Effects of intraoperative leak testing on postoperative leak-related outcomes after primary bariatric surgery: an analysis of the MBSAQIP database

Real-Time Perfusion and Leak Assessment in Bariatric Surgery: Bridging Traditional and Advanced Techniques

This comprehensive literature review explores the efficacy of real-time perfusion and leak assessment methods in bariatric surgery, comparing traditional techniques with advanced imaging modalities. As the global incidence of obesity and related comorbidities rises, the demand for bariatric surgeries such as Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy has increased, along with the risk of serious complications like anastomotic and staple line leaks. Traditional intraoperative leak testing methods, including the air leak and methylene blue dye tests, are commonly employed but exhibit inconsistent sensitivity in leak detection. Intraoperative endoscopy, although underutilized, offers enhanced visualization and has been associated with reduced leak and complication rates in certain cases. Emerging technologies such as indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence, laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI), and hyperspectral imaging (HSI) provide real-time assessment of tissue perfusion, potentially improving surgical outcomes. ICG fluorescence enables visualization of blood flow to detect ischemia, while LSCI offers immediate, dye-free perfusion mapping, and HSI assesses tissue oxygenation without the need for contrast agents. Despite their promise, these technologies are limited by high costs, technical complexity, and varying accessibility, with current evidence insufficient to confirm their superiority over traditional methods. Future research should focus on large-scale, multicenter trials to validate these advanced techniques and refine their application in clinical practice. Integrating traditional and emerging methods may optimize intraoperative decision-making, reduce complications rates, and enhance patient outcomes in bariatric surgery.

American society for metabolic and bariatric surgery: intra-operative care pathway for minimally invasive Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

BACKGROUND

Clinical care pathways help guide and provide structure to clinicians and providers to improve healthcare delivery and quality. The Quality Improvement and Patient Safety Committee (QIPS) of the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS) has previously published care pathways for the performance of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and pre-operative care of patients undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB).

OBJECTIVE

This current RYGB care pathway was created to address intraoperative care, defined as care occurring on the day of surgery from the preoperative holding area, through the operating room, and into the postanesthesia care unit (PACU).

METHODS

PubMed queries were performed from January 2001 to December 2019 and reviewed according to Level of Evidence regarding specific key questions developed by the committee.

RESULTS

Evidence-based recommendations are made for care of patients undergoing RYGB including the pre-operative holding area, intra-operative management and performance of RYGB, and concurrent procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

This document may provide guidance based on recent evidence to bariatric surgeons and providers for the intra-operative care for minimally invasive RYGB.

Comparison of the postoperative outcome with and without intraoperative leak testing for sleeve gastrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 469 588 cases

OBJECTIVE

Postoperative staple line leakage (SLL) after sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is a rare but serious complication. Many surgeons routinely test anastomosis with an intraoperative leak test (IOLT) as part of the SG procedure. This meta-analysis aims to determine whether an IOLT plays a role in reducing the rate of postoperative staple line related complications in patients who underwent SG.

METHODS

The authors searched the PubMed, Web of science, the Cochrane Library, and Clinical Trials.gov databases for clinical studies assessing the application of IOLT in SG. The primary endpoint was the development of postoperative SLL. Secondary endpoints included the postoperative bleeding, 30 days mortality rates, and 30 days readmission rates.

RESULTS

Six studies totaling 469 588 patients met the inclusion criteria. Our review found that the SLL rate was 0.38% (1221/ 324 264) in the IOLT group and 0.31% (453/ 145 324) in the no intraoperative leak test (NIOLT) group. Postoperative SLL decreased in the NIOLT group compared with the IOLT group (OR=1.27; 95% CI: 1.14-1.42, P =0.000). Postoperative bleeding was fewer in the IOLT group than that in the NIOLT group (OR 0.79; 95% CI: 0.72-0.87, P =0.000). There was no significant difference between the IOLT group and the NIOLT group regarding 30 days mortality rates and 30 days readmission rates ( P >0.05).

CONCLUSION

IOLT was correlated with an increase in SLL when included as a part of the SG procedure. However, IOLT was associated with a lower rate of postoperative bleeding. Thus, IOLT should be considered in SG in the situation of suspected postoperative bleeding.

