Sleeve gastrectomy and crural repair in obese patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease and/or hiatal hernia

The effect of laparoscopic vertical sleeve gastrectomy and laparoscopic roux-en-Y gastric bypass on gastroesophageal reflux disease: An updated meta-analysis and systematic review of 5-year post-operative data from randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

To evaluate 5-year effect of laparoscopic vertical sleeve gastrectomy (LVSG) versus laparoscopic roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) on gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) solely based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis of 5-year postoperative GERD data comparing LVSG and LRYGB in adults were undertaken. Electronic databases were searched from January 2015 to March 2024 for publications meeting inclusion criteria. The Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman random effects model was applied to estimate pooled odds ratio where meta-analysis was possible. Bias and certainty of evidence were assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2 and GRADE.

RESULTS

Five RCTs were analysed (LVSG n = 554, LRYGB n = 539). LVSG was associated with increased adverse GERD outcomes compared to LRYGB at 5 years. The odds for revisional surgery to treat GERD in LVSG patients were 11 times higher compared to LRYGB (OR 11.47, 95% CI 1.83 to 71.69; p = 0.02; I2 = 0% High level of certainty). Similarly pharmacological management for increasing GERD was significantly more frequent in LVSG patients compared to LRYGB (OR 3.89, 95% CI 2.31 to 6.55; p ≤ 0.01; I2 = 0% Moderate level of certainty). Overall, LVSG was associated with significantly more interventions (both medical and surgical) for either worsening GERD and/or development of de novo GERD compared to LRYGB (OR 5.98, 95% CI 3.48 to 10.29; p ≤ 0.01; I2 = 0%) Moderate level of certainty).

CONCLUSIONS

The development and worsening of GERD symptoms are frequently associated with LVSG compared to LRYGB at 5 years postoperatively requiring either initiation or increase of pharmacotherapy or failing that revisional bariatric surgery. Appropriate patient/surgical selection is crucial to reduce these postoperative risks of GERD.

Full esophageal mobilization during hiatal hernia repair with concomitant sleeve gastrectomy improves postoperative reflux symptoms for patients with preexisting reflux

BACKGROUND

Hiatal hernia repair (HHR) performed concurrently with vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG) has been shown to improve postoperative gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, data on the optimal extent of esophageal mobilization during repair are lacking. Mobilization techniques for HHR during VSG include partial (PM) or full (FM) mobilization of the esophagus. We hypothesize that patients who undergo full mobilization will be less likely to develop postoperative reflux.

METHODS

A single-institution retrospective review of all patients who underwent a VSG with a HHR between 2014 and 2021 was conducted. The primary outcome was postoperative reflux symptoms defined by diagnosis in the medical record, utilization of anti-reflux medications, and GERD health-related quality of life (GERD-HRQL) scores obtained via patient surveys.

RESULTS

There were 190 patients included with 80 patients (42.1%) undergoing PM and 110 (57.9%) undergoing FM. Rates of preoperative reflux were similar between the two groups (47.5% vs. 51.8%; p = 0.55). During the GERD-HRQL survey, there were 114 patients (60.0%) contacted with a participation rate of 91.2% (104 patients). Patients with preoperative reflux who underwent PM were found to have a higher rate of reported postoperative reflux (90.0% vs. 62.5%; p = 0.03) and higher GERD-HRQL scores (16.40 ± 9.95 vs. 10.84 ± 9.01; p = 0.04). Patients without preoperative reflux did not have a significant difference in reported reflux (55.0% vs. 51.7%; p = 0.82) or GERD-HRQL scores (12.35 ± 14.14 vs. 9.93 ± 9.46; p = 0.25).

CONCLUSION

Our study found that postoperative GERD was higher in patients with preexisting reflux who underwent partial esophageal mobilization during concurrent hiatal hernia repair with vertical sleeve gastrectomy. In patients without preoperative GERD, our data suggest that postoperative reflux symptoms are not dependent on the extent of esophageal mobilization during hiatal hernia repair with vertical sleeve gastrectomy.

Does the Repair of an Accidentally Discovered Hiatal Hernia and Gastropexy Affect the Incidence of De Novo Postoperative GERD Symptoms After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy?

Background

The relationship between laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is intricate. Hiatal hernia repair or gastropexy can have an impact on postoperative GERD.

Aim

To assess the effect of the repair of an accidentally discovered HH and/or gastropexy on the development of de novo postoperative GERD symptoms after LSG.

Methods

This retrospective study included all obese patients who underwent LSG at our hospital from January 2018 to June 2022. The data retrieved from patients' files comprised demographic and clinical data, including BMI, GERD symptoms, and comorbidities. Hiatal hernias, surgical technique, gastropexy, duration, and intraoperative complications were recorded. Postoperative data included early and late postoperative complications, weight loss, de novo GERD, and medication use.

Results

The study included 253 patients, 89 males (35.2%) and 164 females (64.8%), with a mean age of 33.3±10.04 years. De novo GERD was detected in 94 individuals (37.15%). HH was accidentally found and repaired in 29 patients (11.5%). Only 10.3% of LSG and HH repair patients had de novo GERD symptoms, compared to 40.6% of non-HH patients. 149 patients (58.9%) had gastropexy with LSG. Postoperative de novo GERD symptoms were comparable for LSG with gastropexy (40.5%) and LSG alone (40.9%).

Conclusion

After one year, concurrent hiatal hernia repair and LSG seem to be safe and beneficial in lowering postoperative de novo GERD symptoms. The inclusion of gastropexy with LSG had no significant impact on postoperative de novo GERD. Both HH repair and gastropexy lengthened the operation but did not increase its complications.

Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease after Sleeve Gastrectomy: Effectiveness of Medical, Endoscopic, and Surgical Therapies

Introduction: Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) has become the most frequently performed bariatric operation in the United States. One of the main disadvantages of this procedure is the risk of developing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) after the operation. We aimed to analyze different approaches for the treatment of GERD after SG. Methods: A literature review was performed to identify all possible treatment options for post-SG GERD. All the studies were assessed for full eligibility by manual assessment of their aims, methodology, results, and conclusions. Records were individually reviewed by the authors comparing outcomes and complications between procedures. Results: Although some studies have shown improvement or even resolution of GERD symptoms after SG, most patients develop or worsen symptoms. Lifestyle modifications along with medical therapy should be started on patients with GERD after SG. For those who are refractory to medication, endoscopic and surgical therapies can be offered. Conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is consistently effective in treatment of GERD and is the ideal therapy in patients with associated insufficient weight loss. Endoscopic and alternative surgical procedures are also available and have shown acceptable short-term outcomes. Conclusions: Several treatment options exist for the treatment of GERD after SG. Although conversion to RYGB remains the most effective therapy, other emerging endoscopic and surgical procedures could avoid the potential morbidity of this procedure and should be further evaluated. An evidence-based algorithm for the management of GERD after SG is proposed to guide decision making.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease following laparoscopic vertical sleeve gastrectomy and laparoscopic roux-en-Y gastric bypass: meta-analysis and systematic review of 5-year data

To compare 5-year gastroesophageal reflux outcomes following Laparoscopic Vertical Sleeve Gastrectomy (LVSG) and Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) based on high quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We conducted a sub-analysis of our systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs of primary LVSG and LRYGB procedures in adults for 5-year post-operative complications (PROSPERO CRD42018112054). Electronic databases were searched from January 2015 to July 2021 for publications meeting inclusion criteria. The Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman random effects model was utilized to estimate weighted mean differences where meta-analysis was possible. Bias and certainty of evidence was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2 and GRADE. Four RCTs were included (LVSG n = 266, LRYGB n = 259). An increase in adverse GERD outcomes were observed at 5 years postoperatively in LVSG compared to LRYGB in all outcomes considered: Overall worsened GERD, including the development de novo GERD, occurred more commonly following LVSG compared to LRYGB (OR 5.34, 95% CI 1.67 to 17.05; p = 0.02; I2 = 0%; (Moderate level of certainty); Reoperations to treat severe GERD (OR 7.22, 95% CI 0.82 to 63.63; p = 0.06; I2 = 0%; High level of certainty) and non-surgical management for worsened GERD (OR 3.42, 95% CI 1.16 to 10.05; p = 0.04; I2 = 0%; Low level of certainty) was more common in LVSG patients. LVSG is associated with the development and worsening of GERD symptoms compared to LRYGB at 5 years postoperatively leading to either introduction/increased pharmacological requirement or further surgical treatment. Appropriate patient/surgical selection is critical to minimize these postoperative risks.

