Natural sleep endoscopy in obstructive sleep apnea: A systematic review

A Critical Analysis of Pharyngeal Patterns of Collapse in Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Beyond the Endoscopic Classification Systems

(1) Background: Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy (DISE) enables the three-dimensional and dynamic visualization of the upper airway (UA) during sleep, which is useful in selecting the best treatment option for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients, particularly for surgical procedures. Despite international consensus statements or position papers, a universally accepted DISE methodology and classification system remain a controversial open question. (2) Methods: A review of the English scientific literature on DISE related to endoscopic classification systems and surgical outcome predictors (3) Results: Of the 105 articles, 47 were included in the analysis based on their content's relevance to the searched keywords. (4) Conclusions: A final report and scoring classification system is not universally accepted; the most internationally applied endoscopic classification system during DISE does not cover all patterns of events that occur simultaneously during the endoscopic examination, highlighting that several configurations of collapse and obstruction at different UA levels could be observed during DISE, which should be described in detail if DISE has to be considered in the decision-making process for the UA surgical treatment in OSA patients and if DISE has to have a role as a predictive factor for surgical outcomes analysis.

Quantitative Measurement of Pharyngeal Dimensions During Drug-induced Sleep Endoscopy for Oral Appliance Outcome

OBJECTIVE

To quantitatively investigate the effect of mandibular advancement devices (MADs) on pharyngeal airway dimensions in a transverse plane as measured during drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE).

METHODS

Data from 56 patients, treated with MAD at 75% maximal protrusion and with baseline Apnea-Hypopnea Index ≥10 events/h, were analyzed. For each patient, three snapshots were selected from DISE video footage at baseline, with MAD presence, and during chin lift, resulting in 498 images (168/168/162, baseline/MAD/chin lift). Cross-sectional areas, anteroposterior (AP) and laterolateral (LL) dimensions on both retroglossal and retro-epiglottic levels were measured. To define the effect of MAD and chin lift on pharyngeal dimensions, linear mixed-effect models were built. Associations between MAD treatment response and pharyngeal expansion (MAD/chin lift) were determined.

RESULTS

Significant differences were found between retroglossal cross-sectional areas, AP, and LL dimensions at baseline and with MAD presence. At a retro-epiglottic level, only LL dimensions differed significantly with MAD presence compared to baseline, with significant relation of LL expansion ratio to treatment response (p = 0.0176). After adjusting the response definition for the sleeping position, greater retroglossal expansion ratios were seen in responders (1.32 ± 0.48) compared to non-responders (1.11 ± 0.32) (p = 0.0441). No significant association was found between response and pharyngeal expansion by chin lift.

CONCLUSION

Our observations highlight the additional value of quantitative pharyngeal airway measurements during DISE with MAD presence in evaluating MAD treatment outcome. These findings demonstrate an increase in retroglossal airway dimensions during DISE, with MAD presence, and more pronounced increase in retroglossal expansion ratios in MAD treatment responders compared to non-responders after sleeping position correction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 133:3619-3627, 2023.

Upper Airway Surgery or Weight Control? Modified Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy for Obstructive Sleep Apnea

OBJECTIVE

To identify the value of head rotation in the supine position and oral appliance (OA) use in drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE).

STUDY DESIGN

Eighty-three sleep apnea adults undergoing target-controlled infusion-DISE (TCI-DISE) were recruited from a tertiary academic medical center.

SETTING

During DISE, 4 positions were utilized: supine position (position 1), head rotation (position 2), mandibular advancement using an OA (position 3), and head rotation with an OA (position 4).

METHODS

Polysomnography (PSG) data and anthropometric variables during DISE were analyzed.

RESULTS

Eighty-three patients (65 men and 18 women; mean [standard deviation, SD], 48.5 [11.0] years) who underwent PSG and TCI-DISE were included. The mean (SD) apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) was 35.5 (22.4) events/h. Twenty-three patients had persistent complete concentric velopharyngeal collapse in the supine position, even with concurrent head rotation and OA (position 4). Their mean (SD) AHI was 54.7 (24.6) events/h, significantly higher than that of the 60 patients without such collapse in position 4 (p < .001). Their mean (SD) body mass index (BMI) was 29.0 (4.1) kg/m2 , also significantly higher (p = .005). After adjustment for age, BMI, tonsil size, and tongue position, the degree of velum and tongue base obstruction was significantly associated with sleep apnea severity in positions 2, 3, and 4.