Prediction of thirty-day morbidity and mortality after duodenal switch using an artificial neural network

BACKGROUND

Understanding factors that increase risk of both mortality and specific measures of morbidity after duodenal switch (DS) is important in deciding to offer this weight loss operation. Artificial neural networks (ANN) are computational deep learning approaches that model complex interactions among input factors to optimally predict an outcome. Here, a comprehensive national database is examined for patient factors associated with poor outcomes, while comparing the performance of multivariate logistic regression and ANN models in predicting these outcomes.

METHODS

2907 DS patients from the 2019 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database were assessed for patient factors associated with the previously validated composite endpoint of 30-day postoperative reintervention, reoperation, readmission, or mortality using bivariate analysis. Variables associated (P ≤ 0.05) with the endpoint were imputed in a multivariate logistic regression model and a three-node ANN with 20% holdback for validation. Goodness-of-fit was assessed using area under receiver operating curves (AUROC).

RESULTS

There were 229 DS patients with the composite endpoint (7.9%), and 12 mortalities (0.4%). Associated patient factors on bivariate analysis included advanced age, non-white race, cardiac history, hypertension requiring 3 + medications (HTN), previous foregut/obesity surgery, obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), and higher creatinine (P ≤ 0.05). Upon multivariate analysis, independently associated factors were non-white race (odds ratio 1.40; P = 0.075), HTN (1.55; P = 0.038), previous foregut/bariatric surgery (1.43; P = 0.041), and OSA (1.46; P = 0.018). The nominal logistic regression multivariate analysis (n = 2330; R² = 0.02, P < 0.001) and ANN (R² = 0.06; n = 1863 [training set], n = 467 [validation]) models generated AUROCs of 0.619, 0.656 (training set) and 0.685 (validation set), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Readily obtainable patient factors were identified that confer increased risk of the 30-day composite endpoint after DS. Moreover, use of an ANN to model these factors may optimize prediction of this outcome. This information provides useful guidance to bariatricians and surgical candidates alike.

Does endoscopy at the time of revisional bariatric surgery decrease complication rates? an analysis of the NSQIP database

BACKGROUND

Endoscopy is performed routinely during bariatric surgery. It is often used for provocative testing and intraluminal inspection during Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RNYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG). Recent publications would indicate about one-quarter of bariatric cases are performed with concurrent endoscopy, resulting in a slight increase in time but no increase in complications within 30 days compared with cases where no endoscopy is performed. Do these results persist for endoscopy during revisional bariatric surgery (RBS)?

METHODS

An analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Initiative Program (NSQIP) was conducted for the years 2005-2017. Seventeen postoperative outcomes were analyzed in this database. A 1:1 propensity score matching analysis was completed for 13 patient comorbidities and demographics. A McNemar's test for paired categorical variables and a paired t-test for continuous variables were completed, with a significant P value of 0.05. The results were reported as the frequency and percentage for categorical variables and the mean (± standard deviation) for continuous variables.

RESULTS

A total of 7249 RBS cases were identified. After propensity score matching for patient comorbidities and demographics 2329 cases remained. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) was performed in 375 (16%) of these patients. There were no differences in complication rates between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Similar to non-revisional bariatric surgery, there is no difference in 30-day postoperative complications when endoscopy is performed in RBS. Endoscopy is performed in about one-sixth of RBS cases.

Non-stenting treatment versus endoscopic stent placement in staple line leaks after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy

PURPOSE

Presentation of results of non-stenting treatment versus endoscopic stenting placement in gastric staple leaks after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG).

METHODS

Between January 2007 and August 2020, 1371 eligible patients underwent LSG. After gastric leak detection, patients were classified into treatment groups A (endoscopic stent placement) and B (non-stenting management). Overall hospital stay, the time to complete gastric leak resolution and the incidence of further operative management constituted the main outcome measures. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics and linear regression tests as needed.

