1
|
Yildirim O, Peck KK, Saha A, Karimi S, Lis E. Dynamic Contrast Enhanced MR Perfusion and Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of Marrow-Replacing Disorders of the Spine: A Comprehensive Review. Radiol Clin North Am 2024; 62:287-302. [PMID: 38272621 DOI: 10.1016/j.rcl.2023.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2024]
Abstract
Significant advancements in cancer treatment have led to improved survival rates for patients, particularly in the context of spinal metastases. However, early detection and monitoring of treatment response remain crucial for optimizing patient outcomes. Although conventional imaging methods such as bone scan, PET, MR imaging, and computed tomography are commonly used for diagnosing and monitoring treatment, they present challenges in differential diagnoses and treatment response monitoring. This review article provides a comprehensive overview of the principles, applications, and practical uses of dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging in the assessment and monitoring of marrow-replacing disorders of the spine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Onur Yildirim
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA.
| | | | - Atin Saha
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Sasan Karimi
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Eric Lis
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Burgess L, Nguyen E, Tseng CL, Guckenberger M, Lo SS, Zhang B, Nielsen M, Maralani P, Nguyen QN, Sahgal A. Practice and principles of stereotactic body radiation therapy for spine and non-spine bone metastases. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2024; 45:100716. [PMID: 38226025 PMCID: PMC10788412 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2023] [Revised: 11/23/2023] [Accepted: 12/16/2023] [Indexed: 01/17/2024] Open
Abstract
Radiotherapy is the dominant treatment modality for painful spine and non-spine bone metastases (NSBM). Historically, this was achieved with conventional low dose external beam radiotherapy, however, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is increasingly applied for these indications. Meta-analyses and randomized clinical trials have demonstrated improved pain response and more durable tumor control with SBRT for spine metastases. However, in the setting of NSBM, there is limited evidence supporting global adoption and large scale randomized clinical trials are in need. SBRT is technically demanding requiring careful consideration of organ at risk tolerance, and strict adherence to technical requirements including immobilization, simulation, contouring and image-guidance procedures. Additional considerations include follow up practices after SBRT, with appropriate imaging playing a critical role in response assessment. Finally, there is renewed research into promising new technologies that may further refine the use of SBRT in both spinal and NSBM in the years to come.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Burgess
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Eric Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Walker Family Cancer Centre, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada
| | - Chia-Lin Tseng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Simon S. Lo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Beibei Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michelle Nielsen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Pejman Maralani
- Department of Medical Imaging, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Quynh-Nhu Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Centre, University of Texas, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Griffith JF, Yip SWY, van der Heijden RA, Valenzuela RF, Yeung DKW. Perfusion Imaging of the Musculoskeletal System. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2024; 32:181-206. [PMID: 38007280 DOI: 10.1016/j.mric.2023.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2023]
Abstract
Perfusion imaging is the aspect of functional imaging, which is most applicable to the musculoskeletal system. In this review, the anatomy and physiology of bone perfusion is briefly outlined as are the methods of acquiring perfusion data on MR imaging. The current clinical indications of perfusion related to the assessment of soft tissue and bone tumors, synovitis, osteoarthritis, avascular necrosis, Keinbock's disease, diabetic foot, osteochondritis dissecans, and Paget's disease of bone are reviewed. Challenges and opportunities related to perfusion imaging of the musculoskeletal system are also briefly addressed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James F Griffith
- Department of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong.
