How to select the lowest instrumented vertebra in Lenke type 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients?

Variations of Radiographic Parameters Relevant to the Presumed Lower Instrumented Vertebrae During Intraoperative Fluoroscopic Positioning for Lenke 5/6 Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

BACKGROUND

Radiographic evaluation of the presumed lower instrumented vertebrae (LIV) is crucial for determining the optimal fusion level for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) with main thoracolumbar/lumbar curves. However, few studies have examined its variations intraoperatively. This study aims to investigate the radiographic variations of the presumed LIV during fluoroscopic positioning to aid surgeons in decision-making.

METHODS

Lenke 5/6 AIS patients who underwent correction surgery in our center were consecutively recruited from January 2021 to December 2023. The spinal radiographs, including preoperative standing X-ray, recumbent computed tomography (CT), and intraoperative positioning fluoroscopy, were collected. The parameters of the presumed LIV were measured and compared. The correlation analysis was also performed to establish the liner regression equation.

RESULTS

Ninety-seven patients, comprising 23 boys and 74 girls, were enrolled, with an average main curve of 55.1 ± 11.0°. The vertebral body tilt and disc angle of the presumed LIV were 27.2 ± 6.2° and 8.5 ± 3.8° on preoperative standing X-rays, respectively, both significantly decreasing on CT images and intraoperative fluoroscopy. The rotation of the presumed LIV also showed significant differences intraoperatively. Significant correlations were observed between vertebral body tilt and disc angle across X-rays, CT images, and fluoroscopy. A linear equation was established for predicting intraoperative variations of the presumed LIV based on baseline X-rays.

CONCLUSIONS

This study firstly reports the radiographic variations of the presumed LIV using intraoperative positioning fluoroscopy for Lenke 5/6 AIS and establishes the correlation with baseline measurements. This information may assist surgeons in selecting the optimal LIV, but long-term follow-up is needed to evaluate its outcomes.

Is It Enough to Stop Distal Fusion at L3 in Mild to Moderate Lenke 5C Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients?

OBJECTIVE

There has been no definitive conclusion on the selection of the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) in Lenke 5C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether it is enough to stop distal fusion at L3 in mild to moderate Lenke 5C AIS patients with posterior selective lumbar fusion, Ponte osteotomies and segmental direct vertebra rotation and to analyze the risk factors for postoperative complications in patients selecting L3 as the LIV.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted on 106 Lenke 5C AIS patients who underwent corrective surgery in our institution from 2010 to 2021, with a minimum 2-year follow-up. The LIV was L3 or L4. According to the LIV, patients were initially divided into Group I (the LIV was L3) and Group II (the LIV was L4). Then, Group I was further divided into a complication group and a non-complication group. Demographics, radiological parameters, postoperative complications, and clinical outcomes were recorded. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic analysis were used to identify the risk factors for postoperative complications in patients with L3 as the LIV.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the demographics, radiological parameters, postoperative complications, or clinical outcomes between Group I and Group II (p > 0.05), and the outcomes were satisfactory in both groups. The main postoperative complications were distal adding-on (11 cases), coronal imbalance (16 cases), proximal junctional kyphosis (2 cases), and internal fixation failure (4 cases). Logistic regression analysis revealed that age and postoperative C7-CSVL were independent predictors of postoperative complications when selecting L3 as the LIV.

CONCLUSION

Terminating the distal fusion level at L3 was practical for mild to moderate Lenke 5C AIS patients. For patients selecting L3 as the LIV, younger patients should be cautious, and maintaining postoperative coronal balance is necessary for avoiding postoperative complications.

The Clinical Significance of the Lowest Instrumented Vertebra in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Selecting the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) in fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis is potentially the most nuanced decision a surgeon has to make. This article reviews the literature on the range-of-motion loss related to the LIV, ability to return to sports based on LIV, correlation between LIV and disk degeneration, and short-term and long-term clinical outcomes related to LIV.