CONCLUSION

We showed the feasibility, safety, and usefulness of using simple edge-to-edge, reusable OA in DISE. Patients who are not responsive to head rotation and OA during TCI-DISE may need upper airway surgery and/or weight control.

Comparison of Remimazolam and Propofol for Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy: A Randomized Clinical Trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of remimazolam with those of propofol for drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) in patients with obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS).

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective, single-center, randomized clinical trial.

SETTING

Xiangya Hospital of Central South University.

METHODS

Patients with OSAHS receiving DISE were randomly assigned to either the remimazolam or propofol group. The primary outcome was the incidence of hypoxemia (pulse oxygen saturation [SpO2 ] < 90%) during DISE. The secondary outcomes were the incidence of severe hypoxemia (SpO2  < 80%), the minimal value of SpO2 , sedation success rate (completion of DISE according to the medication regimen), and incidence of events of interest (including injection pain, bradycardia, and decreased respiratory rate).

RESULTS

Sixty-four patients were included in this study. The incidence of hypoxemia was significantly lower in the remimazolam than in the propofol group (25.00% vs 62.50%, respectively; relative risk, 0.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.20-0.74; p < .01). There was no significant difference in the sedation success rate between the remimazolam and propofol groups (96.88% vs 81.25%, respectively; relative risk, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.01-1.50; p = .10). The incidence of at least 1 event of interest was lower in the remimazolam than in the propofol group (43.75% vs 96.88%, respectively; relative risk, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.29-0.63; p < .01).

CONCLUSION

Remimazolam can present satisfactory sedative efficacy in DISE, with a lower incidence of hypoxemia and a higher safety profile than propofol.

Impact of Upper Airway Characteristics on Disease Severity and CPAP Therapy in Chinese Patients With OSA: An Observational Retrospective Study

Objective

The characteristics of the upper airway (UA) are important for the evaluation and treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). This study aimed to investigate the association of UA characteristics with OSA severity, titration pressure, and initiation of and 3-month compliance with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP).

Methods

This retrospective study included consecutive patients examined using a semi-quantitative UA evaluation system (combination with physical examination and awake endoscopy) during 2008–2018 at the Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Peking University First Hospital. First, the differences in UA characteristics were compared between patients with simple snorers and mild OSA and those with moderate-to-severe OSA. Then, the effect of UA characteristics on the initiation to CPAP therapy and 3-month adherence to CPAP was conducted.

Results

Overall, 1,002 patients were included, including 276 simple snorers and patients in the mild OSA group [apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) <15] and 726 patients in the moderate-to-severe OSA group (AHI ≥15). Tongue base hypertrophy, tonsillar hypertrophy, mandibular recession, neck circumstance, and body mass index (BMI) were independent risk factors for moderate-to-severe OSA. Among those patients, 119 patients underwent CPAP titration in the sleep lab. The CPAP pressures in patients with thick and long uvulas, tonsillar hypertrophy, lateral pharyngeal wall stenosis, and tongue hypertrophy were higher than those of the control group (P < 0.05, respectively). The logistic regression analysis showed that nasal turbinate hypertrophy, mandibular retrusion, and positive Müller maneuver in the retropalate and retroglottal regions were independent predictors for the initiation of home CPAP treatment.

Conclusion

Multisite narrowing and function collapse of the UA are important factors affecting OSA severity, CPAP titration pressure, and the initiation of home CPAP therapy. Clinical evaluation with awake endoscopy is a safe and effective way for the assessment of patients with OSA in internal medicine.