| | - Stefanie W Y Yip
- Department of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong
| | - Rianne A van der Heijden
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Raul F Valenzuela
- Department of Musculoskeletal Imaging, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, USA
| | - David K W Yeung
- Department of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mulyadi R, Putri PP, Handoko, Zairinal RA, Prihartono J. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging parameter changes as an early biomarker of tumor responses following radiation therapy in patients with spinal metastases: a systematic review. Radiat Oncol J 2023; 41:225-236. [PMID: 38185927 PMCID: PMC10772591 DOI: 10.3857/roj.2023.00290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2023] [Revised: 08/18/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This systematic review aims to assess and summarize the clinical values of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) parameter changes as early biomarkers of tumor responses following radiation therapy (RT) in patients with spinal metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic search was conducted on five electronic databases: PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, Cochrane, and Embase. Studies were included if they mentioned DCE-MRI parameter changes before and after RT in patients with spinal metastases with a correlation to tumor responses based on clinical and imaging criteria. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 was used to assess study quality. RESULTS This systematic review included seven studies involving 107 patients. All seven studies evaluated the transfer constant (Ktrans), six studies evaluated the plasma volume fraction (Vp), three studies evaluated the extravascular extracellular space volume fraction, and two studies evaluated the rate constant. There were variations in the type of primary cancer, RT techniques used, post-treatment scan time, and median follow-up time. Despite the variations, however, the collected evidence generally suggested that significant differences could be detected in DCE-MRI parameters between before and after RT, which might reflect treatment success or failures in long-term follow-up. Responders showed higher reduction and lower values of Ktrans and Vp after RT. DCE-MRI parameters showed changes and detectable recurrences significantly earlier (up to 6 months) than conventional MRI with favorable diagnostic values. CONCLUSION The results of this systematic review suggested that DCE-MRI parameter changes in patients with spinal metastases could be a promising tool for treatment-response assessment following RT. Lower values and higher reduction of Ktrans and Vp after treatment demonstrated good prediction of local control. Compared to conventional MRI, DCE-MRI showed more rapid changes and earlier prediction of treatment failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rahmad Mulyadi
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - Pungky Permata Putri
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - Handoko
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | | | - Joedo Prihartono
- Department of Community Medicine Pre Clinic, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bahouth SM, Yeboa DN, Ghia AJ, Tatsui CE, Alvarez-Breckenridge CA, Beckham TH, Bishio AJ, Li J, McAleer MF, North RY, Rhines LD, Swanson TA, Chenyang W, Amini B. Multidisciplinary management of spinal metastases: what the radiologist needs to know. Br J Radiol 2022; 95:20220266. [PMID: 35856792 PMCID: PMC9815745 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20220266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2022] [Revised: 06/17/2022] [Accepted: 07/11/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
The modern management of spinal metastases requires a multidisciplinary approach that includes radiation oncologists, surgeons, medical oncologists, and diagnostic and interventional radiologists. The diagnostic radiologist can play an important role in the multidisciplinary team and help guide assessment of disease and selection of appropriate therapy. The assessment of spine metastases is best performed on MRI, but imaging from other modalities is often needed. We provide a review of the clinical and imaging features that are needed by the multidisciplinary team caring for patients with spine metastases and stress the importance of the spine radiologist taking responsibility for synthesizing imaging features across multiple modalities to provide a report that advances patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah M Bahouth
- Musculoskeletal Imaging and Intervention Department, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston MA, USA
| | - Debra N Yeboa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Amol J Ghia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Claudio E Tatsui
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Thomas H Beckham
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Andrew J Bishio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jing Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mary Frances McAleer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Robert Y North
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Laurence D Rhines
- Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Todd A Swanson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Wang Chenyang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Behrang Amini
- Department of Musculoskeletal Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bottero M, Faiella A, Giannarelli D, Farneti A, D'Urso P, Bertini L, Landoni V, Vici P, Sanguineti G. A prospective study assessing the pattern of response of local disease at DCE-MRI after salvage radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2022; 35:21-26. [PMID: 35516461 PMCID: PMC9065465 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2022.04.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2022] [Revised: 04/18/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 10/29/2022] Open
|
7
|
Arthur A, Johnston EW, Winfield JM, Blackledge MD, Jones RL, Huang PH, Messiou C. Virtual Biopsy in Soft Tissue Sarcoma. How Close Are We? Front Oncol 2022; 12:892620. [PMID: 35847882 PMCID: PMC9286756 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.892620] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2022] [Accepted: 05/31/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
