The short-term effects of opioid and non-opioid pharmacotherapies on sleep in people with chronic low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

"My Back Exercise App"-mHealth for Low Back Pain: Development and Usability Testing

Effective management of chronic low back pain (LBP) often relies on maintaining a healthy lifestyle. Mobile health (mHealth) applications provide a unique opportunity to support LBP sufferers by integrating evidence-based health education into daily routines. However, many existing mHealth apps lack scientific rigour in their development, limiting their impact. This study reports on developing and usability testing My Back Exercise, an mHealth app designed to support individuals managing chronic LBP through a user-centred, theory-based approach. The development followed the Double Diamond framework and Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) model, focusing on behaviour change theory to promote healthy lifestyle habits. Usability testing involved ten users and employed the System Usability Scale (SUS) and Mobile App Rating Scale (MARS) to assess engagement, functionality, aesthetics, and information quality. Additionally, a think-aloud approach captured real-time feedback and guided iterative improvements. Results showed that the app was well-received, achieving a SUS mean score of 79 (total score of 100) and a MARS mean score of 3.7 (out of 5.0). Key intervention components included exercises, sleep management, diet, and pain education, contributing to a holistic self-management tool. This study provides a transparent roadmap for the development of evidence-based digital health tools. The My Back Exercise app offers an innovative, holistic approach to help people self-manage chronic LBP using evidence-based methods.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41666-024-00179-0.

Duration, Cost, and Escalation of Care Events for Physical Therapy Management of Low Back Pain in Service Members With Limb Loss

INTRODUCTION

Physical therapy (PT) is recommended as a primary treatment for low back pain (LBP), a common and impactful musculoskeletal condition after limb loss. The purpose of this brief report is to report the duration and cost of PT care, and subsequent escalation of care events, for LBP in service members with and without limb loss.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort, descriptive study. Service members with and without limb loss (matched) who received PT for LBP at a military treatment facility from 2015 to 2017 were included. Duration of PT care, number of PT visits, and escalation of care events 1 year after PT were extracted from medical records. Escalation of care events was identified as epidural steroid injections, referrals to specialists (e.g., orthopedists, spine surgeons, and pain management), and LBP-related hospitalizations.LBP-related PT encounters were queried; duration of care, number of visits, and cost of care were quantified. Escalation of care events, including opioid prescription, epidural steroid injections, specialty referrals, and hospitalizations, were identified up to 1 year after PT care.

RESULTS

The average course of PT care for LBP was 12.9 more visits, 48.7 days longer, and $764.50 more expensive in service members with limb loss (n = 16) vs. those without limb loss (n = 48). Higher rates of opioid prescriptions and specialty referrals were observed in service members with limb loss.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that service members with limb loss and LBP received higher quantities and longer durations of PT than those without limb loss, yielding a nearly 4 times higher cost of PT.

Sleep as a prognostic factor in low back pain: a systematic review of prospective cohort studies and secondary analyses of randomized controlled trials

Sleep problems are common in individuals with low back pain (LBP) and sleep restriction seems to be associated with impaired pain processing. Our objective was to investigate whether sleep is associated with future LBP outcomes (i.e. pain intensity, disability, and recovery) in adults. We conducted a systematic review of prospective cohort studies and secondary analyses of randomized controlled trials (registration-PROSPERO CRD42022370781). In December 2022, we searched the MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and PsycINFO databases. Fourteen studies, totaling 19 170 participants were included. Thirteen studies were rated as having high risk of bias (QUIPS tool). We used vote-counting and meta-analysis approaches to synthesize the data. We found associations between baseline sleep with future pain intensity, recovery, and between changes in sleep with changes in pain intensity, changes in disability, and recovery. We further synthesized outcomes as "overall LBP improvement" outcomes. Baseline poor sleep was moderately associated with non-improvement in LBP in the long-very long term (OR 1.55, 95% CI: 1.39 to 1.73; three studies providing unadjusted effect sizes), and non-improvement in sleep was largely associated with non-improvement in LBP in the short-moderate term (OR 3.45, 95% CI: 2.54 to 4.69; four studies providing unadjusted effect sizes). We found no association between baseline sleep with future disability and overall LBP improvement in the short-moderate term. Therefore, sleep may be a prognostic factor for pain intensity and recovery from LBP. All findings were supported by low to very low-quality evidence. Better-conducted studies are needed to strengthen our certainty about the evidence.

