1
|
Jones CM, Sobngwi-Tambekou J, Mijumbi RM, Hedquist A, Wenham C, Parkhurst J. The Roles of Regional Organisations in Strengthening Health Research Systems in Africa: Activities, Gaps, and Future Perspectives. Int J Health Policy Manag 2022; 11:2672-2685. [PMID: 35279037 PMCID: PMC9818106 DOI: 10.34172/ijhpm.2022.6426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2021] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Regional cooperation on health in Africa is not new. The institutional landscape of regional cooperation for health and health research, however, has seen important changes. Recent health emergencies have focussed regional bodies' attention on supporting aspects of national health preparedness and response. The state of national health research systems is a key element of capacity to plan and respond to health needs - raising questions about the roles African regional bodies can or should play in strengthening health research systems. METHODS We mapped regional organisations involved in health research across Africa and conducted 18 interviews with informants from 15 regional organisations. We investigated the roles, challenges, and opportunities of these bodies in strengthening health research. We deductively coded interview data using themes from established pillars of health research systems - governance, creating resources, research production and use, and financing. We analysed organisations' relevant activities in these areas, how they do this work, and where they perceive impact. RESULTS Regional organisations with technical foci on health or higher education (versus economic or political remits) were involved in all four areas. Most organisations reported activities in governance and research use. Involvement in governance centred mainly around agenda-setting and policy harmonisation. For organisations involved in creating resources, activities focused on strengthening human resources, but few reported developing research institutions, networks, or infrastructure. Organisations reported more involvement in disseminating than producing research. Generally, few have directly contributed to financing health research. Informants reported gaps in research coordination, infrastructure, and advocacy at regional level. Finally, we found regional bodies' mandates, authority, and collaborations influence their activities in supporting national health research systems. CONCLUSION Continued strengthening of health research on the African continent requires strategic thinking about the roles, comparative advantages, and capability of regional organisations to facilitate capacity and growth of health research systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine M. Jones
- Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | | | - Rhona M. Mijumbi
- The Centre for Rapid Evidence Synthesis, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Aaron Hedquist
- LSE Health, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | - Clare Wenham
- Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| | - Justin Parkhurst
- Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Poursheikhali A, Alkhaldi M, Dehnavieh R, Haghdoost A, Masoud A, Noorihekmat S, Cheshmyazdan MR, Bamir M. What the policy and stewardship landscape of a national health research system looks like in a developing country like Iran: a qualitative study. Health Res Policy Syst 2022; 20:116. [PMID: 36307850 PMCID: PMC9617330 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-022-00905-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2022] [Accepted: 09/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The health research system (HRS) is an important national priority that requires a systematic and functional approach. Evaluating the HRS of Iran as a developing country and identifying its challenges reveals the stewardship-related role in how the whole system is operating well. This study aims to assess the HRS in terms of stewardship functions and highlight the enhancement points. METHODS This study was carried out between March 2020 and April 2021 using a systematic review and meta-synthesis of evidence to examine the Iranian HRS stewardship challenges and interview 32 stakeholders, using a critical case sampling and snowballing approach which included both semi-structured and in-depth interviews. The interviewees were selected based on criteria covering policy-makers, managers, research bodies and nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) in health research-related fields like higher education, research, technology, innovation and science. All data were analysed using content analysis to determine eight main groups of findings under three levels: macro, meso, and micro. RESULTS Analysis of the findings identified eight main themes. The most critical challenges were the lack of an integrated leadership model and a shared vision among different HRS stakeholders. Their scope and activities were often contradictory, and their role was not clarified in a predetermined big picture. The other challenges were legislation, priority-setting, monitoring and evaluation, networking, and using evidence as a decision support base. CONCLUSIONS Stewardship functions are not appropriately performed and are considered the root causes of many other HRS challenges in Iran. Formulating a clear shared vision and a work scope for HRS actors is critical, along with integrating all efforts towards a unified strategy that assists in addressing many challenges of HRS, including developing strategic plans and future-oriented and systematic research, and evaluating performance. Policy-makers and senior managers need to embrace and use evidence, and effective networking and communication mechanisms among stakeholders need to be enhanced. An effective HRS can be achieved by redesigning the processes, regulations and rules to promote transparency and accountability within a well-organized and systematic framework.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Atousa Poursheikhali
- Health Services Management Research Center, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Medical University Campus, Haft-Bagh Highway, Kerman, Iran
| | - Mohammed Alkhaldi
- McGill University Health Center, Faculty and Department of Medicine, School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
- Health System Impact Fellowship, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Ottawa, Canada
- Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Canadian University Dubai, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Reza Dehnavieh
- Health Foresight and Innovation Research Center, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
| | - AliAkbar Haghdoost
- Health Services Management Research Center, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Medical University Campus, Haft-Bagh Highway, Kerman, Iran.
| | - Ali Masoud
- Faculty of Management and Medical Information Sciences, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
| | - Somayeh Noorihekmat
- Social Determinant of Health Research Center, Institute for Future Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
| | - Mohammad Reza Cheshmyazdan
- Department of Medical Library and Information Science, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
| | - Mousa Bamir
- Health Foresight and Innovation Research Center, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hedquist A, Jones CM, Mijumbi RM, Sobngwi-Tambekou J, Parkhurst J, Wenham C. Mapping regional cooperation of state actors for health research systems in Africa: A social network analysis. PLOS GLOBAL PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 2:e0001142. [PMID: 36962649 PMCID: PMC10022136 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0001142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Accepted: 09/12/2022] [Indexed: 03/26/2023]
Abstract
Regional bodies can potentially play an important role in improving health research in Africa. This study analyses the network of African state-based regional organisations for health research and assesses their potential relationship with national health research performance metrics. After cataloguing organisations and their membership, we conducted a social network analysis to determine key network attributes of national governments' connections via regional organisations supporting functions of health research systems. This data was used to test the hypothesis that state actors with more connections to other actors via regional organisations would have higher levels of health research performance across indicators. With 21 unique regional organisations, the African continent is densely networked around health research systems issues. In general, the regional network for health research is inclusive. No single actor serves as a nexus. However, when statistics are grouped by African Union regions, influential poles emerge, with the most predominate spheres of influence in Eastern and Western Africa. Further, when connectivity data was analysed against national health research performance, there were no statistically significant relationships between increased connectivity and higher performance of key health research metrics. The inclusive and dense network dynamics of African regional organisations for health research strengthening present key opportunities for knowledge diffusion and cooperation to improve research capacity on the continent. Further reflection is needed on appropriate and meaningful ways to assess the role of regionalism and evaluate the influence of regional organisations in strengthening health research systems in Africa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron Hedquist
- LSE Health, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, United Kingdom
| | - Catherine M Jones
- LSE Health, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rhona M Mijumbi
- The Centre for Rapid Evidence Synthesis, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
| | | | - Justin Parkhurst
- Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, United Kingdom
| | - Clare Wenham
- Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mansour R, Naal H, Kishawi T, Achi NE, Hneiny L, Saleh S. Health research capacity building of health workers in fragile and conflict-affected settings: a scoping review of challenges, strengths, and recommendations. Health Res Policy Syst 2021; 19:84. [PMID: 34022883 PMCID: PMC8140497 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-021-00725-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2020] [Accepted: 04/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fragile and conflict-affected settings (FCAS) have a strong need to improve the capacity of local health workers to conduct health research in order to improve health policy and health outcomes. Health research capacity building (HRCB) programmes are ideal to equip health workers with the needed skills and knowledge to design and lead health-related research initiatives. The study aimed to review the characteristics of HRCB studies in FCASs in order to identify their strengths and weaknesses, and to recommend future directions for the field. METHODS We conducted a scoping review and searched four databases for peer-reviewed articles that reported an HRCB initiative targeting health workers in a FCAS and published after 2010. Commentaries and editorials, cross-sectional studies, presentations, and interventions that did not have a capacity building component were excluded. Data on bibliographies of the studies and HRCB interventions and their outcomes were extracted. A descriptive approach was used to report the data, and a thematic approach was used to analyse the qualitative data. RESULTS Out of 8822 articles, a total of 20 were included based on the eligibility criteria. Most of the initiatives centred around topics of health research methodology (70%), targeted an individual-level capacity building angle (95%), and were delivered in university or hospital settings (75%). Ten themes were identified and grouped into three categories. Significant challenges revolved around the lack of local research culture, shortages in logistic capability, interpersonal difficulties, and limited assessment and evaluation of HRCB programmes. Strengths of HRCB interventions included being locally driven, incorporating interactive pedagogies, and promoting multidisciplinary and holistic training. Common recommendations covered by the studies included opportunities to improve the content, logistics, and overarching structural components of HRCB initiatives. CONCLUSION Our findings have important implications on health research policy and related capacity building efforts. Importantly, FCASs should prioritize (1) funding HRCB efforts, (2) strengthening equitable international, regional, and national partnerships, (3) delivering locally led HRCB programmes, (4) ensuring long-term evaluations and implementing programmes at multiple levels of the healthcare system, and (5) adopting engaging and interactive approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rania Mansour
- Global Health Institute, American University of Beirut, Beirut, 1107 2020 Lebanon
- St. George’s, University of London, London, UK
| | - Hady Naal
- Global Health Institute, American University of Beirut, Beirut, 1107 2020 Lebanon
| | - Tarek Kishawi
- Global Health Institute, American University of Beirut, Beirut, 1107 2020 Lebanon
| | - Nassim El Achi
- Global Health Institute, American University of Beirut, Beirut, 1107 2020 Lebanon
| | - Layal Hneiny
- Saab Medical Library, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Shadi Saleh
- Global Health Institute, American University of Beirut, Beirut, 1107 2020 Lebanon
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hanney SR, Kanya L, Pokhrel S, Jones TH, Boaz A. How to strengthen a health research system: WHO's review, whose literature and who is providing leadership? Health Res Policy Syst 2020; 18:72. [PMID: 32571364 PMCID: PMC7308111 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-020-00581-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2020] [Accepted: 05/21/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health research is important for the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals. However, there are many challenges facing health research, including securing sufficient funds, building capacity, producing research findings and using both local and global evidence, and avoiding waste. A WHO initiative addressed these challenges by developing a conceptual framework with four functions to guide the development of national health research systems. Despite some progress, more is needed before health research systems can meet their full potential of improving health systems. The WHO Regional Office for Europe commissioned an evidence synthesis of the systems-level literature. This Opinion piece considers its findings before reflecting on the vast additional literature available on the range of specific health research system functions related to the various challenges. Finally, it considers who should lead research system strengthening. MAIN TEXT The evidence synthesis identifies two main approaches for strengthening national health research systems, namely implementing comprehensive and coherent strategies and participation in partnerships. The literature describing these approaches at the systems level also provides data on ways to strengthen each of the four functions of governance, securing financing, capacity-building, and production and use of research. Countries effectively implementing strategies include England, Ireland and Rwanda, whereas West Africa experienced effective partnerships. Recommended policy approaches for system strengthening are context specific. The vast literature on each function and the ever-growing evidence-base are illustrated by considering papers in just one key journal, Health Research Policy and Systems, and analysing the contribution of two national studies. A review of the functions of the Iranian system identifies over 200 relevant and mostly national records; an analysis of the creation of the English National Institute for Health Research describes the key leadership role played by the health department. Furthermore, WHO is playing leadership roles in helping coordinate partnerships within and across health research systems that have been attempting to tackle the COVID-19 crisis. CONCLUSIONS The evidence synthesis provides a firm basis for decision-making by policy-makers and research leaders looking to strengthen national health research systems within their own national context. It identifies five crucial policy approaches - conducting situation analysis, sustaining a comprehensive strategy, engaging stakeholders, evaluating impacts on health systems, and partnership participation. The vast and ever-growing additional literature could provide further perspectives, including on crucial leadership roles for health ministries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen R. Hanney
- Health Economics Research Group, Institute of Health, Environment and Societies, Brunel University London, Uxbridge, UB8 3PH United Kingdom
| | - Lucy Kanya
- Health Economics Research Group, Institute of Health, Environment and Societies, Brunel University London, Uxbridge, UB8 3PH United Kingdom
- Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, United Kingdom
| | - Subhash Pokhrel
- Health Economics Research Group, Institute of Health, Environment and Societies, Brunel University London, Uxbridge, UB8 3PH United Kingdom
| | - Teresa H. Jones
- Health Economics Research Group, Institute of Health, Environment and Societies, Brunel University London, Uxbridge, UB8 3PH United Kingdom
| | - Annette Boaz
- Faculty of Health, Social Care and Education, a partnership between Kingston University and St George’s, University of London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cash-Gibson L, Harris M, Guerra G, Benach J. A novel conceptual model and heuristic tool to strengthen understanding and capacities for health inequalities research. Health Res Policy Syst 2020; 18:42. [PMID: 32366322 PMCID: PMC7197115 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-020-00559-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2019] [Accepted: 04/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Despite increasing evidence on health inequalities over the past decades, further efforts to strengthen capacities to produce research on this topic are still urgently needed to inform effective interventions aiming to address these inequalities. To strengthen these research capacities, an initial comprehensive understanding of the health inequalities research production process is vital. However, most existing research and models are focused on understanding the relationship between health inequalities research and policy, with less focus on the health inequalities research production process itself. Existing conceptual frameworks provide valuable, yet limited, advancements on this topic; for example, they lack the capacity to comprehensively explain the health (and more specifically the health inequalities) research production process at the local level, including the potential pathways, components and determinants as well as the dynamics that might be involved. This therefore reduces their ability to be empirically tested and to provide practical guidance on how to strengthen the health inequalities research process and research capacities in different settings. Several scholars have also highlighted the need for further understanding and guidance in this area to inform effective action. Methods Through a critical review, we developed a novel conceptual model that integrates the social determinants of health and political economy perspectives to provide a comprehensive understanding of how health inequalities research and the related research capacities are likely to be produced (or inhibited) at local level. Results Our model represents a global hypothesis on the fundamental processes involved, and can serve as a heuristic tool to guide local level assessments of the determinants, dynamics and relations that might be relevant to better understand the health inequalities research production process and the related research capacities. Conclusions This type of knowledge can assist researchers and decision-makers to identify any information gaps or barriers to be addressed, and establish new entry points to effectively strengthen these research capacities. This can lead to the production of a stronger evidence base, both locally and globally, which can be used to inform strategic efforts aimed at achieving health equity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucinda Cash-Gibson
- Research Group on Health Inequalities, Environment and Employment Conditions Knowledge Network (GREDS-EMCONET), Department of Political and Social Sciences, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Mercè Rodoreda 24 Building, Campus Ciutadella UPF, Ramon Trias Fargas, 25-27, 08003, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain. .,Johns Hopkins University - Pompeu Fabra University Public Policy Center, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
| | - Matthew Harris
- The School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Germán Guerra
- National Institute of Public Health, Mexico, Av. Universidad No. 655 Colonia Santa Maria Ahuacatitlán, C.P, 62100, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico
| | - Joan Benach
- Research Group on Health Inequalities, Environment and Employment Conditions Knowledge Network (GREDS-EMCONET), Department of Political and Social Sciences, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Mercè Rodoreda 24 Building, Campus Ciutadella UPF, Ramon Trias Fargas, 25-27, 08003, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.,Johns Hopkins University - Pompeu Fabra University Public Policy Center, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.,Transdisciplinary Research Group on Socioecological Transitions (GinTRANS2), Universidad Autónoma, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND A substantial growth has been reported in Iran's health research output over the last recent decades, throughout the times of economic, social, and political instability. This study reviewed the existing literature to provide a better understanding of the evolution of Iran's health research system over this period. METHODS A narrative review of studies addressing health research system (HRS) in Iran was performed. The search strategy and categorization of the retrieved data was informed by the HRS framework of the World Health Organization (WHO). This framework proposes four functions for HRS: (i) stewardship; (ii) financing; (iii) creating and sustaining resources; and (iv) producing and using research. Searches in MEDLINE through PubMed (using MeSH terms) complemented with semantic searches through PubMed and Google Scholar were conducted. RESULTS After removing the duplicates, 805 articles were retrieved, of which 601 were irrelevant, and 204 were reviewed. CONCLUSIONS Iran has made substantial progress in different components of its HRS over the last few decades, such as starting a discourse surrounding health research ethics, priority-setting, and placing monitoring mechanisms while increasing the capacity for conducting and publishing research. However, there is still room for improvements, or even a need for fundamental changes, in several components, such as regarding increasing the research budget and improving the funding allocation mechanisms; improving the education curriculum; and promoting the use of evidence. The findings emphasized that improvement of HRS functions requires addressing context-specific problems. This review provides essential lessons to share with other low- and middle-income countries and international organizations, eg, the WHO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Parisa Mansoori
- Centre for Global Health Research, Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Malla C, Aylward P, Ward P. Knowledge translation for public health in low- and middle- income countries: a critical interpretive synthesis. Glob Health Res Policy 2018; 3:29. [PMID: 30377666 PMCID: PMC6196454 DOI: 10.1186/s41256-018-0084-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2018] [Accepted: 09/27/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Effective knowledge translation allows the optimisation of access to and utilisation of research knowledge in order to inform and enhance public health policy and practice. In low- and middle- income countries, there are substantial complexities that affect the way in which research can be utilised for public health action. This review attempts to draw out concepts in the literature that contribute to defining some of the complexities and contextual factors that influence knowledge translation for public health in low- and middle- income countries. Methods A Critical Interpretive Synthesis was undertaken, a method of analysis which allows a critical review of a wide range of heterogeneous evidence, through incorporating systematic review methods with qualitative enquiry techniques. A search for peer-reviewed articles published between 2000 and 2016 on the topic of knowledge translation for public health in low- and middle – income countries was carried out, and 85 articles were reviewed and analysed using this method. Results Four main concepts were identified: 1) tension between ‘global’ and ‘local’ health research, 2) complexities in creating and accessing evidence, 3) contextualising knowledge translation strategies for low- and middle- income countries, and 4) the unique role of non-government organisations in the knowledge translation process. Conclusion This method of review has enabled the identification of key concepts that may inform practice or further research in the field of knowledge translation in low- and middle- income countries. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s41256-018-0084-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Malla
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Sturt Road, Bedford Park, Adelaide, South Australia 5042 Australia
| | - Paul Aylward
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Sturt Road, Bedford Park, Adelaide, South Australia 5042 Australia
| | - Paul Ward
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Sturt Road, Bedford Park, Adelaide, South Australia 5042 Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Deutsch-Feldman M, Ali J, Kass N, Phaladze N, Michelo C, Sewankambo N, Hyder AA. Improving institutional research ethics capacity assessments: lessons from sub-Saharan Africa. Glob Bioeth 2018; 31:120-132. [PMID: 33343187 PMCID: PMC7734104 DOI: 10.1080/11287462.2018.1528660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2018] [Accepted: 09/20/2018] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The amount of biomedical research being conducted around the world has greatly expanded over the past 15 years, with particularly large growth occurring in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This increased focus on understanding and responding to disease burdens around the world has brought forth a desire to help LMIC institutions enhance their own capacity to conduct scientifically and ethically sound research. In support of these goals the Johns Hopkins-Fogarty African Bioethics Training Program (FABTP) has, for the past six years, partnered with three research institutions in Africa (University of Botswana, Makerere University in Uganda, and the University of Zambia) to support research ethics capacity. Each partnership began with a baseline evaluation of institutional research ethics environments in order to properly tailor capacity strengthening activities and help direct limited institutional resources. Through the course of these partnerships we have learned several lessons regarding the evaluation process and the framework used to complete the assessments (the Octagon Model). We believe that these lessons are generalizable and will be useful for groups conducting such assessments in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Molly Deutsch-Feldman
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA
| | - Joseph Ali
- Johns Hopkins Berman Institute for Bioethics, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Nancy Kass
- Johns Hopkins Berman Institute for Bioethics, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | | | | | - Adnan A. Hyder
- Johns Hopkins Berman Institute for Bioethics, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
AlKhaldi M, Alkaiyat A, Abed Y, Pfeiffer C, Halaseh R, Salah R, Idries M, Abueida S, Idries I, Jeries I, Meghari H, Shaar A, Tanner M, Haj-Yahia S. The Palestinian health research system: who orchestrates the system, how and based on what? A qualitative assessment. Health Res Policy Syst 2018; 16:69. [PMID: 30064510 PMCID: PMC6069718 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-018-0347-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2018] [Accepted: 07/12/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2011, the WHO Eastern Mediterranean Region committee launched a strategy for scaling up research in the region to address the countries' health needs through formulating and analysing the National Health Research System (HRS). Stewardship comprises three functions, namely governance, policy and priorities, and is a central pillar of this system to ensure a well-organised and functioning HRS. This study aims to examine the perceptions of the HRS performers to understand these functions and to generate insights for system strengthening. METHODS The study was carried out in Palestine, targetting three sectors in the health field, including relevant governmental health institutions, schools of public health, and major local and international health agencies. The data were collected through 52 in-depth interviews (IDIs) and 6 focus group discussions (FGDs) with policy-makers, academics, directors, and experts. Participants and institutions were selected purposively based on a set of criteria and peer review. RESULTS A total of 104 experts participated in the IDIs (52 participants) and FGDs (52 participants in 6 FGDs), highlighting that stewardship functions remain problematic and insufficiently performed, mainly due to a missing health research structural and regulatory framework and dispersed health research work. Despite the limited good practices, the majority of the participants described the Ethical Review and Clearance as weak due to the lack of an agreed-upon national committee and procedural quality and ethics guidelines for non-compliance. A policy or strategy dedicated to health research is lacking. The exercises of research priority-setting appear to be evolving despite the lack of consensus and the low levels of knowledge and experience in research prioritisation. Common gaps, such as weak political will and capacity support, the absence of a national unified regulating body, and the indirect effects of political conditions on strengthening the HRS as well as other sectors, also emerged. CONCLUSIONS The stewardship functions of the Palestinian HRS remain weak along with substantial political, structural, and resources and capacity gaps. The study emphasises the imperative need to initiate strategic efforts led by the MOH and the Palestinian National Institute of Public Health alongside with other players to strengthen a national HRS through improving the stewardship functions. To achieve this, attention and support of decision-makers, involvement, mobilisation and strategic dialogue are indispensable, in order to embark on building a well-regulated and coordinated structure, operational research policy, and prioritisation of essential research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammed AlKhaldi
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Socinstr. 57, 4002, Basel, Switzerland. .,University of Basel, Petersplatz 1, 4003, Basel, Switzerland. .,Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine.
