Traction X-ray under general anesthesia helps to save motion segment in treatment of Lenke type 3C and 6C curves

Variations of Radiographic Parameters Relevant to the Presumed Lower Instrumented Vertebrae During Intraoperative Fluoroscopic Positioning for Lenke 5/6 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

BACKGROUND

Radiographic evaluation of the presumed lower instrumented vertebrae (LIV) is crucial for determining the optimal fusion level for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) with main thoracolumbar/lumbar curves. However, few studies have examined its variations intraoperatively. This study aims to investigate the radiographic variations of the presumed LIV during fluoroscopic positioning to aid surgeons in decision-making.

METHODS

Lenke 5/6 AIS patients who underwent correction surgery in our center were consecutively recruited from January 2021 to December 2023. The spinal radiographs, including preoperative standing X-ray, recumbent computed tomography (CT), and intraoperative positioning fluoroscopy, were collected. The parameters of the presumed LIV were measured and compared. The correlation analysis was also performed to establish the liner regression equation.

RESULTS

Ninety-seven patients, comprising 23 boys and 74 girls, were enrolled, with an average main curve of 55.1 ± 11.0°. The vertebral body tilt and disc angle of the presumed LIV were 27.2 ± 6.2° and 8.5 ± 3.8° on preoperative standing X-rays, respectively, both significantly decreasing on CT images and intraoperative fluoroscopy. The rotation of the presumed LIV also showed significant differences intraoperatively. Significant correlations were observed between vertebral body tilt and disc angle across X-rays, CT images, and fluoroscopy. A linear equation was established for predicting intraoperative variations of the presumed LIV based on baseline X-rays.

CONCLUSIONS

This study firstly reports the radiographic variations of the presumed LIV using intraoperative positioning fluoroscopy for Lenke 5/6 AIS and establishes the correlation with baseline measurements. This information may assist surgeons in selecting the optimal LIV, but long-term follow-up is needed to evaluate its outcomes.

Defining "successful" treatment outcomes in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a scoping review

PURPOSE

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is the most common type of scoliosis that affects children aged 10-18 years old, manifesting in a three-dimensional spinal deformity. This study aimed to explore outcome measures used in defining AIS treatment success. Particularly, analyzing the extent of qualitative and quantitative (radiographic and quality of life domains) measures to evaluate AIS and whether AIS treatment approaches (surgical, bracing and physiotherapy) influences outcomes used as proxies of treatment success.

METHODS

EMBASE and MEDLINE databases were used to conduct a systematic scoping review with 654 search queries. 158 papers met the inclusion criteria and were screened for data extraction. Extractable variables included: study characteristics, study participant characteristics, type of study, type of intervention approach and outcome measures.

RESULTS

All 158 studies measured quantitative outcomes. 61.38% of papers used radiographic outcomes whilst 38.62% of papers used quantitative quality of life outcomes to evaluate treatment success. Irrespective of treatment intervention utilized, the type of quantitative outcome measure recorded were similar in proportion. Moreover, of the radiographic outcome measures, the subcategory Cobb angle was predominantly used across all intervention approaches. For quantitative quality of life measures, questionnaires investigating multiple domains such as SRS were primarily used as proxies of AIS treatment success across all intervention approaches.

CONCLUSION

This study identified that no articles employed qualitative measures of describing the psychosocial implications of AIS in defining treatment success. Although quantitative measures have merit in clinical diagnoses and management, there is increasing value in using qualitative methods such as thematic analysis in guiding clinicians to develop a biopsychosocial approach for patient care.

The Last Touched Vertebra on Supine Radiographs Can Be the Optimal Lower Instrumented Vertebra in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients

Objective

To determine whether the last touched vertebra (LTV) on supine radiographs is suitable for the lower instrumented vertebra (LIV) in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) correction surgery.