Postoperative Coronal Imbalance in Lenke 5C Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Evolution, Risk Factors, and Clinical Implications

OBJECTIVE

To explore the changes in coronal imbalance (CIB) in Lenke 5C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) after posterior selective fusion surgery and determine their implications for surgical decision-making.

METHODS

One hundred twenty patients were categorized according to the preoperative coronal pattern (type A, coronal balance distance [CBD]<20 mm; type B, CBD≥20 mm and coronal C7 plumbline [C7PL] shifted to the concave side of the curve; type C, CBD≥20 mm and C7PL shifted to the convex side of the curve). CIB group (CIB+) was defined as having a CBD≥20 mm at the 2-year follow-up.

RESULTS

Compared to type A patients, the prevalence of postoperative CIB was higher in type C patients both immediately postoperative (22% vs. 38%, p<0.05) and at the final follow-up (5% vs. 29%, p<0.05), whereas type A patients showed a greater improvement in CBD (9 of 12 vs. 6 of 24, p<0.05) at the final follow-up. The majority of patients in all groups had recovered to type A at the final follow-up (96 of 120). The proximal Cobb-1 strategy reduced the incidence of postoperative CIB (1 of 38) at the 2-year follow-up, especially in preoperative type C patients. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that type C and overcorrection of the thoracolumbar curve were risk factors for CIB at the 2-year follow-up (p=0.007 and p=0.026, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Patients with type C CIB in AIS exhibited unsatisfactory restoration, with 29% of them exhibiting CIB at the final follow-up. The selective fusion strategy of proximal Cobb-1 may reduce the risk of postoperative CIB especially when the preoperative coronal pattern is type C.

Comparable rates of lumbar disc degeneration at long-term following adolescent idiopathic scoliosis spinal fusion extended to L3 or L4: systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) requires a careful choice of fusion levels. The usual recommendation for the selection of the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) for double major or thoracolumbar/lumbar (TL/L) curves falls on L3 or L4. The aim of the present study is to assess if the spinal fusion with LIV selection of L3 or L4 in AIS patients has a clinical or radiological impact in terms of degenerative disc disease (DDD) in distal unfused segments at long-term follow-up.

METHODS

A systematic search of electronic databases from eligible articles was conducted. Only studies regarding long-term follow-up of AIS patients treated with spinal fusion were included. Clinical and radiographic outcomes were extracted and summarized. Meta-analysis on long-term follow-up MRI studies was performed. p value < 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies were included, for a total of 1264 patients. Clinical assessment of included patients showed a slight tendency to have worse clinical outcomes if spinal fusion is extended to L4 rather than L3. Despite that, meta-analysis could not be performed on clinical parameters because of heterogeneity of evaluated PROMs in included studies. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluation at long-term follow-up showed no significant difference in terms of disc degeneration rate at overall meta-analysis (p = 0.916) between patients fused to L3 and L4.

CONCLUSION

The LIV selection of L3 rather than L4, according to current literature, does not prevent disc degeneration in distal unfused segments over the long term. Long-term studies of patients treated with contemporary spinal instrumentation are needed.

Lowest Instrumented Vertebra at L3 Versus L4 in Posterior Fusion for Moderate Lenke 5C Type Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Case-Match Radiological Study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the radiological outcomes in Lenke 5C type patients whose lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) was L3 or L4 in a case-match study.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective case-match study and included 82 patients in the study. Radiological results before surgery, after surgery, and at last follow-up were recorded and analyzed in the L3 and L4 groups.