A shift in radiology to a data-driven specialty has been unlocked by synergistic developments in imaging biomarkers (IB) and computational science. This is advancing the capability to deliver “virtual biopsies” within oncology. The ability to non-invasively probe tumour biology both spatially and temporally would fulfil the potential of imaging to inform management of complex tumours; improving diagnostic accuracy, providing new insights into inter- and intra-tumoral heterogeneity and individualised treatment planning and monitoring. Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare tumours of mesenchymal origin with over 150 histological subtypes and notorious heterogeneity. The combination of inter- and intra-tumoural heterogeneity and the rarity of the disease remain major barriers to effective treatments. We provide an overview of the process of successful IB development, the key imaging and computational advancements in STS including quantitative magnetic resonance imaging, radiomics and artificial intelligence, and the studies to date that have explored the potential biological surrogates to imaging metrics. We discuss the promising future directions of IBs in STS and illustrate how the routine clinical implementation of a virtual biopsy has the potential to revolutionise the management of this group of complex cancers and improve clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amani Arthur
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, United Kingdom
| | - Edward W. Johnston
- Sarcoma Unit, The Royal Marsden National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jessica M. Winfield
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, United Kingdom
- Sarcoma Unit, The Royal Marsden National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Matthew D. Blackledge
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, United Kingdom
| | - Robin L. Jones
- Sarcoma Unit, The Royal Marsden National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- Division of Clinical Studies, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Paul H. Huang
- Division of Molecular Pathology, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, United Kingdom
- *Correspondence: Paul H. Huang, ; Christina Messiou,
| | - Christina Messiou
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, United Kingdom
- Sarcoma Unit, The Royal Marsden National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- *Correspondence: Paul H. Huang, ; Christina Messiou,
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kousi E, Messiou C, Miah A, Orton M, Haas R, Thway K, Hopkinson G, Zaidi S, Smith M, Barquin E, Moskovic E, Fotiadis N, Strauss D, Hayes A, Schmidt MA. Descriptive analysis of MRI functional changes occurring during reduced dose radiotherapy for myxoid liposarcomas. Br J Radiol 2021; 94:20210310. [PMID: 34545764 PMCID: PMC9328045 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20210310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Myxoid liposarcomas (MLS) show enhanced response to radiotherapy due to their distinctive vascular pattern and therefore could be effectively treated with lower radiation doses. This is a descriptive study to explore the use of functional MRI to identify response in a uniform cohort of MLS patients treated with reduced dose radiotherapy. METHODS 10 patients with MLS were imaged pre-, during, and post-radiotherapy receiving reduced dose radiotherapy and the response to treatment was histopathologically assessed post-radiotherapy. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), T2* relaxation time, volume transfer constant (Ktrans), initial area under the gadolinium curve over 60 s (IAUGC60) and (Gd) were estimated for a central tumour volume. RESULTS All parameters showed large inter- and intrasubject variabilities. Pre-treatment (Gd), IAUGC60 and Ktrans were significantly different between responders and non-responders. Post-radiotherapy reductions from baseline were demonstrated for T2*, (Gd), IAUGC60 and Ktrans for responders. No statistically significant ADC differences were demonstrated between the two response groups. Significantly greater early tumour volume reductions were observed for responders. CONCLUSIONS MLS are heterogenous lesions, characterised by a slow gradual contrast-agent uptake. Pre-treatment vascular parameters, early changes to tumour volume, vascular parameters and T2* have potential in identifying response to treatment. The delayed (Gd) is a suitable descriptive parameter, relying simply on T1 measurements. Volume changes precede changes in MLS functionality and could be used to identify early response. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE MLS are are characterised by slow gradual contrast-agent uptake. Measurement of the delayed contrast-agent uptake (Gd) is simple to implement and able to discriminate response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evanthia Kousi
- MRI unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Christina Messiou
- Radiology department, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Aisha Miah
- Sarcoma Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Matthew Orton
- MRI unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Rick Haas
- Sarcoma Unit, Department of Radiotherapy, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Radiotherapy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Khin Thway
- Molecular pathology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Georgina Hopkinson
- MRI unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Shane Zaidi
- Sarcoma Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Myles Smith
- Sarcoma Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Eleanor Moskovic
- Radiology department, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Nicos Fotiadis
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation trust, London, UK
| | - Dirk Strauss
- Sarcoma/Melanoma Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Andrew Hayes
- Sarcoma/Melanoma Unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Maria A Schmidt
- MRI unit, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Chen Y, Zhang E, Wang Q, Yuan H, Zhuang H, Lang N. Use of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for the early assessment of outcome of CyberKnife stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with spinal metastases. Clin Radiol 2021; 76:864.e1-864.e6. [PMID: 34404514 DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2021.07.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2021] [Accepted: 07/13/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