Methods

In total, 57 patients were included in the study following posterior instrumentation and fusion. The average follow-up period was 2.2 years. Patients were classified into 4 groups according to the relationship of the location of LIV, LTV, and the last substantially touched vertebra (LSTV) on upright radiographs and the LTV on supine radiographs. In group 1, the upright LTV and supine LTV were the same. Group 1 was subdivided into group 1A and group 1B according to whether the LTV and LSTV were different or the same, respectively. In group 2, the upright LTV was selected as the LIV, whereas in group 3, the supine LTV was selected as the LIV. The baseline characteristics and the preoperative and postoperative radiographic/clinical outcomes of the groups were analyzed.

Results

No differences were found in the preoperative clinical and radiographic baseline characteristics of the 4 groups except the LIV-central sacral vertical line distance. The immediate, 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year postoperative outcomes were not significantly different among the 4 groups. One patient (4.3%) in group 1A experienced radiographic adding-on without clinical symptoms. No patients underwent revision surgery.

Conclusion

The group in whom the LIV was selected as the LTV on supine x-rays showed similar postoperative radiographic and clinical results to other groups. The LTV on preoperative supine radiographs is acceptable as the LIV in AIS surgery to maximize motion segments.

Postoperative Correction in Idiopathic Scoliosis: Which Preoperative Imaging Technique Is Most Predictive?

INTRODUCTION

Preoperative radiographic assessment of curve flexibility in patients with idiopathic scoliosis is important to determine Lenke classification, operative levels, and potential postoperative correction. However, no consensus exists regarding the optimal technique. We compared measurements from supine side bending (SB) and intraoperative traction radiographs under general anesthesia (TUGA) with actual postoperative correction followed for 1 year.

METHODS

We identified 235 patients with idiopathic scoliosis who underwent posterior spinal fusion with pedicle screw instrumentation between 2010 and 2018 who had preoperative and postoperative radiographs including standing posterior-anterior (PA) and lateral radiographs, preoperative SB radiographs, and TUGA radiographs. Curves were categorized into proximal thoracic, main thoracic/thoracolumbar (MT), and distal thoracolumbar/lumbar (TL/L) curves. Flexibility was calculated from SB and TUGA radiographs. Correction rates were calculated from 1 month and 1 year radiographs postoperatively. Bending radiographs that correlated significantly with postoperative correction with P<0.10 were eligible for inclusion. Preoperative demographics, etiology, deformity details, and surgical details were included in the multivariate models.

RESULTS

On univariate analysis, TUGA radiographs correlated with postoperative correction at 1 month and 1 year on MT curves (r=0.214, P=0.001; r=0.209, P=0.001) and TL/L curves (r=0.280, P<0.001; r=0.181, P=0.006). Supine SB radiographs did not correlate with postoperative correction on either MT or T/TL curves. On multivariate analysis, major curve TUGA radiographs were independently associated with postoperative MT curve correction at 1 month (beta: 0.158, 95% confidence interval: 0.035-0.280, P=0.012) and 1 year (beta: 0.195, 95% confidence interval: 0.049-0.340, P=0.009). MT curve SB radiographs were not associated with postoperative major curve correction at 1 month (P=0.088).

CONCLUSIONS

TUGA radiographs independently correlated with postoperative main thoracic and distal thoracolumbar/lumbar curve correction at 1 month and 1 year postoperatively. SB radiographs independently correlated only with TL/L curve correction at 1 year postoperatively. However, this correlation was not as strong as TUGA correction (beta of 0.280 vs. beta of 0.092). TUGA radiographs appear superior to SB radiographs at predicting curve correction after surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Preoperative supine traction radiographs often result in higher Lenke classifications than supine bending radiographs in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective chart and radiographic review.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to determine if both traction and side-bending radiographs yield the same Lenke classification. Supine side-bending radiographs are used to evaluate curve flexibility and assign Lenke classification in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS). Supine traction radiographs are another tool used by treating surgeons to gauge flexibility and appropriate levels for spinal fusion in AIS.

METHODS

Retrospective chart and radiographic review were performed on AIS patients that underwent a posterior spinal fusion from 2008 to 2017. Cobb angles and Lenke classifications were determined on all upright posterioanterior (PA) spine radiographs, supine traction radiographs, and four supine bending radiographs. Statistical analysis using independent t tests and chi-square tests as appropriate were compared between patients with or without discordant Lenke classifications with p value set at < 0.05 for statistical significance.