RESULTS

After matching the age, Risser's sign, sex, and main Cobb, 41 pairs of patients were enrolled in our study. The total fusion segments in the L3 group (median [interquartile range]: 5.0 [6.0-5.0]) were shorter than those in the L4 group (6.0 [6.5-6.0]). The main curve was significantly corrected after surgery in both groups, and was comparable at the last followup between groups. In addition, according to the results of Fisher precision probability test, there was no significant difference of coronal or sagittal imbalance between the 2 groups at the 2-year follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The correction in coronal and sagittal planes in L3 group and L4 group remains similar. On account of more motion segments, L3 could be an ideal choice as LIV in moderate Lenke 5C type AIS. Long-term follow-up is needed to evaluate the effect of larger compensatory lumbar-sacral curve when stopping at L3.

Rotational Assessment of Thoracolumbar/Lumbar Curves According to Lowest Instrumented Vertebra Level

Background

It is not clearly defined in the literature how the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) selection effects the rotation of lumbar vertebrae at fused and unfused levels in thoracolumbar/lumbar (TL/L) curves. The aim of this study was to evaluate the rotational profile of structural TL/L curves, corrected with rod derotation manoeuvre, according to LIV level.

Methods

82 consecutive AIS patients with structural TL/L curves who were treated with long segment posterior instrumentation and fusion were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were divided into three groups according to LIV level: lower end vertebra (LEV) group (32 patients), LEV-1 group (23 patients) and LEV + 1 group (27 patients). Cobb angles of structural curves, coronal and sagittal balance were evaluated with direct roentgenograms. Rotation of upper end vertebra, apical vertebra, LIV-1, LIV and LIV + 1 was evaluated with computerised tomography. Clinical outcomes were assessed using SRS-22 questionnaire.

Results

Mean follow-up time was 31 months (range 24-42 months). Preoperative LIV rotation was measured as 16.03°, 16.08° and 12.68° in LEV, LEV-1 and LEV + 1 groups, which changed postoperatively as 13.36°, 16.52° and 9.74° respectively. Postoperative LIV-1, LIV and LIV + 1 rotation values were significantly higher in LEV-1 group compared to LEV + 1 group. None of the patients developed coronal or sagittal imbalance. No significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of SRS-22 scores.

Conclusions

Axial rotation of LIV and vertebrae adjacent to LIV is higher when the fusion is stopped at LEV-1. However, higher rotation does not seem to cause poor radiologic and clinical outcomes in the last follow-up.

Posterior spinal fusion with lowest instrumented vertebra at L4 in idiopathic scoliosis: optimizing radiographic outcomes using pre-operative flexibility radiographs

PURPOSE

In idiopathic scoliosis (IS), there is general agreement ending PSFs at L3 or more cranial is preferred to optimize spinal motion, and extending PSFs to L4 may be necessary; however, this may also cause coronal imbalance or caudal disc wedging post-operatively due to leveling of L4 tilt. The purpose of this study was to identify a pre-operative radiographic measurement, which can be used to quantify the optimal amount of L4 tilt for ideal post-operative radiographic alignment.

METHODS

The study was a retrospective analysis of IS patients who underwent PSF to L4, with minimum 2-year follow-up post-operatively. Optimal outcome was defined by coronal balance, and L4-5 and L5-S1 disc wedging.

RESULTS

44 patients (84% females, mean age 13.6 years) were included. Analysis of pre-operative flexibility radiographs determined only the L5 tilt on the right side-bending (RSB) radiograph correlated with optimal outcome 2 (p = 0.03). To confirm the validity, the RSB value was subtracted from the post-operative C7-L4 tilt and the odds ratio analysis which was significantly correlated with optimal outcome 1 at final follow-up (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1-1.09).

CONCLUSIONS

In PSF to L4 for IS, L5 tilt measured from the pre-operative supine RSB radiograph can be used to optimize radiographic outcomes. Matching the pre-operative L5 tilt on RSB radiograph by leaving L4 tilted at the end of the PSF construct during surgery, quantified by the C7-L4 acute angle tilt, appears to be a useful method to achieve the desired post-operative alignment.