Investigation of the Relationship Between Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy and Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Using 24-hour Multichannel Intraluminal Impedance With pH Testing According to Current Consensus

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is a popular weight loss procedure with potential effects on gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, research on the association between LSG and GERD using objective evaluation criteria, such as multichannel intraluminal impedance combined with pH testing (MII-pH), is limited. This study aimed to investigate the impact of LSG on GERD using MII-pH and current consensus guidelines.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

It was conducted as a prospective clinical study on 33 patients who underwent LSG between January 2022 and August 2022. MII-pH and high-resolution manometry were performed preoperatively and 3 to 6 months postoperatively. GERD diagnosis was based on MII-pH results using the Lyon and Update Porto consensus guidelines.

RESULTS

Postoperative MII-pH analysis revealed a significant increase in acid reflux time, acid exposure time, reflux index, esophageal clearance, total reflux time, and longest reflux period. Weak acid reflux episodes decreased, while Demeester score and alkaline reflux showed nonsignificant increases. Pathologic reflux significantly increased postoperatively based on MII-pH diagnosis. High-resolution manometry showed a significant increase in unsuccessful motility.

CONCLUSION

Although the Demeester score calculation consists of 6 metrics, including acid exposure time, the acid exposure time is more specific in detecting pathologic reflux. Pathologic GERD increases significantly with LSG in the early period. Therefore, preoperative and postoperative endoscopy and MII-pH can provide valuable information regarding the need for closer follow-up after LSG.

Bikini-line Hiatal Hernia Repair (BLHHR) During Sleeve Gastrectomy

BACKGROUND

To preserve the aesthetic benefits achieved with Bikini line sleeve gastrectomy (BLSG), we have devised a novel approach for simultaneous hiatal hernia repair (HHR), known as bikini-line hiatal hernia repair (BLHHR). This manuscript presents our initial experience with BLHHR and assesses its feasibility and outcomes.

METHODS

A prospective preliminary study was conducted on patients who underwent BLHHR between September 2020 and October 2022. Patient demographics, preoperative assessments, operative details, postoperative outcomes, and aesthetic evaluations were recorded. Feasibility and safety were assessed.

RESULTS

Among 891 BLSG patients, 89 (9.9%) underwent BLHHR. The mean distances between the xiphoid process and the umbilicus, symphysis pubis, and anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) were 28.8 ± 2.2, 33.9 ± 3.1, and 31.2 ± 1.8 cm, respectively. Optimal visualization and accessibility of the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) were achieved without compromising HHR repair or sleeve gastrectomy. The mean operative time was 76.5 ± 11 min, longer than the 58 ± 10 min required for BLSG alone. Patient scar satisfaction ranged from 87.5 to 97.9%, and the mean pain score was 2.9 ± 0.8. No major complications were reported. At 6 months, %EWL (percentage of excess weight loss) was 53.3 ± 13.7%, GERD (gastroesophageal reflux disease) remission was achieved in 62.8% of patients and comorbidities were improved.

CONCLUSION

BLHHR was potentially feasible and safe. Outcomes related to patient scar satisfaction, weight loss, improvement of associated comorbidities, and GERD symptoms were not compromised. The aesthetic benefits achieved by BLSG were maintained.

Outcomes of Concurrent Hiatus Hernia Repair with Different Bariatric Surgery Procedures: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Hiatus hernia (HH) is prevalent among patients with obesity. Concurrent repair is often performed during metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS), but a consensus on the safety and effectiveness of concurrent HH repair (HHR) and MBS remains unclear. We performed a systematic review of the safety and effectiveness of concurrent HHR and MBS through the measurement of multiple postoperative outcomes.

METHOD

Seventeen studies relating to concurrent MBS and HHR were identified. MBS procedures included laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB), and adjustable gastric banding (LAGB). Studies with pre- and postoperative measurements and outcomes were extracted.

RESULTS

For LSG, 9 of 11 studies concluded concurrent procedures to be safe and effective with no increase in mortality. Reoperation and readmission rates however were increased with HHR, whilst GORD rates were seen to improve, therefore providing a solution to the predominant issue with LSG. For LRYGB, in all 5 studies, concurrent procedures were concluded to be safe and effective, with no increase in mortality, length of stay, readmission and reoperation rates. Higher complication rates were observed compared to LSG with HHR. Among LAGB studies, all 4 studies were concluded to be safe and effective with no adverse outcomes on mortality and length of stay. GORD rates were seen to decrease, and reoperation rates from pouch dilatation and gastric prolapse were observed to significantly decrease.

CONCLUSION

Concurrent HHR with MBS appears to be safe and effective. Assessment of MBS warrants the consideration of concurrent HHR depending on specific patient case and the surgeon's preference.

GERD-screening before bariatric surgery: the predictive value of the GERD-HRQL questionnaire score compared with preoperative EGD findings

BACKGROUND

There is an ongoing debate on how to best identify patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) before bariatric surgery. The value of routine preoperative esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is questioned, and patient reported symptoms are commonly used for screening. The goal of this study is to determine if patient reported symptoms using a validated questionnaire correlate with preoperative EGD findings.

METHODOLOGY

A prospective cohort study at a single institution was performed. Patients undergoing bariatric surgery between December 2020 and March 2023 were required to report symptoms of reflux by completing a preoperative GERD. Health-Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) questionnaire and undergo a mandatory preoperative screening EGD. Patients were stratified into two cohorts: (group A) asymptomatic (score = 0) and (group B) symptomatic (score > 0). Statistical analysis was conducted using Pearson's chi-squared test and Wilcoxon rank-sum test in RStudio version 4.2.2. The predictive value of the GERD-HRQL score was analyzed using Areas Under the Curve (AUC; AUC = 0.5 not predictive, 0.5 < AUC ≥ 6 poor prediction & AUC > 0.9 excellent prediction) calculated from Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves.

RESULTS

200 patients were included; median age was 42.0 years (IQR 36.0 to 49.2). There were 79 patients (39.5%) in Group A and 121 patients (60.5%) in Group B. There was no difference in the frequency esophagitis (27.8% vs 32.2%, p = 0.61) or hiatal hernias (49.4% vs 47.1%, p = 0. 867) between group A and group B, respectively. ROC analysis revealed that the total GERD HRQL scores, heartburn only scores and regurgitation only scores, were poor predictors of esophagitis found on EGD (AUC 0.52, 0.53, 0.52), respectively. In asymptomatic patients, higher BMI was significantly associated with esophagitis (OR 1.15, 95% CI 1.06-1.27, p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Symptoms, identified through the GERD-HRQL questionnaire, are a poor indicator of esophagitis or its severity in patients undergoing workup for bariatric surgery. Therefore, liberal screening upper endoscopy is recommended for pre-bariatric surgery patients to guide appropriate procedure selection.

