Health trajectories of immigrants in the United States: Does income inequality of country of origin matter?

"My children will grow up more healthy than me because of the vaccinations they received": Using the migrant health trajectory model to understand Vietnamese American parents' attitudes towards vaccinations and the U.S. healthcare system

Previous studies have examined the rationales affluent white American parents give for distrusting vaccinations and the U.S. healthcare system; fewer studies have investigated the vaccine- and healthcare-related attitudes of foreign-born parents who have resettled in the U.S. Drawing on 40 in-depth interviews with Vietnamese American parents who emigrated from Vietnam and reside in Southern California, this study finds that these parents favor vaccinations and trust the U.S. healthcare system. However, contrary to the "good" refugee and "model" minority stereotypes, which racializes Asian Americans as blindly adhering to authority to assimilate, these Vietnamese Americans reported purposefully agreeing to vaccinations because they believe that vaccines are a privileged prevention strategy, ensured by the U.S. healthcare system to safeguard their and their children's livelihoods. Interview participants chronicled their social experiences as refugees, particularly their upbringing in Vietnam (where they witnessed vaccine and healthcare inequities) and their emigration to and resettlement in the U.S. (a social setting they believe has an abundance of advantageous health resources) as social factors influencing their vaccination and healthcare standpoints. By attending to Vietnamese American parents' unique emigration health trajectories, this study highlights how vaccination and healthcare attitudes are social acts shaped by interlinking socio-historical, -political, and -cultural contexts.

Spaces of Segregation and Health: Complex Associations for Black Immigrant and US-Born Mothers in New York City

Black immigrants are a growing proportion of the Black population in the USA, and despite the fact that they now comprise nearly a quarter of Black urban residents, few studies address the relationships between racial segregation and maternal and birth outcomes among Black immigrants. In this study of birth outcomes among US-born and immigrant Black mothers in New York City between 2010 and 2014, we applied multilevel models, assessing the association between segregation (measured through a novel kernel-based measure of local segregation) and adverse birth outcomes (preterm birth (PTB) and low birth weight (LBW; < 2500 g)) among African-born, Caribbean-born, and US-born Black mothers. We found that African-born and Caribbean/Latin American-born Black mothers had a significantly lower incidence of PTB compared with US-born Black mothers (7.0 and 10.1, respectively, compared with 11.2 for US-born mothers). We also found disparities in the incidence of infant LBW by nativity, with the highest incidence among infants born to US-born mothers (10.9), compared with African-born (6.9) and Caribbean-born mothers (9.0). After adjusting for maternal (maternal age; higher rates of reported drug use and smoking) and contextual characteristics (neighborhood SES; green space access), we found that maternal residence in an area with high Black segregation increases the likelihood of PTB and LBW among US-born and Caribbean-born Black mothers. In contrast, the association between segregation and birth outcomes was insignificant for African-born mothers. Associations between tract-level socioeconomic disadvantage and birth outcomes also varied across groups, with only US-born Black mothers showing the expected positive association with risk of PTB and LBW.

Peoples' expectations of healthcare: A conceptual review and proposed analytical framework

Expectations shape how one experiences the healthcare one receives. In this paper we argue that the current conceptualisations of expectations within the healthcare literature have much to gain from the many recent and adjacent conceptual developments in other disciplines. The concept of expectations has been extensively studied across disciplines - we review the key texts on the subject in the business, management, social psychology, and sociology literatures to provide a conceptual overview and propose an integrative analytical framework for better understanding individuals' expectations in healthcare. We argue that peoples' expectations of a care encounter are usefully understood as being shaped by their social locations at particular points of time, which is at the intersection of multiple social structures and relations. Peoples' future expectations of care may also be influenced by the experiences of past and current care encounters, framed again by intersecting social structures and relations at that point in time. We demonstrate how an intersectional, translocational and relational analytical approach can allow researchers and practitioners to consider how peoples' social locations shape their expectations of care, not only within a given social environment, but at certain points in time and over time. We emphasise that, given the mobilities and mixing societies are experiencing globally, such an approach is particularly useful for understanding healthcare-related expectations and experiences of all.

