Resected gastric volume has no influence on early weight loss after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy

Development and Evaluation of a Quality Assessment Tool for Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Videos: A Review and Comparison of Academic and Online Video Resources

BACKGROUND

Video recording of surgical procedures is increasing in popularity. They are presented in various platforms, many of which are not peer-reviewed. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) videos are widely available; however, there is limited evidence supporting the use of reporting guidelines when uploading LSG videos to create a valuable educational video. We aimed to determine the variations and establish the quality of published LSG videos, in both peer-reviewed literature and on YouTube, using a newly designed checklist to improve the quality and enhance the transparency of video reporting.

METHODS

A quality assessment tool was designed by using existing research and society guidelines, such as the Bariatric Metabolic Surgery Standardization (BMSS). A systematic review using PRISMA guidelines was performed on MEDLINE and EMBASE databases to identify video case reports (academic videos) and a similar search was performed on the commercial YouTube platform (commercial videos) simultaneously. All videos displaying LSG were reviewed and scored using the quality assessment tool. Academic and commercial videos were subsequently compared and an evidence-based checklist was created.

RESULTS

A total of 93 LSG recordings including 26 academic and 67 commercial videos were reviewed. Mean score of the checklist was 5/11 and 4/11 for videos published in articles and YouTube, respectively. Academic videos had higher rates of describing instruments used, such as orogastric tube (P < 0.001) and stapler information (P = 0.04). Fifty-four percent of academic videos described short-term patient outcomes, while not reported in commercial videos (P < 0.001). Sleeve resection status was not universally reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Videos published in the academic literature are describing steps in greater detail with more emphasis on specific technical elements and patient outcomes and thus have a higher educational value. A new quality assessment tool has been proposed for video reporting guidelines to improve the reliability and value of published video research.

Can Weight of The Resected Stomach Predict Weight Loss Results After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy?

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is the most commonly performed bariatric procedure worldwide. Many factors have been investigated in the literature to predict weight loss outcomes after LSG. However, insufficient data regarding the resected stomach weight (RGW) exists. This retrospective study aimed to investigate the association between RGW and weight loss outcomes 1 year after LSG.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-four patients who underwent LSG in a tertiary care center were evaluated retrospectively. The statistical analyses were performed to investigate the correlation between preoperative demographics, RGW, and the excess weight loss percentage (%EWL) and percent total weight loss (%TWL).

RESULTS

The mean RGW was 169.7±40.1, ranging from 101 to 295 grams. The RGW was significantly correlated with preoperative weight (r=0.486; P<0.001), body mass index (r=0.420; P=0.002), and age (r=0.327; P=0.01). However, RGW did not predict postoperative weight loss, as measured by percent total weight loss (%TWL) and percent excess weight loss (%EWL), respectively (r=0.044; P=0.75 and r=-0.216; P=0.11). Multiple linear regression analysis identified age as a negative predictor for both %TWL (β=-0.351, P=0.005) and %EWL (β=-0.265, P=0.03), while preoperative body mass index was a negative predictor for %EWL (β=-0.469, P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

The RGW, although correlated with patient characteristics, does not serve as a reliable predictor of postoperative weight loss in the first year after LSG. Further research is needed to improve predictive models and patient care in bariatric surgery.

Incidence and Intensity of Early Dumping Syndrome and Its Association with Health-Related Quality of Life Following Sleeve Gastrectomy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Dumping syndrome (DS) is a shared but underappreciated complication after metabolic-bariatric surgery. The purpose of the study was to investigate the prevalence and intensity of symptoms suggestive of DS and their relationship with health-related quality of life (HRQOL) after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG).

METHOD

A retrospective cohort study was performed for all patients with a history of sleeve gastrectomy between July 2017 and July 2022 in our center. Basial clinic statistics were gathered from electronic medical database, the prevalence and severity of DS were assessed by Dumping Symptom Rating Scale (DSRS), and HRQOL is collected through the Short Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36).