Relationship between lumbosacral transitional vertebra and postoperative outcomes of patients with Lenke 5C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a minimum 5-year follow-up study

PURPOSE

To assess the incidence of lumbosacral transitional vertebra (LSTV) in Lenke 5C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and evaluate the relationship between postoperative outcomes and LSTV when the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) is fixed at L3.

METHODS

The study included 61 patients with Lenke 5C AIS who underwent fusion surgery of L3 as the LIV who were followed-up for a minimum of 5 years. Patients were divided into two groups: LSTV + and LSTV-. Demographic, surgical, and radiographic data, including L4 tilt and thoracolumbar/lumbar (TL/L) Cobb angle, were obtained and analyzed.

RESULTS

LSTV was observed in 15 patients (24.5%). The L4 tilt was not significantly different between the two groups preoperatively (P = 0.54); however, it was significantly greater in the LSTV group postoperatively (2 weeks: LSTV +  = 11.7 ± 3.1, LSTV -  = 8.8 ± 3.2, P = 0.013; 2 years: LSTV +  = 11.5 ± 3.5, LSTV -  = 7.9 ± 4.1, P = 0.006; 5 years: LSTV +  = 9.8 ± 3.1, LSTV -  = 7.3 ± 4.5,  P= 0.042). The postoperative TL/L curve was greater in the LSTV + group, with significant differences at 2 weeks and 2 years postoperatively (preoperative: LSTV +  = 53.5 ± 11.2, LSTV -  = 51.7 ± 10.3,P = 0.675; 2 weeks: LSTV +  = 16.1 ± 5.0, LSTV- = 12.2 ± 6.6, P = 0.027; 2 years: LSTV +  = 21.7 ± 5.9, LSTV -  = 17.6 ± 5.9, P = 0.035; 5 years: LSTV +  = 18.7 ± 5.8, LSTV -  = 17.0 ± 6.1, P = 0.205).

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of LSTV in Lenke 5C AIS patients was 24.5%. Lenke 5C AIS patients with LSTV with the LIV at L3 had a significantly greater postoperative L4 tilt than those without LSTV and retained the TL/L curve.

Posterior-only correction surgery for idiopathic scoliosis Lenke type 5c: differences of strategies and outcomes between adult patients and adolescent patients

PURPOSE

To compare radiographic parameters, and functional and surgical outcomes between lumbar adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and lumbar adult idiopathic scoliosis (AdIS).

METHODS

A retrospective study was performed to identify Lenke 5c type AIS and AdIS patients from our scoliosis database who had undergone posterior surgical treatment for scoliosis. Preoperative and postoperative radiographic and clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

A total of 22 patients were included in AdIS group, and 44 matched patients in AIS group. AdIS group had significantly larger L3 and L4 tilt and translation than AIS group (P < 0.05). AdIS group had larger T10-L2 angle and smaller T5-T12 angle (P < 0.05). AdIS group had higher VAS scores (P < 0.05) and pain domain of SRS-22 scores (P < 0.05) as compared to AIS group. Correlation analysis demonstrated positive relationship between VAS scores and T10-L2 angle (r = 0.492, P < 0.05). AdIS group was fused longer than AIS group (P < 0.05). Cobb angle of TL/L curve was larger and correction ratio was smaller at AdIS group (P < 0.05). AdIS group still had significantly larger L3 and L4 tilt and translation than AIS group (P < 0.05). CT measurements demonstrated larger postoperative vertebral body rotation at apical vertebrae and LIV at AdIS group (P < 0.05). Vertebral correction ratio was smaller at AdIS group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Lenke 5c AdIS patients had greater preoperative and postoperative L3 and L4 tilt and translation, as well as less correction of major curve and vertebral body derotation than AIS patients. However, the incidence of adding-on was similar between the two groups.

