Risk factors for laryngeal penetration-aspiration in patients with acute traumatic cervical spinal cord injury

Methods of diagnosis and rehabilitation of dysphagia in patients with spinal cord injury: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Latest epidemiological metrics put a global prevalence of 20.6 million people suffering from spinal cord injury (SCI), leading to a burden of functional disability, deterioration in quality of life and reduced life expectancy. A thorough statement of diagnostic methods and treatment protocols for swallowing disorders after SCI stands as a major priority to streamline patient care and cost-sharing. Here we have provided a systematic overview of the evidence on diagnostic and rehabilitation protocols of dysphagia in the SCI population.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

The literature was searched in six electronic databases up to April 30th, 2024. Screening the 521 retrieved articles for inclusion criteria resulted in the selection of 43 studies that reported assessment tools and rehabilitation protocols for dysphagia in patients with SCI. Two researchers extracted the data in parallel, and inter-rater reliability (IRR) was used to estimate inter-coder agreement and then κ statistic to measure accuracy and precision. Based on PRISMA concepts and quality assessment steps, a k coefficient of at least 0.9 was obtained in all data extraction steps. All reports were assessed for risk of bias using the NIH Quality Assessment Toolkit. The study protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023449137).

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Dysphagia assessment methods were collected and grouped into four different macro categories (clinical assessment, rating scale, self-reported questionnaire, and instrumental assessment). It was found that the Bedside Swallow Evaluation (BSE) for the clinical assessment category (50%), the Bazaz score (32.5%) for the rating scale category, the Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10) (44.4%) for the self-reported questionnaire category, and the Videofluoroscopic Study of Swallowing (VFSS) (48.9%) for the instrumental assessment category were the most representative tools. The rehabilitation protocols described included either an early oral feeding exclusion or a consistency-modified oral intake, postural adaptations, oxygen therapy with a high-flow nasal cannula combined with indirect/direct therapy, specific exercises, and neuromuscular electrical stimulation.

CONCLUSIONS

Methods of diagnosis and rehabilitation protocols for dysphagia in SCI patients appear inconsistent. Further rigorous studies are needed to achieve better clinical handling in SCI settings while lowering the load of patient morbidity and related healthcare costs.

Risk Factors for Dysphagia After Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: A Retrospective Study

OBJECTIVE

To identify risk factors for dysphagia in individuals who sustained traumatic cervical SCI. The pathophysiologic mechanisms of dysphagia in individuals with traumatic cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) are not well understood yet. Several risk factors for developing dysphagia after SCI were postulated including mechanical ventilation, tracheostomy, age, female sex, anterior surgical approach, SCI severity, and multilevel spinal fusion.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis: Candidate explanatory variables, including injury severity, age, neurological level of injury, surgical approach, number of fused spinal segments, and tracheostomy including its type, were analyzed using univariate and multivariable statistical analyses.

SETTING

We included patients, who were treated at the BG Trauma Center Murnau between 2013 and 2022.

PARTICIPANTS

Datasets of a total of 407 patients with traumatic cervical SCI were included.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Dysphagia prevalence and identification of associated risk factors.

RESULTS

Our analysis included 407 individuals, of whom 22.6% had dysphagia. Tracheostomy and age were identified as the main risk factors for dysphagia after traumatic cervical SCI. Contrary to previous literature, injury severity, an anterior surgical approach, the type of tracheostomy, a higher neurological level of SCI, and multilevel spinal fusion did not show an increased risk after accounting for other factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study identifies age and tracheostomy as primary risk factors for dysphagia after SCI, allowing to identify patients at risk and inform early-stage clinical management.

Pulmonary function and sarcopenia as predictors of dysphagia in cervical spinal cord injury

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the risk factors associated with dysphagia in individuals with cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI) and analyze the differences between individuals with improved penetration-aspiration (PA) and persistent PA on follow-up.

SETTING

Tertiary inpatient rehabilitation facilities.

