1
|
Kelmendi N, Nilsson M, Taloyan M, Sundberg K, Langius-Eklöf A, Craftman ÅG. Preferences for Tailored Support - Patients' and Health Care Professionals' Experiences Regarding Symptoms and Self-Management Strategies During the First Year After Curatively Intended Prostate Cancer Treatment. Patient Prefer Adherence 2024; 18:275-288. [PMID: 38333642 PMCID: PMC10850763 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s440689] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2023] [Accepted: 01/06/2024] [Indexed: 02/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose There is an increase in the number of men undergoing screening for prostate cancer, and advancements in treatments, which implies current knowledge about symptoms and self-management. This study aims to explore experiences of symptom distress, and self-management strategies during the first year after curatively intended treatment for prostate cancer, as identified by patients and health care professionals. Methods A qualitative design was used, including data triangulation from individual interviews with patients (n =17) and one focus group interview with healthcare professionals (n =5). Thematic analysis was used. Results The two main themes were identified: living with the consequences of treatment and navigating a new situation. Living with the consequences of treatment illustrated how losing control of bodily functions such as bladder, bowel, and sexual functions interfered with daily life. A stigma around the disease was described, and a life living in an unfamiliar body challenged ideas of masculinity. The first months after treatment ended was a distressing period related to the abruption in frequent contact with healthcare providers, and concerns about the future. The second theme, navigating a new situation, illustrates that self-management strategies varied, due to individual factors as did the need for tailored information and support provided from healthcare professionals and family, which was highly valued. Information and support were described as complex topics and healthcare professionals emphasized the need for appropriate education for staff to provide proper support to men after ended treatment. Conclusion Lingering symptoms and concerns were evident during the first year after treatment. Self-management strategies varied, and timely and tailored information and support during the first year were considered highly valued, important, and preferred by patients. Our results indicate that support should be offered immediately after curatively intended treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nazmije Kelmendi
- Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Nursing, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Academic Primary Health Care Center, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Marie Nilsson
- Academic Primary Health Care Center, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Family Medicine and Primary Care, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Marina Taloyan
- Academic Primary Health Care Center, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Family Medicine and Primary Care, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Kay Sundberg
- Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Nursing, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ann Langius-Eklöf
- Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Nursing, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Åsa G Craftman
- Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Division of Nursing, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
King-Dowling S, Psihogios AM, Hill-Kayser C, Szalda D, O’Hagan B, Darabos K, Daniel LC, Barakat LP, Fleisher L, Maurer LA, Velázquez-Martin B, Jacobs LA, Hobbie W, Ginsberg JP, Vachani CC, Metz JM, Schwartz LA. Acceptability and feasibility of survivorship care plans and an accompanying mobile health intervention for adolescent and young adult survivors of childhood cancer. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2021; 68:e28884. [PMID: 33416214 PMCID: PMC9639403 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.28884] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Self-management interventions for adolescent and young adult (AYA) survivors of childhood cancer are needed. The present study reports on the acceptability and feasibility of delivering survivorship care plans (SCPs) and an accompanying app to AYA. PROCEDURE AYA (n = 224) ages 15-29 who completed treatment for cancer were randomized and received a digital SCP only or an SCP plus a mobile app intended to enhance self-management. For 16 weeks, the app delivered one to two daily messages complementing information in their SCP and tailored based on age, treatment, and health goal. Data are presented on feasibility, self-reported acceptability (including satisfaction and perceived benefits) and its relationship to app engagement (for those in app group), and feedback from qualitative interviews conducted with 10 AYA. RESULTS The SCP and app proved feasible as evidenced by high recruitment and retention, access to technology, time analysis, moderate app engagement, and minimal technical issues. However, 12% reported never reading the SCP and 8% never used the app. The app and SCP were acceptable to AYA, and SCP acceptability ratings did not differ between groups. For those with the app, acceptability was positively related to message engagement. AYA recommended enhanced individualization and design features of the SCP and app. CONCLUSIONS Results support the use of tailored SCPs and mobile health interventions for most AYA, as well as the need for further refinement and research. Delivery of SCPs and digital interventions are acceptable and feasible to AYA survivors, and may help promote health-related knowledge and survivorship self-management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara King-Dowling
- The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Division of Oncology, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Alexandra M. Psihogios