Defining "successful" treatment outcomes in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a scoping review

PURPOSE

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is the most common type of scoliosis that affects children aged 10-18 years old, manifesting in a three-dimensional spinal deformity. This study aimed to explore outcome measures used in defining AIS treatment success. Particularly, analyzing the extent of qualitative and quantitative (radiographic and quality of life domains) measures to evaluate AIS and whether AIS treatment approaches (surgical, bracing and physiotherapy) influences outcomes used as proxies of treatment success.

METHODS

EMBASE and MEDLINE databases were used to conduct a systematic scoping review with 654 search queries. 158 papers met the inclusion criteria and were screened for data extraction. Extractable variables included: study characteristics, study participant characteristics, type of study, type of intervention approach and outcome measures.

RESULTS

All 158 studies measured quantitative outcomes. 61.38% of papers used radiographic outcomes whilst 38.62% of papers used quantitative quality of life outcomes to evaluate treatment success. Irrespective of treatment intervention utilized, the type of quantitative outcome measure recorded were similar in proportion. Moreover, of the radiographic outcome measures, the subcategory Cobb angle was predominantly used across all intervention approaches. For quantitative quality of life measures, questionnaires investigating multiple domains such as SRS were primarily used as proxies of AIS treatment success across all intervention approaches.

CONCLUSION

This study identified that no articles employed qualitative measures of describing the psychosocial implications of AIS in defining treatment success. Although quantitative measures have merit in clinical diagnoses and management, there is increasing value in using qualitative methods such as thematic analysis in guiding clinicians to develop a biopsychosocial approach for patient care.

How to make a more optimal surgical plan for Lenke 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients: a comparative study based on the changes of the sagittal alignment and selection of the lowest instrumented vertebra

BACKGROUND

The treatment of patients with Lenke 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is closely related to the pelvic because the spine-pelvis is an interacting whole. Besides, the choice of fusion segment is a significant issue; with the optimal choice, there will be fewer complications and restoring the pelvic morphology to some extent. This study aims to analyze the impact of changes in sagittal parameters and selection of the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) on spine and pelvic morphology for better surgical strategy.

METHOD

Ninety-four patients with Lenke 5 AIS who underwent selective posterior thoracolumbar/lumbar (TL/L) curve fusion were included in the study and grouped according to pelvic morphology and position of LIV. Spinopelvic parameters were measured preoperatively, postoperatively, and at the latest follow-up. The patient's preoperative and last follow-up quality of life was assessed with the MOS item short-form health survey (SF-36) and scoliosis research society 22-item (SRS-22).

RESULT

Patients being posterior pelvic tilt had the oldest mean age (P = 0.010), the smallest lumbar lordosis (LL) (P = 0.036), the smallest thoracic kyphosis (TK) (P = 0.399) as well as the smallest proximal junctional angle (PJA) while those being anterior pelvic tilt had the largest PJA. The follow-up TK significantly increased in both groups of anterior and normal pelvic tilt (P < 0.039, P < 0.006) while no significant changes were observed in the posterior pelvic tilt group. When LIV is above L4, the follow-up PJA was larger than other groups (P = 0.049, P = 0.006). When LIV is below L4, the follow-up TK and PT were larger and LL was smaller than other groups(P < 0.05). The SF-36 and SRS-22 scores were better in the LIV = L4 group than in other groups at the last follow-up (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The correction of TK and LL after surgery can improve pelvic morphology. Besides, LIV is best set at L4, which will facilitate the recovery of TK, the improvement of symptoms, and the prevention of complications and pelvic deformities. Level of evidence Level III.

How to select the lowest instrumented vertebra in NF-1 non-dystrophic scoliosis

PURPOSE

To investigate lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) selection strategy for neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF-1) non-dystrophic scoliosis.