METHODS

Medical records of individuals with CSCI admitted between December 2009 and February 2023 who underwent a videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) were retrospectively reviewed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to assess risk factors for dysphagia. Differences between individuals with improved PA and persistent PA were analyzed using an independent t-test.

RESULTS

In total, 149 participants were enrolled. Age (odds ratio (OR) 1.08, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04-1.12), percentage of forced vital capacity to predicted normal (FVC (% predicted)) (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.85-0.94), and skeletal muscle index (OR 0.89, 95% CI, 0.79-0.99) were significant factors associated with the risk of PA. Based on the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the cut-off values for age, FVC (% predicted), and skeletal muscle index were determined as 56.0, 45.7, and 41.0, respectively. A secondary analysis of the follow-up VFSS was conducted on 38 participants. The follow-up FVC (% predicted) and degree of weight loss differed significantly between the improved PA and persistent PA groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Older age, low FVC (% predicted), and low skeletal muscle index can be predictors of dysphagia in patients with CSCI. On follow-up VFSS, individuals with improved PA demonstrated greater improvement in FVC (% predicted).

Association between Anterior Surgical Approach and Dysphagia Severity in Patients with Cervical Spinal Cord Injury

INTRODUCTION

Early detection and management of dysphagia are essential for preventing aspiration pneumonia and reducing mortality in patients with cervical spinal cord injury (C-SCI). In this study, we identified risk factors for dysphagia in patients with C-SCI by analyzing the correlation between the clinical factors and the severity of dysphagia, not the presence or absence of dysphagia. Combined with the analysis results of previous studies, we thought that this additional analysis method could more accurately reveal the risk factors for dysphagia in patients with C-SCI.

METHODS

The presence and severity of dysphagia in patients with C-SCI was evaluated using a modified videofluoroscopic dysphagia scale (mVDS) and penetration-aspiration scale (PAS). All included patients with C-SCI performed a video fluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS). Clinical factors such as age, sex, the presence of tracheostomy, spinal cord independence measure (SCIM), pulmonary function test (PFT), including forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), FVC/FEV1, maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP), and maximal expiratory pressure (MEP), American Spinal Cord Injury Association (ASIA) score, Berg Balance Scale (BBS), and operation method were investigated.

RESULTS

In the multivariate regression analysis, the anterior surgical approach was the only clinical factor that had a significant correlation in both mVDS and PAS, which represents the severity of dysphagia in C-SCI patients (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The anterior surgical approach was correlated with the severity of dysphagia in patients with C-SCI. Considering this, as one of the risk factors affecting dysphagia in patients with C-SCI, surgical method may also need to be considered. Additionally, we recommend that clinicians should pay particular attention to the potential for development of dysphagia in patients who received anterior cervical surgery. However, further prospective studies with larger sample sizes are needed for more accurate generalization.

Using Reference Values to Identify Profiles of Swallowing Impairment in a Case Series of Individuals With Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury

PURPOSE

In this article, we illustrate use of a systematic approach to rating videofluoroscopic swallowing studies (VFSS), the Analysis of Swallowing Physiology: Events, Kinematics and Timing (ASPEKT) method. The method is applied to a clinical case series of individuals with a history of traumatic spinal cord injury (tSCI) requiring surgical intervention using a posterior approach. Previous studies suggest that swallowing is highly variable in this population given heterogeneity in mechanisms, location and extent of injury, and in surgical management approaches.

METHOD

The case series involved 6 individuals who were at least 1 month postsurgery for management of tSCI. Participants completed a VFSS using a standardized bolus protocol. Each VFSS was blindly rated in duplicate using the ASPEKT method and compared with published reference values.