| | - Abdulsalam Alkaiyat
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Socinstr. 57, 4002, Basel, Switzerland.,University of Basel, Petersplatz 1, 4003, Basel, Switzerland.,Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine
| | - Yehia Abed
- Faculty of Public Health, Al Quds University, Jerusalem, Palestine
| | - Constanze Pfeiffer
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Socinstr. 57, 4002, Basel, Switzerland.,University of Basel, Petersplatz 1, 4003, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Rana Halaseh
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine
| | - Ruba Salah
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine
| | - Manar Idries
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine
| | - Said Abueida
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine
| | - Ibrahim Idries
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine
| | - Ibrahim Jeries
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine
| | - Hamza Meghari
- University College London UCL, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ali Shaar
- United Nations Population Fund, Jerusalem, Palestine
| | - Marcel Tanner
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Socinstr. 57, 4002, Basel, Switzerland.,University of Basel, Petersplatz 1, 4003, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Saleem Haj-Yahia
- Cardiovascular Institute, Glasgow University, Glasgow, United Kingdom.,Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine.,School of Clinical Sciences, Bristol University, Bristol, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Assessing policy-makers', academics' and experts' satisfaction with the performance of the Palestinian health research system: a qualitative study. Health Res Policy Syst 2018; 16:66. [PMID: 30045746 PMCID: PMC6060523 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-018-0341-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2017] [Accepted: 06/22/2018] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background There is a growing demand within international health agencies to ensure health research systems (HRSs) are strengthened and well-functioning to support healthcare systems (HCSs). Understanding HRS performance through system actors is an indispensable move in analysing this system. This study aims to examine policy-makers’, academics’ and experts’ satisfaction with overall HRS performance, while also investigating their perceptions about political will and attention towards health research. Ultimately, we want to identify gaps related to performance and generate insights on how to move forward for HRS performance strengthening. Methods This study was carried out in Palestine, targeting three sectors, namely government institutions, public health universities, and major local and international health non-governmental organisations (NGOs). Semi-structured, in-depth interviews (IDIs) and focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted with participants. The institutions from the three sectors were selected based on stated criteria and peer reviews. Data were translated from Arabic into English, transcribed, content checked by the principal investigator, imported to a software programme (MAXQDA 12), and then coded. Thematic content analysis was used. Results A total of 104 experts participated in 52 IDIs and 52 experts participated in 6 FGDs. Findings revealed three principal domains. First, the HRS in Palestine is remarkably underperforming, and the majority of experts were unsatisfied. Participants perceived the system as ineffective and inefficient, poorly managed and lacking systematic assessment. Second, the factors behind system underperformance were (1) an unstructured system and the lack of a research culture as well as of a governing body or policies; (2) health research was seen as individualistic, non-development driven and unutilised in policy decisions; and (3) considerably deficient coordination and essential resources. The third finding showed inadequate political support and engagement, which then also related to system underperformance. Conclusions The Palestinian HRS is perceived as underperforming by health experts at different levels, where research is not on the leadership agendas. Potential actions should be taken to actively engage the state health decision-makers and inform them of the importance, uses and impacts of performance assessment. Findings urge policy-makers and legislators to build an inclusive and national body of governance with agreed strategies including fundamentally hybrid and aligned performance assessment mechanisms, such as a research observatory platform. In addition, it is recommended to establish a strategic plan to expand professionals’ research awareness and abilities, as well as empower the institution’s research monitoring and evaluation capacities. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12961-018-0341-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
|
12
|
AlKhaldi M, Abed Y, Pfeiffer C, Haj-Yahia S, Alkaiyat A, Tanner M. Understanding the concept and importance of the health research system in Palestine: a qualitative study. Health Res Policy Syst 2018; 16:49. [PMID: 29914533 PMCID: PMC6007061 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-018-0315-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2017] [Accepted: 04/12/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The importance of a health research system (HRS), namely an instrument for developing and enabling health systems, is increasing, particularly in developing countries. Assessing the perceptions of system performers is a necessary part of system analysis, which seeks to recognize a system’s strengths and limitations aiming towards improvement. This study assesses the perceptions of policy-makers, academicians and experts regarding the HRS concept and its importance to generate insights for system strengthening. In Palestine, HRS is just emerging, helping to address the many public health-related challenges faced by the country. Methods The study was implemented from January until July 2016, targeting three sectors, namely relevant government institutions, schools of public health, and major local and international health agencies. Data was collected through 52 in-depth interviews and six focus group discussions (FGDs) with policy-makers, academics, directors and experts. Participants and institutions were selected based on stated criteria and peer review. Data were translated, transcribed, checked and then imported to a software program (MAXQDA 12) for thematic and content analysis. Results A total of 104 experts participated, wherein 52 were interviewed and 52 participated in the six FGDs. The HRS concept, as defined by WHO, was conceptualized differently among participants with unclear delineations between various components. Inconsistencies appeared when participants attempted to conceptualize HRS in broader contexts, though HRS goals and functions were sufficiently delineated. The majority of participants agreed that HRS correlates with notions of ‘improvement’ and recognized HRS ‘as a significant gain’. Neglect of HRS was perceived as a big loss. Conclusions The study revealed that the level of understanding of HRS among health experts in Palestine is inadequate and not sufficiently conceptualized for its application. Findings also underlined the need to establish a central governance coordination body that promotes HRS understanding, awareness and culture as an enabler for HRS strengthening. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12961-018-0315-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammed AlKhaldi
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Socinstr. 57, 4002, Basel, Switzerland. .,University of Basel, Petersplatz 1, 4003, Basel, Switzerland. .,Najah National University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Nablus, Palestine.
