How do C2 tilt and C2 slope correlate with patient reported outcomes in patients after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion?

Odontoid Parameters in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

The purposes of this study were to compare the characteristics of odontoid parameters between subjects with and without adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and to investigate the correlation between odontoid parameters and other cervical sagittal parameters.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Previous studies have shown that odontoid parameters are important parameters related to cervical sagittal alignment. However, there are few reports on odontoid parameters in patients with AIS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between November 2022 and November 2023, 42 AIS patients (AIS group) underwent standing erect whole-spine posteroanterior and lateral full-spine digital radiography. Correspondingly, 28 sex- and age-matched normal adolescents (control group) were enrolled. Odontoid parameters and other cervical sagittal parameters, including odontoid incidence (OI), odontoid tilt (OT), C2 slope (C2S), T1 slope (T1S), C0-2 angle, C2-7 angle (CL), and T1S-CL, were measured via standing plain radiographs. Pearson correlation and linear regression were used to compare the sagittal parameters between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of cervical sagittal parameters, including OI, OT, C2S, C0-2 angle, or T1S-CL. After Bonferroni correction, in the AIS group, OI was significantly correlated with C2S (r=0.37, P<0.05) and T1S-CL (r=0.34, P<0.05). OI matched with the C0-2 angle (r2=0.081), and T1S-CL (r2=0.093). In the control group, after Bonferroni correction, OI was significantly correlated with C2S (r=0.49, P<0.01) and T1S-CL (r=0.40, P<0.05). OI matched with T1S-CL (r2=0.130).

CONCLUSIONS

OI is a constant cervical anatomic parameter closely related to other cervical sagittal parameters and was not affected by adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Comparison between atlantoaxial and occipitocervical fusion: clinical implications of restoring the atlanto-occipital joint

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Cervical myelopathy originating from high cervical pathology is typically managed through stabilization constructs, with the most common options being atlantoaxial fusion (AAF) and occipitocervical fusion (OCF). However, a well-established comparison of the 2 techniques in terms of clinical and radiological outcomes has not been made.

PURPOSE

Compare the surgical outcomes of AAF and OCF with a minimum follow-up period of 2 years.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

A total of 64 patients who underwent AAF (n=46) and OCF (n=18) to treat cervical myelopathy were retrospectively reviewed.

OUTCOME MEASURE

Neck pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Neck Disability Index (NDI), Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores and postoperative complications were assessed as clinical outcomes. For the radiological outcomes, cervical sagittal parameters including C0-2 lordosis, C2-7 lordosis, C0-7 lordosis, neck range of motion (ROM), C2-7 sagittal vertical axis, C2 sagittal tilt, T1 slope, chin brow vertical angle and McGregor slope were evaluated.

METHODS

Continuous variables between AAF and OCF were compared using either the Mann-Whitney U test or an independent T-test. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was utilized to compare variables across preoperative, 1-month postoperative, and final follow-up periods.

RESULTS

Both the AAF and OCF groups did not show any significant differences in the total NDI score, VAS for neck pain, and JOA score when comparing preoperative and postoperative evaluations. However, at 1 month postoperatively (AAF group, 2.63; OCF group, 8.00: p=.006) and final follow-ups (AAF group, 3.08; OCF group, 7.82: p=.003), the OCF group showed a significant decline in the lifting function compared to the AAF group. Furthermore, the decrease in neck ROM was significantly more severe in the OCF group compared to the AAF group (AAF group, -6.4°; OCF group, -20.1°: p=.010).

CONCLUSIONS

The OCF has the potential to limit neck movement and impede lifting capabilities after the surgery. Hence, the AAF is advisable over the OCF, especially for younger individuals or those involved in strenuous physical work.

Lower C2 slope and milder uncovertebral joint degeneration are risk factors for pseudarthrosis after single-level anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF): retrospective study of 102 patients with minimum 2-year follow-up

BACKGROUND

Achieving bony fusion after anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion is crucial for restoring spinal stability; however, the risk factors associated with fusion failure, or pseudarthrosis, remain unclear. This study aims to identify risk factors for pseudarthrosis following anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion and evaluate the impact of C2 slope and uncovertebral joint degeneration on this condition.

METHODS

Patients who underwent single-level anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion between May 2015 and April 2022 and had a minimum of 2 years of computed tomography follow-up were retrospectively enrolled. Preoperative demographic, surgical, clinical, and radiographic data were collected. Patients were divided into fusion and pseudarthrosis groups based on fusion status evaluated at the final follow-up computed tomography. After identifying statistically significant variables through intergroup comparisons, multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to determine the risk factors for pseudarthrosis.

