Bone Metastases: From Mechanisms to Treatment

Differences in Prognosis and Recurrence Patterns Between Ulcerative Colitis-Associated Colorectal Cancer and Sporadic Colorectal Cancer: A Matched-Pair Analysis

BACKGROUND

Clinicopathological differences exist between ulcerative colitis-associated colorectal cancer (UC-CRC) and sporadic colorectal cancer (S-CRC). However, differences in the prognosis remain controversial, and the reason for these differences remains unclear. We therefore assessed the differences between patients with UC-CRC and S-CRC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a matched-pair analysis of the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of patients with UC-CRC and S-CRC who underwent colorectal resection between January 2000 and December 2021 at two institutions. Patients were matched according to age, sex, date of surgery, tumor location, and Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) stage.

RESULTS

A total of 5992 patients underwent surgery for CRC at the two institutions, and 288 patients (48 with UC-CRC and 240 with S-CRC) were matched in this study. Patients with UC-CRC underwent more invasive surgery and had a longer operative time than those with S-CRC, but there was no marked difference in postoperative complications or perioperative mortality. Long-term outcomes showed a similar 5-year overall survival (OS) for UC-CRC and S-CRC (86.5% versus 88.8%, p = 0.742); however, in stage 3 patients, patients with UC-CRC had a poorer 5-year OS than those with S-CRC (51.4% versus 83.8%, p = 0.032). The first recurrence sites in stage 3 UC-CRC were peritoneal dissemination followed by the bones, while those in S-CRC were the liver and pulmonary system.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite no significant differences in surgical outcomes, patients with UC-CRC had a poorer prognosis than those with S-CRC at stage 3. The recurrence patterns in UC-CRC differed from those in S-CRC, suggesting a possible prognostic difference.

Lytic lesion of the mandible revealing a metastatic breast cancer

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women and the second leading cause of cancer-related death. Breast cancer manifestations in the head and neck are relatively rare, have greater predilection for the jaws than for soft tissues. Metastasis in the oral cavity account for only 1 to 3 % of all oral malignant lesions. Regardless of the rare occurrence of metastatic lesions to the jaw, it should be taken into consideration in the individuals with a history of malignancy.

CASE PRESENTATION

The article reports a rare case of metastatic lesion of breast cancer to unilateral mandibular ramus region. The 66-year-old female patient was complaining of pain and swelling in the right mandible angle. She was referred to our department by her oncologist with the differential diagnosis of osteonecrosis or metastasis. She had undergone radical mastectomy for invasive lobular carcinoma of the left breast without adjuvant treatment. Oral cavity examination did not reveal the existence of any ulcer or fistula. Based on the patient's medical history and paresthesia of the lower lip and chin, the metastatic disease was highly suspected. The patient was referred to her oncologist for chemotherapy treatment before any invasive surgical management.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer affecting women globally. Bone is the most common site of metastasis in BC patients, with up to 75 % of stage IV BC patients developing skeletal metastasis. The frequent metastatic sites of bone are spine, ribs, sternum, femur, pelvis. Breast carcinoma metastasizes to the jaw bones are uncommon.

CONCLUSION

The diagnosis of metastasis to the oral cavity is a significant challenge to the clinician due to the lack of pathognomonic signs and symptoms. The general dentist or dental specialist should maintain a high level of suspicion while dealing patients with a history of cancer.

Radiomics‑Clinical model based on 99mTc-MDP SPECT/CT for distinguishing between bone metastasis and benign bone disease in tumor patients

BACKGROUND

To establish a radiomics-clinical model based on 99mTc-MDP SPECT/CT for distinguishing between bone metastasis and benign bone disease in tumor patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 256 patients (122 with bone metastasis and 134 with benign bone disease) and randomized them in the ratio of 6:2:2 into training, test and validation sets. All patients underwent 99mTc-labeled methylene diphosphonate (99mTc-MDP) SPECT/CT. We manually outlined the volumes of interest (VOIs) of lesions using ITK-SNAP from SPECT and CT images. In the training set, radiomics features were extracted using PyRadiomics and selected using Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression. Then, we established three radiomics models (CT, SPECT and SPECT-CT models) using support vector machine (SVM). In addition, a radiomics-clinical model was constructed using multivariable logistic regression analysis. The four models' performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Using DeLong test to make comparisons between the ROC (receiver operating characteristic) curves of different models. The clinical utility of the models was evaluated using decision curve analysis (DCA).