| | - Yehia Abed
- Al-Quds University, Faculty of Public Health, Jerusalem, Palestine
| | - Constanze Pfeiffer
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Socinstr. 57, 4002, Basel, Switzerland.,University of Basel, Petersplatz 1, 4003, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Saleem Haj-Yahia
- University Teaching Hospital, Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine.,Najah National University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Nablus, Palestine.,Bristol University, School of Clinical Sciences, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Abdulsalam Alkaiyat
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Socinstr. 57, 4002, Basel, Switzerland.,University of Basel, Petersplatz 1, 4003, Basel, Switzerland.,Najah National University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Nablus, Palestine
| | - Marcel Tanner
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Socinstr. 57, 4002, Basel, Switzerland.,University of Basel, Petersplatz 1, 4003, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Franzen SRP, Chandler C, Siribaddana S, Atashili J, Angus B, Lang T. Strategies for developing sustainable health research capacity in low and middle-income countries: a prospective, qualitative study investigating the barriers and enablers to locally led clinical trial conduct in Ethiopia, Cameroon and Sri Lanka. BMJ Open 2017; 7:e017246. [PMID: 29030412 PMCID: PMC5652508 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES In 2013, the WHO stated that unless low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) become producers of research, health goals would be hard to achieve. Among the capacities required to build a local evidence base, ability to conduct clinical trials is important. There is no evidence-based guidance for the best ways to develop locally led trial capacity. This research aims to identify the barriers and enablers to locally led clinical trial conduct in LMICs and determine strategies for their sustainable development. DESIGN Prospective, multiple case study design consisting of interviews (n=34), focus group discussions (n=13) and process mapping exercises (n=10). SETTING Case studies took place in Ethiopia (2011), Cameroon (2012) and Sri Lanka (2013). PARTICIPANTS Local health researchers with previous experiences of clinical trials or stakeholders with an interest in trials were purposively selected through registration searches and snowball sampling (n=100). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES Discussion notes and transcripts were analysed using thematic coding analysis. Key themes and mechanisms were identified. RESULTS Institutions and individuals were variably successful at conducting trials, but there were strong commonalities in the barriers and enablers across all levels and functions of the research systems. Transferable mechanisms were summarised into the necessary conditions for trial undertaking, which included: awareness of research, motivation, knowledge and technical skills, leadership capabilities, forming collaborations, inclusive trial operations, policy relevance and uptake and macro and institutional strengthening. CONCLUSIONS Barriers and enablers to locally led trial undertaking exist at all levels and functions of LMIC research systems. Establishing the necessary conditions to facilitate this research will require multiple, coordinated interventions that seek to resolve them in a systemic manner. The strategies presented in the discussion provide an evidence-based framework for a self-sustaining capacity development approach. This represents an important contribution to the literature that will be relevant for research funders, users and producers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel R P Franzen
- The Global Health Network, Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Oxford Policy Management, Oxford, UK
| | - Clare Chandler
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Sisira Siribaddana
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine & Allied Sciences, Rajarata University of Sri Lanka, Saliyapura, Sri Lanka
| | - Julius Atashili
- Department of Public Health and Hygiene, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Buea, Buea, Cameroon
| | - Brian Angus
- Centre for Clinical Vaccinology & Tropical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Trudie Lang
- The Global Health Network, Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Sombié I, Aidam J, Montorzi G. Evaluation of regional project to strengthen national health research systems in four countries in West Africa: lessons learned. Health Res Policy Syst 2017; 15:46. [PMID: 28722552 PMCID: PMC5516846 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-017-0214-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Since the Commission on Health Research for Development (COHRED) published its flagship report, more attention has been focused on strengthening national health research systems (NHRS). This paper evaluates the contribution of a regional project that used a participatory approach to strengthen NHRS in four post-conflict West African countries - Guinea-Bissau, Liberia, Sierra Leone and Mali. METHODS The data from the situation analysis conducted at the start of the project was compared to data from the project's final evaluation, using a hybrid conceptual framework built around four key areas identified through the analysis of existing frameworks. The four areas are governance and management, capacities, funding, and dissemination/use of research findings. RESULTS The project helped improve the countries' governance and management mechanisms without strengthening the entire NHRS. In the four countries, at least one policy, plan or research agenda was developed. One country put in place a national health research ethics committee, while all four countries could adopt a research information management system. The participatory approach and support from the West African Health Organisation and COHRED were all determining factors. CONCLUSION The lessons learned from this project show that the fragile context of these countries requires long-term engagement and that support from a regional institution is needed to address existing challenges and successfully strengthen the entire NHRS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Issiaka Sombié
- West Africa Health Organisation, BP 153, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
| | - Jude Aidam
- West Africa Health Organisation, BP 153, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso
| | - Gabriela Montorzi
- Council on Health Research for Development (COHRED), Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Khatib R, Giacaman R, Khammash U, Yusuf S. Challenges to conducting epidemiology research in chronic conflict areas: examples from PURE- Palestine. Confl Health 2017; 10:33. [PMID: 28239410 PMCID: PMC5320635 DOI: 10.1186/s13031-016-0101-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2016] [Accepted: 10/07/2016] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Little has been written on the challenges of conducting research in regions or countries with chronic conflict and strife. In this paper we share our experiences in conducting a population based study of chronic diseases in the occupied Palestinian territory and describe the challenges faced, some of which were unique to a conflict zone area, while others were common to low- and middle- income countries. After a short description of the situation in the occupied Palestinian territory at the time of data collection, and a brief overview of the design of the study, the challenges encountered in working within a fragmented health care system are discussed. These challenges include difficulties in planning for data collection in a fragmented healthcare system, standardizing data collection when resources are limited, working in communities with access restricted by the military, and considerations related to the study setting. Ways of overcoming these challenges are discussed. Conducting epidemiological research can be very difficult in some parts of our turbulent world, but data collected from such regions may contrast with those solely from politically and economically more stable regions. Therefore, special efforts to collect epidemiologic data from regions engulfed by strife, while challenging are essential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rasha Khatib
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Loyola Medical Center, Maywood, IL USA
| | - Rita Giacaman
- Institute of Community and Public Health, Birzeit University, Birzeit, occupied Palestinian territory Palestine
| | - Umaiyeh Khammash
- UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East, East Jerusalem, occupied Palestinian territory Palestine
| | - Salim Yusuf
- Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University and Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kebede D, Zielinski C, Mbondji PE, Sanou I, Kouvividila W, Lusamba-Dikassa PS. Research and its governance in health research institutions in sub-Saharan African countries: results of a questionnaire-based survey. J R Soc Med 2014; 107:55-69. [PMID: 24914129 DOI: 10.1177/0141076814531751] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
SUMMARY Objective: To describe governance and stewardship of research in health research institutions in the World Health Organization (WHO) African Region. Design: A structured questionnaire was used to solicit information on governance and stewardship from health research institutions. Setting: Forty-two Member States of the WHO African Region. Participants: Key informants from the respondent health research institutions in the respondent sub-Saharan African countries. Main outcome measures: Institutions' participation in setting the national health research agenda. Institutional research priorities, scientific reviews and governance structure. Results: During the previous 12 months, the heads of 49% of respondent health research institutions participated in the setting or coordination of national research priorities. The most frequently cited priorities for contributing to or performing research were improving health programmes, producing new knowledge, influencing health policies and conducting operational research. For 78% of respondent institutions, scientific review was required for research funded directly by the institution, and for 73% of respondent institutions, scientific review was required for research not funded by the institution. However, most respondent institutions did not have written policies or guidelines, either for the scientific review of proposals (70%) or regarding conflict of interest on scientific review committees (80%). Conclusions: Some health research institutions demonstrate good practice in terms of the establishment of structures and processes for governance and stewardship, many others do not. There is a need for the strengthening of the stewardship capacity of research institutions in the Region.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Derege Kebede
- World Health Organization Regional Office for Africa, PO Box 6, Brazzaville, Congo
| | - Chris Zielinski
- World Health Organization Regional Office for Africa, PO Box 6, Brazzaville, Congo
| | | | - Issa Sanou
- World Health Organization Regional Office for Africa, PO Box 6, Brazzaville, Congo