RESULTS

A total of 27 patients (19 F/8 M, median age: 44.8 years (range: 36-58) with median preoperative BMI: 43.5 kg/m² (range: 37.0-48.7)) presented with gastric staple line leak (1.9%) - mean detection day 5.8 postop (range: 1-12). Eight patients enrolled in group A and 19 patients in group B. The mean hospital stay for group A was 41.2 days (range: 24-60) versus 15 days (range: 12-18) for group B (p < 0.001). Complete leakage resolution was observed at mean 42.4 days (range 25-60) for group A and 34.5 days (range: 28-40) for group B patients, (p = 0.025). Only 2 group A patients accomplished complete leak resolution without additional intervention. Five group A patients (62.5%) versus 4 group B patients (21.1%) needed operative intervention during the treatment course (p = 0.037).

CONCLUSIONS

Conservative, non-stenting treatment of staple line leaks after LSG is feasible and is associated with superior results in terms of hospital say and leak resolution in comparison to endoscopic stenting.

A Comprehensive Review of Endoscopic Management of Sleeve Gastrectomy Leaks

BACKGROUND

Bariatric surgery leaks result in significant morbidity and mortality. Experts report variable therapeutic approaches, without uniform guidelines or consensus.

OBJECTIVE

To review the pathogenesis, risk factors, prevention, and treatment of gastric sleeve leaks, with a focus on endoscopic approaches. In addition, the efficacy and success rates of different treatment modalities are assessed.

DESIGN

A comprehensive review was conducted using a thorough literature search of 5 online electronic databases (PubMed, PubMed Central, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Web of Science) from the time of their inception through March 2020. Studies evaluating gastric sleeve leaks were included. MeSH terms related to "endoscopic," "leak," "sleeve," "gastrectomy," "anastomotic," and "bariatric" were applied to a highly sensitive search strategy. The main outcomes were epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes.

RESULTS

Literature search yielded 2418 studies of which 438 were incorporated into the review. Shock and peritonitis necessitate early surgical intervention for leaks. Endoscopic therapies in acute and early leaks involve modalities with a focus on one of: (i) defect closure, (ii) wall diversion, or (iii) wall exclusion. Surgical revision is required if endoscopic therapies fail to control leaks after 6 months. Chronic leaks require one or more endoscopic, radiologic, or surgical approaches for fluid collection drainage to facilitate adequate healing. Success rates depend on provider and center expertise.

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic management of leaks post sleeve gastrectomy is a minimally invasive and effective alternative to surgery. Their effect may vary based on clinical presentation, timing or leak morphology, and should be tailored to the appropriate endoscopic modality of treatment.

Global Variations in Practices Concerning Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass-an Online Survey of 651 Bariatric and Metabolic Surgeons with Cumulative Experience of 158,335 Procedures

INTRODUCTION

There is significant variation in practices concerning Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) among bariatric surgeons, but there is currently a lack of robust data on the nature and extent of these variations. The purpose of this study was to understand global variations in practices concerning RYGB.

METHODS

A questionnaire-based survey on Survey Monkey® was created, and the link was shared freely on various social media platforms. The link was also distributed through a personnel email network of authors.

RESULTS

A total of 657 surgeons from 65 countries completed the survey. Crohn's disease and liver cirrhosis were considered absolute contraindications for RYGB by 427 surgeons (64.98%) and 347 surgeons (53.30%), respectively. More than 68.5% of surgeons performed routine upper GI endoscopy while 64.17% performed routine ultrasound of abdomen preoperatively. The majority of surgeons (77.70%) used the perigastric technique for Gastric pouch creation. Approximately, 79.5% used orogastric bougie. More than 70% of the respondents did not use any staple line reinforcement routinely. Only 17.67% of surgeons measured the whole small bowel length, and the majority of surgeons (86.5%) used constant length of BP limb. Approximately, 89% used constant length of alimentary limb. Approximately, 95% of surgeons preferred antecolic bypass, and more than 86% routinely closed the Petersen defect. Marginal ulcer prophylaxis was used by the majority (91.17%). Almost 95% of surgeons recommended lifelong vitamin and mineral supplements.

CONCLUSION

This survey identifies global variations in practices concerning RYGB. It identifies several areas for future research and consensus building.

Intraoperative leak test is associated with lower postoperative bleed rate in primary sleeve gastrectomy: a propensity matched analysis of primary and revision bariatric surgery using the MBSAQIP database

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal leaks after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy (SG) occur infrequently but lead to clinical and socioeconomic burden on patients. Surgeons perform intraoperative leak test (IOLT) via gastric tube or endoscopy to help prevent postoperative leaks. However, there is knowledge gap in the literature on effectiveness of IOLT during bariatric surgery.

METHODS

In this observational cohort study using the 2015-2017 MBSAQIP database, we compared the outcomes in patients who received IOLT with those who did not during primary or revision RYGB and SG. The primary outcome was 30-day postoperative leak. Secondary outcomes were procedure duration and the rates of 30-day postoperative bleed, readmission, reoperation and intervention. Propensity score matching was used to assemble cohorts of patients with similar baseline characteristics.

RESULTS

Among 363,042 patients, 82% underwent IOLT. Four subgroups of patients who underwent operations with or without IOLT during primary RYGB (n = 13,756), primary SG (n = 110,810), revision RYGB (n = 1140), and revision SG (n = 5576) had similar propensity scores and were matched 1:1. Patients who underwent IOLT had similar postoperative leak rates compared to those who did not (Primary RYGB with IOLT 0.7% v. without IOLT 0.6%; Primary SG 0.4% v. 0.3%; Revision RYGB 2.3% v. 1.0%; Revision SG 1.1% v. 0.7%). In primary SG subgroup, patients who underwent IOLT had lower postoperative bleed rates (0.6% v. 0.8%, p = 0.002). In primary RYGB and SG subgroups, operations with IOLT were slightly longer.

CONCLUSION

Postoperative leak rates after primary and revision bariatric surgery were low and similar irrespective of IOLT. Patients who had IOLT during primary SG had lower postoperative bleed rates. Current judgment as to whether to perform an IOLT leads to excellent outcomes, and thus, current practices should continue. However, one should consider an IOLT during primary SG, not necessarily to reduce leak rates but to help reduce postoperative bleeding occurrences.

Role of Primary Use of Mega Stents Alone and Combined with Other Endoscopic Procedures for Early Leak and Stenosis After Bariatric Surgery, Single-Institution Experience

PURPOSE

Surgical therapy for post-bariatric surgery complications is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Endoscopic options like primarily endoscopically placed fully covered self-expandable metallic stents (SEMS) offer significant benefits for the management of leaks and obstructions or stenosis, and even in case of mega stent failure, further endoscopic techniques could resolve the situation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a single-centre retrospective study on patients with leakage and stenosis/obstruction after bariatric surgery who were managed primarily by SEMS between January 2015 and January 2019. Clinical success rate was evaluated in terms of the cure of the reason for stenting, the need for other interventions, and the presentation of stent-related complications.

RESULTS

There were 58 patients included, (50 with leak, 8 with stenosis/obstruction following bariatric surgery). Mean time to stent placement was 6.82 (±1.64) days for the leak group and 35 (±21.13) days for the stenosis group (p = 0.019). Successful outcomes with SEMS alone were achieved in 42 (72.41%) patients, while 16 patients had failed SEMS treatment, of whom 14 were successfully managed by endoscopic procedures while two cases needed surgical intervention. Of the SEMS-related complications encountered, 25.86% were ulcers; 24.13%, vomiting; 22.41%, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GerdQ≥8); 18.96%, stent migration; and 5.17%, stent intolerance.

CONCLUSION

A mega stent is an effective and safe tool for the early management of post-bariatric surgery leakage and stenosis, and it is associated with acceptable rates of failure that can be managed by further endoscopic techniques in most of the patients.

Endoscopy Used as Provocative Testing in Bariatric Surgery: An Analysis of the Texas Public Use Data File

Background

Many bariatric surgeons test the anastomosis and staple lines with some sort of provocative test. This can take the form of an air leak test with a nasogastric tube with methylene blue dye or with an endoscopy. The State Department of Health Statistics in Texas tracks outcomes using the Texas Public Use Data File (PUDF).

Methods

We queried the Texas Inpatient and Outpatient PUDFs for 2013 to 2017 to examine the number of bariatric surgeries with endoscopy performed at the same time. We used the International Classification of Diseases Clinical Modification Version 9 (ICD-9-CM) and ICD-10 procedure codes and Current Procedural Terminology for Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) and endoscopy, and the ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 diagnosis codes for morbid obesity.

Results

There were 74,075 SG reported in the Texas Inpatient and Outpatient PUDF for the years 2013-2017. Of the SG performed, 5,521 (7.4%) had an intraoperative endoscopy. For the 19,192 LRYGB reported, 1640 (8.6%) underwent LRYGB + endoscopy. This was broken down by SG only vs SG + endoscopy and LRYGB only vs LRYGB + endoscopy. Overall, SG + endoscopy had a significantly shorter length of stay (LOS) vs LRYGB + endoscopy at 1.74 d vs 2.34 d (P < .001) and a significantly less cost of $71,685 vs $91,093 (P < .001).

Conclusions

A small percentage of SG and LRYGB patients underwent endoscopy for provocative testing over the study period. Provocative testing with endoscopy costs more for SG and LRYGB and was associated with a shorter LOS.

Laparoscopic revision to total gastrectomy or fistulo-jejunostomy as a definitive surgical procedure for chronic gastric fistula after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy

BACKGROUND

Staple-line leaks (SLL) after sleeve gastrectomy (SG) are a rare but serious complication requiring radiologic and endoscopic interventions with varying degrees of success. When failed, a chronic gastrocutaneous fistula forms with decreasing chances of closure with time. Definitive surgical management of chronic SLL after SG include laparoscopic revision to total/subtotal gastrectomy (LTG/LSTG) or a fistulo-jejunostomy (LRYFJ), both with Roux-en-Y reconstruction.

OBJECTIVES

Comparison of SG revisions to LTG/LSTG versus LRYFJ as a definitive treatment for chronic SLL.

SETTING

High-volume bariatric unit.

METHODS

Retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database identified 17 patients with chronic gastric fistula after SG that were revised to either LTG/LSTG or LRYFJ between September 2011 and May 2020. Demographic characteristics, clinical data, quality of life, and laboratory values for both options were compared.

RESULTS

Of the 17 conversions, 8 were revised to LTG/LSTG and 9 to LRYFJ. Mean age and body mass index at revision were 36.85 years (range, 21-66 yr) and 29 kg/m² (range, 21-36 kg/m²), respectively. Average preoperative endoscopic attempts was 5 (range, 1-16). The overall average operation time of revision was 183 minutes (range, 130-275 min) with no significant difference between either conversion options. Mean follow-up time was 46.5 months (range, 1-81 mo) and was available for 10 patients (58.8%). Food intolerance was significantly better after revision to LRYFJ (n = 6/6, 100% versus n = 1/5, 20%, P < .05). There were no significant differences between revisional procedures and laboratory abnormalities.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic revision to LRYFJ is a safe and feasible treatment for chronic SLL.

Evolving Trends in North American Gastric Bypass Delivery: a Retrospective MBSAQIP Analysis of Technical Factors and Outcomes from 2015 to 2018

PURPOSE

A number of procedural and technical factors have been adopted over time to overcome the steep learning curve and adverse safety profile of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). However, the evolution and impact of these factors are not currently known which limits our ability to optimize RYGB delivery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data was extracted from the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) data registry from 2015 to 2018. All primary RYGB procedures were included while prior revisional surgeries and emergency surgeries were excluded. Primary outcomes included characterizing the trends in procedural and technical factors associated with RYGB.

RESULTS

A total of 156,941 patients underwent primary RYGB from 2015 to 2018 with a mean age of 45.2 ± 11.9 years and a mean body mass index of 46.4 ± 8.4 kg/m [1]. The majority of patients were female (80.3%), of white racial status (73.5%), and of non-smoking status (92.1%). The most commonly performed approach was laparoscopic RYGB although an increase in robotic cases was observed over time. Rates of drain placement and postoperative swallow studies decreased by 10% from 2015 to 2018. Together, these trends were associated with reductions in serious complications, readmission, and re-intervention rates over time.

CONCLUSION

The proportion of RYGB cases performed in MBSAQIP accredited centers has decreased from 2015 to 2018 associated with an increased adoption of sleeve gastrectomy Leaks, serious complications, readmission, and reintervention rates improved with each operative year suggesting that the technical proficiency and safety of RYGB continue to evolve with time.