AIM To explore the value of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) for evaluating early outcomes of CyberKnife radiosurgery for spinal metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with spinal metastases who were treated with CyberKnife radiosurgery from July 2018 to December 2020 were enrolled. Conventional MRI and DCE-MRI were performed before treatment and at 3 months after treatment. Patients showing disease progression were defined as the progressive disease (PD) group and those showing complete response, partial response, and stable disease were defined as the non-PD group. The haemodynamic parameters (volume transfer constant [Ktrans], rate constant [Kep], and extravascular space [Ve]) before and after treatment between the groups were analysed. Area under the curve (AUC) values were calculated. RESULTS A total of 27 patients with 39 independent spinal lesions were included. The median follow-up time was 18.6 months (6.2-36.4 months). There were 27 lesions in the non-PD group and 12 lesions in the PD group. Post-treatment Kep, ΔKtrans and ΔKep in the non-PD group (0.959/min, - 32.6% and -41.1%, respectively) were significantly lower than the corresponding values in PD group (1.429/min, 20.4% and -6%; p<0.05). Post-treatment Ve and ΔVe (0.223 and 27.8%, respectively) in the non-PD group were significantly higher than that of the PD group (0.165 and -13.5%, p<0.05). ΔKtrans showed the highest diagnostic efficiency, with an AUC of 0.821. CONCLUSIONS DCE-MRI parameters change significantly at an early stage after CyberKnife stereotactic radiosurgery for spinal metastases. DCE-MRI may be of value in determining the early treatment response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Chen
- Department of Radiology, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, PR China
| | - E Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Peking University International Hospital, 1 Life Science Park, Life Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 102206, PR China
| | - Q Wang
- Department of Radiology, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, PR China
| | - H Yuan
- Department of Radiology, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, PR China
| | - H Zhuang
- Department of Radiotherapy, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, PR China
| | - N Lang
- Department of Radiology, Peking University Third Hospital, 49 North Garden Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, PR China.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Wang C, Padgett KR, Su MY, Mellon EA, Maziero D, Chang Z. Multi-parametric MRI (mpMRI) for treatment response assessment of radiation therapy. Med Phys 2021; 49:2794-2819. [PMID: 34374098 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2021] [Revised: 06/23/2021] [Accepted: 06/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays an important role in the modern radiation therapy (RT) workflow. In comparison with computed tomography (CT) imaging, which is the dominant imaging modality in RT, MRI possesses excellent soft-tissue contrast for radiographic evaluation. Based on quantitative models, MRI can be used to assess tissue functional and physiological information. With the developments of scanner design, acquisition strategy, advanced data analysis, and modeling, multiparametric MRI (mpMRI), a combination of morphologic and functional imaging modalities, has been increasingly adopted for disease detection, localization, and characterization. Integration of mpMRI techniques into RT enriches the opportunities to individualize RT. In particular, RT response assessment using mpMRI allows for accurate characterization of both tissue anatomical and biochemical changes to support decision-making in monotherapy of radiation treatment and/or systematic cancer management. In recent years, accumulating evidence have, indeed, demonstrated the potentials of mpMRI in RT response assessment regarding patient stratification, trial benchmarking, early treatment intervention, and outcome modeling. Clinical application of mpMRI for treatment response assessment in routine radiation oncology workflow, however, is more complex than implementing an additional imaging protocol; mpMRI requires additional focus on optimal study design, practice standardization, and unified statistical reporting strategy to realize its full potential in the context of RT. In this article, the mpMRI theories, including image mechanism, protocol design, and data analysis, will be reviewed with a focus on the radiation oncology field. Representative works will be discussed to demonstrate how mpMRI can be used for RT response assessment. Additionally, issues and limits of current works, as well as challenges and potential future research directions, will also be discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chunhao Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Kyle R Padgett
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA.,Department of Radiology, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Min-Ying Su
- Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Irvine, California, USA.,Department of Medical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Eric A Mellon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Danilo Maziero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Zheng Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Valenzuela RF, Kundra V, Madewell JE, Costelloe CM. Advanced Imaging in Musculoskeletal Oncology: Moving Away From RECIST and Embracing Advanced Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor Imaging (ABASTI) - Part I - Tumor Response Criteria and Established Functional Imaging Techniques. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2020; 42:201-214. [PMID: 33814106 DOI: 10.1053/j.sult.2020.08.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
According to the Revised Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1, the majority of bone metastases are considered to be nonmeasurable disease. Traditional response criteria rely on physical measurements. New criteria would be valuable if they incorporated newly developed imaging features in order to provide a more comprehensive assessment of oncological status. Advanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequences such as diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and perfusion-weighted imaging (PWI) with dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) perfusion imaging are reviewed in the context of the initial and post-therapeutic assessment of musculoskeletal tumors. Particular attention is directed to the pseudoprogression phenomenon in which a successfully treated tumor enlarges from the pretherapeutic baseline, followed by regression without a change in therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raul Fernando Valenzuela
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Musculoskeletal Imaging, Houston, Texas.