Gastroesophageal reflux management after vertical sleeve gastrectomy

VSG is the most used surgical procedure in the world. Among the main complications linked to this procedure is GERD. It is apparent that endoscopic control protocols should be undertaken in all patients recovering from a VSG procedure. This is particularly key when taking into account the large number of patients suffering from GERD that show no symptoms, a situation that in many cases leads to severe esophagitis or even adenocarcinoma. Once the pertinent diagnostic tests have been carried out, the specialist should seek a conservative medical treatment including PPI. In the event that this treatment should fail, the next step to be considered should be a surgical procedure. In this case, the ideal procedure would be a reconversion to gastric bypass due to its low-risk and its results. There are other alternatives such as the Stretta, Linx or ARMS procedures; however, further research is necessary to prove their reliability.

Concomitant Hiatal Hernia Repair With Sleeve Gastrectomy: Impact on Gastroesophageal Reflux?

BACKGROUND

Hiatal hernia (HH), whenever encountered during sleeve gastrectomy (SG), needs to be addressed because of its strong association with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, the mid-term to long-term effects of hiatal hernia repair (HHR) on GERD remain unclear.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional observational analysis of patients who underwent SG + HHR and had completed at least 1 year of follow-up. The preoperative data were retrieved from a prospectively maintained database. Of the 590 patients who underwent SG, 63 patients (10.7%) with concomitant HHR were assessed for the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and symptoms of GERD using the GERD-Q questionnaire.

RESULTS

Of the 63 patients, 11 were lost to follow-up, and one underwent Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for HH recurrence and severe reflux. The remaining 51 patients were assessed at a mean follow-up of 3.7±2.0 years. Of these, 51% (26/51) patients had preoperative reflux symptoms. On follow-up, 69.2% (18/26) had complete resolution with significant improvement in their GERD-Q scores (9.8±3.1 to 6.5±2.1; P =0.001), while 76.2% (16/21) of patients were off the PPIs. The incidence of de novo GERD was found in 20% (5/25) of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients of morbid obesity with HH, concomitant HHR with SG leads to improvement of the reflux symptoms in more than two-thirds of the patients, besides alleviating the use of PPIs.

Anti-reflux surgery vs. bariatric surgery as anti-GERD and hiatal hernia treatment in obese patient. New surgical proposals

The persistence of obesity favors the failure of the Fundoplication (FP) in the treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux (GER). However, the weight loss obtained with the performance of a Gastric Bypass (GBP) allows a good resolution of symptoms, without increasing the incidence of postoperative complications. All of this leads us to consider that while FP is the indication in patients with BMI < 30, in those patients with BMI > 35, GBP appears to be the procedure of choice. But there is still no position in the case of patients with a BMI between 30 and 35, although we must take into account that an increase in GER recurrence has been described after FP in patients with a BMI > 30. Although Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG) is one of the most frequently used bariatric procedures in recent years, its association with a high rate of postoperative GER has led several authors to propose its performance associated with an anti-reflux procedure in patients with GER symptoms. Likewise, if the existence of an Hiatal Hernia is verified, it must be treated by hiatoplasty, both during the performance of a GBP and a SG. This simultaneous treatment is not associated with an increase in complications.

Reflux and Barrett's esophagus after sleeve gastrectomy: analysis of a statewide database

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have suggested that sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is associated with the development of Barrett esophagus (BE) even in the absence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the rates of upper endoscopy and incidence of new BE diagnoses in patients undergoing SG.

SETTING

This was a claims-data study of patients who underwent SG between 2012 and 2017 while enrolled in a U.S. statewide database.

METHODS

Diagnostic claims data were used to identify pre- and postoperative rates of upper endoscopy, GERD, reflux esophagitis, and BE. Time-to-event analysis using a Kaplan-Meier approach was performed to estimate the cumulative postoperative incidence of these conditions.

RESULTS

We identified 5562 patients who underwent SG between 2012 and 2017. Of these, 1972 patients (35.5%) had at least 1 diagnostic record of upper endoscopy. The preoperative incidences of a diagnosis of GERD, esophagitis, and BE were 54.9%, 14.6%, and .9%, respectively. The predicted postoperative incidences of GERD, esophagitis, and BE, respectively, were 18%, 25.4%, and 1.6% at 2 years and 32.1%, 85.0%, and 6.4% at 5 years.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large statewide database, rates of esophagogastroduodenoscopy remained low after SG, but the incidence of a new postoperative esophagitis or BE diagnosis in patients who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy was higher than in the general population. Patients undergoing SG may have a disproportionately high risk of developing reflux complications including BE after surgery.

Postoperative outcomes for sleeve gastrectomy patients with positive pH-defined GERD

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a possible side effect of sleeve gastrectomy (SG). However, procedure selection for patients with GERD and risk factors for morbidity after bypass surgeries is complex. For patients with a preoperative GERD diagnosis, literature related to worsening postoperative symptoms is discordant.

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluated the effects of SG on patients with pre-operative GERD confirmed through pH testing.

SETTING

University Hospital, United States.

METHODS

This was a single-center case-series. SG patients with preoperative pH testing were compared based on DeMeester scoring. Preoperative demographics, endoscopy results, need for conversion surgery, and changes in gastrointestinal quality of life (GIQLI) scores were compared. Two-sample independent t-tests assuming unequal variances were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty SG patients had preoperative pH testing. Nine patients were GERD positive; median DeMeester score 26.7 (22.1-31.15). Eleven patients were GERD negative, with a median DeMeester score of 9.0 (4.5-13.1). The two groups had similar median BMI, preoperative endoscopic findings and use of GERD medications. Concurrent hiatal hernia repair was performed in 22% of GERD positive vs. 36% of GERD negative patients, (p = 0.512). Two patients in the GERD positive cohort required conversion to gastric bypass (22%), while none in the GERD negative cohort did. No significant postoperative differences were noted in GIQLI, heartburn, or regurgitation symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Objective pH testing may allow the differentiation of patients who would be higher risk for need for conversion to gastric bypass. For patients with mild symptoms, but negative pH testing, SG may represent a durable option.

Comparison of upper gastrointestinal series and symptom questionnaires with intraoperative diagnosis of hiatal hernia during sleeve gastrectomy

BACKGROUND

Hiatal hernias are common in bariatric surgery patients, but the utility of preoperative hiatal hernia diagnosis prior to sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is debated.

OBJECTIVE

This study compared preoperative and intraoperative hiatal hernia detection rates in patients undergoing laparoscopic SG.

SETTING

University hospital, United States.

METHODS

As part of a randomized trial evaluating the role of routine crural inspection during SG, an initial cohort was prospectively studied to assess the correlation between preoperative upper gastrointestinal (UGI) series, reflux and dysphagia symptoms, and intraoperative hiatal hernia diagnosis. Preoperatively, patients completed the Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Questionnaire (GerdQ), the Brief Esophageal Dysphagia Questionnaire (BEDQ), and a UGI series. Intraoperatively, patients with an anteriorly visible defect underwent hiatal hernia repair followed by SG. All others were randomized to standalone SG or posterior crural inspection with repair of any hiatal hernia identified prior to SG.

RESULTS

Between November 2019 and June 2020, 100 patients (72 female patients) were enrolled. Preoperative UGI series identified hiatal hernia in 28% (26 of 93) of patients. Intraoperatively, hiatal hernia was diagnosed during initial inspection in 35 patients. Diagnosis was associated with older age, lower body mass index, and Black race but did not correlate with GerdQ or BEDQ. Using the standard conservative approach, compared with intraoperative diagnosis, sensitivity and specificity of the UGI series were 35.3% and 80.7%, respectively. Hiatal hernia was identified in an additional 34% (10 of 29) of patients randomized to posterior crural inspection.

CONCLUSION

Hiatal hernias are highly prevalent in SG patients. However, GerdQ, BEDQ, and a UGI series unreliably identify hiatal hernia in the preoperative setting and should not influence intraoperative evaluation of the hiatus during SG.