RESULT

In total, 133 of 202 patients completed the questionnaire (response rate 65.8%). A total of 64.7% (N = 86) of participants were female, aged 34.0 (IQR 26.0-39.0) years at completion of the questionnaire, with a mean body mass index of 35.8 (IQR 31.4-40.5) kg/m2. The prevalence of symptoms suggestive of DS was 45.9% (N = 61), and the associated protective factor was the time between surgery and study. Compared with the patients without DS, patients with DS scored significantly worse on four of eight SF-36 subdomains.

CONCLUSION

Symptoms suggestive of early dumping syndrome after sleeve gastrectomy are common and are associated with a worse health-related quality of life, which deserves clinical attention. Additional counselling, education, and care are needed to mitigate the decline in quality of life caused by dumping symptoms.

Correlation Between Preoperative Gastric Volume and Weight Loss After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy

PURPOSE

Long-term studies reported inadequate weight loss or weight regain after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). This study investigated a possible relationship between preoperative gastric volume (GV) measured by CT volumetry and weight loss one year after LSG.

METHODS

This prospective study included 120 patients scheduled for LSG. 3D CT gastric volumetry was done before surgery. The weight loss in the first year was serially recorded. The primary outcome measure was the correlation between preoperative GV and postoperative weight loss after one year. The secondary outcomes were the correlation between preoperative GV and other patients' characteristics as age and body mass index (BMI).

RESULTS

Weight and BMI decreased significantly up to 12 months. The percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL) at 6 and 12 months was significantly higher than at three months. Preoperative GV was 1021 ± 253, ranging from 397 to 1543 mL. GV was not related to sex, age, weight, height, postoperative weight, and BMI.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative gastric volume cannot predict weight loss one year after LSG. It is not correlated with age, sex, or preoperative weight, and BMI.

Correlation of Gastric Volume and Weight Loss 5 Years Following Sleeve Gastrectomy

INTRODUCTION

The volume of the gastric reservoir (VGR) after sleeve gastrectomy influences weight loss in the short-term, but long-term results are scarce. The aim was to analyze the correlation between the VGR and weight loss at 5 years of follow-up.

METHODS

It is a prospective observational study of 50 patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy (SG) from February 2009 to December 2013. An upper gastrointestinal series was performed at 1 month and at 1 and 5 years after surgery. A composite formula was used for VGR estimation. Weight loss-related data included the following: body mass index (BMI), percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL), and percentage of excess BMI loss (%EBMIL) at 1 month and at 1 and 5 years. Uni- and multivariate analyses were carried out to determine other factors that might influence long-term weight loss results.

RESULTS

The %EWL at 1 year was 74.5(63.8-86) vs. 55.5(47-74.3) at 5 years (p < 0.001). The VGR 1 month after surgery was 114.9 (90.5-168.3) mL. The VGR increased from 216.7 (155.1-278.6) to 367.5 (273-560.3) mL (p < 0.001) at 1 and 5 years. Although a significant inverse correlation was observed between VGR and BMI, %EWL, and %EBMIL at 1 year, it disappeared at 5 years. In the multivariate analysis, the main factor to predict worse weight results at 5 years was a pre-surgical BMI ≥ 50 kg/m².

CONCLUSION

The VGR increased progressively during the study period. Although an inverse relationship between VGR and weight was found at 1 year, this correlation did not remain at 5 years. A preoperative BMI ≥ 50 kg/m² is the main predictive factor of poor weight outcomes.

Application and Significance of Gas-Liquid Combined Measurement in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy

OBJECTIVE

To explore the application of gas-liquid combined measurement method in the measurement of the resected gastric volume(RGV) during LSG and the analysis of related factors affecting the RGV.

METHODS

The clinical data of 84 patients were analyzed retrospectively. LSG was performed in 84 patients. The preoperative and intraoperative conditions were recorded.Analyze the relevant factors of the volume, so as to evaluate the measurement method.