Problems with opioids - beyond misuse

The U.S. is grappling with an opioid epidemic, with millions of adults on long-term opioid therapy (LTOT). Although patients often report pain relief and improved daily function with opioids, research shows no significant differences in short-term outcomes between opioid and non-opioid users, as well as no long-term opioid benefits. This scoping review aims to identify lesser-known side effects of long-term opioid use and increase awareness of them, allowing healthcare providers and patients to better assess the risks and benefits of opioid use. Our data search from PubMed and Google Scholar used keywords related to opioids, chronic pain, hypogonadism, endocrinopathies, cancer progression, cardiovascular events, renovascular events, sleep disturbances, mood disorders and others, narrowing down to English-language full articles published from January 2018 to April 2023. This review emphasizes the probable serious adverse consequences of long-term opioid use on various body systems in patients with chronic pain. Given the lack of long-term benefits and significant adverse effects, our review underscores the critical need for healthcare providers to include these risks in discussions with patients when considering the long-term use of opioid therapy.

Comparative effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions on sleep in individuals with chronic musculoskeletal pain: A systematic review with network meta-analysis

This network meta-analysis aimed to estimate the comparative effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions on sleep in individuals with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Seven databases were systematically searched up to February 2023. A random-effects network meta-analysis in a frequentist framework was performed to synthesize continuous data as standardized mean differences (SMD) along with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI). A total of 15,641 records were identified, and 107 randomized controlled trials involving 8,121 participants were included. Of 14 identified interventions, eight were significantly more effective than passive control in improving sleep quality at immediate post-intervention (SMDs = 0.67-0.74), with cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) being the most effective treatment (SMD = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.45-1.03). Only CBT demonstrated sustained effects at short-term (SMD = 1.56; 95% CI: 0.62-2.49) and mid-term (SMD = 1.23; 95% CI: 0.44-2.03) follow-ups. Furthermore, CBT significantly improved subjective (SMD = 0.64; 95% CI: 0.25-1.03) and objective (SMD = 0.30; 95% CI: 0.01-0.59) sleep efficiency compared with passive control at immediate post-intervention. Our findings support CBT as the first-line treatment for improving sleep in individuals with chronic musculoskeletal pain, given its superior effectiveness across multiple sleep outcomes and its sustainable effects until mid-term follow-up. However, the certainty of evidence for these interventions in improving sleep quality was very low to low.

Effects of pharmacotherapy on sleep-related outcomes in adults with chronic low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Background

Adults with chronic low back pain (CLBP) suffer impaired sleep. Medications for CLBP can impact sleep which in turn may influence treatment outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the effects of pharmacotherapy (any type) on sleep in adults with CLBP.

Methods

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched PubMed, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, PsycINFO, EMBASE, and CENTRAL from inception to 10 July 2022. Randomised controlled trials that investigated the effects of pharmacotherapy on sleep in adults with CLBP were included. Manual citation search of relevant systematic reviews and included studies were also conducted. Mean change from baseline for sleep outcomes (e.g., sleep quality, total sleep time, wake after sleep onset) was the effect of interest. Pairwise inverse-variance random effect meta-analysis was performed to impute pooled estimates (Hedges' g or risk ratios). The Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman method was used where there were ≤5 studies. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system was used for evaluating the certainty of evidence. This study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022309419).

Findings

Assessment of 3959 records resulted in nine studies (n = 2927) being included. Pharmacotherapy for CLBP management had a small, yet unlikely clinically significant, effect on improving sleep in adults with CLBP, when compared to placebo (g [95% CI]: -0.23 [-0.37, -0.09], p = .0009; I 2  = 30.1%; n = 1433; studies: n = 8; GRADE: low). Notably, no eligible studies investigated the effect of sleep medications in this population, despite being within the scope of this review.

Interpretation

Pharmacotherapy used to manage CLBP provided improvements in sleep in adults with CLBP. Given that these effects were small and unlikely clinically significant, clinicians could consider alternative treatments (e.g., non-pharmacological interventions) for managing sleep in adults with CLBP. However, low to very low certainty of evidence precluded strong conclusions. To improve certainty of evidence and confidence in the effect estimates, future research needs to use robust method to minimise bias. Additional research evaluating multiple sleep characteristics, using both validated objective and subjective measures, is also warranted to further investigate the influence of distinct sleep parameters.

Funding

The Summer Research Scholarship from the Appleton Institute, Central Queensland University, Australia.