RESULTS

184 patients met inclusion criteria, 36 males and 148 females. The average Cobb angle for the proximal thoracic (PT) curve was 27.2°, main thoracic (MT) curve was 60.5°, and thoracolumbar/lumbar (TL/L) curve was 48.0°. Significantly less curve correction was found with supine traction radiographs compared with bending radiographs: PT (23.1° vs 18.9°, p < 0.001), MT (38.9° vs 37.9°, p = 0.015), and TL/L (25.9° vs. 18.0°, p < 0.001). Lenke Classification was found concordant in 151/184 (82.1%). Traction views in the discordant Lenke classification group demonstrated less curve correction than those in the concordant group: PT (27.4° vs. 22.1°, p = 0.011), MT (45.3° vs. 37.5°, p < 0.001), and TL/L (29.3° vs 25.1°, p = 0.019).

CONCLUSION

Supine traction and supine bending radiographs provided a concordant Lenke classification 82.1% of the time. However, supine traction radiographs demonstrate less curve correction, a higher Lenke classification, and underestimated the TL/L curve correction to a greater degree. A single supine traction film is not an adequate substitute to side-bending radiographs when determining Lenke classification in patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Restoring sagittal and frontal balance following posterior instrumented fusion

Correction techniques for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis have evolved over the years as the understanding of the disease and the implant technology advanced. Utilization of the modern implant systems, along with the appropriate corrective maneuvers and selection of the appropriate levels of instrumentation, improves the outcomes after surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Coronal and sagittal balance are important predictors for successful posterior spine fusion. Many corrective methods have been developed to address the multiple facets of the spinal deformity and curve types. Treating surgeons should familiarize themselves with all of the techniques, their utility, and appropriate usage in different deformity settings. A literature review is provided with the best evidence available to achieve optimal deformity correction to help guide treating physicians.

How to Avoid Distal Adding-on Phenomenon for Rigid Curves in Major Thoracolumbar and Lumbar Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis? Identifying the Incidence of Distal Adding-on by Selection of Lowest Instrumented Vertebra

OBJECTIVE

We sought to compare the radiologic outcomes for different distal fusion levels in a rigid curve with major thoracolumbar and lumbar (TL/L) adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) using rod derotation (RD) with direct vertebral rotation (DVR) after pedicle screw instrumentation (PSI).

METHODS

This study finally enrolled 28 patients who were diagnosed with AIS in rigid curve with major TL/L curves, treated by PSI with RD and DVR and with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Patients were divided into 2 groups, L3 and L4, on the basis of the distal fusion level at the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) of L3 or L4.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in TL/L curve, thoracic (minor), and compensatory (caudal) curves between the L3 and L4 groups either postoperatively (P = 0.162, 0.426, and 0.762, respectively) or at the last follow-up (P = 0.952, 0.620, and 0.562, respectively). The overall prevalence of unsatisfactory results was 42.9% (12/28 patients). The prevalence of unsatisfactory results was 61.1% (11/18) in the L3 group and 10% (1/10) in the L4 group, which was significantly different (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Unsatisfactory results occurred more often in the L3 group than in the L4 group, and unsatisfactory results had significant influence on progression of TL/L and distal compensatory curves. Such progression was closely correlated with deteriorating LIV disk angle in the L3 group. Therefore if the curve is rigid, LIV should be extended to L4 to avoid the adding-on phenomenon in the treatment of major TL/L AIS using RD with DVR after PSI.

Criteria for Ending the Distal Fusion at the L3 Vertebra vs. L4 in Surgical Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients with Lenke Type 3C, 5C, and 6C Curves: Results After Ten Years of Follow-up

Introduction

The selection of the most distal caudal vertebra in spinal fusion surgeries in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients with structural lumbar curvatures is still a matter of debate. The aim of this study was to determine the preoperative radiological criteria on the traction X-rays under general anesthesia (TrUGA) for selection between the L3 and L4 vertebrae and to assess the efficacy of these criteria via the long-term results of patients with Lenke Type 3C, 5C, and 6C curves.