RESULTS

The analysis revealed considerable heterogeneity across this clinical sample. Penetration-aspiration scale scores of 3 or higher were not observed in this cohort. Of note, patterns of impairment did emerge, suggesting there are some commonalities across profiles in this population, including the presence of residue associated with poor pharyngeal constriction, reduced upper esophageal opening diameter, and short upper esophageal sphincter opening duration.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the participants in this clinical sample shared a history of tSCI requiring surgical intervention using a posterior approach, there was great heterogeneity in swallowing profile. Using a systematic method to identify atypical swallowing parameters can guide clinical decision making for determining rehabilitative targets and measuring swallowing outcomes.

Establishment of a Multi-parameter Evaluation Model for Risk of Aspiration in Dysphagia: A Pilot Study

It's difficult for clinical bedside evaluations to accurately determine the occurrence of aspiration in patients. Although VFSS and FEES are the gold standards for clinical diagnosis of dysphagia, which are mainly used to evaluate people at high risk of dysphagia found by bedside screening, the operation is complicated and time-consuming. The aim of this pilot study was to present an objective measure based on a multi-parameter approach to screen for aspiration risk in patients with dysphagia. Objective evaluation techniques based on speech parameters were used to assess the oral motor function, vocal cord function, and voice changes before and after swallowing in 32 patients with dysphagia (16 low-risk aspiration group, 16 high-risk aspiration group). Student's t test combined with stepwise logistic regression were used to determine the optimal index. The best model consists of three parameters, and the equation is: logit(P) = - 3.824 - (0.504 × maximum phonation time) + (0.008 × second formant frequency of /u/) - 0.085 × (fundamental frequency difference before and after swallowing). An additional eight patients with dysphagia were randomly selected as the validation group of the model. When applied to validation, this model can accurately identify the risk of aspiration in 87.5% of patients, and the sensitivity is as high as 100%. Therefore, it has certain clinical practical value that may help clinicians to assess the risk of aspiration in patients with dysphagia, especially for silent aspiration.

Development of a swallowing risk screening tool and best practice recommendations for the management of oropharyngeal dysphagia following acute cervical spinal cord injury: an international multi-professional Delphi consensus

PURPOSE

International multi-professional expert consensus was sought to develop best practice recommendations for clinical management of patients following cervical spinal cord injury with oropharyngeal dysphagia and associated complications. Additionally, risk factors for dysphagia were identified to support the development of a screening tool.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A two-round Delphi study was undertaken with a 27-member panel of expert professionals in cervical spinal cord injury and complex dysphagia. They rated 85 statements across seven topic areas in round one, using a five-point Likert scale with a consensus set at 70%. Statements not achieving consensus were revised for the second round. Comparative group and individual feedback were provided at the end of each round.

RESULTS

Consensus was achieved for 50 (59%) statements in round one and a further 12 (48%) statements in round two. Recommendations for best practice were agreed for management of swallowing, respiratory function, communication, nutrition and oral care. Twelve risk factors for dysphagia were identified for components of a screening tool.

CONCLUSIONS

Best practice recommendations support wider clinical management to prevent complications and direct specialist care. Screening for risk factors allows early dysphagia identification with the potential to improve clinical outcomes. Further evaluation of the impact of these recommendations is needed.Implications for RehabilitationDysphagia is an added complication following cervical spinal cord injury (cSCI) affecting morbidity, mortality and quality of life.Early identification of dysphagia risk allows focused interventions that reduce associated nutritional and respiratory impairments.Best practice recommendations based on expert consensus provide a baseline of appropriate interventions, in the absence of empirical evidence.A multi-professional approach to rehabilitation encourages a consistent and coordinated approach to care across acute and rehabilitation settings.

Oropharyngeal Dysphagia in Acute Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: A Literature Review

Dysphagia (swallowing impairment) is a frequent complication of cervical spinal cord injury (cSCI). Recently published national guidance in the UK on rehabilitation after traumatic injury confirmed that people with cSCI are at risk for dysphagia and require early evaluation while remaining nil by mouth [National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Rehabilitation after traumatic injury (NG211), 2022, https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng21]. While the pathogenesis and pathophysiology of dysphagia in cSCI remains unclear, numerous risk factors have been identified in the literature. This review aims to summarize the literature on the risk factors, presentation, assessment, and management of dysphagia in patients with cSCI. A bespoke approach to dysphagia management, that accounts for the multiple system impairment in cSCI, is presented; the overarching aim of which is to support effective management of dysphagia in patients with cSCI to prevent adverse clinical consequences.