- The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Division of Oncology, Philadelphia, PA, USA,University of Pennsylvania, The Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Christine Hill-Kayser
- University of Pennsylvania, The Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA,University of Pennsylvania, Abramson Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Dava Szalda
- The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Division of Oncology, Philadelphia, PA, USA,University of Pennsylvania, The Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Bridget O’Hagan
- The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Division of Oncology, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Katie Darabos
- The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Division of Oncology, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Lamia P. Barakat
- The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Division of Oncology, Philadelphia, PA, USA,University of Pennsylvania, The Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Laurie A. Maurer
- Tennessee Department of Health, HIV/STD/Viral Hepatitis Section, Nashville, TN, USA
| | | | - Linda A. Jacobs
- University of Pennsylvania, The Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA,University of Pennsylvania, Abramson Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Wendy Hobbie
- The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Division of Oncology, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jill P. Ginsberg
- The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Division of Oncology, Philadelphia, PA, USA,University of Pennsylvania, The Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Carolyn C Vachani
- University of Pennsylvania, Abramson Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - James M. Metz
- University of Pennsylvania, The Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA,University of Pennsylvania, Abramson Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Lisa A. Schwartz
- The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Division of Oncology, Philadelphia, PA, USA,University of Pennsylvania, The Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vena JA, Copel LC. A concept analysis of remission within the domain of cancer survivorship. Nurs Forum 2021; 56:421-428. [PMID: 33634534 DOI: 10.1111/nuf.12558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2020] [Revised: 01/09/2021] [Accepted: 01/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
AIM This concept analysis aims to formulate a unique theoretical definition of the term remission as used in cancer survivorship. BACKGROUND Inadequate communication between healthcare providers and cancer survivors is a shared burden affecting survivor well-being. Healthcare providers regularly use the term remission in cancer prognosis, treatment, and long-term cancer management; yet, how healthcare providers and cancer survivors define and interpret the concept of remission is less understood. DESIGN The Walker and Avant method of concept analysis was applied to define the term remission within the domain of cancer survivorship. DATA SOURCE: Three health sciences databases were chosen for the literature search, including PubMed, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Ovid Medline. REVIEW METHODS: Included research articles were evaluated to define the antecedents, attributes, consequences, and empirical referents of the term remission. RESULTS A cancer diagnosis is the most commonly cited antecedent to cancer remission. During remission, most cancer patients are free of measurable or symptomatic disease; however, the remission milestone is complemented by multiple physical and psychological symptoms. More specific cancer remission attributes include anxiety, recurrence fears, self-perseverance, and loss of social support. Both positive and negative outcomes accompany cancer remission, including acceptance of the treatment journey, appreciation for life, hope, persistent anxiety, personal relief, and triggered memories. CONCLUSIONS This concept analysis reviewed numerous publications to understand remission in the context of cancer survivorship. Advanced practice and registered nurses have a continued opportunity to improve the communication methods of patient-centered teaching and care planning for cancer patients in remission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph A Vena
- M. Louise Fitzpatrick College of Nursing, Villanova University, Villanova, PA, USA
| | - Linda C Copel
- M. Louise Fitzpatrick College of Nursing, Villanova University, Villanova, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Moser A, Melchior I, Veenstra M, Stoffers E, Derks E, Jie KS. Improving the experience of older people with colorectal and breast cancer in patient-centred cancer care pathways using experience-based co-design. Health Expect 2021; 24:478-490. [PMID: 33440059 PMCID: PMC8077111 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2020] [Revised: 11/23/2020] [Accepted: 12/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient and public involvement (PPI) in quality improvement of oncological care pathways for older patients are rare. OBJECTIVES Improve the care pathway experience of older cancer patients and explore lessons learned regarding how to engage this vulnerable group. DESIGN Experience-Based Co-Design. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS Older cancer patients, their caregivers and healthcare professionals within colorectal and breast cancer care pathways. INTERVENTIONS Co-design quality improvement teams. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Colorectal cancer care pathway touchpoints were (a) availability of a contact person during diagnostic, treatment and aftercare phases; (b) collaboration between physicians and different hospital departments; (c) continuous relationship with same physician; (d) respectful treatment; (e) and information transfer with primary care. Breast cancer care pathway touchpoints were (a) comprehensive information package and information provision, (b) care planning based on patient preferences, (c) continuity of patient-professional relationship and (d) specialized care in case of vulnerability. Challenges related to PPI included (a) ability of older cancer patients to be reflective, critical and think at a collective level; (b) gaining support and commitment of professionals; (d) overcoming cultural differences and power inequalities; and (e) involving researchers and facilitators with appropriate expertise and position. CONCLUSION This multidisciplinary quality improvement project revealed several challenges of PPI with older cancer patients and their caregivers. Research teams themselves need to assume the role of facilitator to enable meaningful PPI of older cancer patients. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION Patient and caregiver representatives and advocates were involved in the design, conduct, analysis, interpretation of the data and preparation of this manuscript.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Albine Moser