Methods

Radiological data of 93 patients (84 females, 9 males) who met the inclusion criteria were retrospectively evaluated. The relationship between the L3 vertebra and the central sacral vertebral line, the portion of the L3 vertebra in the stable zone of Harrington, the parallelism of the L3 with the sacrum, and the tilt and rotation of the L3 on TrUGA radiographs were evaluated for the selection of the lowest instrumented vertebrae (LIV). Clinical results were analyzed using the Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) questionnaire.

Results

The mean follow-up period of the study group was 149.3 months. According to the Lenke classification, 29 patients had Type 3C, 33 had Type 5C, and 31 had Type 6C curves. The preoperative analysis was based on standing anteroposterior (AP), supine traction, and bending X-rays, and the L3 vertebra was selected as the LIV in 37 patients (40%). These X-rays suggested L4 as the LIV in 56 patients (60%); however, based on our study criteria, the L3 vertebra was selected. No significant loss of correction was observed nor additional surgery due to decompensation was required in the follow-up period.

Conclusion 

The use of TrUGA radiographs with the identified criteria is an efficient alternative method in the selection of the LIV in patients with Lenke Type 3C, 5C, and 6C curves.

Current concepts in the surgical management of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a complex 3D deformity of the spine. Its prevalence is between 2% and 3% in the general population, with almost 10% of patients requiring some form of treatment and up to 0.1% undergoing surgery. The cosmetic aspect of the deformity is the biggest concern to the patient and is often accompanied by psychosocial distress. In addition, severe curves can cause cardiopulmonary distress. With proven benefits from surgery, the aims of treatment are to improve the cosmetic and functional outcomes. Obtaining correction in the coronal plane is not the only important endpoint anymore. With better understanding of spinal biomechanics and the long-term effects of multiplanar imbalance, we now know that sagittal balance is equally, if not more, important. Better correction of deformities has also been facilitated by an improvement in the design of implants and a better understanding of metallurgy. Understanding the unique character of each deformity is important. In addition, using the most appropriate implant and applying all the principles of correction in a bespoke manner is important to achieve optimum correction.

In this article, we review the current concepts in AIS surgery.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:415–24.

Importance of Distal Fusion Level in Major Thoracolumbar and Lumbar Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Treated by Rod Derotation and Direct Vertebral Rotation Following Pedicle Screw Instrumentation

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective comparative study.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to analyze the exact distal fusion level in the treatment of major thoracolumbar and lumbar (TL/L) adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) using rod derotation (RD) and direct vertebral rotation (DVR) following pedicle screw instrumentation (PSI).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Proper determination of distal fusion level is a very important factor in deformity correction and preservation of motion segments in the treatment of major TL/L AIS.

METHODS

AIS patients with major TL/L curves (n = 64) treated by PSI with RD and DVR methods with a minimum 2-year follow-up were divided into AL3 (flexible) and BL3 (rigid) according to the flexibility and rotation by preoperative bending radiographs.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in TL/L (major) curve between the AL3 and BL3 groups postoperatively (P = 0.933) and at the last follow-up (P = 0.144). In addition, there was no significant difference in thoracic (minor) and compensatory (caudal) curve postoperatively (thoracic curve: P = 0.828, compensatory curve: P = 0.976); however, there was a significant difference in compensatory (caudal) curve at the last follow-up (P = 0.041). The overall prevalence of unsatisfactory results was 28.1% (18/64 patients), and the prevalence was 15.2% (7/46) in the AL3 group and 61.1% (11/18) in the BL3 group, which was significantly different (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) would be selected at L3 (EV) when the curve is flexible; L3 crosses CSVL with a rotation of less than grade II in preoperative bending radiographs. However, if the curve is rigid, LIV should be extended to L4 (EV + 1) in order to prevent the adding-on phenomenon in the treatment of major TL/L AIS using RD and DVR following PSI.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Five major controversial issues about fusion level selection in corrective surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a narrative review

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Shoulder imbalance, coronal decompensation, and adding-on phenomenon following corrective surgery in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis are known to be related to the fusion level selected. Although many studies have assessed the appropriate selection of the proximal and distal fusion level, no definite conclusions have been drawn thus far.