Anatomical and Imaging Study on the Optimum Entry Point and Trajectory for Anterior Transpedicular Root Screw Placement into the Lower Cervical Spine

Objective

To study the optimum entry point and trajectory for anterior transpedicular root screw (ATPRS) placement into the lower cervical spine (LCS), so as to provide a basis for clinical application.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of cervical CT images of patients who underwent cervical CT examination in the Spinal Surgery of Ningbo No. 6 Hospital from January 2020 to August 2021 was conducted. The data were obtained and modeled. On the coronal plane, the vertebral body (VB) between the anterior midline of cervical vertebral segments C_3-7 and the left P line (by drawing the line parallel to the anterior midline of the VB at the intersection of the anterior edge of the Luschka's joint and the upper endplate) was equally divided into 9 zones (a-i). The ideal entry point and path of cervical ATPRS were designed and recorded. Additionally, 7 cadaveric specimens were selected, and the screw placement parameters were regenerated according to the above methods for screw placement.

Results

Zone i of each segment, with the longest screw length, was the best area for screw placement. In all patients, the horizontal angles of vertebrae C_3-7 in zones a, d, and g, zones b, e, and h, and zones c, f, and i showed a gradually decreasing trend. The sagittal angle range of C_3-7 in all patients showed a gradually increasing trend in zones a-c, d-f, and g-i. The distance from the anterior midline of C_3-7 to the P line increased in all patients, and the distance was longer in males than in females, with statistical significance. Pedicle screws were successfully inserted in all the 7 cadaveric specimens.

Conclusions

ATPRS placement can be used for LCS internal fixation, and the precise screw placement parameters can be simulated by the software, which provides theoretical basis for its future clinical application.

Laryngeal and swallow dysregulation following acute cervical spinal cord injury

Laryngeal function is vital to airway protection. While swallow is mediated by the brainstem, mechanisms underlying increased risk of dysphagia after cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) are unknown. We hypothesized that loss of descending phrenic drive affects swallow and breathing differently, and loss of ascending spinal afferent information alters swallow regulation. We recorded electromyograms from upper airway and chest wall muscles in freely breathing pentobarbital-anesthetized cats and rats. Inspiratory laryngeal activity increased ~two-fold following C2 lateral-hemisection. Ipsilateral to the injury, crural diaphragm EMG amplitude was reduced during breathing (62 ± 25% change post-injury), but no animal had complete termination of activity; 75% of animals increased contralateral diaphragm recruitment, but this did not reach significance. During swallow, laryngeal adductor and pharyngeal constrictor muscles increased activity, and diaphragm activity was bilaterally suppressed. This was unexpected because of the ipsilateral-specific response during breathing. Swallow-breathing coordination was also disrupted and more swallows occurred during early expiration. Finally, to determine if the chest wall is a major source of feedback for laryngeal regulation, we performed T1 total transections in rats. As in the C2 lateral-hemisection, inspiratory laryngeal recruitment was the first feature noted. In contrast to the C2 lateral-hemisection, diaphragmatic drive increased after T1 transection. Overall, we found that SCI alters laryngeal drive during swallow and breathing, and reduced swallow-related diaphragm activity. Our results show behavior-specific effects, suggesting SCI affects swallow more than breathing, and emphasizes the need for additional studies on the effects of ascending afferents from the spinal cord on laryngeal function.

