Patient Motivations and Goals for Bariatric Surgery: A Mixed Methods Study

DELTO Study: Delphi Consensus on Long-Term Textbook Outcome After Metabolic Bariatric Surgery

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to create a comprehensive Core Outcome Set (COS) for assessing the long-term outcome (≥ 5 years) after Metabolic Bariatric Surgery (MBS), through the use of the Delphi method.

METHODS

The study utilized a three-phase approach. In Phase 1, a long list of items was identified through a literature review and expert input, forming the basis for an online Delphi survey. In Phase 2, Dutch healthcare professionals involved in MBS care, defined as having at least 1 year of experience in routine follow-up or managing issues arising during follow-up, rated the importance of these items over three Delphi rounds using a 5-point Likert scale. Participants had the option to suggest additional items. Consensus was defined as 75% agreement among panelists. In Phase 3, the final COS was validated at a national conference.

RESULTS

Thirty-one professionals participated in the first Delphi round. Of these, 28 (90%) completed the second round, and 24 (77%) completed the third round. The final COS, validated by 18 healthcare professionals, included various domains: short-term textbook outcome, weight loss, remission of comorbidities, quality of life, micronutrient deficiencies, lifestyle, psychopathology, long-term complications, and preoperative indication.

CONCLUSIONS

The final COS offers a multidimensional approach to evaluate long-term outcomes after MBS. This COS is expected to enhance the measurement and benchmarking of MBS care, providing a more holistic view of patient outcomes.

Patients experience with preoperative use of anti-obesity medications and associations with bariatric surgery expectations

BACKGROUND

Few studies have investigated the use of anti-obesity medications (AOMs) before bariatric surgery and how prior use impacts patients' goals and expectations for surgery.

OBJECTIVES

This study investigated associations between patients' experiences with AOMs and weight loss expectations before bariatric surgery.

SETTINGS

Single tertiary university hospital.

METHODS

Patients were electronically surveyed with a 31-item questionnaire via email or the patient portal with a primary predictor variable of AOMs presurgery. Outcomes included degree of weight loss and weight regain and motivation for seeking surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 346 persons were invited to complete the survey; 112 surveys (32.4%) were completed, with 7 excluded because of not answering the AOM question. 73% reported AOM use. Among those who took AOMs before seeking bariatric surgery, average weight loss was 13 kg (SD 10) corresponding to a 4.4-kg/m2 decrease in BMI. Of past AOM recipients, 87% reported weight regain on stopping AOMs. Average weight regain was 18 kg (SD 13; 126% increase). Patients reported improved longevity and quality of life as motivation for seeking surgery, with AOM use history having no effect. Subjects reported an average weight loss goal of 65.8 kg (39% of baseline weight) from bariatric surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

AOMs were commonly used in those seeking bariatric surgery, but motivation for surgery did not differ by AOM use history. Motivations were most often related to goals for better overall health.

Assessing the Clinical Efficacy of a Virtual Reality Tool for the Treatment of Obesity: Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Virtual reality (VR) interventions, based on cognitive behavioral therapy principles, have been proven effective as complementary tools in managing obesity and have been associated with promoting healthy behaviors and addressing body image concerns. However, they have not fully addressed certain underlying causes of obesity, such as a lack of motivation to change, low self-efficacy, and the impact of weight stigma interiorization, which often impede treatment adherence and long-term lifestyle habit changes. To tackle these concerns, this study introduces the VR self-counseling paradigm, which incorporates embodiment and body-swapping techniques, along with motivational strategies, to help people living with obesity effectively address some of the root causes of their condition.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to assess the clinical efficacy of ConVRself (Virtual Reality self-talk), a VR platform that allows participants to engage in motivational self-conversations.

