Stereotactic radiosurgery: the patient's experience

Patient reported outcomes and short-term adjustment trajectories following gamma knife radiosurgery for benign brain tumor

PURPOSE

Patient reported outcomes (PROs) in the context of Gamma Knife Stereotactic Radiosurgery (GKSRS) for benign brain tumor have been under-researched. This study examined changes in PROs and adjustment trajectories post-GKSRS.

METHOD

50 adults (54% female) aged on average 53.18 (SD = 14.76) years with benign brain tumor were assessed 1 week before GKSRS, 1-2 weeks post-GKSRS, and at 3-month follow-up. Telephone-based questionnaires of anxiety and depressive symptoms, cognitive function, symptom burden, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) were completed.

RESULTS

Significant improvements in HRQoL, perceived cognitive ability, anxiety, and total brain tumor symptoms were evident between pre-GKSRS and 3-month follow-up. Conversely, there was a significant short-term increase in depressive symptoms at post-GKSRS; however, levels did not differ from pre-GKSRS at follow-up. No significant changes were evident on PROs of headaches or fatigue. About half of the participants (46-51%) experienced reliable improvement in global HRQoL, and one-third (31-34%) reported improved anxiety symptoms. Increased depressive symptoms was seen in 34% of participants post-GKSRS and 18% at follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

At 3 months post-GKSRS, improvements in HRQoL, anxiety, perceived cognitive ability, and total brain tumor symptoms were evident. Routine monitoring and support for pre-GKSRS anxiety and depressive symptoms post-GKSRS is recommended.

Individuals' perceptions of health and well-being in the context of stereotactic radiosurgery for benign brain tumour: A longitudinal qualitative investigation

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Treatment-related outcomes after Gamma Knife Stereotactic Radiosurgery (GKSRS) for benign brain tumour are well-established; yet patient reported outcomes have been largely overlooked. This study explored individuals' perspectives of their health and well-being prior to and following GKSRS.

METHOD

Twenty adults (65% female) aged 24-71 years with benign brain tumour were recruited from a major metropolitan hospital and assessed approximately one week prior to, two weeks after, and at three months following GKSRS. They completed telephone-based interviews focusing on general health, symptoms, and well-being. Interviews were transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Three major themes characterized individuals' perceptions of their health and well-being. "Understanding my Illness and Treatment" reflected individuals' efforts to make sense of their illness and symptoms to reduce ambiguity and increase sense of control. "Experiencing Gamma Knife" related to expectations of the procedure, outcomes, daily impacts, and emotional reactions. "Adjusting one's Mindset and Coping" characterised how peoples' approaches to coping with their illness were altered over time.

CONCLUSIONS

Coping and adjustment is highly individualistic in the context of GKSRS. Over time, most individuals were able to make sense of their illness, adjust their mindset and utilize behavioural strategies and support systems to cope with the long-term effects.

Frame-Based and Mask-Based Stereotactic Radiosurgery: The Patient Experience, Compared

INTRODUCTION

Noninvasive frameless modalities have become increasingly utilized for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for benign and malignant pathologies. There is minimal comparison in the literature of frame-based (FB) and mask-based (MB) SRS. With the dual capabilities of the Elekta Gamma Knife® Icon™, we sought to compare patient perceptions of FB and MB SRS with respect to comfort and pain and to examine effects of lesion type on the patient experience of SRS.

METHODS

Over a 1-year period, patients who underwent single fraction, fractionated or hypofractionated FB or MB Gamma Knife SRS at our institution were given an 8-question survey about their experience with the procedure immediately after treatment was completed. Descriptive statistics were applied.

RESULTS

A total of 117 patients completed the survey with 65 FB and 52 MB SRS treatments. Mean pain for FB SRS (5.64 ± 2.55) was significantly greater than mean pain for MB SRS (0.92 ± 2.24; t114 = 10.46, p < 0.001). Patient comfort during the procedure was also higher for those having MB SRS (p < 0.001). Mixed results were obtained when investigating if benign versus malignant diagnosis affected patient experience of SRS. For the purposes of this study, malignant diagnoses were almost entirely metastatic lesions. Diagnosis played no role on pain levels when all patients were analyzed together. The treatment technique had no effect on patient comfort in patients with benign diagnoses, while patients with malignant diagnoses treated with MB SRS were more likely to be comfortable (p < 0.001). Among patient's receiving FB treatments, diagnosis played no role on patient comfort. When only MB treatments were analyzed, patients were more likely to be comfortable if they had a malignant lesion (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients treated with MB SRS experience the procedure as more comfortable and less painful compared to those treated using a FB modality. Overall, this difference was not affected by a benign versus a malignant diagnosis and the treatment type is more indicative of the patient experience during SRS. A more homogenous sample between modalities and diagnoses and further follow-up with the patient's input on their experience would be beneficial.

Evaluation of patient education materials for stereotactic radiosurgery from high-performing neurosurgery hospitals and professional societies

Background

Little is known about the readability and utility of patient education materials for stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Therefore, the goal of this investigation was to evaluate such materials from high-performing neurosurgery hospitals and professional societies through an analysis of readability and educational content.

Methods

In this cross-cross sectional study, 61 websites associated with the top 50 neurosurgery and neurology hospitals according to U.S. News & World Report (USNWR) and 11 predetermined professional medical societies were queried. Identified SRS education materials were analyzed by 6 readability indices. Educational content was assessed by 10 criteria based on surveys of patients' perspectives about SRS.