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Simba D, Mukose A, Bazeyo W. Institutional capacity for health systems research in East and Central African Schools of Public Health: strengthening human and financial resources. Health Res Policy Syst 2014; 12:23. [PMID: 24888371 PMCID: PMC4050402 DOI: 10.1186/1478-4505-12-23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2013] [Accepted: 04/11/2014] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite its importance in providing evidence for health-related policy and decision-making, an insufficient amount of health systems research (HSR) is conducted in low-income countries (LICs). Schools of public health (SPHs) are key stakeholders in HSR. This paper, one in a series of four, examines human and financial resources capacities, policies and organizational support for HSR in seven Africa Hub SPHs in East and Central Africa. METHODS Capacity assessment done included document analysis to establish staff numbers, qualifications and publications; self-assessment using a tool developed to capture individual perceptions on the capacity for HSR and institutional dialogues. Key informant interviews (KIIs) were held with Deans from each SPH and Ministry of Health and non-governmental officials, focusing on perceptions on capacity of SPHs to engage in HSR, access to funding, and organizational support for HSR. RESULTS A total of 123 people participated in the self-assessment and 73 KIIs were conducted. Except for the National University of Rwanda and the University of Nairobi SPH, most respondents expressed confidence in the adequacy of staffing levels and HSR-related skills at their SPH. However, most of the researchers operate at individual level with low outputs. The average number of HSR-related publications was only <1 to 3 per staff member over a 6-year period with most of the publications in international journals. There is dependency on external funding for HSR, except for Rwanda, where there was little government funding. We also found that officials from the Ministries of Health often formulate policy based on data generated through ad hoc technical reviews and consultancies, despite their questionable quality. CONCLUSIONS There exists adequate skilled staff for HSR in the SPHs. However, HSR conducted by individuals, fuelled by Ministries' of Health tendency to engage individual researchers, undermines institutional capacity. This study underscores the need to form effective multidisciplinary teams to enhance research of immediate and local relevance. Capacity strengthening in the SPH needs to focus on knowledge translation and communication of findings to relevant audiences. Advocacy is needed to influence respective governments to allocate adequate funding for HSR to avoid donor dependency that distorts local research agenda.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daudi Simba
- Department of Community Health, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, United Nations Road, P.O. Box 65015, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - Aggrey Mukose
- Department Disease Control and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, P.O. Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda
| | - William Bazeyo
- Department of Community Health and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, P.O. Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Masalu JR, Aboud M, Moshi MJ, Mugusi F, Kamuhabwa A, Mgimwa N, Freeman P, Goodell AJ, Kaaya EE, Macfarlane SB. An institutional research agenda: focusing university expertise in Tanzania on national health priorities. J Public Health Policy 2013; 33 Suppl 1:S186-201. [PMID: 23254843 DOI: 10.1057/jphp.2012.50] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
A well-articulated institutional health research agenda can assist essential contributors and intended beneficiaries to visualize the link between research and community health needs, systems outcomes, and national development. In 2011, Tanzania's Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences (MUHAS) published a university-wide research agenda. In developing the agenda, MUHAS leadership drew on research expertise in its five health professional schools and two institutes, its own research relevant documents, national development priorities, and published literature. We describe the process the university underwent to form the agenda and present its content. We assess MUHAS's research strengths and targets for new development by analyzing faculty publications over a five-year period before setting the agenda. We discuss implementation challenges and lessons for improving the process when updating the agenda. We intend that our description of this agenda-setting process will be useful to other institutions embarking on similar efforts to align research activities and funding with national priorities to improve health and development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joyce R Masalu
- Department of Preventive and Community Dentistry, School of Dentistry, and Directorate of Research and Publications, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, PO Box 65001, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Hyder AA, Zafar W, Ali J, Ssekubugu R, Ndebele P, Kass N. Evaluating institutional capacity for research ethics in Africa: a case study from Botswana. BMC Med Ethics 2013; 14:31. [PMID: 23899301 PMCID: PMC3734072 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6939-14-31] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2012] [Accepted: 05/29/2013] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The increase in the volume of research conducted in Low and Middle Income Countries (LMIC), has brought a renewed international focus on processes for ethical conduct of research. Several programs have been initiated to strengthen the capacity for research ethics in LMIC. However, most such programs focus on individual training or development of ethics review committees. The objective of this paper is to present an approach to institutional capacity assessment in research ethics and application of this approach in the form of a case study from an institution in Africa. METHODS We adapted the Octagon model originally used by the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency to assess an organization along eight domains in research ethics: basic values and identity; structure and organization; ability to carry out activities; relevance of activities to stated goals; capacity of staff and management; administrative, financing and accounting systems; its relations with target groups; and the national context. We used a mixed methods approach to collect empirical data at the University of Botswana from March to December 2010. RESULTS The overall shape of the external evaluation Octagon suggests that strengths of the University of Botswana are in the areas of structure, relevance, production and identity; while the university still needs more work in the areas of systems of finance, target groups, and environment. The Octagons also show the similarities and discrepancies between the 'external' and 'internal' evaluations and provide an opportunity for exploration of these different assessments. For example, the discrepant score for 'identity' between internal and external evaluations allows for an exploration of what constitutes a strong identity for research ethics at the University of Botswana and how it can be strengthened. CONCLUSIONS There is a general lack of frameworks for evaluating research ethics capacity in LMICs. We presented an approach that stresses evaluation from both internal and external perspectives. This case study highlights the university's rapid progress in developing research ethics capacity and points to some notable areas for improvement. We believe that such an empirically-driven and participatory assessment allows a more holistic measurement and promotion of institutional capacity strengthening for research ethics in LMICs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adnan A Hyder
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 North Wolfe Street, Suite E-8132, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Waleed Zafar
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 North Wolfe Street, Suite E-8132, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Joseph Ali
- Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Robert Ssekubugu
- Rakai Health Sciences Program, Uganda Virus Research Institute, Kalisizo, Uganda
| | | | - Nancy Kass
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 North Wolfe Street, Suite E-8132, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
- Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Abstract
Health research capacity strengthening (HRCS) is a strategy implemented worldwide to improve the ability of developing countries to tackle the persistent and disproportionate burdens of disease they face. Drawing on a review of existing HRCS literature and our experiences over the course of an HRCS project in Vietnam, we summarise major challenges to the HRCS enterprise at the interpersonal, institutional and macro levels. While over the course of several decades of HRCS initiatives many of these challenges have been well documented, we highlight several considerations that remain underarticulated. We advance critical considerations of the HRCS enterprise by discussing (1) how the organisation of US public health funding shapes the ecology of knowledge production in low- and middle-income country contexts, (2) the barriers US researchers face to effectively collaborate in capacity strengthening for research-to-policy translation, and (3) the potential for unintentional negative consequences if HRCS efforts are not sufficiently reflexive about the limitations of dominant paradigms in public health research and intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily E Vasquez
- Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Gadsby EW. Research capacity strengthening: donor approaches to improving and assessing its impact in low- and middle-income countries. Int J Health Plann Manage 2012; 26:89-106. [PMID: 20422620 DOI: 10.1002/hpm.1031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Increasing attention, and a concomitant increase in funds, is being devoted to the strengthening of research capacity for health within low- and middle-income countries. Yet approaches to research capacity strengthening (RCS) are still new, and there is much debate about how to strengthen something that is so difficult to define, let alone measure. This paper aims to inform our understanding of how research capacity is being strengthened, and how we might consider the effectiveness of these initiatives. It does this by examining (a) understandings of and approaches to RCS, and (b) different ways in which RCS is monitored and evaluated. The study included a literature review, internet search, and analysis of the web pages and available documents for six donor organizations key to health RCS. E-mail and telephone discussions were conducted with experts in the area of health RCS, as well as semi-structured telephone interviews with representatives from the six identified organizations. The study found that understandings of and approaches to RCS are wide ranging. We are at the early stages of knowing how best to identify, target and affect the many factors that are important for stronger research capacity. Furthermore, as RCS initiatives become more wide-ranging and complex, they become more difficult to monitor and evaluate. Donors are struggling with many challenges associated with tracking RCS initiatives. There is no consensus on the best methods or tools to use. There is a clear need for improved strategies and the development of a tried and tested framework for RCS tracking.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erica Wirrmann Gadsby
- Nuffield Centre for International Health and Development, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, Leeds University, Leeds, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Chanda-Kapata P, Campbell S, Zarowsky C. Developing a national health research system: participatory approaches to legislative, institutional and networking dimensions in Zambia. Health Res Policy Syst 2012; 10:17. [PMID: 22672331 PMCID: PMC3463500 DOI: 10.1186/1478-4505-10-17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2011] [Accepted: 05/16/2012] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
For many sub-Saharan African countries, a National Health Research System (NHRS) exists more in theory than in reality, with the health system itself receiving the majority of investments. However, this lack of attention to NHRS development can, in fact, frustrate health systems in achieving their desired goals. In this case study, we discuss the ongoing development of Zambia's NHRS. We reflect on our experience in the ongoing consultative development of Zambia's NHRS and offer this reflection and process documentation to those engaged in similar initiatives in other settings. We argue that three streams of concurrent activity are critical in developing an NHRS in a resource-constrained setting: developing a legislative framework to determine and define the system's boundaries and the roles all actors will play within it; creating or strengthening an institution capable of providing coordination, management and guidance to the system; and focusing on networking among institutions and individuals to harmonize, unify and strengthen the overall capacities of the research community.