Dysphagia in cervical spinal cord injury: How international literature trends can guide South African practice patterns - A scoping review

BACKGROUND

The limited data regarding dysphagia in high-level spinal cord injuries (SCIs) stem from economically developed countries. Dysphagia is prevalent in patients with cervical SCI; however, in a South African context, speech-language pathologists (SLPs) are not seen as key when managing this population. This may result in patients not being screened or identified early, leading to possible complications. The literature could provide useful insight on how best to address this clinical gap.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of my study was to conduct a scoping review on the description of dysphagia, the risk factors for developing dysphagia post-SCI and the practice patterns of team members working with dysphagia in cervical SCIs.

METHODS

A five-step scoping review was undertaken. Data were analysed by using descriptive statistics as well as a thematic analysis by using a top-down approach.

RESULTS

Through the process of screening according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 25 articles were included. Primarily, the pharyngeal phase was affected, which can lead to an aspiration pneumonia. The key risk factors were the presence of a tracheostomy tube, the use of ventilation and anterior spinal cord surgery. There was little mention regarding specific practice patterns, but an interdisciplinary approach was suggested as the most efficient model.

CONCLUSIONS

Specific guidelines and management options need to be considered for a South African context, given the high incidence of trauma-related injuries. There needs to be locally produced research, providing suggestions on how different team members can screen and identify dysphagia within this population. Solutions need to be unique, and contextually responsive and appropriate.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

The team members and the roles of these different team members need to be re-examined in order to ensure the early identification and management of cervical SCI patients who are at risk of developing a dysphagia.

Single and sequential voluntary cough in children with chronic spinal cord injury

We investigated the impact of spinal cord injury (SCI) on cough capacity in 10 children (Mean ± SD, age 8 ± 4 years) and compared it to 15 typically developing children (age 8 ± 3 years). Participants underwent spirometry, single and sequential cough assessment with surface-electromyography from respiratory muscles. Inspiratory phase duration, inspiratory phase peak flow, inspiratory phase rise time, compression phase duration, expiratory phase rise time, expiratory phase peak airflow (EPPF) and cough volume acceleration (CVA) parameters of single and sequential cough were measured. Root mean square (RMS) values of right pectoralis-major, intercostal, rectus-abdominus (RA), and oblique (OB) muscles were calculated and mean of three trials were compared. The significance criterion was set at P < 0.05. The SCI group produced significantly lower lung volumes, EPPF, CVA, and RMS values of RA and OB during expiratory phases of single and sequential coughs. The decrease in activation in expiratory muscles in the SCI group accounts for the impaired expiratory flow and may contribute to risk of respiratory complications.

Mechanism of Dysphagia after Acute Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury

Swallowing dysfunction, which may cause aspiration pneumonia, is one of the most important complications of treatment of traumatic cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI); however, the mechanism of dysphagia is not well understood. No previous studies have reported the association between morphological changes of the soft tissue and dysphagia. We aimed to determine the factors associated with severity of dysphagia after CSCI and elucidate its mechanism. We conducted a prospective analysis of patients with acute traumatic CSCI who were admitted within 2 weeks of the injury. Dysphagia was evaluated using the Dysphagia Severity Scale (DSS) 2 weeks after the injury. The widths of the retropharyngeal and retrotracheal spaces were measured to assess soft tissue damage owing to the injury using sagittal images of computed tomography. We also assessed age, surgery of the injured cervical spine, presence of tracheostomy, osteophyte behind the pharynx, level of injury, and motor score 2 weeks after the injury. A total of 136 persons met our criteria. Given that 44 persons were categorized under grades <5 of the DSS, which were defined as different types of aspirations, the incidence of aspiration was 32%. The multiple regression analysis revealed that age, motor score, tracheostomy, and retropharyngeal space were significantly associated with DSS. Severe paresis, tracheostomy, old age, and swelling of the retropharyngeal space were significantly affected by dysphagia after CSCI. Morphological changes in the pharynx, situated right behind the larynx, after the injury affects the mechanism of dysphagia.