METHODS

Consecutive eligible subjects with NF-1 non-dystrophic scoliosis were included. All patients were followed up at least for 24 months. Enrolled patients with LIV in stable vertebra were divided into stable vertebra group (SV group), and the other patients with LIV above the stable vertebra were divided into above stable vertebra group (ASV group). Demographic data, operative data, preoperative and postoperative radiographic data, and clinical outcome were collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

There were 14 patients in SV group (ten males and four females, mean age 13.9 ± 4.1 years) and 14 patients in ASV group (nine males and five females, mean age 12.9 ± 3.5 years). The mean follow-up period was 31.7 ± 17.4 months for patients in SV group and 33.6 ± 17.4 months for patients in ASV group, respectively. No significant differences were found in demographic data between two groups. The coronal Cobb angle, C7-CSVL, AVT, LIVDA, LIV tilt and SRS-22 questionnaire outcome significantly improved at the final follow-up in both groups. However, significantly higher loss of correction rate and increasement of LIVDA were found in ASV group. Two patients (14.3%) in ASV group but none in SV group suffered adding-on phenomenon.

CONCLUSIONS

Although patients in both SV and ASV groups obtained improved therapeutic efficacy at final follow-up, the radiographic and clinical outcome seemed more likely to deteriorate in ASV group after surgery. The stable vertebra should be recommended as LIV for NF-1 non-dystrophic scoliosis.

Influence of Lateral Translation of Lowest Instrumented Vertebra on L4 Tilt and Coronal Balance for Thoracolumbar and Lumbar Curves in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

This study aimed to evaluate the lowest instrumented vertebra translation (LIV-T) in the surgical treatment of thoracolumbar/lumbar adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and to analyze the radiographic parameters in relation to LIV-T and L4 tilt and global coronal balance. A total of 62 patients underwent posterior spinal fusion (PSF, n = 32) or anterior spinal fusion (ASF, n = 30) and were followed up for a minimum of 2 years. The mean preoperative LIV-T was significantly larger in the ASF group than the PSF (p < 0.01), while the final LIV-T was equivalent. LIV-T at the final follow-up was significantly correlated with L4 tilt and the global coronal balance (r = 0.69, p < 0.01, r = 0.38, p < 0.01, respectively). Receiver-operating characteristic analysis for good outcomes, with L4 tilt <8° and coronal balance <15 mm at the final follow-up, calculated the cutoff value of the final LIV-T as 12 mm. The cutoff value of preoperative LIV-T that would result in the LIV-T of ≤12 mm at the final follow-up was 32 mm in PSF, although no significant cutoff value was calculated in ASF. ASF can centralize the LIV better than PSF with a shorter segment fusion, and could be useful in obtaining a good curve correction and global balance without fixation to L4 in cases with large preoperative LIV-T.

Distal adding-on after surgery in Lenke 5C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: clinical and radiological outcomes

Background

To evaluate the incidence and risk factors of postoperative distal adding-on in patients with Lenke 5C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). More accurate selection criteria for the lower instrumented vertebra (LIV) should be confirmed to prevent distal adding-on.

Methods

Forty-six patients with Lenke 5C AIS who underwent posterior fusion were enrolled in the study. Patients were allocated into adding-on and no adding-on groups. Demographic data, clinical data, and radiographic parameters were recorded and compared.

Results

Postoperative distal adding-on occurred in eight patients (17.4%) during follow-up. Demographic data, clinical data, and baseline radiographic parameters of the two groups were not significantly different. The postoperative thoracolumbar (TL) or lumbar (L) Cobb angle, LIV translation, and LIV + 1 translation were higher in the adding-on group than those in the no adding-on group, while the postoperative coronal imbalance of the adding-on group was lower than that of the no adding-on group. The level difference of last barely touched vertebra (LBTV) and last substantial touched vertebra (LSTV) with LIV were higher in the adding-on group than in the no adding-on group.

Conclusion

Postoperative TL/L curve, postoperative LIV translation, postoperative LIV + 1 translation, and postoperative coronal imbalance were determined as risk factors for postoperative distal adding-on in patients with Lenke 5C AIS. Moreover, LIV selection of LBTV-1 or LSTV-1 may cause a higher risk of postoperative distal adding-on.