Results

Fifty-four materials were identified from the target population (45 from USNWR hospital websites and 9 from professional society websites). Mean readability of materials ranged from 11.7 to 15.3 grade level, far more difficult than national recommendations of sixth and eighth grade. Materials were found to have deficiencies in educational content. Compared with high-performing hospitals, materials from websites of professional societies were longer (P = .002), and more likely to discuss risks and benefits specific to SRS (P = .008), alternative treatment options (P = .05) and expected outcomes or postprocedure descriptions (P = .004). Hospital materials were also more likely to favor brand-specific terminology (eg, GammaKnife) over generic terminology (eg, radiosurgery; P = .019).

Conclusion

Publicly available online patient educational materials for SRS are written at reading levels above national recommendations. Furthermore, many lack information identified as important by patients. Reevaluation and improvement of online SRS educational materials on a national scale are warranted.

Patients' experiences of remote communication after pacemaker implant: The NORDLAND study

BACKGROUND

The concept of 'patient experience' has become central to how to improve healthcare. Remote communication with patients is today a frequent practice in healthcare services, showing similar outcomes to standard outpatient care while enabling cost reduction in both formal and informal care. The purpose of this study was to analyse the experiences of people with telemonitoring pacemakers.

METHODS

Patients were randomly allocated to either the telemonitoring or hospital monitoring follow-ups. Using the 'Generic Short Patient Experiences Questionnaire' (GS-PEQ), as well as an ad-hoc survey from the 'telehealth patient satisfaction survey' and 'costs survey', patients' experiences were measured six months after the pacemaker implant in a cohort of 50 consecutive patients. The mean age was 74.8 (± 11.75) years and 26 (52%) patients were male of which 1 was lost in follow-up. Finally, 24 patients were followed up with standard hospital monitoring, while 25 used the telemonitoring system. Differences in baseline characteristics between groups were not found.

RESULTS

Findings showed overall positive and similar experiences in patients living with telemonitoring and hospital monitoring pacemakers. Significant differences were found in GS-PEQ concerning how telemonitoring patients received less information about their diagnosis/afflictions (p = 0.046). We did not find significant differences in other items such as 'confidence in the clinicians' professional skills', 'treatment perception adapted to their situation', 'involvement in decisions regarding the treatment', 'perception of hospital organisation', 'waiting before admission', 'satisfaction of help and treatment received', 'benefit received', and 'incorrect treatment'.

CONCLUSIONS

The remote communication of pacemakers was met with positive levels of patients' experiences similarly to patients in the hospital monitoring follow-up. However, telemonitoring patients received less information. Thus, improving the quality and timing of information is required in telemonitoring patients in the planning and organisation of future remote communication healthcare services for people living with a pacemaker implant.

A prospective patient-focused evaluation of the tolerance and acceptability of a stereotactic radiosurgery procedure

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a frequently used non-surgical procedure to treat benign and malignant brain lesions. Few studies have focused on patient perceptions of SRS. The aims of this patient-focused study were to assess patient experiences of SRS, and changes in patient-reported symptoms over 12weeks post-SRS. Using the 6-point Likert Scoring Scale in a diary-format for a less discriminatory evaluation, patients self-reported presence or absence, and severity of physical and psychological symptoms within 24h, 1-week, and 12-weeks post-SRS. Non-parametric repeated measures ANOVA was used to evaluate changes in symptoms. Of the 748 recruited patients, 690 returned the first diary (92%), while 564 patients returned all three diaries for matched responses analysis (82%). Three-quarters of 690 patients reported receiving clear verbal explanations and printed material prior to their procedure, and 99% reported the clinical team were 'very supportive' or gave 'wonderful care'. Fatigue (82%) and headaches (65%) were the most frequently reported symptoms within 24-h post-SRS. Over 12weeks, patients reported significant reductions in headache, nausea, fatigue, anxiety and tension (p<0.001); loss of balance and concentration significantly increased by 12-weeks post-SRS (p<0.001). Some patients attributed symptoms such as fatigue or headaches to the demands of the procedure day. Findings of this study reflect the need to further research patients' physical and psychological symptoms post-SRS, which may differ from the clinicians' perception of the effects of treatment.

Cancer survivors' experience of time: time disruption and time appropriation

AIM

This paper reports a study to explore how cancer survivors talk about, experience and manage time in everyday life.

BACKGROUND

There is an increasing interest in specific physical and psychosocial aspects of life after cancer diagnosis and treatment, but hardly any research follows cancer survivors over time to explore how perceptions and experiences change.

METHODS

An exploratory study was carried out in 2002-2004 with a purposive sample of adults who had experienced various forms of cancer. Data collection included 9 weeks of participant observation at a Cancer Rehabilitation Centre and ethnographic interviews with 23 informants. Ten men and 13 women were interviewed twice: 2 weeks after their stay and 18 months later.

FINDINGS

Data were analysed from a culture-analytical perspective. Three main themes regarding the survivors' handling and perception of time were found: (1) cancer disrupts time and life; (2) awareness of time increases, time is verbalized and reflected; and (3) the informants appropriate time. A diagnosis of cancer, even for a survivor, means a confrontation with death. It means a disruption of continuous clock and calendar time. Survivors appropriate time, and prioritize how and with whom they want to spend their time.

CONCLUSION

With an increasing number of people being cured following a cancer diagnosis, nurses and oncology nurse specialists who work with cancer survivors must be aware of the fact that time is a central theme in understanding cancer survivors' lives, and they must know how to guide these survivors in their new lives and take care of their well-being.