- Research Centre for Autonomy and Participation of Chronically Ill People, Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, Heerlen, The Netherlands.,Department of Family Medicine, CAPHRI, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Inge Melchior
- Department of Internal Medicine, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Sittard, The Netherlands.,Research Centre for Integrative Patient Centred Health Care, Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | - Marja Veenstra
- Burgerkracht Limburg (Citizin Power Limburg), Sittard, The Netherlands
| | - Esther Stoffers
- Burgerkracht Limburg (Citizin Power Limburg), Sittard, The Netherlands
| | - Elvira Derks
- Department of Quality Improvement, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Sittard, The Netherlands
| | - Kon-Siong Jie
- Department of Internal Medicine, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Sittard, The Netherlands.,Research Centre for Integrative Patient Centred Health Care, Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, Heerlen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Survivors of lymphoma experience multiple challenges after treatment. However, a lack of knowledge of in-depth experiences of lymphoma survivors in early aftercare persists. OBJECTIVE To gain an in-depth understanding of the experiences of lymphoma survivors in early aftercare who have received an aftercare consultation based on evidence-based guideline recommendations, with an advanced practice nurse. METHODS This study used a narrative design. We recruited lymphoma survivors after a best-practice aftercare consultation with an advanced practice nurse. A total of 22 lymphoma survivors and 9 partners participated. Data were collected through narrative interviews and analyzed according to thematic narrative analysis. RESULTS Six themes emerged: living and dealing with health consequences, coping with work and financial challenges, having a positive outlook and dealing with uncertainty, deriving strength from and experiencing tensions in relationships, getting through tough times in life, and receiving support from healthcare professionals. CONCLUSIONS The stories of lymphoma survivors in early aftercare revealed their experiences of how they coped with a range of challenges in their personal lives. Choosing an aftercare trajectory based on an aftercare consultation that encourages patients to think about their issues, goals, and possible aftercare options may be useful for their transition from treatment to survivorship. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Survivors' social support and self-management capabilities are important aspects to be addressed in cancer care. An aftercare consultation involving shared goal setting and care planning may help nurses provide personalized aftercare.
Collapse
|
6
|
Brauer ER, Pieters HC, Ganz PA, Landier W, Pavlish C, Heilemann MV. "Improving to where?": treatment-related health risks and perceptions of the future among adolescents and young adults after hematopoietic cell transplantation. Support Care Cancer 2019; 27:623-630. [PMID: 30043264 PMCID: PMC6326869 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-018-4350-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2018] [Accepted: 07/09/2018] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Despite the prevalence of hematological malignancies in early adulthood, very little is known about hematopoietic cell transplantation among adolescents and young adults, and even less is known about their transition from the completion of therapy to early survivorship. In this qualitative study, we investigated the impact of the cancer experience on sense of life potential and perception of the future from the perspectives of adolescents and young adults after hematopoietic cell transplantation. METHODS In-depth interviews were conducted with adolescents and young adults who underwent allogeneic or autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation between the ages of 15-29 years and were 6-60 months post-treatment. Interview transcripts were systematically coded based on constructivist grounded theory. RESULTS Eighteen adolescents and young adults participated and described how they came to understand the lifelong, chronic nature of cancer survivorship. "Improving to where?" was a question raised in the post-treatment period that reflected participants' confusion about the goals of treatment and expectations for survivorship. Participants reported bracing themselves for "something bad" to deal with the uncertainty of medical and psychosocial effects of treatment. They struggled to move forward with their lives given their substantial health risks and found it necessary to "roll with the punches" in order to adjust to this new reality. CONCLUSIONS Adolescents and young adults who undergo hematopoietic cell transplantation are at significant risk for long-term and late effects in survivorship. Age-appropriate interventions are needed to support these survivors as they manage their fears about the future while enhancing health and well-being.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eden R Brauer
- UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, 650 Charles Young Drive South, Box 956900, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-6900, USA.