Efficacy of Sleeve Gastrectomy with Concomitant Hiatal Hernia Repair versus Sleeve-Fundoplication on Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Resolution: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

(1) Background: There is still disagreement over how sleeve gastrectomy (SG) affects gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The debate regarding the best option for patients undergoing bariatric surgery who are also affected by GERD and/or hiatal hernia continues to divide the community of bariatric surgeons. While concomitant hiatal hernia repair (SG + HHR) has been proposed as a means of reducing the risk of GERD following SG with varying degrees of success, the addition of a fundoplication (SG + FP) has been suggested in recent years as a way to improve the lower esophageal sphincter's competency. The aim of this study is to systematically review and meta-analyze the efficacy of SG + HHR versus SG + FP on GERD remission in patients with obesity. (2) Methods: A systematic review of the literature was conducted, and studies analyzing the effects of SG + HHR versus SG + FP on postoperative GERD were included. The methodological quality of included trials was evaluated. The primary outcome was postoperative GERD rate, erosive esophagitis, and 12-month weight loss. Secondary outcomes included postoperative complications and mortality. The PRISMA guidelines were used to carry out the present systematic review (PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42023405600). (3) Results: Fifteen articles with a total of 1164 patients were included in the meta-analysis; 554 patients underwent SG + HHR while 610 underwent SG + FP. In the SG + HHR group, 58.5 ± 28.9% of subjects presented clinical GERD symptoms compared to 20.4 ± 17.5% postoperatively (p < 0.001). In the SG + FP group, 64.8 ± 39.4% were affected by GERD preoperatively compared to only 5 ± 8.1% postoperatively (p < 0.001). SG + FP patients had a significantly greater GERD remission compared to SG + HHR (p < 0.001). Weight loss was similar between groups (p = 0.125). The rate of leaks was 0.18% and 0.33% in the SG + HHR and SG + FP, respectively (p = 0.657), while perforations were significantly higher after SG + FP compared to the SG + HHR group (3.1% versus 0%, p = 0.002). The mortality rate was significantly greater in the SG + FP group (0.5% versus 0%, p = 0.002). (4) Conclusions: This study revealed that both SG with concomitant HHR and sleeve-fundoplication are effective in terms of reflux resolution and weight outcomes, with superiority of SG + FP in terms of GERD control, despite a greater overall complication rate. Both strategies can therefore be suggested as a suitable alternative variant to a conventional SG in subjects with obesity and concomitant hiatal hernia and/or GERD. Studies with extended follow-up and direct comparisons of these surgical approaches to conventional SG are warranted.

Reconstruction of the phreno-esophageal ligament (R-PEL) prevents the intrathoracic migration (ITM) after concomitant sleeve gastrectomy and hiatal hernia repair

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG) is the most attractive bariatric procedure, but the postoperative intrathoracic gastric migration (ITM) and "de novo" GERD are major concerns. The main objective of our study was to evaluate the efficiency of the concomitant HHR with or without partial reconstruction of phreno-esophageal ligament (R-PEL) to prevent ITM after LSG. The secondary objectives focused on procedure's metabolic and GERD-related outcomes.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

Consecutive patients who underwent primary LSG and concomitant HHR were included in a single-center prospective study. According to the HHR surgical technique, two groups were analyzed and compared: Group A included patients receiving crura approximation only and Group B patients with R-PEL. The patients' evolution of co-morbidities, GERD symptoms, radiologic, and endoscopic details were prospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

Two hundred seventy-three patients undergoing concurrent HHR and LSG were included in the study (Group A and B, 146 and 127 patients) The mean age and BMI were 42.6 ± 11.3 and 43.4 ± 6.8 kg/m2. The 12-month postoperative ITM was radiologically found in more than half of the patients in Group A, while in group B, the GEJ's position appeared normal in 91.3% of the patients, meaning that R-PEL reduced 7 times the rate of ITM. The percentage of no-improvement and "de novo" severe esophagitis (Los Angeles C) was 4 times higher in group A 3.4% vs. 0.8% with statistical significance, and correlated to ITM. The GERD symptoms were less frequent in Group B vs Group A, 21.3% vs 37%, with statistical significance. No Barrett's esophagus and no complication were recorded in any of the patients.

CONCLUSION

Concurrent LSG and HHR by crura approximation only has a very high rate of ITM in the first postoperative year (over 50%). R-PEL is an innovative technique which proved to be very efficient in preventing the ITM after HHR.

Comparison of Sleeve Volume Between Banded and Non-banded Sleeve Gastrectomy: Midterm Effect on Weight and Food Tolerance-a Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Sleeve dilatation after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) causes weight regain (WR). Banded sleeve gastrectomy (BSG) was proposed to prevent dilatation and reduce WR.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study on patients who underwent BSG and LSG and completed 4 years of follow-up from 2016 to 2021 was included. Body mass index (BMI), percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL), percentage of total weight loss (%TWL), and FT scores were calculated at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years. The sleeve volume was estimated at 6 months, 1 year, and 4 years. Multi-variate analysis was conducted to assess correlations between covariates. WR was calculated as weight gain > 10%, > 10 kg above the nadir, or BMI increase of ≥ 5 kg/m 2 above the nadir.

RESULTS

This study included LSG 1279 patients and BSG 132 patients. Mean %EWL at 1 year was 83.87 ± 17.25% in LSG vs. 85.71 ± 7.92% in BSG and was 83.47 ± 18.87% in LSG and 85.54 ± 7.48% in BSG at 4 years. Both had significant weight loss over time (p. < 0.001) with no significant main effect of surgery (p.0.438). Mean sleeve volume at 6 months was 102.32 ± 9.88 ± 10.28 ml in LSG vs. 101.89 ± 10.019 ml in BSG and at 4 years was 580.25 ± 112.25 ml in LSG vs. 157.94 ± 12.54 ml in BSG (p. < 0.001). WR occurred in 136 (10.6%) and 4 (3.1%) (p.0.002) in LSG and BSG patients, 90 (7%) vs. zero (0%) (p.0.002) and 31 (2.4%) vs. zero (0%) (p.0.07) using the > 10%, > 10 kg increase above the nadir and the ≥ 5 kg/m 2 BMI increases above the nadir formulas, respectively.

CONCLUSION

BSG had significantly lower sleeve volume, significantly lower WR, and significantly lower FT scores than LSG after 4 years from surgery; however, volume changes were not correlated with weight loss.

Impacts of sleeve gastrectomy on gastroesophageal reflux disease in severely obese Korean patients

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has established popularity as a bariatric and metabolic surgery. However, the incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) following LSG is controversial. This study aims to describe the prevalence of de novo GERD after LSG.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed for 130 patients who underwent a routine endoscopic surveillance before and after LSG between January 2013 and October 2018. The diagnosis of GERD was determined by presence of symptoms, history of PPI treatment, and endoscopic findings. The esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) was performed annually after LSG and/or when the patients complained of severe reflux symptoms.

RESULTS

The prevalence of GERD before surgery was 18.5%. At 1 year after LSG, GERD was present in 70 (53.8%) of the 130 patients. GERD consisted of 55 patients with newly developed GERD, and 15 with preexisting GERD. 9 (37.5%) out of pre-existing GERD patients were free of symptoms and abnormal finding at EGD following LSG. During the LSG, 66 (50.8%) patients with hiatal hernia underwent re-approximation of the diaphragmatic crura. There was no significant relationship between hiatal hernia repair and postoperative GERD (p = 0.39). Number of patients taking PPI medication before and after LSG were 34 (26.2%) and 49 (37.7%). Out of 56 (43.1%) patients with endoscopic lesions, LA grade A was 31 (23.9%), B = 15 (11.5%), C = 4 (3.1%), and D = 6 (4.6%).