RESULT

The RGV measured by us was significantly correlated with body weight and BMI, and was most closely correlated with body weight (r = 0.367); it was also correlated with gender, three-dimensional, blood lipid and other indicators.

CONCLUSION

The measurement method of volume of stomach in vitro (Gas-liquid combined measurement method) during LSG operation is of high feasibility and objective authenticity.

Impact of Resection Volume/Stapler Firings-Ratio on Perioperative Complications and Weight Loss After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy

Background

Major postoperative morbidity after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is often related to staple line leaks (SLL). Of note, a recent study suggested a central role of the absolute numbers of stapler firings as a predictive factor for postoperative morbidity due to SLL. In addition, a larger gastric remnant volume could be responsible for lower weight loss after LSG, and nevertheless, the gastric resection volume (GRV) is strictly related to the residual volume.

Methods

Prospectively, collected data of 384 consecutive patients with complete follow-up at 12 months after LSG at our institution were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were stratified according to three different variables (i.e., number of stapler firings, GRV, and GRV/stapler firings-ratio), and respective impact on postoperative complications and weight loss was analyzed.

Results

High absolute number of stapler firings was linked to increased intraoperative and postoperative bleeding and prolonged hospitalization, but was not associated with SLL, transfusion rate or revisional procedures. Absolute GRV showed no impact on both complications and outcome after LSG. Interestingly, higher ratio of GRV/stapler firings was not only linked to decreased intraoperative bleeding and shorter hospital stay but also to higher Excess Body Mass Index Loss (EBMIL) at 12 months after LSG.

Conclusions

Here, we introduce GRV/stapler firings-ratio as a simple predictive factor for identifying patients at risk for postoperative complications and impaired weight loss that is superior compared with absolute number of stapler firings or GRV alone.

The Unconventional Role for Gastric Volume in the Response to Bariatric Surgery for Both Weight Loss and Glucose Lowering

OBJECTIVE

To study the relationship between the amount of surgery-induced gastric volume reduction and long-term weight loss and glucose tolerance.

BACKGROUND DATA

Vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG) has recently surpassed gastric bypass to become the most popular surgical intervention to induce sustained weight loss. Besides inducing significant weight loss, VSG also improves glucose tolerance. Although no clear correlation has been observed between the size of the residual stomach and sustained weight loss, this begs the question whether less aggressive gastric volume reduction may provide sufficient efficacy when weight loss is not the major goal of the surgical intervention.

METHODS

A series of strategies to reduce gastric volume were developed and tested in Long Evans male rats, namely: VSG, Fundal (F)-Resection, Gastric Sleeve Plication (GSP), Fundal-Plication, and Fundal-Constrained.

RESULTS

All surgical interventions resulted in a reduction of gastric volume relative to sham, but none of the interventions were as effective as the VSG. Gastric volume was linearly correlated to increased gastric emptying rate as well as increased GLP-1 response. Overall, cumulative food intake was the strongest correlate to weight loss and was logarithmically related to gastric volume. Regression modeling revealed a nonlinear inverse relation between body weight reduction and gastric volume, confirming that VSG is the only effective long-term weight loss strategy among the experimental operations tested.

CONCLUSIONS

The data suggest a minimum threshold volume of the residual stomach that is necessary to induce sustained weight loss. Although all gastric volume interventions increased the GLP-1 response, none of the interventions, except VSG, significantly improved glucose tolerance. In conclusion, if weight loss is the primary goal of surgical intervention, significant volume reduction is required, and this most likely requires excising gastric tissue.

Analysis of Medium-Term Weight Regain 5 Years After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy

OBJECTIVE

Some patients fail to maintain weight loss after bariatric surgery. Weight regain (WR) disturbs the patients due to possible reappearance of obesity-related comorbidities. This study aimed to assess WR 5 years after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 100 adults who underwent LGS. The percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL) was recorded. WR was defined as an increase of at least 10% of the lowest postoperative weight. Patients with WR were subjected to CT gastric volumety. Eating behavior was assessed by the Three-Factor Eating Questionnaire-Revised 18-Items (TFEQ-R18).