| | - Vikas Kundra
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Musculoskeletal Imaging, Houston, Texas
| | - John E Madewell
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Musculoskeletal Imaging, Houston, Texas
| | - Colleen M Costelloe
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Musculoskeletal Imaging, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
O'Sullivan S, McDermott R, Keys M, O'Sullivan M, Armstrong J, Faul C. Imaging response assessment following stereotactic body radiotherapy for solid tumour metastases of the spine: Current challenges and future directions. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2020; 64:385-397. [PMID: 32293114 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.13032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2019] [Accepted: 03/09/2020] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Patients with metastatic disease are routinely serially imaged to assess disease burden and response to systemic and local therapies, which places ever-expanding demands on our healthcare resources. Image interpretation following stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for spine metastases can be challenging; however, appropriate and accurate assessment is critical to ensure patients are managed correctly and resources are optimised. Here, we take a critical review of the merits and pitfalls of various imaging modalities, current response assessment guidelines, and explore novel imaging approaches and the potential for radiomics to add value in imaging assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siobhra O'Sullivan
- St Luke's Institute of Cancer Research, St Luke's Radiation Oncology Network, Dublin 6, Ireland.,Department of Radiation Oncology, St Luke's Radiation Oncology Network, Dublin 6, Ireland
| | - Ronan McDermott
- St Luke's Institute of Cancer Research, St Luke's Radiation Oncology Network, Dublin 6, Ireland.,Department of Radiation Oncology, St Luke's Radiation Oncology Network, Dublin 6, Ireland
| | - Maeve Keys
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St Luke's Radiation Oncology Network, Dublin 6, Ireland
| | - Maeve O'Sullivan
- Department of Radiology, Beaumont Hospital, Royal College of Surgeons of Ireland, Dublin 9, Ireland
| | - John Armstrong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St Luke's Radiation Oncology Network, Dublin 6, Ireland
| | - Clare Faul
- Department of Radiation Oncology, St Luke's Radiation Oncology Network, Dublin 6, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Mouawad M, Biernaski H, Brackstone M, Lock M, Yaremko B, Shmuilovich O, Kornecki A, Ben Nachum I, Muscedere G, Lynn K, Prato FS, Thompson RT, Gaede S, Gelman N. DCE-MRI assessment of response to neoadjuvant SABR in early stage breast cancer: Comparisons of single versus three fraction schemes and two different imaging time delays post-SABR. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2020; 21:25-31. [PMID: 32021911 PMCID: PMC6993055 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2019.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2019] [Accepted: 12/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine the effect of dose fractionation and time delay post-neoadjuvant stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) on dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI parameters in early stage breast cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS DCE-MRI was acquired in 17 patients pre- and post-SABR. Five patients were imaged 6-7 days post-21 Gy/1fraction (group 1), six 16-19 days post-21 Gy/1fraction (group 2), and six 16-18 days post-30 Gy/3 fractions every other day (group 3). DCE-MRI scans were performed using half the clinical dose of contrast agent. Changes in the surrounding tissue were quantified using a signal-enhancement threshold metric that characterizes changes in signal-enhancement volume (SEV). Tumour response was quantified using Ktrans and ve (Tofts model) pre- and post-SABR. Significance was assessed using a Wilcoxin signed-rank test. RESULTS All group 1 and 4/6 group 2 patients' SEV increased post-SABR. All group 3 patients' SEV decreased. The mean Ktrans increased for group 1 by 76% (p = 0.043) while group 2 and 3 decreased 15% (p = 0.028) and 34% (p = 0.028), respectively. For ve, there was no significant change in Group 1 (p = 0.35). Groups 2 showed an increase of 24% (p = 0.043), and Group 3 trended toward an increase (23%, p = 0.08). CONCLUSION Kinetic parameters measured 2.5 weeks post-SABR in both single fraction and three fraction groups were indicative of response but only the single fraction protocol led to enhancement in the surrounding tissue. Our results also suggest that DCE-MRI one-week post-SABR may be too early for response assessment, at least for single fraction SABR, whereas 2.5 weeks appears sufficiently long to minimize confounding acute effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Mouawad
- Medical Biophysics, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Muriel Brackstone
- Medical Biophysics, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
- Lawson Health Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada
- London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
- St. Joseph’s Health Care, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michael Lock
- London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Oncology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Brian Yaremko
- London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Oncology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Olga Shmuilovich
- Lawson Health Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada
- St. Joseph’s Health Care, London, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medical Imaging, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anat Kornecki
- Lawson Health Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada
- St. Joseph’s Health Care, London, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medical Imaging, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ilanit Ben Nachum
- Lawson Health Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada
- St. Joseph’s Health Care, London, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medical Imaging, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Giulio Muscedere
- Lawson Health Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada
- St. Joseph’s Health Care, London, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medical Imaging, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kalan Lynn
- Lawson Health Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada
- London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
- St. Joseph’s Health Care, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Frank S. Prato
- Medical Biophysics, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
- Lawson Health Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada
- St. Joseph’s Health Care, London, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medical Imaging, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - R. Terry Thompson
- Medical Biophysics, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
- Lawson Health Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Stewart Gaede
- Medical Biophysics, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
- Lawson Health Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada
- London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Oncology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Neil Gelman
- Medical Biophysics, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