METHODS

A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 68 participants from the bariatric surgery waiting list from the obesity unit of the Vall d'Hebron University Hospital in Barcelona, Spain. Participants were assigned to 1 of 3 groups: a control group (CG), which only received treatment as usual from the obesity unit; experimental group 1 (EG1), which, after intensive motivational interviewing training, engaged in 4 sessions of VR-based self-conversations with ConVRself, and underwent embodiment and body-swapping techniques; and experimental group 2 (EG2), which engaged in 4 VR-based sessions led by a virtual counselor with a prerecorded discourse, and only underwent the embodiment technique. In the case of both EG1 and EG2, the VR interventions were assisted by a clinical researcher. Readiness to change habits, eating habits, and psychological variables, as well as adherence and satisfaction with ConVRself were measured at baseline, after the intervention, 1 week after the intervention, and 4 weeks after the intervention.

RESULTS

Regarding the primary outcomes, EG1 (24/68, 35%) and EG2 (22/68, 32%) showed significant improvements in confidence to lose weight compared to the CG (22/68, 32%) at all assessment points (β=-.16; P=.02). Similarly, EG1 demonstrated a significant increase after the intervention in readiness to exercise more compared to the CG (β=-.17; P=.03). Regarding the secondary outcomes, EG1 participants showed a significant reduction in uncontrolled eating (β=.71; P=.01) and emotional eating (β=.29; P=.03) compared to the CG participants, as well as in their anxiety levels compared to EG2 and CG participants (β=.65; P=.01). In addition, participants from the experimental groups reported high adherence and satisfaction with the VR platform (EG1: mean 59.82, SD 4.00; EG2: mean 58.43, SD 5.22; d=0.30, 95% CI -0.30 to 0.89).

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed that using VR self-conversations, based on motivational interviewing principles, may have benefits in helping people with obesity to enhance their readiness to change habits and self-efficacy, as well as reduce dysfunctional eating behaviors and anxiety.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05094557; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05094557.

Perceived Benefits of Bariatric Surgery: Patient Perspectives

BACKGROUND

Obesity is a chronic and complex disease characterized by the excessive accumulation of adipose tissue, which has detrimental effects on health. Evaluating the changes in quality of life (QoL) after bariatric surgery complements the medical benefits which are documented by healthcare professionals.

PURPOSE

To study the perceived health benefits 1 year after substantial weight loss induced by bariatric surgery.

METHODS

This pilot study evaluated patients 1 year after bariatric surgery using 13 questions related to the health domains of the KOSS: airway, body mass, cardiovascular risk, diabetes, economic impact, functional, gonadal impact, health status perceived, image, junction of the gastro-esophagus, kidney, liver, and medication. In addition, the patients were asked to score the most significant benefit as "1," while the least beneficial benefit was scored as "13."

RESULTS

One hundred fourteen consecutive patients were evaluated (men = 37 and women = 77). The responses were divided into functional, metabolic, and mental/social benefits. Patients ranked the functional question, "I became more active, and I can do more things" as the most important (average score of 3.7 ± 0.2), followed by a question related to metabolic status: "I am less worried about my risk of heart disease" (4.5 ± 0.3), and then a social/mental question, "My clothes fit better" (5.4 ± 0.3). The three least valuable benefits for the cohort were sexual life improvements (8.9 ± 0.3), heartburn improvements (9.0 ± 0.3), and urinary incontinence improvements (9.8 ± 0.3).

CONCLUSIONS

Our observational pilot study demonstrated that patients value functional benefits after substantial weight loss the most, but that metabolic benefits and social/mental health benefits are also considered important.

Do reasons for undergoing bariatric surgery influence weight loss and health-related quality of life?-A Swedish mixed method study

Background

A wish for improved health or avoidance of ill health is often given as reason for wanting to undergo bariatric surgery. How such reasons relate to postoperative outcome is unclear.

Objective

The aim was to explore Swedish patients’ reasons for undergoing bariatric surgery. Also, we wanted to analyze if there were sex and age differences and associations with weight loss and health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

Settings

This was a single-center study conducted at a university hospital.

Method

Data on 688 patients (528 women and 160 men) including a free text response was analyzed inductively and deductively using predefined statements and was merged with data from the Scandinavian Obesity Surgery Registry. All data was analyzed using descriptive and analytic statistics.