CONCLUSION

In this study, 42.3% (n = 55) of total patients developed newly developed GERD, and 7.7% (n = 10) had LA grade C or D esophagitis.

Impact of concurrent hiatal hernia repair during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy on patient-reported gastroesophageal reflux symptoms: a state-wide analysis

BACKGROUND

Concurrent hiatal hernia repair (HHR) during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) may improve gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms. However, patient-reported outcomes are limited, and the influence of surgeon technique remains unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To assess patient-reported GERD severity before and after LSG with and without concomitant HHR.

SETTING

Teaching and non-teaching hospitals participating in a state-wide quality improvement collaborative.

METHODS

Using a state-wide bariatric-specific data registry, all patients who underwent a primary LSG between 2015 and 2019 who completed a baseline and 1 year validated GERD health related quality of life (GERD-HRQL) survey were identified (n = 11,742). GERD severity at 1 year as well as 30-day risk-adjusted adverse events was compared between patients who underwent LSG with or without HHR. Results were also stratified by anterior versus posterior HHR.

RESULTS

A total of 4015 patients underwent a LSG-HHR (34%). Compared to patients who underwent LSG without HHR, LSG-HHR patients were older (47.8 yr versus 44.6 yr; P < .0001), had a lower preoperative body mass index (BMI) (45.8 kg/m² versus 48 kg/m²; P < .0001) and more likely to be female (85.2% versus 77.6%, P < .0001). Patients who underwent a posterior HHR (n = 3205) experienced higher rates of symptom improvement (69.5% versus 64.0%, P = .0014) and lower rates of new onset symptoms at 1 year (28.2% versus 30.2%, P = .0500). Patients who underwent an anterior HHR (n = 496) experienced higher rates of hemorrhage and readmissions with no significant difference in symptom improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

Concurrent posterior hiatal HHR at the time of sleeve gastrectomy can improve reflux symptoms. Patients undergoing anterior repair derive no benefit and should be avoided.

Does the use of bioabsorbable mesh for hiatal hernia repair at the time of bariatric surgery reduce recurrence rates? A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Anywhere from 16% to 37% of patients undergoing bariatric and metabolic surgery are estimated to have a hiatal hernia. To address the lack of long-term data showing the efficacy of bioabsorbable mesh in reducing the recurrence of hiatal hernia in patients who undergo bariatric surgery, we evaluated the world literature and performed a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate hiatal hernia recurrence rates after placement of bioabsorbable mesh in bariatric patients.

SETTING

Meta-analysis of world literature.

METHODS

We performed a literature search using PubMed and MEDLINE with search terms including "hiatal hernia recurrence," "bariatric surgery," "bioabsorbable mesh," "Gore BIO-A," and "trimethylene carbonate." Analysis was conducted to compare surgical time, length of stay, recurrence rate, hernia size, and changes in body mass index before and after surgery between mesh-group (MG) and nonmesh (NM) patients. The meta-analysis was described using standardized mean difference, weighted mean difference, effect size, and 95% confidence interval (CI). An I² statistic was computed to assess heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Twelve studies with 1351 patients were included in our meta-analysis. Four studies had both an MG and an NM group. There were 668 patients in the MG and 683 patients in the NM group. Hernia size noted in the NM group (7 cm²) was compared with that in the MG (6.5 cm²) (95% CI: 3.89-9.14; P = .86). The MG had fewer recurrences than the NM group (effect size, 2% versus 14%; 95% CI: -.26 to -.02; P = .027). The average follow-up was 28.8 months for the MG and 32.8 months for the NM group.

CONCLUSION

Repair with bioabsorbable mesh at the time of the index bariatric surgery is more effective at reducing the recurrence rate of hiatal hernia than suture cruroplasty. Further studies investigating the long-term outcomes of bioabsorbable mesh placed at the time of bariatric surgery are needed.

Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Symptoms after Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Retrospective Study

(1) Background: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is widely performed in bariatric surgery. However, the prevalence and risk factors of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms after LSG remain unclear to date. This study aimed to identify risk factors of GERD after LSG. (2) Methods: We conducted a retrospective study at Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and reviewed 296 patients who underwent LSG from 2016 to 2019. A total of 143 patients who underwent preoperative esophagogastroduodenoscopy and completed the 12-month postoperative follow-up were enrolled. Patients’ demographic data, comorbidities, and postoperative weight loss results were recorded for analysis. The GerdQ questionnaire was used to assess GERD after LSG. (3) Results: There were eight surgical complications (5.6%) among the 143 studied patients (median age, 36 years; 56 (39.2%) men; median body weight 105.5 kg; median body mass index [BMI], 38.5 kg/m2). Twenty-three patients (16.1%) developed de novo GERD symptoms. GERD was significantly associated with older age (p = 0.022) and lower BMI (<35 kg/m2, p = 0.028). In multiple logistic regression analysis, age and BMI were significantly associated with GERD. (4) Conclusions: LSG is a safe and effective weight loss surgery. In our study, it led to 16.1% of de novo GERD symptoms, which were significantly related to older age and lower BMI (<35 kg/m2).

Peri-operative Morbidity of Nissen Sleeve Gastrectomy: Prospective Evaluation of a Cohort of 365 Patients, Beyond the Learning Curve

PURPOSE

Over the last decade, an important interest was taken to prevent the reflux following sleeve. A new variant, Nissen-sleeve, was described with the purpose to prevent GERD and to decrease the occurrence of leak. The current study reports the preliminary results of a prospective trial.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All consecutive patients who underwent a Nissen-Sleeve between January 2018 and September 2020 were included. Baseline characteristics including age, gender, weight, body mass index (BMI), GERD symptoms, and treatment were evaluated after 1 year. Operative time, length of stay, complication, and reoperation data were also collected.

RESULTS

Three hundred sixty-five consecutive patients decided to undergo Nissen-sleeve: 75% females with median age of 41.2 years (+ / - 14.1) and an average BMI of 41.6 kg/m² (+ / - 5.4). There were 16 cases (4.4%) of early postoperative complications (< 30 days): six cases of acute wrap perforation (1.6%), intraabdominal bleeding for 5 patients (1.4%), one case of wrap dilatation (0.3%), one case of acute complete aphagia, one case of incarcerated umbilical hernia, and 2 cases (0.5%) of pulmonary atelectasis/pneumonia and one venous pulmonary embolism. We recorded the following complications: 16 patients (4.4%) mild dysphagia; 3 patients (0.8%) chronic dysphagia; and 2 cases of wrap perforation that have been diagnosed 8 and 9 months respectively, after the procedure due to the use of steroids not associated with PPI intake. The mean operative time was 83 min (46-125 min). The conversion and mortality rates were nil.

CONCLUSION

Following the initial learning curve and additional technical modifications, the Nissen-Sleeve appears to be a safe surgical technique with an acceptable early postoperative complication rate.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02310178.

Staple Line Intrathoracic Migration After Sleeve Gastrectomy: Correlation between Symptoms, CT Three-Dimensional Stomach Analysis, and 24-h pH Monitoring

PURPOSE

Migration of the staple line is the definition of sliding hiatus hernia in sleeve gastrectomy patients. The main aim was to determine the frequency and measurement of intrathoracic staple line migration and its correlation with GERD symptoms and pH monitoring.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a prospective clinical trial including all patients who underwent sleeve gastrectomy more than 1 year previously. All the patients underwent computed tomography (CT) imaging, and migration of the proximal end of the suture above the level of the hiatus was measured in mm. All the patients with symptoms suggestive of GERD were assessed using the GERD impact scale (GIS), and wireless 24-h esophageal pH and symptom association monitoring (SAP) were carried out. Analysis of risk factors for postoperative staple line migration was performed.