- Lawson Health Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medical Imaging, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Chen Y, He Y, Zhao C, Li X, Zhou C, Hirsch FR. Treatment of spine metastases in cancer: a review. J Int Med Res 2019; 48:300060519888107. [PMID: 31878807 PMCID: PMC7607531 DOI: 10.1177/0300060519888107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
As a consequence of the improvements in diagnostic technology along with gains in life expectancy of cancer patients, the incidence of spine metastases has increased. Spine metastases can affect the patient's quality of life and negatively impact on their prognosis. Multidisciplinary treatments involve surgery, chemotherapy, radiosurgery and radiotherapy. Spine metastases should be treated using a multidisciplinary and integrated approach that involves spinal surgeons, medical oncologists and radiologists. More research is required to elucidate the pathological mechanisms involved in the aetiology of spine metastasis. This review describes the current situation regarding the diagnosis of spine metastasis, what is understood about the pathological development of spine metastasis and the evolution of the multidisciplinary treatments that are available for patients with spine metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Chen
- Spine Centre, Department of Orthopaedics, Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Yayi He
- Department of Medical Oncology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University Medical School Cancer Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Chao Zhao
- Department of Lung Cancer and Immunology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University Medical School Cancer Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Xuefei Li
- Department of Lung Cancer and Immunology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University Medical School Cancer Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Caicun Zhou
- Department of Medical Oncology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University Medical School Cancer Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Fred R Hirsch
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Neuroimaging and Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) for Spine Metastasis. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2019; 28:85-96. [PMID: 31022051 DOI: 10.1097/rmr.0000000000000199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Historically, management options for spinal metastases include surgery for stabilization and decompression and/or external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). EBRT is palliative in nature, as it lacks accurate targeting such that the prescribed radiation doses must be limited in order to maintain safety. Modern advancement in imaging and radiotherapy technology have facilitated the development of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), which provides increased targeted precision for radiation delivery to tumors resulting in lower overall toxicity, particularly to regional structures such as the spinal cord and esophagus, while delivering higher, more effective, and radically ablative radiation doses.Over the past decade, SBRT has been increasingly utilized as a method of treating spinal metastases either as the primary modality or following surgical intervention in both de novo and reirradiation setting. Numerous studies suggest that SBRT is associated with an 80% to 90% rate of 1-year local control across clinical scenarios. For example, studies of SBRT as the primary treatment modality suggest long-term local control rate of 80% to 95% for spinal metastases. Similarly, SBRT in the adjuvant setting following surgery is associated with local control rates ranging from 70% to 100%. Furthermore, because SBRT allows for lower dose to the spinal cord, it has also been used in patients who have had prior radiation therapy, with studies showing 66% to 93% local control in this scenario.
Collapse
|
16
|
Reynolds HM, Parameswaran BK, Finnegan ME, Roettger D, Lau E, Kron T, Shaw M, Chander S, Siva S. Diffusion weighted and dynamic contrast enhanced MRI as an imaging biomarker for stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) of primary renal cell carcinoma. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0202387. [PMID: 30114235 PMCID: PMC6095575 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2018] [Accepted: 08/01/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To explore the utility of diffusion and perfusion changes in primary renal cell carcinoma (RCC) after stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) as an early biomarker of treatment response, using diffusion weighted (DWI) and dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) MRI. Methods Patients enrolled in a prospective pilot clinical trial received SABR for primary RCC, and had DWI and DCE MRI scheduled at baseline, 14 days and 70 days after SABR. Tumours <5cm diameter received a single fraction of 26 Gy and larger tumours received three fractions of 14 Gy. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps were computed from DWI data and parametric and pharmacokinetic maps were fitted to the DCE data. Tumour volumes were contoured and statistics extracted. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients were computed between MRI parameter changes versus the percentage tumour volume change from CT at 6, 12 and 24 months and the last follow-up relative to baseline CT. Results Twelve patients were eligible for DWI analysis, and a subset of ten patients for DCE MRI analysis. DCE MRI from the second follow-up MRI scan showed correlations between the change in percentage voxels with washout contrast enhancement behaviour and the change in tumour volume (ρ = 0.84, p = 0.004 at 12 month CT, ρ = 0.81, p = 0.02 at 24 month CT, and ρ = 0.89, p = 0.001 at last follow-up CT). The change in mean initial rate of enhancement and mean Ktrans at the second follow-up MRI scan were positively correlated with percent tumour volume change at the 12 month CT onwards (ρ = 0.65, p = 0.05 and ρ = 0.66, p = 0.04 at 12 month CT respectively). Changes in ADC kurtosis from histogram analysis at the first follow-up MRI scan also showed positive correlations with the percentage tumour volume change (ρ = 0.66, p = 0.02 at 12 month CT, ρ = 0.69, p = 0.02 at last follow-up CT), but these results are possibly confounded by inflammation. Conclusion DWI and DCE MRI parameters show potential as early response biomarkers after SABR for primary RCC. Further prospective validation using larger patient cohorts is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hayley M. Reynolds
- Department of Physical Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- * E-mail:
| | | | - Mary E. Finnegan
- Department of Imaging, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Eddie Lau
- Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Tomas Kron
- Department of Physical Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mark Shaw
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sarat Chander
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Shankar Siva
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Faruqi S, Tseng CL, Whyne C, Alghamdi M, Wilson J, Myrehaug S, Soliman H, Lee Y, Maralani P, Yang V, Fisher C, Sahgal A. Vertebral Compression Fracture After Spine Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy: A Review of the Pathophysiology and Risk Factors. Neurosurgery 2017; 83:314-322. [DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyx493] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2017] [Accepted: 09/07/2017] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Vertebral compression fracture (VCF) is a challenging and not infrequent complication observed following spine stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT).