Result

The most common reason for undergoing bariatric surgery was pain in different body parts. A wish for an improved medical condition was reported by most patients (59%, n = 408), followed by physical limitations making daily life difficult (42%, n = 288). Men and women reported similar reasons. Younger patients were more distressed about physical appearance (p = 0.001) and older patients wanted to improve their medical condition (p = 0.013). Health-related quality of life improved irrespective of reasons for undergoing surgery.

Conclusion

The most reported reasons for undergoing bariatric surgery were a wish for improved medical condition and to make daily life easier. Factors associated with the decision for surgery showed that there were few sex differences, but age seemed to be a factor. The HRQoL trajectory showed improvement regardless of reasons for undergoing surgery.

A 7-Year Study of the Durability of Improvements in Pain, Physical Function, and Work Productivity After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy

IMPORTANCE

Bariatric surgical procedures are associated with clinically important improvements (CIIs) in pain and physical function. However, there are declines in initial improvement by the third postoperative year, and the long-term durability of improvements are not well-described.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the durability of improvements in pain and physical function through 7 years after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or sleeve gastrectomy (SG).

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This study is part of the Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery-2 (LABS-2), a cohort study at 10 US hospitals. Adults with severe obesity (ie, body mass index of 35 or greater) undergoing bariatric surgery were assessed preoperatively (2006-2009) and followed up annually for as long as 7 years or until 2015. Of 1829 participants who underwent RYGB or SG in LABS-2, 338 were excluded from this study because they had a follow-up period of less than 5 years. Analysis of participants who underwent RYGB or SG and completed research assessments preoperatively and postoperatively for 5 to 7 years was conducted from March to April 2022.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Preoperative-to-postoperative CIIs in pain and physical function scores from the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey and the Western Ontario McMaster Osteoarthritis Index, and 400-meter walk time, using previously established thresholds; and remission of mobility deficit, ie, inability to walk 400 meters in 7 minutes or less.

RESULTS

A total of 1491 individuals were included, with 1194 (80%) women; 59 (4%) Hispanic, 164 (11%) non-Hispanic Black, and 1205 (82%) non-Hispanic White individuals; a preoperative median (IQR) age of 47 (38-55) years; and a preoperative median (IQR) body mass index of 47 (42-52). Between 3 and 7 years after surgery, the percentage of participants with preoperative-to-postoperative CIIs in bodily pain decreased from 50% (95% CI, 48%-53%) to 43% (95% CI, 40%-46%), in physical function from 75% (95% CI, 73%-77%) to 64% (95% CI, 61%-68%), and in 400-meter walk time from 61% (95% CI, 56%-65%) to 50% (95% CI, 45%-55%). Among participants with a preoperative mobility deficit, remission decreased from 50% (95% CI, 42%-57%) to 41% (95% CI, 32%-49%), and among participants with severe knee or hip pain or disability, the percentage with CIIs in knee and hip pain and function decreased (eg, hip pain: from 77% [95% CI, 72%-82%] to 65% [95% CI, 58%-72%]; knee function: from 77% [95% CI, 73%-82%] to 72% [95% CI, 67%-77%]).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cohort study, despite decreases in preoperative-to-postoperative improvements across follow-up, CIIs in perceived bodily and joint-specific pain and in self-reported and objectively measured physical function ranged from 41% to 72%, depending on the measure and subgroup, 7 years after surgery, suggesting that RYGB and SG are commonly associated with long-term CIIs in pain and physical function.

Assessment of Physical Activity and Healthy Eating Behaviors Among US Adults Receiving Bariatric Surgery

IMPORTANCE

Bariatric surgery effectively treats severe obesity and metabolic diseases. However, individual outcomes vary depending on sustainable lifestyle change. Little is known about lifestyle patterns after bariatric surgery among the US population.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the level of physical activity and eating behavior among postbariatric surgery patients, individuals eligible for surgery, and those with normal weight.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

A cross-sectional study using nationally representative survey data from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2015-2018. Respondents included for analysis were age 18 years or older, and categorized by individuals with normal weight, individuals who received bariatric surgery, and individuals clinically eligible for bariatric surgery. Analyses were performed from February to October 2021.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Self-reported measures were used to assess physical activity (moderate-to-vigorous physical activity [MVPA], sedentary activity, and whether PA guidelines were met) and eating behaviors (total energy intake and Healthy Eating Index [HEI]-2015 diet quality scores).