RESULTS

Between March 2018 and December 2018, 194 patients were evaluated (mean age 45.1 ± 11.2 years; 161 females); 88/194 (45.4%) presented an average intrathoracic migration of 16.2 ± 6.9 mm. Thirty-eight of 194 (19.5%) patients presented symptoms suggestive of gastroesophageal reflux. There was a significant relationship between staple line intrathoracic migration and postsleeve GERD symptomatology (p = 0.0004, OR = 4.25 [1.92-9.39]). However, there was no significant correlation between positive 24-h pH monitoring and intrathoracic migration of the staple line (p = 0.1).

CONCLUSION

A migration greater than 17 mm was strongly correlated with postsleeve GERD symptoms but not with positive 24-h pH monitoring.

The Effect of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy With Concomitant Hiatal Hernia Repair on Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

AIM

The aim of this study is to reveal incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and to determine the effect of LSG with hiatal hernia repair on GERD.

METHODS

A total of 440 patients, 395 of them underwent primary LSG (group A) and 45 of them underwent LSG with concomitant hiatal hernia repair (group B) between March 2018 and September 2020 were included in the study. Presence of hiatal hernia was evaluated with endoscopy and confirmed intraoperatively. Patients were evaluated for GERD symptoms in the pre and postoperative period. Two groups' data were compared.

RESULTS

Mean age of the 440 patients was 38.4±11 years (56% female) and mean body mass index was 44.2±7 kg/m2. Symptomatic GERD was detected in 103 (23.4%) and hiatal hernia was detected in 45 (10.2%) patients. İn the preoperative assessment there was no difference with regard to demographics and symptomatic GERD between the 2 groups. Mean duration of follow-up was 17±5.7 (12 to 28) months in the overall study population. Mean body mass index decreased to 28.3±4.9 kg/m2at 12 months after LSG. Excess weight loss ratio was found to be 81±20.4%. The rate of symptomatic GERD after LSG in group A was found to be 20% (n=79/395). Of these patients, 46 (11.6%) had de novo GERD and 33 (38%) had persistent GERD. GERD resolved completely in 54 (62%) patients. In the group B, the rate of symptomatic GERD was detected as 33% (n=15/45) (P=0.04). The rate of de novo GERD (20%) was also higher in group B (P=0.03). The rate of persistent GERD (37%) and GERD resolution (62%) were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSION

İn our study, symptomatic and de novo GERD rates were detected to be higher in the LSG+HH group than LSG alone.

Relationship between gastroesophageal reflux disease and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a narrative review

This paper aims to revisit the relationship between gastroesophageal reflux disease and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in obese patients by reviewing the recent available literature, in the form of a narrative review. The interpretation of the current evidence is challenged by the fact that published data are contradictory and comparison between studies is difficult. Most studies investigate the presence of gastroesophageal reflux disease by assessing only the symptoms reported by patients. A few studies have objectively investigated gastroesophageal reflux disease by functional tests and endoscopic evaluation. Also, the surgical technique of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy plays an important role in the incidence of postoperative gastroesophageal reflux disease. In conclusion, surgeons must be aware of the existence of gastroesophageal reflux disease and, at the same time, patients should be informed regarding the possible effect of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy on gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Effect of Concomitant Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy and Hiatal Hernia Repair on Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Patients with Obesity: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Hiatal hernia repair (HHR) during sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is recommended when hiatal hernia (HH) is found intraoperatively. However, its effect on gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) remains controversial.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of concomitant SG and HHR on GERD in patients with obesity.

METHODS

Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched for all studies reporting the efficacy of SG+HHR for patients with obesity and GERD up to March 2021.

RESULTS

A total of 18 studies totaling 937 patients met the inclusion criteria. The results of meta-analysis showed that after SG+HHR, there was a significant reduction in GERD symptoms (OR: 0.20; 95% CI: 0.10 to 0.41; P < 0.00001), improvement in esophagitis (OR: 0.12, 95% CI: 0.05 to 0.26, P < 0.001), and decrease in GERD-HRQL (MD: 19.13, 95% CI: -3.74 to 34.51; P=0.01). The incidence of GERD remission after SG+HHR was 68.0% (95% CI: 55.0-80.9%), de novo GERD was 12% (95% CI: 8-16%), and HH recurrence was 11% (95% CI: 4 to 19%). SG+HHR was superior to SG alone in GERD remission (OR: 2.97, 95% CI: 1.78 to 4.95, P < 0.0001). However, there was no significant difference in de novo GERD after SG+HHR compared with SG alone.

CONCLUSIONS

SG+HHR can positively affect weight loss, GERD resolution, esophagitis reduction, and GERD-HRQL improvement. SG+HHR seems to have a promising future in patients with obesity and GERD. However, further studies based on objective assessment are warranted to evaluate these results better.

Reflux After Sleeve Gastrectomy: An Update

Background: Modifications of gastric anatomy, function, and of the esophagogastric junction secondary to sleeve gastrectomy (SG) can worsen the symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Its late diagnosis and poor treatment can lead to serious complications. In recent years, attempts have been made to optimize preoperative studies and improve surgical techniques to prevent this problem. The aim of this study was to update on the presence of GERD and their symptoms post-SG. Methods: A literature review of articles based on randomized clinical trials on the presence of GERD after SG was carried out, in a period of 10 years. Results: A result of 336 articles was obtained, of which 327 were discarded and 9 were included. The variables of GERD post-SG were analyzed according to their symptoms ("improved," "worsened," and "unchanged"), "remission," or appearance "de novo." Conclusion: GERD is a frequently associated pathology in obese patients. Several authors reported that symptoms worsen after SG, and has been diagnosed de novo. The application of exhaustive preoperative studies and a correct surgical technique could reduce its incidence.

Hiatal Hernia Repair during Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis on Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease symptoms changes

Introduction Obesity is associated with a higher prevalence of various comorbidities including gastroesophageal reflux disease. It is yet still unclear whether LSG exacerbates or alleviates GERD symptoms. Available date in the literature on LSG influence on GERD are contradictory. Material and methods Systematic review of literature comparing GERD in sleeve gastrectomy versus sleeve gastrectomy with concomtitant hiatal repair. The review was conducted in January 2021 in accordance to PRISMA guidelines. Inclusion criteria involved reporting GERD and comparison of above mentioned techniques. Primary outcome of interest were alleviation of GERD and "de-novo" GERD symptoms. Secondary outcomes were operative time and morbidity. Results Initial search yielded 831 records. After the review and full-text screening 5 studies were included in the analysis. There were no differences in terms of GERD outcomes, p=0.74 for alleviation, p=0.77 for new symptoms. Concomitant hiatal hernia repair significantly prolongs sleeve gastrectomy by 38 mins. Conclusion There are no differences in GERD between hiatal hernia repair during sleeve gastrectomy in comparison to sleeve gastrectomy alone. More high-quality studies are required to fully evaluate this subject.

Impact of the Hepatic Branch of the Vagus Nerve Transection in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy for Patients with Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

BACKGROUND

An increase in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has been reported, and concomitant hiatal hernia repair (HHR) during LSG is expected to reduce the incidence of post-LSG GERD. In HHR, the hepatic branch of the vagus nerve is anatomically transected. Recent experimental animal models suggest that vagotomy may affect glycemic control and weight loss through a neuroendocrine response.

OBJECTIVES

To examine whether LSG with/without hepatic branch vagotomy (HV) has a clinical impact on glycemic control in patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Furthermore, the impact on weight loss and post-LSG GERD were evaluated.

METHODS

A total of 204 Japanese patients with obesity and T2DM, who underwent LSG and completed 1-year follow-up, were retrospectively analyzed. Operative outcomes, weight loss, glycemic, and GERD-related parameters were compared between the LSG/HHR/HV group (n = 89) and the LSG group (n = 115).