Collapse
|
23
|
Kok MO, Rodrigues A, Silva AP, de Haan S. The emergence and current performance of a health research system: lessons from Guinea Bissau. Health Res Policy Syst 2012; 10:5. [PMID: 22321566 PMCID: PMC3295730 DOI: 10.1186/1478-4505-10-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2011] [Accepted: 02/09/2012] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little is known about how health research systems (HRS) in low-income countries emerge and evolve over time, and how this process relates to their performance. Understanding how HRSs emerge is important for the development of well functioning National Health Research Systems (NHRS). The aim of this study was to assess how the HRS in Guinea Bissau has emerged and evolved over time and how the present system functions. METHODS We used a qualitative case-study methodology to explore the emergence and current performance of the HRS, using the NHRS framework. We reviewed documents and carried out 39 in-depth interviews, ranging from health research to policy and practice stakeholders. Using an iterative approach, we undertook a thematic analysis of the data. RESULTS The research practices in Guinea Bissau led to the emergence of a HRS with both local and international links and strong dependencies on international partners and donors. The post-colonial, volatile and resource-dependent context, changes in donor policies, training of local researchers and nature of the research findings influenced how the HRS evolved. Research priorities have mostly been set by 'expatriate' researchers and focused on understanding and reducing child mortality. Research funding is almost exclusively provided by foreign donors and international agencies. The training of Guinean researchers started in the mid-nineties and has since reinforced the links with the health system, broadened the research agenda and enhanced local use of research. While some studies have made an important contribution to global health, the use of research within Guinea Bissau has been constrained by the weak and donor dependent health system, volatile government, top-down policies of international agencies, and the controversial nature of some of the research findings. CONCLUSIONS In Guinea Bissau a de facto 'system' of research has emerged through research practices and co-evolving national and international research and development dynamics. If the aim of research is to contribute to local decision making, it is essential to modulate the emerged system by setting national research priorities, aligning funding, building national research capacity and linking research to decision making processes. Donors and international agencies can contribute to this process by coordinating their efforts and aligning to national priorities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maarten O Kok
- Department of Health Sciences, VU University, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Amabelia Rodrigues
- Instituto Nacional da Saúde Pública, CP 861, 1004 Bissau Cedex, Bissau. República da Guiné-Bissau
| | - Augusto Paulo Silva
- Minsterio da Saúde Pública, Avenida Unidade Africana, Caixa Postal 50, 1013, Bissau Cedex, República da Guiné-Bissau
| | - Sylvia de Haan
- Council on Health Research for Development (COHRED), 1-5 Route des Morillons, 1211 Genève, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Kirigia JM, Kirigia DG. The essence of governance in health development. Int Arch Med 2011; 4:11. [PMID: 21443766 PMCID: PMC3072323 DOI: 10.1186/1755-7682-4-11] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2010] [Accepted: 03/28/2011] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Governance and leadership in health development are critically important for the achievement of the health Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) and other national health goals. Those two factors might explain why many countries in Africa are not on track to attain the health MDGs by 2015. This paper debates the meaning of 'governance in health development', reviews briefly existing governance frameworks, proposes a modified framework on health development governance (HDG), and develops a HDG index. DISCUSSION We argue that unlike 'leadership in health development', 'governance in health development' is the sole prerogative of the Government through the Ministry of Health, which can choose to delegate (but not abrogate) some of the governance tasks. The general governance domains of the UNDP and the World Bank are very pertinent but not sufficient for assessment of health development governance. The WHO six domains of governance do not include effective external partnerships for health, equity in health development, efficiency in resource allocation and use, ethical practises in health research and service provision, and macroeconomic and political stability. The framework for assessing health systems governance developed by Siddiqi et al also does not include macroeconomic and political stability as a separate principle. The Siddiqi et al framework does not propose a way of scoring the various governance domains to facilitate aggregation, inter-country comparisons and health development governance tracking over time.This paper argues for a broader health development governance framework because other sectors that assure human rights to education, employment, food, housing, political participation, and security combined have greater impact on health development than the health systems. It also suggests some amendments to Siddigi et al's framework to make it more relevant to the broader concept of 'governance in health development' and to the WHO African Region context. SUMMARY A strong case for broader health development governance framework has been made. A health development governance index with 10 functions and 42 sub-functions has been proposed to facilitate inter-country comparisons. Potential sources of data for estimating HDGI have been suggested. The Governance indices for individual sub-functions can aid policy-makers to establish the sources of weak health governance and subsequently develop appropriate interventions for ameliorating the situation.
Collapse
|
25
|
Hyder AA, Corluka A, Winch PJ, El-Shinnawy A, Ghassany H, Malekafzali H, Lim MK, Mfutso-Bengo J, Segura E, Ghaffar A. National policy-makers speak out: are researchers giving them what they need? Health Policy Plan 2010; 26:73-82. [PMID: 20547652 PMCID: PMC4031573 DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czq020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 113] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
The objective of this empirical study was to understand the perspectives and attitudes of policy-makers towards the use and impact of research in the health sector in low- and middle-income countries. The study used data from 83 semi-structured, in-depth interviews conducted with purposively selected policy-makers at the national level in Argentina, Egypt, Iran, Malawi, Oman and Singapore. The interviews were structured around an interview guide developed based on existing literature and in consultation with all six country investigators. Transcripts were processed using a thematic-analysis approach. Policy-makers interviewed for this study were unequivocal in their support for health research and the high value they attribute to it. However, they stated that there were structural and informal barriers to research contributing to policy processes, to the contribution research makes to knowledge generally, and to the use of research in health decision-making specifically. Major findings regarding barriers to evidence-based policy-making included poor communication and dissemination, lack of technical capacity in policy processes, as well as the influence of the political context. Policy-makers had a variable understanding of economic analysis, equity and burden of disease measures, and were vague in terms of their use in national decisions. Policy-maker recommendations regarding strategies for facilitating the uptake of research into policy included improving the technical capacity of policy-makers, better packaging of research results, use of social networks, and establishment of fora and clearinghouse functions to help assist in evidence-based policy-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adnan A Hyder
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Noronha J, Silva TRD, Szklo F, Barata RB. Análise do sistema de pesquisa em saúde do Brasil: o ambiente de pesquisa. SAUDE E SOCIEDADE 2009. [DOI: 10.1590/s0104-12902009000300007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJETIVO: conhecer a percepção dos formuladores de política científica, pesquisadores e usuários dos resultados da pesquisa em saúde sobre o ambiente da pesquisa em saúde no país. Método: estudo descritivo com dados obtidos por meio de questionário padronizado aplicado a uma amostra probabilística de líderes de grupos de pesquisa de instituições do Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo, Minas Gerais, Rio Grande do Sul, Bahia e Distrito Federal; e, amostra intencional de formuladores de política científica e usuários dos resultados de pesquisa. Questionários desenvolvidos e testados por equipe da Organização Mundial de Saúde (OMS), utilizados em 12 estudos-pilotos em países de renda média e baixa. RESULTADOS: os entrevistados consideram a motivação para a produção e utilização da pesquisa em saúde melhor em suas instituições do que no país. Os aspectos do ambiente de pesquisa considerados prioritários foram: relevância dos problemas investigados, incentivo à carreira do pesquisador e transparência no financiamento. Os aspectos mais bem avaliados foram: acesso às informações científicas, oportunidades para comunicação e publicação dos resultados e treinamento dos pesquisadores. As piores avaliações foram feitas para: salários, incentivos à carreira e transparência no financiamento. Os resultados sofreram a influência da área científica de atuação dos entrevistados, da posição como formulador, pesquisador ou usuário e dos grupos etários. CONCLUSÃO: os entrevistados avaliaram o ambiente de pesquisa em saúde no país como regular para a maioria dos aspectos analisados destacando como bons apenas o treinamento dos pesquisadores, o acesso à informação científica e as oportunidades para publicação. Há necessidade de aprimoramento de vários aspectos do ambiente de pesquisa em saúde no país.
