The role of affect in associations between sleep disturbances and posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms: A systematic review

Moving toward affective immunology: Legacy and future directions

The term "affective immunology" has recently been used to denote a field focused on the interplay between affective processes (including mood states, specific emotions, and regulatory processes) and various aspects of immune function. The overarching goals of this commentary are a) to provide historical underpinnings of this field with a focus on the profound impact of the work of Janice Kiecolt-Glaser, who is further honored in this special issue, b) to review important off-shoots of her legacy work in this domain, and c) to highlight important future directions for the field. Kiecolt-Glaser's work laid much of the foundation for affective immunology, with groundbreaking research related to depression, hostility and dyadic interactions, loneliness, and other affective patterns, often in the context of holistic models, novel experimental designs, and interventions. Her former mentees (and many of their mentees) have carried on her legacy in these domains, in ways that continue to advance appreciation of how affective processes relate to immune function. There are numerous remaining questions for the field to pursue, including better understanding of the role of emotion regulation, emotional reactivity and recovery, restorative processes, affective variability, and developmental and dynamic social processes. Such work will require greater use of longitudinal and within-person approaches and/or examination of processes in daily life, as well as models that account for interactive and reciprocal processes and which integrate behavior, social context, sociocultural factors, individual differences, and other aspects of health. As more work in these domains continues, building on Kiecolt-Glaser's rich legacy, we move toward the emergence of affective immunology as an important subfield in the domain of psychoneuroimmunology, one which will offer more nuanced understanding of the role of affective processes in immune health.

Prevalence of major depressive disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder among first-time sleep center attendees

BACKGROUND

Sleep disorders and psychiatric disorders stand in a bidirectional relationship. Sleep complaints are prominent in populations with psychiatric disorders, especially amongst people with major depressive disorder (MDD) and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Consultations at sleep clinics offer opportunities to screen psychiatric disorders and to propose primary psychiatric care.

METHODS

This descriptive study was conducted on 755 patients making their first visit to sleep clinic, with 574 seeking consultation for suspected obstructive sleep apnoea-hypopnoea syndrome (OSAHS), 139 for complaints of insomnia, and 42 for complaints of hypersomnia. The results of 387 screening scales for MDD (BDI-II) and 403 for TSPT (PCL-5) were compared according to the reason given for the consultation.

RESULTS

In the whole group, 12.1 % of patients presented a positive MDD screening and 4.9 % for PTSD. Among patients presenting with insomnia, 19.8 % had a positive screening for MDD, as compared to 9.3 % in patients presenting with suspected OSAHS (p = 0.02). Regarding PTSD, 9.7 % of patients seeking consultation because of insomnia had a positive screening, compared to 2.9 % among patients with suspected OSAHS (p = 0.03). Among patients with a positive screening for MDD, 40.5 % were not receiving antidepressant or mood stabilizer treatment.

CONCLUSION

Positive screening for MDD and PTSD are frequent in patients who attend sleep centers, especially amongst those presenting with insomnia. Nearly half of the patients with positive screening for MDD or PTSD were not receiving a dedicated pharmacological treatment. These figures emphasize systematic screening for psychiatric disorders in sleep clinics.