Cost analysis of laparoscopic gastric bypass practice using current Medicare reimbursement and practice costs

Central Venous Line Placement prior to Gastric Bypass Improves Operating Room Efficiency

Background. Bariatric surgery has increased across America. Venous access is difficult in these patients. Anesthesiologists often utilize valuable operating room (OR) time acquiring reliable intravenous lines. Our objective was to determine if outpatient central venous line (CVL) placement improves OR efficiency and professional reimbursement for CVL insertion. Methods. In our bariatric practice, selected surgery patients have outpatient CVLs placed during prophylactic vena cava filter placement. In a cohort of 268 gastric bypass patients operated between 1/01 and 11/06, we compared time-to-incision between 106 with pre-established CVLs and 162 without. In addition, we determined professional compensation rates for CVLs placed outpatient versus CVLs inserted in the OR. Results. Patients with preoperative (outpatient) CVLs required 35.6 ± 12.5 minutes to skin incision compared with 42.5 ± 13.9 minutes for controls (P < 0.0001), and 34.9% had skin incision in <30 minutes compared with 16.4% of controls. Radiologists collected 28.2% of outpatient billings for CPT code 36556, compared with anesthesiologists who collected <1% when placing CVLs in the OR. Conclusions. Outpatient CVLs prior to gastric bypass improve efficiency in the OR with earlier skin incision. Professional reimbursement is better for outpatient CVLs than intraoperative inpatient CVLs.

Surgical weight loss >65 years old: is it worth the risk?

BACKGROUND

Weight loss surgery in patients >65 years old has been underused, secondary to the morbidity and mortality concerns of healthcare providers. Comparative outcomes analyses of this patient population have been lacking. The purpose of the present report was to evaluate the safety and outcome of gastric bypass in patients >65 years of age.

METHODS

A prospective database was used to analyze the safety, operative morbidity, and outcome. All patients undergoing surgery since January 2005 were included.

RESULTS

The analysis of 1474 patients demonstrated a greater operative risk profile for patients >65 years (n = 100) compared with those <65 years old (n = 1374) related to sleep apnea (45% versus 34%), diabetes mellitus (65% versus 33%), and hypertension (81% versus 57%). The operative outcomes were similar for the 2 groups as determined by the operative time (70 versus 65 minutes), length of stay (1.97 versus 1.3 days), and 30-day readmission rate (6.0% versus 7.4%). The postoperative complication rates were low in the patients >65 years old (bleeding 1.0%, pulmonary 3.0%, cardiac 2.0%, wound 2.0%, and 30-day mortality rate 0%). The percentage of excess body weight loss in the gastric bypass patients was similar between the patients >65 years old and those <65 years old at 12 months (74.8% versus 77.8%) and 24 months (83.4% versus 78.5%).

CONCLUSION

Our experience represents one of the largest series of laparoscopic gastric bypass in elderly patients. The data have demonstrated excellent outcomes compared with a younger population.