| | - Huibrie C Pieters
- UCLA School of Nursing, 4-956 Factor Bldg, Box 956918, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-6918, USA
| | - Patricia A Ganz
- UCLA Fielding School of Public Health, UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, 650 Charles Young Drive South, Room A2-125 CHS, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-6900, USA
| | - Wendy Landier
- University of Alabama at Birmingham Schools of Medicine and Nursing, 1600 7th Avenue South, Lowder 500, Birmingham, AL, 35233, USA
| | - Carol Pavlish
- UCLA School of Nursing, 4-238 Factor Bldg, Box 956918, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-6918, USA
| | - MarySue V Heilemann
- UCLA School of Nursing, 5-252 Factor Bldg, Box 956919, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-6919, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Friesen-Storms JH, Bours GJ, Snijders IC, van der Weijden T, Jie KSG, Beurskens AJ. A conversation approach based on shared goal-setting and shared decision-making for nurses in cancer aftercare: A developmental study. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2018; 35:107-116. [PMID: 30057077 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2018.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2017] [Revised: 06/02/2018] [Accepted: 06/11/2018] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to develop and pretest a systematic conversation approach for nurses to tailor aftercare to oncology patient's goals, unmet needs and wishes. METHODS We used an iterative developmental process for complex interventions: 1. Identifying problems 2. Identifying overall objectives 3. Designing the intervention 4. Pretesting and adapting the intervention. RESULTS The main results of the problem identification were: non-systematic and incomplete screening of potential issues, caveats in providing information, and shared decision-making. The overall objective formulated was: To develop a model for aftercare conversations based on shared goal-setting and decision-making. The conversation approach consists of four phases: 1. Preparation of the consultation including a questionnaire, 2. Shared goal-setting by means of a tool visualizing domains of life, and 3. Shared care planning by means of an overview of possible choices in aftercare, a database with health care professionals and a cancer survivorship care plan. 4. EVALUATION The results of the pretest revealed that the conversation approach needs to be flexible and tailored to the patient and practice setting, and embedded in the care processes. The conversation approach was perceived as enhancing patient-centeredness and leading to more in-depth consultations. CONCLUSION The conversation approach was developed in co-creation with stakeholders. The results of the pretest revealed important implications and suggestions for implementation in routine care. The aftercare conversation approach can be used by nurses to provide tailored patient-centered evidence-based aftercare. Tailored aftercare should support oncology patient's goals, unmet needs and wishes. Further tailoring is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jolanda Hhm Friesen-Storms
- Research Centre for Autonomy and Participation for Persons with a Chronic Illness, Zuyd Health, Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, Heerlen, The Netherlands; Maastricht University, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Department of Family Medicine, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Gerrie Jjw Bours
- Research Centre for Autonomy and Participation for Persons with a Chronic Illness, Zuyd Health, Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, Heerlen, The Netherlands; Maastricht University, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Department of Health Services Research, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Trudy van der Weijden
- Maastricht University, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Department of Family Medicine, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Kon-Siong G Jie
- Zuyderland Medical Center Sittard-Geleen, Heerlen, The Netherlands; Research Centre for Integrative Patient Centred Health Care, Zuyd Health, Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | - Anna Jhm Beurskens
- Research Centre for Autonomy and Participation for Persons with a Chronic Illness, Zuyd Health, Zuyd University of Applied Sciences, Heerlen, The Netherlands; Maastricht University, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Department of Family Medicine, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Howard AF, Kazanjian A, Pritchard S, Olson R, Hasan H, Newton K, Goddard K. Healthcare system barriers to long-term follow-up for adult survivors of childhood cancer in British Columbia, Canada: a qualitative study. J Cancer Surviv 2018; 12:277-290. [PMID: 29222704 PMCID: PMC5956053 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-017-0667-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2017] [Accepted: 11/29/2017] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Risk-stratified life-long follow-up care is recommended for adult childhood cancer survivors (CCS) to ensure appropriate prevention, screening, and management of late effects. The identification of barriers to long-term follow-up (LTFU), particularly in varying healthcare service contexts, is essential to develop and refine services that are responsive to survivor needs. We aimed to explore CCS and healthcare professionals (HCP) perspectives of healthcare system factors that function as barriers to LTFU in British Columbia, Canada. METHODS We analyzed data from 43 in-depth interviews, 30 with CCS and 13 with HCP, using qualitative thematic analysis and constant comparative methods. RESULTS Barriers to accessible, comprehensive, quality LTFU were associated with the following: (1) the difficult and abrupt transition from pediatric to adult health services, (2) inconvenient and under-resourced health services, (3) shifting patient-HCP relationships, (4) family doctor inadequate experience with late effects management, and (5) overdue and insufficient late effects communication with CCS. CONCLUSIONS Structural, informational, and interpersonal/relational healthcare system factors often prevent CCS from initially accessing LTFU after discharge from pediatric oncology programs as well as adversely affecting engagement in ongoing screening, surveillance, and management of late effects. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS Understanding the issues faced by adult CCS will provide insight necessary to developing patient-centered healthcare solutions that are key to accessible, acceptable, appropriate, and effective healthcare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Fuchsia Howard
- School of Nursing, The University of British Columbia, T201 - 2211 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, Canada.