PURPOSE

We aimed to assess the problems with fusion level selection for corrective surgery in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, and to enhance understanding about these problems.

STUDY DESIGN

This study is a narrative review.

METHODS

We conducted a literature search of fusion level selection in corrective surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Accordingly, we selected and reviewed five debatable topics related to fusion level selection: (1) selective thoracic fusion; (2) selective thoracolumbar-lumbar (TL-L) fusion; (3) adding-on phenomenon; (4) distal fusion level selection for major TL-L curves; and (5) proximal fusion level selection and shoulder imbalance.

RESULTS

Selective fusion can be chosen in specific curve types, although there is a risk of coronal decompensation or adding-on phenomenon. Generally, wider indications for selective fusions are usually associated with more frequent complications. Despite the determination of several indications for selective fusion to avoid such complications, no clear guidelines have been established. Although authors have suggested various criteria to prevent the adding-on phenomenon, no consensus has been reached on the appropriate selection of lower instrumented vertebra. The fusion level selection for major TL-L curves primarily focuses on whether distal fusion can terminate at L3, a topic that remains unclear. Furthermore, because of the presence of several related factors and complications, proximal level selection and shoulder imbalance has been constantly debated and remains controversial from its etiology to its prevention.

CONCLUSIONS

Although several difficult problems in the diagnosis and treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis have been resolved by understanding its mechanism and via technical advancement, no definite guideline for fusion level selection has been established. A review of five major controversial issues about fusion level selection could provide better understanding of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. We believe that a thorough validation study of the abovementioned controversial issues can help address them.

Utilizing the "Stable-to-be Vertebra" Saves Motion Segments in Growing Rods Treatment for Early-Onset Scoliosis

BACKGROUND

There is no consensus on the selection of distal instrumentation levels in growing rod surgery. Many surgeons utilize the stable zone of Harrington, but there is not overwhelming evidence to support this preference. The aim of this study was to determine the value of bending/traction radiographs in selection of distal instrumentation levels of a growing rod construct in children with idiopathic or idiopathic-like early-onset scoliosis (EOS).

METHODS

Twenty-three consecutive patients with idiopathic or idiopathic-like EOS who underwent growing rod surgery at 2 separate institutions between 2006 and 2011 were included. Lengthening procedures were performed periodically at 6-month intervals. Analyses were performed retrospectively for age at index surgery, follow-up period, and radiographic measurements. Lower instrumented levels, neutral vertebra, stable vertebrae (SV), and stable-to-be vertebrae (StbV) were identified on the preoperative radiographs. Coronal Cobb angles, tilt of lower instrumented vertebra (LIV) and LIV+1, and disk wedging under the LIV and LIV+1 were measured on the early postoperative and latest follow-up radiographs.

RESULTS

Average age at index surgery was 83.6 months. Mean follow-up period was 68.1 months. Initial analysis showed that the relationship of LIV to the StbV was a better predictive of LIV+1 tilt than the SV at the final follow-up. Therefore, the patients were grouped according to the relationship of the LIV to the StbV. LIV was the StbV in 9 patients, proximal to the StbV in 8 patients, and distal to the StbV in 6 patients. At the latest follow-up, tilt of LIV+1 exceeded 10 degrees in 7 of the 8 patients where LIV was proximal to the StbV, whereas only in 1 of 9 patients where LIV was StbV, and in none of the 6 patients where LIV was distal to the StbV. The data indicate that selection of the StbV as the LIV could spare an average of 1.8 vertebral segments when compared with the SV, as StbV is never distal but almost always proximal to the SV.