RESULTS

Of 4659 study participants (mean [SD] age, 46.1 [18.6] years; 2638 [weighted percentage, 58.8%] women; 1114 [weighted percentage, 12.7%] Black, 1570 [weighted percentage, 68.6%] White), 132 (3.7%) reported that they had undergone any bariatric surgery. Median (IQR) time since surgery was 7 (3-10) years. After propensity-score weighting, individuals who underwent bariatric surgery reported more time spent in MVPA than those eligible for surgery (147.9 min/wk vs 97.4 min/wk). Among respondents with normal weight, 45.6% (95% CI, 40.8% to 52.4%) reported meeting PA guidelines, almost 2 times higher than those in the bariatric surgery (23.1%; 95% CI, 13.8% to 32.4%) or in the surgery-eligible group (20.3%; 95% CI, 15.6% to 25.1%). Propensity-score weighted overall HEI was higher for individuals with normal weight (54.4; 95% CI, 53.0 to 55.9) than those who underwent bariatric surgery (50.0; 95% CI, 47.2 to 52.9) or were eligible for the surgery (48.0; 95% CI, 46.0 to 50.0). Across all HEI components, mean scores were similar between the bariatric surgery and surgery-eligible groups. Total energy intake was the lowest among those who underwent bariatric surgery (1746 kcal/d; 95% CI, 1554 to 1937 kcal/d), followed by those with normal weight (1943 kcal/d; 95% CI, 1873 to 2013 kcal/d) and those eligible for bariatric surgery (2040 kcal/d; 1953 to 2128 kcal/d).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cross-sectional study, individuals who underwent bariatric surgery had beneficial lifestyle patterns compared with those eligible for surgery; however, these improvements seemed suboptimal based on the current guidelines. Efforts are needed to incorporate benefits of physical activity and a healthy, balanced diet in postbariatric care.

Obesity surgery in patients with end-stage organ failure: Is it worth it?

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the long-term outcomes of patients with end-stage organ failure (ESOF) undergoing obesity surgery.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the perioperative and mid-term outcomes of patients with ESOF undergoing obesity surgery.

SETTING

University hospital, Germany.

METHODS

A total of 1 094 patients undergoing obesity surgery from 2006 to 2019 were screened. Inclusion criteria were ejection fraction <30%, continuous oxygen/noninvasive ventilation therapy, liver cirrhosis, or kidney failure stage 4/5. ESOF patients were compared with matched standard (MS) patients without advanced organ failure and matched for age, gender, body mass index (BMI), operation type, diabetes, arterial hypertension, and sleep apnea.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven ESOF patients (56% female, age 50.3 ± 8.6, BMI 53.8 ± 8.7 kg/m²) were identified. Eighty-five percent had a sleeve gastrectomy. Mid-term total weight loss was 26.6% ± 9.0% in the ESOF patients versus 17.8% ± 11.1% in MS patients (P = .181). Long-term improvement of type 2 diabetes was comparable (ESOF: HbA1C 8.79 ± 2.06% to 6.25±1.17%, P = .047; MS: HbA1C 7.94 ± 2.02% to 7.2 ± 1.28%; P = .343). Depression scores (Patient Health Questionnaire 9) among ESOF patients improved from 13.0 ± 6.3 to 6.1 ± 5.8 (P = .004) but without significant change in MS patients (9.4 ± 7.3 to 4.3 ± 5.7; P = .082). Lung function improved in all patients although only 15% were off oxygen therapy. Treatment goals were achieved in >50% of the other groups. Major complications occurred in 11% (ESOF) versus 4% (MS) of patients (P = .299) with one death in the ESOF group (4%).

CONCLUSION

Both groups had similar outcomes regarding weight loss and co-morbidity improvement. Depression only improved significantly in the ESOF group. Patients with ESOF should not be precluded from obesity surgery. Further investigation is needed to define optimized selection criteria.