1
|
Kraftson A, Cain-Nielsen AH, Lockwood A, Luo Y, Buda C, Lager C, Esfandiari NH, Oral E, Varban OA. Predicting Early Weight Loss Failure Using a Bariatric Surgery Outcomes Calculator and Weight Loss Curves. Obes Surg 2022; 32:3932-3941. [PMID: 36253661 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-022-06294-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2022] [Revised: 09/23/2022] [Accepted: 09/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Weight loss after bariatric surgery can be accurately predicted using an outcomes calculator; however, outliers exist that do not meet the 1 year post-surgery weight projections. OBJECTIVE Our goal was to determine how soon after surgery these outliers can be identified. DESIGN We conducted a retrospective cohort study. SETTING, PATIENTS, AND INTERVENTION Using a bariatric surgery outcomes calculator formulated by the Michigan Bariatric Surgery Collaborative (MBSC), predicted weight loss at 1 year post-surgery was calculated on all patients who underwent primary bariatric surgery at a single-center academic institution between 2006 and 2015 who also had a documented 1-year follow-up weight (n = 1050). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Weight loss curves were compared between high, low, and non-outliers as defined by their observed-to-expected (O:E) weight loss ratio based on total body weight loss (TBWL) %. RESULTS Mean predicted weight loss for the study group was 39.1 ± 9.9 kg, while mean actual weight loss was 39.7 ± 17.1 kg resulting in a mean O:E 1.01 (± 0.35). Based on analysis of the O:E ratios at 1 year post-surgery, the study group was sub-classified. Low outliers (n = 188, O:E 0.51) had significantly lower weight loss at 2 months (13.1% vs 15.6% and 16.5% TBWL, p < 0. 001) and at 6 months (19% vs 26% and 30% TBWL, p < 0.001) when compared to non-outliers (n = 638, O:E 1.00) and high outliers (n = 224, O:E 1.46), respectively. CONCLUSIONS Weight loss curves based on individually calculated outcomes can help identify low outliers for additional interventions as early as 2 months after bariatric surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Kraftson
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Metabolism, Endocrinology & Diabetes, University of Michigan, 24 Frank Lloyd Wright Drive, Suite G 1500, Ann Arbor, MI, 48105, USA.
| | - Anne H Cain-Nielsen
- Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Amy Lockwood
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Yingying Luo
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Metabolism, Endocrinology & Diabetes, University of Michigan, 24 Frank Lloyd Wright Drive, Suite G 1500, Ann Arbor, MI, 48105, USA
| | - Colleen Buda
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Corey Lager
- Bronson Diabetes and Endocrinology Center, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Nazanene H Esfandiari
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Metabolism, Endocrinology & Diabetes, University of Michigan, 24 Frank Lloyd Wright Drive, Suite G 1500, Ann Arbor, MI, 48105, USA
| | - Elif Oral
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Metabolism, Endocrinology & Diabetes, University of Michigan, 24 Frank Lloyd Wright Drive, Suite G 1500, Ann Arbor, MI, 48105, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Varban OA, Bonham AJ, Stricklen AL, Ross R, Carlin AM, Finks JF, Ghaferi AA. Am I on Track? Evaluating Patient-Specific Weight Loss After Bariatric Surgery Using an Outcomes Calculator. Obes Surg 2021; 31:3210-3217. [PMID: 33825152 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-021-05397-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2021] [Revised: 03/19/2021] [Accepted: 03/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Individual weight loss outcomes after bariatric surgery can vary considerably. As a result, identifying and assisting patients who are not on track to reach their weight loss goals can be challenging. MATERIALS AND METHODS Using a bariatric surgery outcomes calculator, which was formulated using a state-wide bariatric-specific data registry, predicted weight loss at 1 year after surgery was calculated on 658 patients who underwent bariatric surgery at 35 different bariatric surgery programs between 2015 and 2017. Patient characteristics, postoperative complications, and weight loss trajectories were compared between patients who met or exceeded their predicted weight loss calculation to those who did not based on observed to expected weight loss ratio (O:E) at 1 year after surgery. RESULTS Patients who did not meet their predicted weight loss at 1 year (n = 237, 36%) had a mean O:E of 0.71, while patients who met or exceeded their prediction (n = 421, 63%) had a mean O:E = 1.14. At 6 months, there was a significant difference in the percent of the total amount of predicted weight loss between the groups (88% of total predicted weight loss for those that met their 1-year prediction vs 66% for those who did not, p < 0.0001). Age, gender, procedure type, and risk-adjusted complication rates were similar between groups. CONCLUSION Using a bariatric outcomes calculator can help set appropriate weight-loss expectations after surgery and also identify patients who may benefit from additional therapy prior to reaching their weight loss nadir.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver A Varban
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, 2926 Taubman Center, 1500 E Medical Center Drive, SPC 5343, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-5343, USA.
| | - Aaron J Bonham
- Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, 2926 Taubman Center, 1500 E Medical Center Drive, SPC 5343, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-5343, USA
| | - Amanda L Stricklen
- Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, 2926 Taubman Center, 1500 E Medical Center Drive, SPC 5343, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-5343, USA
| | - Rachel Ross
- Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, 2926 Taubman Center, 1500 E Medical Center Drive, SPC 5343, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-5343, USA
| | - Arthur M Carlin
- Department of Surgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Jonathan F Finks
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, 2926 Taubman Center, 1500 E Medical Center Drive, SPC 5343, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-5343, USA
| | - Amir A Ghaferi
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, 2926 Taubman Center, 1500 E Medical Center Drive, SPC 5343, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-5343, USA.,Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, 2926 Taubman Center, 1500 E Medical Center Drive, SPC 5343, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-5343, USA
| |
Collapse
|