Critical closing pressure (Pcrit) of the pharyngeal airway during routine drug-induced sleep endoscopy: feasibility and protocol

In obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), there are various pathophysiological factors affecting the upper airway during sleep. Two prominent factors contributing to OSA are site and pattern of upper airway collapse and degree of pharyngeal collapsibility. In a clinical setting, drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) is used to visualize the structures of the upper airway. Critical closing pressure (Pcrit) is the gold standard measure of pharyngeal collapsibility. This prospective clinical study aimed to investigate the feasibility and protocol of Pcrit measurements during DISE. Thirteen patients with OSA were included. Pcrit was calculated using peak inspiratory airflow and inspiratory ventilation. The proposed protocol was successful in Pcrit measurement during DISE in all subjects [median[Q1;Q3] Pcrit for “peak inspiratory method” (n = 12): −0.84[−2.07;0.69] cmH₂O, “ventilation method” (n = 13): −1.32[2.32;0.47] cmH₂O], highlighting the feasibility of the approach. There was no significant difference (P = 0.67) between calculated Pcrit with either of the calculation methods, indicating high reliability. Correlation analysis showed Pcrit as an independent parameter of any of the anthropometric or polysomnographic parameters. The ventilation method proved to be more successful in assessment of Pcrit in subjects with epiglottic collapse (e.g., with high negative effort dependence). Subjects with palatal complete concentric collapse during DISE had a wide Pcrit range ([−2.86;2.51]cmH₂O), suggesting no close correlation between Pcrit and this DISE pattern (P = 0.38). Incorporation of Pcrit measurements into DISE assessments is feasible and may yield valuable additional information for OSA management. Combining Pcrit and DISE provides information on both the site and degree of upper airway collapse and the degree of pharyngeal collapsibility.

NEW & NOTEWORTHY The protocol of this study was successful in concomitant measurement of Pcrit during routine clinical endoscopy. Comparison of two calculation methods for Pcrit showed that the inspiratory ventilation method was more successful in assessment of Pcrit in subjects with epiglottic collapse who have high negative effort dependence. Subjects with palatal complete concentric collapse during DISE had a wide Pcrit range and did not have a greater Pcrit than patients in other site of collapse categories.

Comparison of Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy and Natural Sleep Endoscopy in the Assessment of Upper Airway Pathophysiology During Sleep: Protocol and Study Design

Study Objectives: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is increasingly recognized as a complex and heterogenous disorder. As a result, a "one-size-fits-all" management approach should be avoided. Therefore, evaluation of pathophysiological endotyping in OSA patients is emphasized, with upper airway collapse during sleep as one of the main features. To assess the site(s) and pattern(s) of upper airway collapse, natural sleep endoscopy (NSE) is defined as the gold standard. As NSE is labor-intensive and time-consuming, it is not feasible in routine practice. Instead, drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) is the most frequently used technique and can be considered as the clinical standard. Flow shape and snoring analysis are non-invasive measurement techniques, yet are still evolving. Although DISE is used as the clinical alternative to assess upper airway collapse, associations between DISE and NSE observations, and associated flow and snoring signals, have not been quantified satisfactorily. In the current project we aim to compare upper airway collapse identified in patients with OSA using endoscopic techniques as well as flow shape analysis and analysis of tracheal snoring sounds between natural and drug-induced sleep. Methods: This study is a blinded prospective comparative multicenter cohort study. The study population will consist of adult patients with a recent diagnosis of OSA. Eligible patients will undergo a polysomnography (PSG) with NSE overnight and a DISE within 3 months. During DISE the upper airway is assessed under sedation by an experienced ear, nose, throat (ENT) surgeon using a flexible fiberoptic endoscope in the operating theater. In contrast to DISE, NSE is performed during natural sleep using a pediatric bronchoscope. During research DISE and NSE, the standard set-up is expanded with additional PSG measurements, including gold standard flow and analysis of tracheal snoring sounds. Conclusions: This project will be one of the first studies to formally compare collapse patterns during natural and drug-induced sleep. Moreover, this will be, to the authors' best knowledge, the first comparative research in airflow shape and tracheal snoring sounds analysis between DISE and NSE. These novel and non-invasive diagnostic methods studying upper airway mechanics during sleep will be simultaneously validated against DISE and NSE. Clinical Trial Registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT04729478.