OBJECTIVE
To summarize the data from the multiple studies that have been published, addressing the risk and predictive factors for VCF post-SBRT.
METHODS
A systematic literature review was conducted. Studies were selected if they specifically addressed risk factors for post-SBRT VCF in their analyses.
RESULTS
A total of 11 studies were identified, reporting both the risk of VCF post-SBRT and an analysis of risk factors based on univariate and multivariate analysis. A total of 2911 spinal segments were treated with a crude VCF rate of 13.9%. The most frequently identified risk factors on multivariate analysis were: lytic disease (hazard ratio [HR] range, 2.76-12.2), baseline VCF prior to SBRT (HR range, 1.69-9.25), higher dose per fraction SBRT (HR range, 5.03-6.82), spinal deformity (HR range, 2.99-11.1), older age (HR range, 2.15-5.67), and more than 40% to 50% of vertebral body involved by tumor (HR range, 3.9-4.46). In the 9 studies that specifically reported on the use of post-SBRT surgical procedures, 37% of VCF had undergone an intervention (range, 11%-60%).
CONCLUSION
VCF is an important adverse effect following SBRT. Risk factors have been identified to guide the selection of high-risk patients. Evidence-based algorithms with respect to patient selection and intervention are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salman Faruqi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Chia-Lin Tseng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Cari Whyne
- Orthopaedic Biomechanics Laboratory, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Majed Alghamdi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jefferson Wilson
- Department of Neurosurgery, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sten Myrehaug
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Hany Soliman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Young Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Pejman Maralani
- Department of Radiology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Victor Yang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Charles Fisher
- Department of Neurosurgery, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
An analysis of knowledge-based planning for stereotactic body radiation therapy of the spine. Pract Radiat Oncol 2017; 7:e355-e360. [DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2017.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2016] [Revised: 02/16/2017] [Accepted: 02/25/2017] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
|
19
|
Kumar KA, Peck KK, Karimi S, Lis E, Holodny AI, Bilsky MH, Yamada Y. A Pilot Study Evaluating the Use of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Perfusion MRI to Predict Local Recurrence After Radiosurgery on Spinal Metastases. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2017; 16:857-865. [PMID: 28449626 PMCID: PMC5762041 DOI: 10.1177/1533034617705715] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging offers noninvasive characterization of the vascular microenvironment and hemodynamics. Stereotactic radiosurgery, or stereotactic body radiation therapy, engages a vascular component of the tumor response which may be detectable using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. The purpose of this study is to examine whether dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging can be used to predict local tumor recurrence in patients with spinal bone metastases who undergo high-dose radiotherapy with stereotactic radiosurgery. Materials and Methods: We conducted a study of 30 patients with spinal metastases who underwent dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging before and after radiotherapy. Twenty patients received single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (24 Gy), while 10 received hypofractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (3-5 fractions, 27-30 Gy total). Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate the actuarial local recurrence rates. Two perfusion parameters (Ktrans: permeability and Vp: plasma volume) were measured for each metastasis. Percentage change in parameter values from pre- to posttreatment was calculated and compared. Results: At 20-month median follow-up, 5 of the 30 patients had pathological evidence of local recurrence. One- and 3-year actuarial local recurrence rates were 24% and 44% for the hypofractionated stereotactic radiosurgery cohort versus 5% and 16% for the single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery cohort (P = .20). The average change in Vp and Ktrans for patients without local recurrence versus those with local recurrence was −76% and −66% versus +28% and −14% (P < .01 for both). With a cutoff point of −20%, Vp had a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 100%, 98%, 91%, and 100%, respectively, for the detection of local recurrence following high-dose radiotherapy. Using this definition, dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging identified local recurrence up to 18 months (mean [standard deviation], 6.6 [6.8] months) earlier than standard magnetic resonance imaging. Conclusions: We demonstrated that changes in perfusion parameters, particularly Vp, after high-dose radiotherapy to spinal bone metastases were predictive of local tumor recurrence. These changes predicted local recurrence on average >6 months earlier than standard imaging did.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kiran A Kumar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Kyung K Peck
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.,Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sasan Karimi
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Eric Lis
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andrei I Holodny
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mark H Bilsky
