain functionality and patency, and overall cost. These population-based outcomes, in conjunction with the efforts of the Fistula First Breakthrough Initiative, have propelled the prevalence of AVFs in the US hemodialysis population. While this endeavor remains steadfast in assuring the continued dominance of this policy for AVF preference, it fails to take into account a subset of the dialysis population who will fail to see the benefits of an AVF. This subset of patients may include the elderly, those with poor vasculature anatomy, those with slowly progressive CKD who are more likely to die than progress to ESRD, and those with an overall poor long-term prognosis and shortened life expectancy. Thus, in an effort to avoid numerous unnecessary surgical and interventional procedures with minimal to no gains in clinical outcomes, an individualized patient approach must be adopted. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services-instituted quality incentive program is designed to reward high AVF prevalence while also penalizing high CVC prevalence. The current model is devoid of case-based adjustment, thus penalties are disbursed to dialysis providers in accordance with a "one-size-fits-all" fistula only approach. The most suitable access for a patient remains the one that takes into account the characteristics unique to the individual patient with a primary focus on patient comfort, satisfaction, quality of life, and clinical outcomes.

Vertical Tunnel-based Low-site Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Implantation Decreases the Incidence of Catheter Malfunction

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is often complicated by catheter dysfunction. We designed a PD catheter implantation technique to reduce catheter dysfunction. Between June 2008 and 2012, 89 patients with end-stage renal disease were enrolled into a prospective study and randomly assigned to receive traditional catheter implantation by open surgery (n = 41) or vertical tunnel-based low-site PD catheter implantation (n = 48). Both procedures used Baxter straight double-cuffed Tenckhoff catheters. The novel implantation technique involves a low-site (7 cm above the midpoint of the pubic symphysis), individually tailored intra-abdominal segment, and increased vertical subcutaneous tunnel. Patients were followed for 1-year after procedure. The vertical tunnel-based low-site method implanted catheters were 3.7 ± 0.9 cm long, with an 11.3 ± 0.9 cm intra-abdominal segment. The incidence of postoperative bleeding, PD fluid leakage, outer cuff extrusion, inflow or outflow pain, peritonitis, tunnel inflammation, or exit-site infection did not differ significantly between the two surgical techniques; however, the incidence of catheter displacement and non-catheter displacement malfunctions after the novel technique (4.2%) was significantly lower than that in traditional open surgery (19.5%, P < 0.05). In conclusions, vertical tunnel-based low-site PD catheter implantation can significantly reduce the occurrence of PD catheter malfunction, particularly catheter displacement.

Trends in US Vascular Access Use, Patient Preferences, and Related Practices: An Update From the US DOPPS Practice Monitor With International Comparisons

BACKGROUND

Since the bundled end-stage renal disease prospective payment system began in 2011 in the United States, some hemodialysis practices have changed substantially, raising the question of whether vascular access practice also has changed. We describe monthly US vascular access use from August 2010 to August 2013 with international comparisons, and other aspects of US vascular access practice.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective observational cohort study of vascular access.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

Maintenance hemodialysis patients in the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS) Practice Monitor (DPM) in the United States (N=3,442; US patients) and 19 other nations (N=8,478).

PREDICTORS

Country, patient demographics, time period.

OUTCOMES

Vascular access use, pre-end-stage renal disease access timing of first nephrologist care and arteriovenous access placement, patient self-reported vascular access preferences (United States only), treatment practices as stated by medical directors.

RESULTS

In the United States from August 2010 to August 2013, arteriovenous fistula (AVF) use increased from 63% to 68%, while catheter use declined from 19% to 15%. Although AVF use did not differ greatly across age groups, arteriovenous graft use was 2-fold higher among black (26%) versus nonblack US patients (13%) in 2013. Across 20 countries in 2013, AVF use ranged from 49% to 92%, whereas catheter use ranged from 1% to 45%. Patient-reported vascular access preferences differed by sex and race, with 16% to 20% of patients feeling uninformed regarding benefits/risks of different vascular access types. Among new (incident) US hemodialysis patients, AVF use remains low, with ∼70% initiating hemodialysis therapy with a catheter (60% starting with catheter when having ≥4 months of predialysis nephrology care). In the United States, longer typical times to first AVF cannulation were reported.