CONCLUSIONS

Choosing the StbV as the LIV saves motion segments and prevents distal adding on, while providing satisfactory deformity correction in idiopathic and idiopathic-like EOS.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III-retrospective comparative study.

Revision surgery for pediatric spine deformity: corrective osteotomies

BACKGROUND

Revision spinal deformity surgery is a considerable undertaking and should never be taken lightly. The complication rates are typically higher than index surgery and technical difficulties are of greater magnitude.

METHODS

A review of the literature on revision surgery on pediatric spine deformities is provided with technical details of vertebral column resection.

CONCLUSIONS

Careful planning and preparation as well as previous experience with such deformities are of utmost importance to achieve satisfactory results.

Pedicle screw versus hybrid construct instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: meta-analysis of thoracic kyphosis

STUDY DESIGN

A quantitative meta-analysis was conducted on publishing studies reporting results of spinal surgery in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with instrumentation of pedicle screw or hybrid construct.

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective is to get overview of the power to restore thoracic kyphosis using 2 different instrumentations.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

During the past years, surgery has mainly focused on correcting the coronal curve, but nowadays, the aims of posterior fusion and instrumentation are to achieve a stable, well-balanced spine in the coronal as well as in the sagittal planes.

METHODS

A PubMed and EMBASE search was conducted using combinations of the key words "hybrid construct" or "pedicle screw" with "adolescent idiopathic scoliosis" up to October 2013. A hand search of reference lists of obtained articles was also performed.

RESULTS

A total of 24 studies were identified and included in this meta-analysis. Of this, 12 included pedicle screw group only, 5 included hybrid construct group only, and 7 included both groups. The total number of patients was 1615. Age ranged from 9 to 26 years, with a mean of 15. For pedicle screw group, we got standard mean difference (SMD) as 0.40 (95% confidence interval, 0.31-0.50); I= 91.4%. For hybrid construct group, we got SMD as 0.15 (95% confidence interval, 0.04-0.26). Both intervals of SMD lay in positive value side. Overall SMD was 0.30 (95% confidence interval, 0.23-0.37). The positive value of SMD means thoracic kyphosis improves after surgery, whereas negative value means kyphosis loss after surgery.

CONCLUSION

There is overall tendency for both instrumentations to restore thoracic kyphosis. Hybrid construct seems to be more powerful in restoring kyphosis than pedicle screw. Preoperative important factor was found to be reasonably distributed or balanced. For operative factor, rod stiffness, fashion of hybrid construct, in situ bending, and rod rotation maneuver could have influence on results of kyphosis in different ways. Loss of correction and limited restoration of loss may do exist after correction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Osteotomies/spinal column resection in paediatric deformity

The spinal deformities in paediatric population differ from those in the adult population. Vertebral osteotomies are indicated when the deformity is too rigid to be corrected either with instrumentation alone or with the addition of soft tissue releases. When surgical intervention is to be carried out, correcting the deformity and ceasing progression should be aimed at as well as allowing further growth and improving pulmonary function. Osteotomies in the spine surgery should aim to achieve an appropriate balance in both sagittal and coronal planes. Varied clinical and radiological scenarios necessitate different osteotomy types. The purpose of this article is to introduce each osteotomy type and discuss their indications, prerequisites and complications. Osteotomy options for correcting spinal deformities are Ponte osteotomy, Smith-Petersen osteotomy, pedicle subtraction osteotomy, bone-disc-bone osteotomy and vertebral column resection. All the osteotomy types are technically demanding. Appropriate selection of the type of the osteotomy depends on the surgeons' experience, type of the deformity, magnitude of the curve, remaining growth potential and operative goals. Neuromonitoring should be an indispensible part of the procedure. Spine osteotomies are effective procedures for the treatment of paediatric spine deformities if experienced surgical team performs them.

Commentary: X-rays under anesthesia as an adjunct to save motion segments in AIS surgery

Hamzaoglu A, Ozturk C, Enercan M, Alanay A. Traction X-ray under general anesthesia helps to save motion segment in treatment of Lenke type 3C and 6C curves. Spine J 2013;13:845-52 (in this issue).