RESULTS

The radiomics-clinical displayed excellent performance, and its AUC was 0.941 and 0.879 in the training and test sets. The DCA of radiomics-clinical model showed the highest clinical utility.

CONCLUSIONS

The radiomics-clinical nomogram for identifying bone metastasis and benign bone disease in tumor patients was suitable to assist in clinical decision.

Biological and Clinical Aspects of Metastatic Spinal Tumors

Simple Summary

Spine metastases are a common life-threatening complication of advanced-stage malignancies and often result in poor prognosis. Symptomatic spine metastases develop in the course of about 10% of malignant neoplasms. Therefore, it is essential for contemporary medicine to understand metastatic processes in order to find appropriate, targeted therapeutic options. Our literature review aimed to describe the up-to-date knowledge about the molecular pathways and biomarkers engaged in the spine’s metastatic processes. Moreover, we described current data regarding bone-targeted treatment, the emerging targeted therapies, radiotherapy, and immunotherapy used for the treatment of spine metastases. We hope that knowledge comprehensively presented in our review will contribute to the development of novel drugs targeting specific biomarkers and pathways. The more we learn about the molecular aspects of cancer metastasis, the easier it will be to look for treatment methods that will allow us to precisely kill tumor cells.

Abstract

Spine metastases are a common life-threatening complication of advanced-stage malignancies and often result in poor prognosis. Symptomatic spine metastases develop in the course of about 10% of malignant neoplasms. Therefore, it is essential for contemporary medicine to understand metastatic processes in order to find appropriate, targeted therapeutic options. Thanks to continuous research, there appears more and more detailed knowledge about cancer and metastasis, but these transformations are extremely complicated, e.g., due to the complexity of reactions, the variety of places where they occur, or the participation of both tumor cells and host cells in these transitions. The right target points in tumor metastasis mechanisms are still being researched; that will help us in the proper diagnosis as well as in finding the right treatment. In this literature review, we described the current knowledge about the molecular pathways and biomarkers engaged in metastatic processes involving the spine. We also presented a current bone-targeted treatment for spine metastases and the emerging therapies targeting the discussed molecular mechanisms.

The 100 most cited papers on bone metastasis: A bibliometric analysis

•

Citations per article in the most 100 top cited articles ranged from 357 to 2167.

•

The leading country was USA, Canada, and United Kingdom.

•

Clinical management of bone metastasis from different malignancy origins.

•

Intense collaborative activity between countries and institutions was obvious between the selected papers.

Background

Over the past few decades, a vast number of articles focused on bone metastasis have been published. Bibliometric analysis is helpful to determine the qualities and characteristics and to reveal the influential articles in this field.

Methods

All the databases in Web of Science were utilized to identify articles published from 1961 to 2020. The top 100 most cited articles on bone metastases were involved for degree centrality analysis and analyses on publication time and citations, journals, authors, geographical distribution, research institutions, and research keywords.

Results

The selected articles were published mainly from 1986 to 2015. The 100 most cited articles were selected from a total of 67,451 citations out of 90,502 publications with a density of 50.239 citations/year. Citations per article ranged from 357 to 2167. The leading country was USA, followed by Canada and United Kingdom. The most frequently studied themes were clinical management of bone metastasis from different malignancy origins. A co-authorship analysis revealed an intense collaborative activity between countries and institutions.

Conclusions

This study identified the top 100 most cited articles on bone metastasis. Publication time, area, and theme distribution were thoroughly analyzed. The present study highlighted some of the most influential contributions to the field. Clinical and academic communities have shown a sustained interest in the management of bone metastasis.