LIMITATIONS

Noncompletion of surveys may affect the generalizability of findings to the wider hemodialysis population.

CONCLUSIONS

AVF use has increased, with catheter use decreasing among prevalent US hemodialysis patients since the introduction of the prospective payment system. However, AVF use at dialysis therapy initiation remains low, suggesting that reforms affecting predialysis care may be necessary to incentivize improvements in fistula rates at dialysis therapy initiation as achieved for prevalent hemodialysis patients.

Bilateral Central Vein Stenosis: Options for Dialysis Access and Renal Replacement Therapy when all upper Extremity Access Possibilities have been Lost

Purpose

Patients with bilateral central vein stenosis present a unique challenge: treatment options are limited, largely unproven and associated with reputedly poor outcomes. Our aim was to compare patency rates of different access and renal replacement treatment (RRT) modalities in patients with bilateral central vein stenosis/occlusion.

Material and methods

Data on all patients presenting to a tertiary referral vascular access centre with end-stage vascular access (defined by bilateral central vein stenosis/occlusion with loss of upper limb access) over a 5-year period were included. 3, 6 and 12-month patencies of translumbar catheters (TLs), tunnelled femoral catheters (Fem), native long saphenous vein loops (SV), prosthetic mid-thigh loop grafts (ThGr), peritoneal dialysis (PD), and expedited donation after cardiac death (DCD) cadaveric renal transplants (Tx) via local allocation policies were compared using log-rank test. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was used to estimate long-term access survival.

Results

One hundred forty-six vascular access modalities were attempted in 62 patients (62 Fem, 25 TL, 15 SV, 25 ThGr, 8 PD, 11 Tx). Median follow-up was 876±57 days. Three, 6 and 12-month primary-assisted patencies for each modality were as follows: Fem: 75.4%, 60% and 28%; TL: 88%, 65% and 50%; SV: 87.5%, 60% and 44.6%; ThGr: 64%, 38% and 23.5%; PD: 62.5%, 62.5% and 50%; Tx: 72.7%, 72.7% and 72.7%. SV had better secondary patency at 900 days (76.9%) than ThGr (49.2%) or Fem (35.8%) (p<0.01). No patients died as a result of loss of access.

Conclusion

Patients with bilateral central vein stenosis often require more than one vascular access modality to achieve a “personal access solution.” Native long saphenous vein loops provided the best long-term patency. Expedited renal transplantation with priority local allocation of DCD organs to patients with precarious vascular access provides a potential solution to this difficult problem.

An assessment of survival among Korean elderly patients initiating dialysis: a national population-based study

Background

Although the proportion of the elderly patients with incident end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients has been increasing in Korea, there has been a lack of information on outcomes of dialysis treatment. This study aimed to assess the survival rate and to elucidate predictors for all-cause mortality among elderly Korean patients initiating dialysis.

Methods

We analyzed 11,301 patients (6,138 men) aged 65 years or older who had initiated dialysis from 2005 to 2008 and had followed up (median, 37.8 months; range, 3–84 months). Baseline demographics, comorbidities and mortality data were obtained using the database from the Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service.

Results

The unadjusted 5-year survival rate was 37.6% for all elderly dialysis patients, and the rate decreased with increasing age categories; 45.9% (65∼69), 37.5% (70∼74), 28.4% (75∼79), 24.1% (80∼84), and 13.7% (≥85 years). The multivariate Cox proportional hazard model revealed that age, sex, dialysis modality, the type of insurance, and comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus, myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, cerebrovascular disease, dementia, chronic pulmonary disease, hemiparesis, liver disease, and any malignancy were independent predictors for mortality. In addition, survival rate was significantly higher in patients on hemodialysis compared to patients on peritoneal dialysis during the whole follow-up period in the intention-to-treat analysis.

Conclusions

Survival rate was significantly associated with age, sex, and various comorbidities in Korean elderly patients initiating dialysis. The results of our study can help to provide relevant guidance on the individualization strategy in elderly ESRD patients requiring dialysis.