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the background factors in terms of anthropometric and T2DM-related parameters between the groups. The median operation times in the LSG/HHR/HV and LSG groups were 133 and 124 minutes, respectively (p = 0.236). At 1 year, the diabetes remission rate, HbA1c, fasting glucose, and C-peptide levels were all comparable between the groups. The weight loss effect was also comparable. The patients in the LSG/HHR/HV group achieved significant improvement and prevention of GERD and hiatus hernia (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

HV does not appear to have a clinical impact on glycemic control and weight loss. Concomitant HHR with LSG serves to reduce post-LSG GERD.

In the eye of the beholder: surgeon variation in intra-operative perceptions of hiatal hernia and reflux outcomes after sleeve gastrectomy

BACKGROUND

Hiatal hernia repair performed at the time of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) may reduce post-operative reflux symptoms. It is unclear whether intra-operative diagnosis of hiatal hernia varies among surgeons or if it affects outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

Surgeons (n = 38) participating in a statewide bariatric surgery quality improvement collaborative reviewed 33 videos of LSG in which no hiatal hernia repair was performed. Reviewers were blinded to patient information and were asked whether they perceived a hiatal hernia. Surgeon characteristics and surgeon-specific patient outcomes for LSG were compared between surgeons who identified at least one hiatal hernia during video review and those who did not.

RESULTS

Ten surgeons (26%) identified at least one hiatal hernia after reviewing the videos. There were no significant differences in operative experience or practice type between surgeons who did and did not identify hiatal hernias. Surgeons who identified a hiatal hernia more often performed concurrent hiatal hernia repair in their practice when compared to those who did not (43.0% versus 36.5%, p < 0.001). Although complication rates were similar between surgeon groups, there were higher rates of de novo reflux symptoms (13.6% versus 11.1%, p = 0.032) and lower rates of antacid discontinuation at one-year (71.0% versus 77.2%, p = 0.043) among surgeons who identified hiatal hernias.

CONCLUSION

Surgeons who identified hiatal hernias during video review had a higher rate of concurrent hiatal hernia repairs in their practice. This was not associated with improved patient-reported reflux symptoms after LSG. Standardizing identification and management of hiatal hernias during bariatric surgery may help improve reflux outcomes post-operatively.

Evaluation of Anterior Phrenoesophageal Ligament Preservation During Hiatus Hernia Repair in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy as an Anti-Reflux Measure

Background: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is the most common bariatric procedure, but it had been reported to increase the incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and its consequences. Some surgeons tried to decrease that by routine hiatal dissection with hiatus hernia (HH) repair. But, hiatal dissection with HH repair is considered an important risk factor for the newly emergent complication of intrathoracic sleeve migration (ITSM). We proposed a new hiatal repair technique, which is expected to improve GERD without increasing the potential for ITSM. This study aims to evaluate the results of this technique. Methods: A prospective observational study was performed at the Ain Shams University Hospital between January 2016 and December 2019. It included patients with morbid obesity and one of the following: Clinical manifestations of GERD with endoscopic evidence of HH/laxity or esophagitis. Asymptomatic HH/laxity. LSG combined and HH repair with anterior phrenoesophageal ligament (PEL) preservation was performed for all patients. Patients were followed up for 12 months. Patients were evaluated after 1 year with an upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy. Results: Thirty-two patients were enrolled in our study. After 1 year, the mean excess weight loss was 63% ± 23%. The mean GERD health-related quality of life (GERD-HRQL) score dropped to 12 ± 8. GERD-HRQL scores improved in 25 of documented esophagitis patients, worsened in 2, and did not change in 2 patients. Endoscopy showed a decrease in rate and degree of esophagitis (from 28 [87.5%] preoperatively to 8 [25%] patients after 1 year of follow-up). The improvement was better in patients with grade A and B esophagitis. Two patients were converted to gastric bypass due to persistent intractable GERD symptoms with grade C esophagitis despite medical treatment. No cases of ITSM were detected. Conclusion: Anterior PEL preserving HH repair combined with LSG is a safe and feasible technique that can control GERD manifestations without interference with the technique or outcome of LSG.

Concomitant Hiatal Hernia Repair with Sleeve Gastrectomy: A 5-Year Analysis

Background: The sleeve gastrectomy (SG) can be associated with postoperative gastroesophageal reflux and when a hiatal hernia (HH) is present, it should be fixed. Earlier studies have shown that 20% of SG have a concomitant hiatal hernia repair (SG+HHR). The aim of this project is to determine the rate of SG+HHR in a large state administrative database.

Methods: The Texas Inpatient Public Use Data File (IPUDF) and Outpatient Public Use Data File (OPUDF) for the years 2013-2017 were examined for patients that underwent SG+HHR at the same time. Patient demographics, diagnosis, and charge data were also examined. A t-test was performed between groups and P was considered significant at < 0.05.

Results: In the OPUDF, there were 6,193 (33.7%) patients who underwent SG+HHR out of 18,403 patients who underwent SG. Mean charges were $94,741 [standard deviation (SD) = $87,284]. Length of stay (LOS) was 2.1 (SD = 3.5) vs 2.3 days (SD = 3.3) with a shorter stay for SG+HHR vs SG alone (P < 0.001). In the IPUDF, there were 11,536 (21.1%) patients who underwent SG+HHR out of 54,545 patients who underwent SG. Mean charges were $69,006 (SD = $46,365). LOS was 1.59 days (SD = 3.7) for SG+HHR vs 1.63 days (SD = 1.6) for SG (P = .043). The rate of SG+HHR increased over the study period.

Conclusions: SG+HHR is common in both the outpatient and inpatient setting. There is a yearly trend of increasing rates of SG+HHR.

ASMBS position statement on the rationale for performance of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy before and after metabolic and bariatric surgery

The following position statement is issued by the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery in response to inquiries made to the Society by patients, physicians, society members, hospitals, health insurance payors, the media, and others regarding the need and possible strategies for screening endoscopic examination before metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS), as well as the rationale, indications, and strategies for postoperative surveillance for mucosal abnormalities, including gastroesophageal reflux disease and associated esophageal mucosal injuries (erosive esophagitis and Barrett's esophagus) that may develop in the long term after MBS, specifically for patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. The general principles described here may also apply to procedures such as biliopancreatic diversion (BPD) and BPD with duodenal switch (DS); however, the paucity of procedure-specific literature for BPD and DS limits the value of this statement to those procedures. In addition, children with obesity undergoing MBS may have unique considerations and are not specifically addressed in this position statement. This recommendation is based on current clinical knowledge, expert opinion, and published peer-reviewed scientific evidence available at this time. The statement is not intended to be and should not be construed as stating or establishing a local, regional, or national standard of care. The statement will be revised in the future as additional evidence becomes available.

Gastroesophageal Reflux After Sleeve Gastrectomy

Sleeve gastrectomy continues to be the most commonly performed bariatric operation worldwide. Development or worsening of pre-existing GERD has been recognized as a significant issue postoperatively. There is a paucity of information concerning the most appropriate preoperative workup and the technical and anatomical factors that may or may not contribute to the occurrence of reflux symptoms. Contemporary data quality is deficient given the predominantly retrospective nature, limited follow-up time, and heterogeneous outcome measures across studies. This has produced mixed results regarding the postoperative incidence and severity of GERD. Ultimately, better-constructed investigations are needed in order to offer evidence-based recommendations that may guide preoperative workup and improved patient selection criteria.