Collapse
|
27
|
Palmer A, Anya SE, Bloch P. The political undertones of building national health research systems--reflections from The Gambia. Health Res Policy Syst 2009; 7:13. [PMID: 19476660 PMCID: PMC2693112 DOI: 10.1186/1478-4505-7-13] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2008] [Accepted: 05/29/2009] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
In developing countries building national health research systems is a movement similar to a political leadership contest. Increasingly, political campaigns to select leaders depend less on ideologies and political messages and more on promising change that will promptly improve the quality of life of the voters. In this process the benefits and risks of every action and statement made by the candidates are carefully assessed. Approaches currently promoted to strengthen health research within ministries of health in developing countries place emphasis on implementing logical steps towards building national health research systems including developing a national health research policy and strategic plan, conducting a situational analysis of research in the country, setting a national health research agenda, establishing research ethics and scientific committees, and building human and institutional capacity for health research management and conduct. Although these processes have successfully improved the standards of health research in some settings, many developing countries struggle to get the process going. One reason is that this approach does not deal with basic questions posed within a ministry of health, namely, "What is the political benefit of the ministry assuming control of the process?" and "What are the political implications for the ministry if another institution spearheads the process?" Seen from the perspective of non-governmental organizations, academic institutions and donors trying to support the processes of strengthening national health research systems, one of the foremost activities that needs to be undertaken is to analyze the political context of national health research and, on that basis, plan and implement appropriate political health research advocacy initiatives. This includes the development of explicit messages on the political benefits to the leadership in the ministry of health of their role in the conduct, management and dissemination of health research within the country. Civil society organizations, with links to both government and non-governmental organizations, are well placed to play the role of advocates. It is only through broad and active participation of stakeholders that the process of developing effective and sustainable national health research systems will truly become a national movement inspired, led and sustained by ministries of health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayo Palmer
- CIAM - Public Health Research & Development Centre, Kanifing Institutional Layout, Kanifing, The Gambia.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Novaes HMD, Carvalheiro JDR. Ciência, tecnologia e inovação em saúde e desenvolvimento social e qualidade de vida: teses para debate. CIENCIA & SAUDE COLETIVA 2007. [DOI: 10.1590/s1413-81232007000700007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Este texto apresenta algumas teses importantes para o desenvolvimento da ciência e tecnologia em saúde, a serem discutidas na 13ª Conferência Nacional de Saúde. Nele foram analisados, com base na literatura, os fatores e processos que determinaram os padrões atuais de produção, incorporação e avaliação de tecnologias nos sistemas de serviços de saúde, que se inserem no contexto de medicalização das sociedades contemporâneas. Foram analisadas também as políticas públicas científicas e tecnológicas e de saúde propostas nos anos 90 nos países desenvolvidos e em desenvolvimento para aumentar o impacto do desenvolvimento científico e tecnológico sobre a saúde das populações. Foram identificadas as dificuldades que essas políticas enfrentam para alcançar o impacto desejado, e os desafios a serem superados no século XXI.
Collapse
|
29
|
Novaes HMD. [From production to evaluation of health systems technologies: challenges for the 21st century]. Rev Saude Publica 2007; 40 Spec no.:133-40. [PMID: 16924313 DOI: 10.1590/s0034-89102006000400018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2006] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
The study analyzes factors and processes identified in the literature that determine the patterns of production, use and assessment of the health care technologies, which are part of the "medicalization" of contemporary societies. We also evaluate the scientific and technological public and health care policies proposed during the 1990s in developed and developing countries to enhance the impact of scientific and technological development on population health. Problems facing these policies were identified, as were the challenges to be overcome in the twenty-first century.
Collapse
|
30
|
Kirigia JM, Wambebe C. Status of national health research systems in ten countries of the WHO African Region. BMC Health Serv Res 2006; 6:135. [PMID: 17052326 PMCID: PMC1622748 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2006] [Accepted: 10/19/2006] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The World Health Organization (WHO) Regional Committee for Africa, in 1998, passed a resolution (AFR/RC48/R4) which urged its Member States in the Region to develop national research policies and strategies and to build national health research capacities, particularly through resource allocation, training of senior officials, strengthening of research institutions and establishment of coordination mechanisms. The purpose of this study was to take stock of some aspects of national resources for health research in the countries of the Region; identify current constraints facing national health research systems; and propose the way forward. METHODS A questionnaire was prepared and sent by pouch to all the 46 Member States in the WHO African Region through the WHO Country Representatives for facilitation and follow up. The health research focal person in each of the countries Ministry of Health (in consultation with other relevant health research bodies in the country) bore the responsibility for completing the questionnaire. The data were entered and analysed in Excel spreadsheet. RESULTS The key findings were as follows: the response rate was 21.7% (10/46); three countries had a health research policy; one country reported that it had a law relating to health research; two countries had a strategic health research plan; three countries reported that they had a functional national health research system (NHRS); two countries confirmed the existence of a functional national health research management forum (NHRMF); six countries had a functional ethical review committee (ERC); five countries had a scientific review committee (SRC); five countries reported the existence of health institutions with institutional review committees (IRC); two countries had a health research programme; and three countries had a national health research institute (NHRI) and a faculty of health sciences in the national university that conducted health research. Four out of the ten countries reported that they had a budget line for health research in the Ministry of Health budget document. CONCLUSION Governments of countries of the African Region, with the support of development partners, private sector and civil society, urgently need to improve the research policy environment by developing health research policies, strategic plans, legislations, programmes and rolling plans with the involvement of all stakeholders, e.g., relevant sectors, research organizations, communities, industry and donors. In a nutshell, development of high-performing national health research systems in the countries of the WHO African Region, though optional, is an imperative. It may be the only way of breaking free from the current vicious cycle of ill-health and poverty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joses M Kirigia
- World Health Organization, Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Congo
| | - Charles Wambebe
- Bingham University, Abuja, Nigeria
- International Biomedical Research in Africa, Abuja, Nigeria
| |
Collapse
|