Prediction of long-term postoperative results of disc wedge and vertebral tilt with intraoperative prone radiograph in posterior correction of thoracolumbar/lumbar curve in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a minimum 5-year follow-up

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Preservation of the more mobile lumbar segments is important during thoracolumbar/lumbar scoliosis surgery; however, the remaining disc wedge angle (DWA) below lowermost instrumented vertebra (LIV) and vertebral body tilt below LIV (LIV+1 tilt) can cause curve progression.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of intraoperative radiograph to predict the postoperative DWA below LIV and LIV+1 tilt on standing radiographs in patients with LIV of L3 or L4.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Retrospective cohort study PATIENT SAMPLE: A total of 235 patients with idiopathic scoliosis who underwent posterior correction and fusion for the structural thoracolumbar curve and were followed up for >5 years were reviewed.

OUTCOME MEASURES

DWA below LIV, LIV+1 tilt, Cobb angle, trunk shift, apical vertebra translation, and pelvic parameters were measured.

METHODS

Correlation between intraoperative and postoperative measurements of DWA below LIV and LIV+1 tilt were assessed. Additional analysis was performed to identify risk factors and prognosis of LIV+1 tilt ≥10° and DWA below LIV of ≥4° RESULTS: LIV+1 tilt measured on intraoperative radiograph was significantly correlated with the postoperative 5-day and postoperative 5-year evaluation in both groups. However, the intraoperative DWA below LIV was only correlated with the postoperative 5-year value in the L3 group (p=.018). At the 5-year follow-up, patients with LIV+1 tilt ≥10° on intraoperative radiography showed significantly greater LIV+1 tilt (p<.001), apical vertebral translation (p<.001), thoracic curve (p=.008), and thoracolumbar curve (p<.001) than patients with LIV+1 tilt <10°. Intraoperative DWA below LIV of ≥4° was only associated with higher DWA below LIV at the 5-year follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative measurement of LIV+1 tilt was correlated with long-term postoperative outcomes, and intraoperative LIV+1 tilt ≥10° was associated with a less favorable radiographic outcome. Intraoperative DWA below LIV demonstrated less correlation with postoperative values and was not a prognostic factor for other radiographic parameters.

How to select the lowest instrumented vertebra in Lenke 5/6 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients with derotation technique

PURPOSE

To introduce and evaluate our lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) selection criteria for Lenke type 5/6 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients with de-rotation technique.

METHODS

There were 53 eligible Lenke 5/6 AIS patients with minimum 2-year follow-up enrolled in current study. The LIV selection criteria were: (1) the first vertebra touching the central sacral vertical line (CSVL) or the most cephalad vertebra which can return to stable zone under lateral bending position; (2) vertebral rotation no more than grade II by Nash-Moe rotation evaluation; (3) the lowest instrumented vertebra disc angle (LIVDA) could be reversed on lateral bending position. Demographic data, operation data and radiographic data were obtained and analyzed.

RESULTS

Both clinical evaluation and radiographic data showed satisfactory outcome. The thoracolumbar/lumbar curve was improved from 53.4 ± 11.0° preoperatively to 6.9 ± 2.6° at the final follow-up. Two patients (3.8%) with adding on and two patients (3.8%) with coronal decompensation were identified at the final follow-up. LIV translation, LIV tilt and LIV disc angle were gradually improved after operation. The preoperative LIV tilt was positively correlated with Cobb angle (p = 0.010) and AVT (p = 0.030) at the final follow-up, and preoperative LIVDA was positively correlated with Cobb angle (p = 0.033) at the final follow-up.

CONCLUSION

In Lenke 5/6 scoliosis, the current LIV selection criteria with de-rotation technique contribute to satisfactory correction rate of 87.1% and minimal alignment complications of 7.6%. LIV could be spontaneously and progressively improved after operation. Preoperative LIV tilt and LIVDA could predict postoperative correction and coronal balance.