The Effect of Bariatric Surgery and Endoscopic Procedures on Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Obesity is a global epidemic posing a significant burden on patients and healthcare systems. Gastroesophageal reflux disease is associated with obesity and its prevalence is also growing worldwide. Numerous bariatric surgeries and endoscopic procedures have arisen to assist with weight loss and management of obesity-related conditions. However, the effect of these interventions on reflux is variable and the evidence is often conflicting. To date, Roux-en-Y gastric bypass remains the gold-standard for attaining both reflux and weight loss management, however novel endoscopic techniques are quickly becoming more prevalent as an alternative to surgery. This review aims to summarize currently available endoscopic and surgical weight loss procedures and their impact on reflux symptoms while emphasizing areas requiring additional investigation.

Diagnostic Criteria for Gastro-esophageal Reflux Following Sleeve Gastrectomy

Background

Gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) post-sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is a controversial issue and diagnostic dilemma. Strong heterogeneity exists in the assessment of reflux post-SG, and better diagnostic tools are needed to characterize symptomatic reflux. We aimed to determine the discriminant factors of symptomatic reflux and establish diagnostic thresholds for GERD following SG.

Materials and Methods

Patients post-SG were categorized into asymptomatic and symptomatic cohorts and completed validated symptom questionnaires. All patients underwent stationary esophageal manometry and 24-h ambulatory pH monitoring. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to determine the strongest discriminant factors for GERD.

Results

Baseline characteristics of the asymptomatic cohort (n = 48) and symptomatic cohort (n = 76) were comparable. The median post-operative duration was 7.3 (14.1) vs 7.5 (10.7) months (p = 0.825). The symptomatic cohort was more female predominant (90.8 vs 72.9%, p = 0.008). Reflux scores were significantly higher in the symptomatic group (36.0 vs 10.5, p = 0.003). Stationary manometry parameters were similar, including hiatus hernia prevalence and impaired esophageal motility. The symptomatic cohort had significantly higher total acid exposure, especially while supine (11.3% vs 0.6%, p < 0.001). Univariate and multivariate regressions delineated reflux score and supine acid exposure as discriminant factors for symptomatic reflux. The thresholds for distinguishing symptomatic reflux are as follows: reflux score of 11.5 (sensitivity 84.0%, specificity 68.2%) and supine acid exposure of 2.65% (sensitivity 67.1%, specificity 70.8%).

Conclusion

A reflux score of 11.5 or more or supine acid exposure of 2.65% or more should be considered diagnostic in defining symptomatic reflux following SG.

Sleeve gastrectomy with tailored 360° fundoplication according to Rossetti in patients affected by obesity and gastroesophageal reflux: a prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is the most frequently performed bariatric procedure. Recent studies demonstrated the correlation between LSG and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness of LSG + Rossetti antireflux fundoplication in patients affected by morbid obesity and GERD.

SETTING

High-volume bariatric center, Italy.

METHODS

This is a prospective, observational cohort study that enrolled 58 patients affected by obesity and GERD who underwent surgery. All the patients had a 12-month follow-up. Gastroscopies were performed preoperatively and at month 12 for 35 patients.

RESULTS

At 1 year after surgery, patients had a consistent decrease in body mass index, from 41.9 ± 4.6 kg/m² to 28.2 ± 3.7 kg/m². GERD improved in 97.1% of patients. Co-morbidities, such as hypertension, type 2 diabetes, respiratory dysfunction, and arthropathies improved as well. The visual analogue scale score regarding the global state of health increased significantly, from 58.1 ± 17.1% before surgery to 98.8 ± 4.1% at 1 year after surgery. Two patients had a fundoplication perforation and needed reparative surgery (3.5%). One patient had anemia that needed a blood transfusion (1.7%). Complications were reduced with a learning curve.

CONCLUSION

LSG + Rossetti fundoplication was shown to be a safe and effective intervention. It could be considered an option in obese patients affected by GERD. A longer follow-up is needed to establish the long-term outcomes.

Laparoscopic Sleeve-Fundoplication for Morbidly Obese Patients with Gastroesophageal Reflux: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Introduction

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has rapidly become popular with excellent results. However, LSG may exacerbate or increase the risk of “de novo” gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Adding a fundoplication has been proposed to increase the lower esophageal sphincter competency. The aim of this study was to examine the current evidence and outcomes of sleeve-fundoplication (Sleeve-F).

Materials and Methods

Systematic review and meta-analysis. Web of Science, PubMed, and Embase data sets were consulted.

Results

Six studies (485 patients) met the inclusion criteria. The age of the patient population ranged from 17 to 72 years old and 82% were females. All patients underwent sleeve-fundoplication. Rossetti, Collis-Nissen, and Nissen were the most commonly performed fundoplications. The estimated pooled prevalence of postoperative leak, gastric perforation, and overall complications were 1.0% (95% CI = 0.0–2.0%), 2.9% (95% CI = 0.0–8.3%), and 9.8% (95% CI = 6.7–13.4%), respectively. The pooled reoperation rate was 4.1% (95% CI = 1.3–10%). There was no mortality. At 12-month follow-up, the estimated pooled BMI and %EWL were 29.9 kg/m² (95% CI = 28.5–31.2) and 66.2% (95% CI = 59.3–71.1), respectively, while esophagitis, PPI consumption, and GERD rates were 8.0% (95% CI 3–21%), 7.8% (95% CI 5–13%), and 11% (95% CI 4–26%).

Conclusions

This systematic review and meta-analysis shows that current evidence for Sleeve-F is limited with high postoperative gastric perforation and overall complication rates. Weight loss and GERD resolution seem promising in the short term; however, further studies are warranted to explore long-term effects with instrumental investigations. Sleeve-F should be considered cautiously while future well-structured randomized trials are warranted.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11695-020-05189-6.

Derangement of esophageal anatomy and motility in morbidly obese patients: a prospective study based on high-resolution impedance manometry

BACKGROUND

Morbidly obese patients often suffer from gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). High-resolution impedance manometry (HRIM) allows a comprehensive evaluation of esophageal motility and esophagogastric junction (EGJ) morphology and helps to clarify GERD pathophysiology.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the esophageal function and EGJ anatomy in morbid obesity by HRIM.

SETTING

University Hospital, Taiwan.

METHODS

We consecutively enrolled 57 morbidly obese patients planning to undergo bariatric surgery and 58 healthy volunteers in this prospective study. All patients responded to validated symptom questionnaires and underwent fasting blood tests, HRIM, and esophagogastroduodenoscopy. We compared anthropometric and HRIM parameters between the 2 groups, and analyzed correlations between the GERD symptom scores and clinical variables in the obese patients.

RESULTS

The obese patients, comprising 30 males (53%), had a median age of 35 years and body mass index of 40.5 kg/m2. The 4-second integrated relaxation pressure in the lower esophageal sphincter was significantly higher in the patients than the volunteers (median: 10.8 versus 5.6 mm Hg; P < .001). EGJ outflow obstruction and ineffective esophageal motility were diagnosed in 16% and 11% of the patients, respectively, versus 5% and 28% of the volunteers (P = .022). Manometric hiatal hernia (m-HH) was present in 19 (33%) of the patients and none of the volunteers; all m-HH were associated with erosive esophagitis. Most of the patients were considered as no GERD by the validated questionnaires, regardless of the presence of m-HH and erosive esophagitis.

CONCLUSIONS

The obese patients had a higher lower esophageal sphincter 4-second integrated relaxation pressure and higher prevalence of EGJ outflow obstruction and m-HH than the healthy volunteers. The presence of m-HH was strongly associated with erosive esophagitis. The absence of GERD symptoms in morbid obesity was not necessarily suggestive of negative esophagogastroduodenoscopy and HRIM findings, and the discrepancy existed between esophagogastroduodenoscopy and HRIM for diagnosing HH. A comprehensive evaluation of the EGJ anatomy and esophageal function may be considered before bariatric surgery.