Association between Prevertebral Soft Tissue Thickening and Dysphagia in Cases of Traumatic Cervical Spinal Cord Injury

Objective

The objectives of this study were to clarify whether prevertebral soft tissue (PVST) thickening increases the risk of dysphagia, to identify at which vertebral level determining PVST thickness is useful, and to determine cutoff values.

Methods

A total of 80 patients with traumatic cervical spinal cord injury (TCSCI) treated over a 43-month period at a single regional institution specializing in cervical spinal cord injuries participated in the study. The exclusion criteria were having undergone anterior cervical spine surgery; a history of complicated traumatic brain injury, complicated vertebral artery injury, or brain injury; endotracheal intubation at day 30 after onset; the disappearance of neurological symptoms within 24 hours after onset; and the use of a halo vest. The associations between PVST thicknesses at C1, C2, C3, C6, and C7 measured by CT on the day of onset and the presence of dysphagia (Food Intake LEVEL Scale score <8) at 30 and 60 days after onset of TCSCI were analyzed using ROC curves to calculate the maximum area under the curve and the PVST cutoff values for these vertebrae. Associations between various risk factors, including PVST thickness, and dysphagia at days 30 and 60 after onset were examined using univariate and multivariate analyses.

Results

Independent associations with dysphagia were found with the C3 PVST thickness (day 30: ≥8.3 mm, day 60: ≥9.4 mm) and tracheostomy.

Conclusion

PVST thickness or injury seems to be an independent risk factor for dysphagia. By measuring PVST, it is possible to estimate the severity of dysphagia even in acute conditions.

Use of the Penetration-Aspiration Scale in Dysphagia Research: A Systematic Review

The penetration-aspiration scale (PAS) is an 8-point scale used to characterize the depth and response to airway invasion during videofluoroscopy. Though widely used in the field of deglutition, there is a lack of consensus regarding the statistical properties of the scale. In order to better understand the state of the literature and the statistical use of the PAS, a systematic review was undertaken to descriptively examine trends in statistical and reporting practices of the PAS since its inception. Online databases were searched for studies citing the original PAS article, which yielded 754 unique articles. Of these, 183 studies were included in the review. Results showed inconsistencies in the statistical use of the scale; 79 studies treated the PAS as ordinal, 71 as categorical, and 49 as interval. Ten types of categorizations were identified. Reporting of power analyses (9%), as well as inter- (26%) and intra-rater (17%) reliability, was uncommon. Among studies that administered multiple bolus volumes or consistencies, 55% reported PAS analyses at the participant/group level only. This review confirms the existence of discrepancies in the statistical treatment of the PAS. A lack of consensus among researchers limits comparisons between studies. The approach to handling this scale dictates the statistical tests used, potentially affecting results and interpretations. Consistent application of statistically sound approaches to PAS analyses is vital for the future of deglutition research.

The time course of dysphagia following traumatic cervical spinal cord injury: a prospective cohort study

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES

To elucidate serial changes in dysphagia and elucidate the critical period for dysphagia following acute traumatic cervical spinal cord injury (CSCI).

SETTING

Spinal Injuries Center, Fukuoka, Japan.

METHODS

We prospectively examined individuals with acute traumatic CSCI admitted within 2 weeks after injury. Severity of dysphagia was evaluated using both the dysphagia severity scale (DSS) and functional oral intake scale (FOIS) at 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months after injury. Condition of oral intake before injury was assessed by history taking. American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) impairment scale grade and motor scores were also assessed at the same timepoints, and the correlation between dysphagia and paresis was analyzed.

RESULTS

Sixty-five individuals with CSCI were assessed consecutively for 3 months after injury. Swallowing function, evaluated using both the DSS and FOIS, was significantly decreased at 2 weeks after injury, but significantly improved thereafter. Significant correlations between severity of dysphagia (DSS and FOIS scores) and motor scores were found at 2 weeks after injury (r_s = 0.66 and 0.61; p < 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively), indicating that individuals with lower motor scores had more severe swallowing dysfunction.