A Global Meta-analysis of the Immigrant Mortality Advantage

A large body of research on the “Healthy Immigrant Effect” (or “Paradox”) has reported an immigrant mortality advantage. However, other studies do not find such significant effects, and some even present contradictory evidence. This article is the first systematic meta-analysis that investigates the immigration-mortality relationship from a global perspective, examining 1,933 all-cause and cardiovascular mortality risk estimates from 103 publications. Our comprehensive analysis allows us to assess interactions between origin and destination regions and to reexamine, on a global scale, some of the most notable explanations for the immigrant mortality advantage, including suggestions that this paradox may be primarily the result of selection effects. We find evidence for the existence of a mild immigrant mortality advantage for working-age individuals. However, the relationship holds only for immigrants who moved between certain world regions, particularly those who immigrated from Northern Africa, Asia, and Southern Europe to richer countries. The results highlight the need in the broader migration literature for an increased focus on selection effects and on outcomes for people who chose not to migrate or who were denied entry into their planned destination country.

Effect of micronutrient supplements on low-risk pregnancies in high-income countries: a systematic quantitative literature review

OBJECTIVE

To assess the quantity and focus of recent empirical research regarding the effect of micronutrient supplementation on live birth outcomes in low-risk pregnancies from high-income countries.

DESIGN

A systematic quantitative literature review.

SETTING

Low-risk pregnancies in World Bank-classified high-income countries, 2019.

RESULTS

Using carefully selected search criteria, a total of 2475 publications were identified, of which seventeen papers met the inclusion criteria for this review. Data contributing to nine of the studies were sourced from four cohorts; research originated from ten countries. These cohorts exhibited a large number of participants, stable data and a low probability of bias. The most recent empirical data offered by these studies was 2011; the most historical was 1980. In total, fifty-five categorical outcome/supplement combinations were examined; 67·3 % reported no evidence of micronutrient supplementation influencing selected outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

A coordinated, cohesive and uniform empirical approach to future studies is required to determine what constitutes appropriate, effective and safe micronutrient supplementation in contemporary cohorts from high-income countries, and how this might influence pregnancy outcomes.

International migration and health: it is time to go beyond conventional theoretical frameworks

The large-scale international migration in the 21st century has emerged as a major threat to the global health equity movement. Not only has the volume of migration substantially increased but also the patterns of migration have become more complex. This paper began by focusing on the drivers of international migration and how health inequalities are linked to migration. Situating migration within the broader structural contexts, the paper calls for using the unharnessed potential of the intersectionality framework to advance immigrant health research. Despite coming from poorer socioeconomic backgrounds and facing disparities in the host society, the immigrants are often paradoxically shown to be healthier than the native population, although this health advantage diminishes over time. Studies on immigrant health, however, are traditionally informed by the acculturation framework which holds the assimilation of unhealthy lifestyles primarily responsible for immigrant health deterioration, diverting the attention away from the structural factors. Although the alternative structural framework came up with the promise to explore the structural factors, it is criticised for an overwhelming focus on access to healthcare and inadequate attention to institutional and societal contexts. However, the heterogeneity of the immigrant population across multiple dimensions of vulnerability demands a novel approach that can bring to the fore both premigratory and postmigratory contextual factors and adequately capture the picture of immigrant health. The paper concludes by questioning the acculturation perspective and pushing the structural paradigm to embrace the intersectionality framework which has the potential to address a wide range of vulnerabilities that intersect to produce health inequalities among the immigrants.

Does "Rural" Always Mean the Same? Macrosocial Determinants of Rural Populations' Health in Poland

Rural areas, as well as urban ones, are not homogeneous in terms of social and economic conditions. Those surrounding large urban centers (suburban rural areas) act different roles than those located in remote areas. This study aims to measure the level of inequalities in social determinants of health (SDH) between two categories of rural areas. We pose the following research hypotheses: (hypothesis H1) rural areas in Poland are relatively homogenous in the context of SDH and (hypothesis H2) SDH affects life expectancies of rural residents. Based on data covering all rural territories, we found that rural areas in Poland are homogenous in SDH. We also find important determinants of health rooted in a demographic structure—the feminization index and a ratio of the working-age population. On the other hand, we cannot confirm the influence of commonly used SDH-GDP and unemployment rate.