- Department of Neurosurgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Yoshiya Yamada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Soliman M, Taunk NK, Simons RE, Osborne JR, Kim MM, Szerlip NJ, Spratt DE. Anatomic and functional imaging in the diagnosis of spine metastases and response assessment after spine radiosurgery. Neurosurg Focus 2017; 42:E5. [PMID: 28041315 DOI: 10.3171/2016.9.focus16350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Spine stereotactic radiosurgery (SSRS) has recently emerged as an increasingly effective treatment for spinal metastases. Studies performed over the past decade have examined the role of imaging in the diagnosis of metastases, as well as treatment response following SSRS. In this paper, the authors describe and review the utility of several imaging modalities in the diagnosis of spinal metastases and monitoring of their response to SSRS. Specifically, we review the role of CT, MRI, and positron emission tomography (PET) in their ability to differentiate between osteoblastic and osteolytic lesions, delineation of initial bony pathology, detection of treatment-related changes in bone density and vertebral compression fracture after SSRS, and tumor response to therapy. Validated consensus guidelines defining the imaging approach to SSRS are needed to standardize the diagnosis and treatment response assessment after SSRS. Future directions of spinal imaging, including advances in targeted tumor-specific molecular imaging markers demonstrate early promise for advancing the role of imaging in SSRS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Joseph R Osborne
- 3Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | - Nicholas J Szerlip
- 4Neurosurgery, University of Michigan Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan; and
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT Soft-tissue sarcoma is one of the few clinical cancer models in which pre-operative radiotherapy is commonly utilized and in which tumor response to radiotherapy could be assessed. However, clinical and histopathological features of soft-tissue sarcomas are not useful in predicting tumor radiotherapy response. Exploration of predictive markers of sarcoma response to radiotherapy is further confounded by discordance between radiological tumor size reduction, pathological changes, and clinical local recurrence rates. The diversity of disease histology and anatomical origin further influences which type of radiotherapy response (volumetric vs. cytotoxic) would best relate to patient outcome. Advances in molecular biology and understanding of sarcoma biology have recently resulted in the identification of several molecular and imaging predictive markers of radiotherapy response. As the underlying mechanism of radiation-induced cell killing involves the production of DNA damage through the production of oxygen radicals, the most promising biomarkers and imaging markers are related to DNA damage repair genes, hypoxia, and tumor vasculature. As bone and cartilaginous sarcomas are less often treated with radiotherapy, biomarkers of response in these diseases are less examined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos H F Chan
- Department of Surgery, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA
| | - Philip Wong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de L'Université de Montréal, 1560 Sherbrooke Street East, Montreal, QC, Canada, H2L 4M1.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Bahig H, Simard D, Létourneau L, Wong P, Roberge D, Filion E, Donath D, Sahgal A, Masucci L. A Study of Pseudoprogression After Spine Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2016; 96:848-856. [PMID: 27788956 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.07.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2015] [Revised: 07/25/2016] [Accepted: 07/26/2016] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine the incidence of pseudoprogression (PP) after spine stereotactic body radiation therapy based on a detailed and quantitative assessment of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) morphologic tumor alterations, and to identify predictive factors distinguishing PP from local recurrence (LR). METHODS AND MATERIALS A retrospective analysis of 35 patients with 49 spinal segments treated with spine stereotactic body radiation therapy, from 2009 to 2014, was conducted. The median number of follow-up MRI studies was 4 (range, 2-7). The gross tumor volumes (GTVs) within each of the 49 spinal segments were contoured on the pretreatment and each subsequent follow-up T1- and T2-weighted MRI sagittal sequence. T2 signal intensity was reported as the mean intensity of voxels constituting each volume. LR was defined as persistent GTV enlargement on ≥2 serial MRI studies for ≥6 months or on pathologic confirmation. PP was defined as a GTV enlargement followed by stability or regression on subsequent imaging within 6 months. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used for estimation of actuarial local control, disease-free survival, and overall survival. RESULTS The median follow-up was 23 months (range, 1-39 months). PP was identified in 18% of treated segments (9 of 49) and LR in 29% (14 of 49). Earlier volume enlargement (5 months for PP vs 15 months for LR, P=.005), greater GTV to reference nonirradiated vertebral body T2 intensity ratio (+30% for PP vs -10% for LR, P=.005), and growth confined to 80% of the prescription isodose line (80% IDL) (8 of 9 PP cases vs 1 of 14 LR cases, P=.002) were associated with PP on univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis confirmed an earlier time to volume enlargement and growth within the 80% IDL as significant predictors of PP. LR involved the epidural space in all but 1 lesion, whereas PP was confined to the vertebral body in 7 of 9 cases. CONCLUSIONS PP was observed in 18% of treated spinal segments. Tumor growth confined to the 80% IDL and earlier time to tumor enlargement were predictive for PP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Houda Bahig
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Dany Simard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Laurent Létourneau
- Department of Radiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Philip Wong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - David Roberge
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Edith Filion
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - David Donath
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Laura Masucci
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|