RESULTS

Preoperative comorbidities improved in 89.5% of the patients. Twenty-five females (32.5%) got pregnant within 3 years after surgery. Age, maximum weight loss, and uncontrolled and emotional eating scales of the TFEQ-R18 were independently affecting %EWL. Also, pregnancy negatively affected %EWL. Fourteen patients regain weight: 11 females and three males. CT volumetry of the 14 patients showed a median stomach volume of 515 mL (range 172-1066 mL). CT estimated gastric volume was negatively correlated with % EWL (r = - 0.674, p = 0.008). Patients who developed WR were significantly older (p = 0.006), with lower maximum weight loss, and having higher scores of uncontrolled and emotional eating scales of TFEQ-R18.

CONCLUSION

Medium-term postsurgical weight regain and unsuccessful weight loss in patients who had undergone LSG is associated with older age, maladaptive eating behavior, larger residual stomach, and pregnancy.

Impact of Resected Gastric Volume on Postoperative Weight Loss after Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy

Among the bariatric surgery community, it has recently emerged the idea of a possible association between resected gastric volume (RGV) and weight loss after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). If the size of the sleeve depends on the bougie caliber, the resected volume of the stomach remains something which is not possible to standardize. The aim of the study was to investigate a possible relationship between RGV and weight loss after LSG. We developed a mathematical method to calculate the RGV, based on the specimen size removed during LSG. Ninety-one patients (63 females and 28 males) affected by morbid obesity were included in the study. They underwent LSG between 2014 and 2016. Mean preoperative BMI was 45 ± 6.4. At 1 year after LSG, the mean BMI was 30 ± 5.3 and the EWL% was 65 ± 20.2. The statistical analysis of RGV, BMI, and EWL% at 1-year follow-up did not find any correlation between the volume of stomach removed and the weight loss after LSG. Further studies in the future should clarify the potential role of RGV during LSG. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03938025.

Resolution of metabolic syndrome and related metabolic disorders after bariatric surgery: comparison of sleeve gastrectomy and gastric bypass

BACKGROUND

The effects of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) on metabolic syndrome (MS) in morbidly obese patients have not been well studied.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness of LSG and LRYGB in Chinese morbidly obese patients with MS.

SETTING

University Hospital, China.

METHODS

Patients who underwent LRYGB or LSG surgery and had completed at least 1 year of follow-up were retrospectively reviewed. Bariatric and metabolic outcomes in the 2 groups were compared. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the predictors of MS remission.

RESULTS

Of the 176 patients enrolled in this study, 79 underwent LSG and 97 underwent LRYGB. Eighty-three met 3 of the International Diabetes Federation criteria for diagnosis of MS, 69 met 4 of the criteria, and 24 met 5 of the criteria. At 1 year after bariatric surgery, 79% of patients achieved remission of MS. In both LSG and LRYGB groups, the number of MS criteria met by patients decreased significantly after surgery. The MS remission rate was not significantly different between the 2 groups (74.7% in LSG versus 82.5% in LGB; P = .21). In LSG patients, there was no significant decrease in blood pressure or increase in the high-density lipoprotein cholesterol at 1 year. On logistic regression analysis, younger age, lower body mass index, and lower homeostatic model of assessment-insulin resistance were independently associated with MS remission at 1 year after surgery. Both groups showed satisfactory and comparable weight loss (percentage of excess weight loss: 71.7% in LSG versus 74.4% in LRYGB). No surgery-related mortality occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Both LSG and LRYGB are feasible, safe, and effective in Chinese obese patients with MS. LSG seems to be inferior to LRYGB with regard to control of hypertension and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol.