Bariatric surgery outcomes in oxygen-dependent patients: analysis of the MBSAQIP database

Opioid-Free Anesthesia in Bariatric Surgery: Is It the One and Only? A Comprehensive Review of the Current Literature

Opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) is a heterogeneous group of general anesthesia techniques in which the intraoperative use of opioids is eliminated. This strategy aims to decrease the risk of complications and improve the patient's safety and comfort. Such potential advantages are particularly beneficial for selected groups of patients, among them obese patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Opioids have been traditionally used as an element of balanced anesthesia, and replacing them requires using a combination of coanalgesics and various types of local and regional anesthesia, which also have their side effects, limitations, and potential disadvantages. Moreover, despite the growing amount of evidence, the empirical data on the superiority of OFA compared to standard anesthesia with multimodal analgesia are contradictory, and potential benefits in many studies are being questioned. Additionally, little is known about the long-term sequelae of such a strategy. Considering the above-mentioned issues, this study aims to present the potential benefits, risks, and difficulties of implementing OFA in bariatric surgery, considering the current state of knowledge and literature.

Obesity surgery in patients with end-stage organ failure: Is it worth it?

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the long-term outcomes of patients with end-stage organ failure (ESOF) undergoing obesity surgery.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the perioperative and mid-term outcomes of patients with ESOF undergoing obesity surgery.

SETTING

University hospital, Germany.

METHODS

A total of 1 094 patients undergoing obesity surgery from 2006 to 2019 were screened. Inclusion criteria were ejection fraction <30%, continuous oxygen/noninvasive ventilation therapy, liver cirrhosis, or kidney failure stage 4/5. ESOF patients were compared with matched standard (MS) patients without advanced organ failure and matched for age, gender, body mass index (BMI), operation type, diabetes, arterial hypertension, and sleep apnea.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven ESOF patients (56% female, age 50.3 ± 8.6, BMI 53.8 ± 8.7 kg/m²) were identified. Eighty-five percent had a sleeve gastrectomy. Mid-term total weight loss was 26.6% ± 9.0% in the ESOF patients versus 17.8% ± 11.1% in MS patients (P = .181). Long-term improvement of type 2 diabetes was comparable (ESOF: HbA1C 8.79 ± 2.06% to 6.25±1.17%, P = .047; MS: HbA1C 7.94 ± 2.02% to 7.2 ± 1.28%; P = .343). Depression scores (Patient Health Questionnaire 9) among ESOF patients improved from 13.0 ± 6.3 to 6.1 ± 5.8 (P = .004) but without significant change in MS patients (9.4 ± 7.3 to 4.3 ± 5.7; P = .082). Lung function improved in all patients although only 15% were off oxygen therapy. Treatment goals were achieved in >50% of the other groups. Major complications occurred in 11% (ESOF) versus 4% (MS) of patients (P = .299) with one death in the ESOF group (4%).

CONCLUSION

Both groups had similar outcomes regarding weight loss and co-morbidity improvement. Depression only improved significantly in the ESOF group. Patients with ESOF should not be precluded from obesity surgery. Further investigation is needed to define optimized selection criteria.

A Comprehensive Review of Endoscopic Management of Sleeve Gastrectomy Leaks

BACKGROUND

Bariatric surgery leaks result in significant morbidity and mortality. Experts report variable therapeutic approaches, without uniform guidelines or consensus.

OBJECTIVE

To review the pathogenesis, risk factors, prevention, and treatment of gastric sleeve leaks, with a focus on endoscopic approaches. In addition, the efficacy and success rates of different treatment modalities are assessed.

DESIGN

A comprehensive review was conducted using a thorough literature search of 5 online electronic databases (PubMed, PubMed Central, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Web of Science) from the time of their inception through March 2020. Studies evaluating gastric sleeve leaks were included. MeSH terms related to "endoscopic," "leak," "sleeve," "gastrectomy," "anastomotic," and "bariatric" were applied to a highly sensitive search strategy. The main outcomes were epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes.

RESULTS

Literature search yielded 2418 studies of which 438 were incorporated into the review. Shock and peritonitis necessitate early surgical intervention for leaks. Endoscopic therapies in acute and early leaks involve modalities with a focus on one of: (i) defect closure, (ii) wall diversion, or (iii) wall exclusion. Surgical revision is required if endoscopic therapies fail to control leaks after 6 months. Chronic leaks require one or more endoscopic, radiologic, or surgical approaches for fluid collection drainage to facilitate adequate healing. Success rates depend on provider and center expertise.

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic management of leaks post sleeve gastrectomy is a minimally invasive and effective alternative to surgery. Their effect may vary based on clinical presentation, timing or leak morphology, and should be tailored to the appropriate endoscopic modality of treatment.