| | - Arminee Kazanjian
- School of Population and Public Health, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Sheila Pritchard
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, BC Children's Hospital, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Rob Olson
- Department of Surgery, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
- Radiation Oncology, BC Cancer Agency - Centre for the North, Prince George, Canada
| | - Haroon Hasan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Kelly Newton
- School of Nursing, The University of British Columbia, T201 - 2211 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Karen Goddard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Novel approaches to support breast cancer survivorship care models. Breast 2017; 36:1-13. [DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2017.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2017] [Revised: 08/04/2017] [Accepted: 08/11/2017] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
|
10
|
Kurtin S. Living with Multiple Myeloma: A Continuum-Based Approach to Cancer Survivorship. Semin Oncol Nurs 2017; 33:348-361. [DOI: 10.1016/j.soncn.2017.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
|
11
|
Mayer D, Deal A, Crane J, Chen R, Asher G, Hanson L, Wheeler S, Gerstel A, Green M, Birken S, Rosenstein D. Using Survivorship Care Plans to Enhance Communication and Cancer Care Coordination: Results of a Pilot Study. Oncol Nurs Forum 2016; 43:636-45. [DOI: 10.1188/16.onf.636-645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
12
|
Walsh K. Addressing psychosocial issues in cancer survivorship: past, present and future. Future Oncol 2016; 12:2823-2834. [PMID: 27467398 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2016-0138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
With a burgeoning population of cancer survivors, organizations in the USA and around the world are considering how to address the many long-term and late psychosocial effects of cancer and cancer treatment. This article reviews the changing landscape of survivorship care over the past 50 years, from the time when there were relatively few survivors to the future, when the number of cancer survivors in the USA alone is expected to reach close to 20 million. Institute of Medicine Reports, intra-organizational summits and accrediting standards that have influenced the development of survivorship care plans and programs and the roles of the Internet and smartphone applications along with oncology specialist and primary care providers are discussed.
Collapse
|
13
|
Szalda D, Pierce L, Hobbie W, Ginsberg JP, Brumley L, Wasik M, Li Y, Schwartz LA. Engagement and experience with cancer-related follow-up care among young adult survivors of childhood cancer after transfer to adult care. J Cancer Surviv 2015; 10:342-50. [DOI: 10.1007/s11764-015-0480-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2015] [Accepted: 08/11/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
14
|
Langbecker D, Ekberg S, Yates P, Chan A, Chan RJ. What are the barriers of quality survivorship care for haematology cancer patients? Qualitative insights from cancer nurses. J Cancer Surviv 2015; 10:122-30. [PMID: 26024780 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-015-0458-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2015] [Accepted: 05/19/2015] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Many haematological cancer survivors report long-term physiological and psychosocial effects beyond treatment completion. These survivors continue to experience impaired quality of life (QoL) as a result of their disease and aggressive treatment. As key members of the multidisciplinary team, the purpose of this study is to examine the insights of cancer nurses to inform future developments in survivorship care provision. METHODS Open text qualitative responses from two prospective Australian cross-sectional surveys of nurses (n = 136) caring for patients with haematological cancer. Data were analysed thematically, using an inductive approach to identify themes. RESULTS This study has identified a number of issues that nurses perceive as barriers to quality survivorship care provision. Two main themes were identified: the first relating to the challenges nurses face in providing care ('care challenges') and the second relating to the challenges of providing survivorship care within contemporary health care systems ('system challenges'). CONCLUSIONS Cancer nurses perceive the nature of haematological cancer and its treatment and of the health care system itself, as barriers to the provision of quality survivorship care. Care challenges such as the lack of a standard treatment path and the relapsing or remitting nature of haematological cancers may be somewhat intractable, but system challenges relating to clearly defining and delineating professional responsibilities and exchanging information with other clinicians are not. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS Addressing the issues identified will facilitate cancer nurses' provision of survivorship care and help address haematological survivors' needs with regard to the physical and psychosocial consequences of their cancer and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danette Langbecker
- School of Nursing and Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia
| | - Stuart Ekberg
- School of Nursing and Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia
| | - Patsy Yates
- School of Nursing and Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia.,Cancer Nursing Professorial Precinct, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| | - Alexandre Chan
- Department of Pharmacy, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.,Department of Pharmacy, National Cancer Centre, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Raymond Javan Chan
- School of Nursing and Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia. .,Cancer Nursing Professorial Precinct, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia. .,Centre for Research and Innovation, West Moreton Hospital and Health Service, Level 8, Tower Block, Ipswich Hospital, Ipswich, QLD, 4305, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|