1
|
Meta F, Khalil LS, Ziedas AC, Gulledge CM, Muh SJ, Moutzouros V, Makhni EC. Preoperative Opioid Use Is Associated With Inferior Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Scores Following Rotator Cuff Repair. Arthroscopy 2022; 38:2787-2797. [PMID: 35398483 DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2022.03.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2021] [Revised: 03/20/2022] [Accepted: 03/22/2022] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine the influence of preoperative opioid use on Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores pre- and postoperatively in patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR). METHODS A retrospective review of all RCR patients aged >18 years old was performed. PROMIS pain interference ("PROMIS PI"), upper extremity function ("PROMIS UE"), and depression ("PROMIS D") scores, were reviewed. These measures were collected at preoperative, 6-month, and 1-year postoperative time points. A prescription drug-monitoring program was queried to track opioid prescriptions. Patients were categorized as chronic users, acute users, and nonusers based on prescriptions filled. Comparison of means were carried out using analysis of variance and least squares means. Effect sizes and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. RESULTS In total, 184 patients who underwent RCR were included. Preoperatively, nonusers (n = 92) had superior PROMIS UE (30.6 vs 28.9 vs 26.1; P < .05) and PI scores (61.5 vs 64.9 vs 65.3; P < .001) compared with acute users (n = 65) and chronic users (n = 27), respectively. At 6 months postoperatively; nonusers demonstrated significantly greater PROMIS UE (41.7 vs 35.6 vs. 33.5; P < .001), lower PROMIS D (41.6 vs 45.8 vs 51.1; P < .001), and lower PROMIS PI scores (50.7 vs 56.3 vs 58.1; P < .01) when compared with acute and chronic users, respectively. Nonusers had lower PROMIS PI (47.9 vs 54.3 vs 57.4; P < .0001) and PROMIS D (41.6 vs 48.3 vs 49.2; P = .0002) scores compared with acute and chronic users at 1-year postoperatively. Nonusers experienced a significantly greater magnitude of improvement in PROMIS D 6 months postoperatively compared with chronic opioid users (-5.9 vs 0.0; P < .01). CONCLUSIONS Patients undergoing RCR demonstrated superior PROMIS scores pre- and postoperatively if they did not use opioids within 3 months before surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III, retrospective comparative trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabien Meta
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, U.S.A..
| | - Lafi S Khalil
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, U.S.A
| | | | - Caleb M Gulledge
- Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, U.S.A
| | - Stephanie J Muh
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, U.S.A
| | - Vasilios Moutzouros
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, U.S.A
| | - Eric C Makhni
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Master H, Pennings JS, Coronado RA, Bley J, Robinette PE, Haug CM, Skolasky RL, Riley LH, Neuman BJ, Cheng JS, Aaronson OS, Devin CJ, Wegener ST, Archer KR. How Many Steps Per Day During the Early Postoperative Period are Associated With Patient-Reported Outcomes of Disability, Pain, and Opioid Use After Lumbar Spine Surgery? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2021; 102:1873-1879. [PMID: 34175276 DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2021.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2021] [Revised: 05/28/2021] [Accepted: 06/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate whether early postoperative walking is associated with "best outcome" and no opioid use at 1 year after lumbar spine surgery and establish a threshold for steps/day to inform clinical practice. DESIGN Secondary analysis from randomized controlled trial. SETTING Two academic medical centers in the United States. PARTICIPANTS We enrolled 248 participants undergoing surgery for a degenerative lumbar spine condition (N=248). A total of 212 participants (mean age, 62.8±11.4y, 53.3% female) had valid walking data at baseline. INTERVENTIONS Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Disability (Oswestry Disability Index), back and leg pain (Brief Pain Inventory), and opioid use (yes vs no) were assessed at baseline and 1 year after surgery. "Best outcome" was defined as Oswestry Disability Index ≤20, back pain ≤2, and leg pain ≤2. Steps/day (walking) was assessed with an accelerometer worn for at least 3 days and 10 h/d at 6 weeks after spine surgery, which was considered as study baseline. Separate multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to determine the association between steps/day at 6 weeks and "best outcome" and no opioid use at 1-year. Receiver operating characteristic curves identified a steps/day threshold for achieving outcomes. RESULTS Each additional 1000 steps/d at 6 weeks after spine surgery was associated with 41% higher odds of achieving "best outcome" (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15-1.74) and 38% higher odds of no opioid use (95% CI, 1.09-1.76) at 1 year. Walking ≥3500 steps/d was associated with 3.75 times the odds (95% CI, 1.56-9.02) of achieving "best outcome" and 2.37 times the odds (95% CI, 1.07-5.24) of not using opioids. CONCLUSIONS Walking early after surgery may optimize patient-reported outcomes after lumbar spine surgery. A 3500 steps/d threshold may serve as an initial recommendation during early postoperative counseling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiral Master
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Jacquelyn S Pennings
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Rogelio A Coronado
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Osher Center for Integrative Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Jordan Bley
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Payton E Robinette
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Christine M Haug
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Richard L Skolasky
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Lee H Riley
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Brian J Neuman
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Joseph S Cheng
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH
| | - Oran S Aaronson
- Howell Allen Clinic, Saint Thomas Medical Partners, Nashville, TN
| | - Clinton J Devin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; Steamboat Orthopedic and Spine Institute, Steamboat Springs, CO
| | - Stephen T Wegener
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Kristin R Archer
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Center for Musculoskeletal Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Osher Center for Integrative Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
| |
Collapse
|