CONCLUSIONS

Dysphagia occurred immediately after injury, but gradually improved over time. Individuals with more severe paralysis had significantly more severe dysphagia. Special attention for dysphagia should be paid to individuals with severe paralysis in acute phase.

Progress of the Anterior Transpedicular Screw in Lower Cervical Spine: A Review

The anterior transpedicular screws (ATPS) fixation is a valuable discovery in the field of lower cervical spine (LCS) reconstruction, as it has the advantages of both anterior and posterior approaches. In recent years, with in-depth research on ATPS fixation related to anatomy, biomechanical tests, and clinical applications, its firm stability and excellent biomechanical properties have been recognized by more and more surgeons. Although ATPS fixation has been gradually applied in clinic settings under the promotion of emerging distinctive instruments, its long-term efficacy still needs to be further clarified due to the lack of large sample size studies and long-term follow-up. Nevertheless, it is believed that with the maturity of digital devices and the development of precision medicine, ATPS fixation has a promising prospect.

Risk factors for dysphagia after a spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the risk factors predictive of dysphagia after a spinal cord injury (SCI).

SETTING

None.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was performed in five scientific databases for English articles that identified risk factors for dysphagia after a SCI in adult (≥19 years) individuals. Data extracted included: author name, year and country of publication, participant demographics, sample size, study design, method of dysphagia diagnosis, and risk factor percentages. Methodological quality of studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. For identified risk factors, risk percentages were transformed into risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals. Quantitative synthesis was performed for risk factors reported in two or more studies using restricted maximum-likelihood estimator random effects models.

RESULTS

Eleven studies met inclusion criteria of which ten studies were of moderate quality (n = 10). Significant risk factors included: age, injury severity, level of injury, presence of tracheostomy, coughing, voice quality, bronchoscopy need, pneumonia, mechanical ventilation, nasogastric tubes, comorbid injury, and a cervical surgery. Results of the quantitative synthesis indicated that the presence of a tracheostomy posed a threefold greater risk of the development of dysphagia (RR: 3.67); while, cervical surgery posed a 1.3 times greater risk of the development of dysphagia (RR: 1.30).

CONCLUSIONS

Knowledge of these risk factors can be a resource for clinicians in the early diagnosis and appropriate medical management of dysphagia post SCI.

Traumatic cervical spinal cord injury: recovery of penetration/aspiration and functional feeding outcome

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES

This prospective cohort study aims to evaluate the recovery of penetration/aspiration and functional feeding outcome in patients with acute TCSCI.

SETTING

Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland METHODS: Forty-six patients with TCSCI were enrolled. All the patients received speech therapeutic interventions based on their clinical needs and were examined with a videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS) at enrollment. The incidence of VFSS-verified laryngeal penetration/aspiration according to Rosenbek's Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) served as the primary outcome. The secondary outcome was the level of functional oral intake (as per the Functional Oral Intake Scale; FOIS). Based on the PAS results, the patients were divided into two groups: (i) penetrator/aspirators (PAS score ≥3) and (ii) non-penetrator/aspirators (PAS score ≤2). Follow-up VFS studies were primarily conducted on the patients with penetration/aspiration in prior VFS studies. The follow-up VFS studies were scheduled on the basis of clinical demand.

RESULTS

Of the 46 patients, 48% had penetration/aspiration in the first VFSS. The second VFSS was conducted on 20 patients, of whom 6 patients (30%) had penetration/aspiration. The third VFSS was conducted on 9 patients. Of these, only two (22%) patients were still penetrator/aspirators. The majority (n = 37, 88%) of the patients presented a total oral intake without restrictions at the time of the final follow-up. Only one patient (2%) was still tube-dependent with consistent oral intake.

CONCLUSION

Swallowing physiology in patients with TCSCI improved during the first months after injury, and the number of penetrator/aspirators decreased progressively.