RESULTS

A total of 102 patients were included in the study, with an average follow-up duration of 3.78 ± 1.70 years. At final follow-up, 37 patients (36.3%) developed pseudarthrosis, while 65 patients (63.7%) achieved fusion. No significant differences were observed in demographic and clinical parameters between the groups. The pseudarthrosis group exhibited significantly greater preoperative C2-7 Cobb angles (p = 0.029), segment range of motion (p < 0.001), lower C2 slope (p < 0.001), and less severe uncovertebral joint degeneration grades (p = 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that, after adjustment, greater segment range of motion (p = 0.003), lower C2 slope (p = 0.006), and milder uncovertebral joint degeneration grades (p = 0.023) were significant risk factors for pseudarthrosis following single-level anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion. The area under the curve of the regression model was 0.867.

CONCLUSIONS

Lower preoperative C2 slope, greater segment range of motion, and milder uncovertebral joint degeneration grades may be risk factors for pseudarthrosis following anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion. These characteristics should be further considered in surgical planning to identify high-risk patients.

Can Preoperative C2 Slope Predict Postoperative Cervical Sagittal Imbalance After Laminoplasty?

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the impact of preoperative C2 slope (C2S) on change in sagittal vertical axis (SVA) and postoperative cervical sagittal imbalance (CSI) after laminoplasty (LP).

METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent LP between January 2015 and January 2022 with a minimum of 12-month follow-up were reviewed. The clinical variables and radiographic measurements were assessed. Patients were divided into improvement (ΔcSVA ≤ -10 mm), stable (-10 mm ≤ ΔcSVA <10 mm), and CSI groups (ΔcSVA≥10 mm). Correlation analysis was performed to explore the associations between ΔcSVA and preoperative factors, postoperative change and outcome variables. Multivariable logistics regression was conducted to determine the factors predicting CSI.

RESULTS

Over the 186 enrolled patients, 23 developed CSI. The CSI group presented with significantly lower preoperative cSVA, greater cervical lordosis (CL) and C2S. At the final follow-up, the CSI group presented significantly higher increase in neck pain, C2S and C7S, and greater loss in CL and range of motion at flexion position. Correlation analysis revealed that ΔcSVA is correlated positively to preoperative CL and surgical segments and negatively to preoperative C2S and cSVA. Multivariable regression revealed that lower preoperative C2S (P = 0.026) was risk factor for postoperative CSI, with 8.9 as a potential cut-off value for C2S.

CONCLUSIONS

Lower preoperative C2S slope was risk factor for post-laminoplasty CSI. The cut-off value of C2S was 8.9. Laminoplasty should be carefully considered for patients with low C2S due to risk of postoperative CSI.

The effect of cervical spine flexion-extension motion on odontoid parameters

OBJECTIVE

To assess the stability of odontoid parameters on flexion-extension motion and to validate the accuracy of the physiological cervical lordosis (CL) predictive formula across different cervical positions.

METHODS

Standard cervical spine lateral radiographs in neutral, flexion, and extension positions were collected to measure odontoid incidence (OI), odontoid tilt (OT), C2 slope (C2S), CL, T1 slope (T1S), and T1S minus CL (T1S-CL). Friedman's test was used to assess the differences in parameters among the three cervical spine positions. The predictive performance of the formula CL = 0.36× OI - 0.67 × OT - 0.69 × T1S was assessed and validated using the Pearson correlation coefficient (r), coefficient of determination (R²), mean squared error (MSE), and mean absolute error (MAE).

RESULTS

No significant differences were found for OI and T1S among the three different cervical spine positions (p = 0.162 and p = 0.186, respectively). There was a strong, significant positive correlation between the predicted value and actual value of physiological CL at three cervical positions (neutral, flexion, and extension). The predictions for the neutral position were the most accurate, with statistical measures of r = 0.85 (p < 0.01), R²=0.82, MAE = 4.28, and MSE = 27.77.

CONCLUSION

OI is a stable and reliable anatomic parameter, not affected by cervical spine flexion-extension motion. OI can serve as a supplementary parameter for evaluating cervical sagittal balance and compensatory ability. The formula CL = 0.36×OI - 0.67×OT - 0.69×T1S provides the best predictions for physiological CL in the neutral position.

A Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Versus Posterior Cervical Laminoplasty for Multilevel Cervical Myelopathy

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective Cohort.

OBJECTIVE

To compare patient-reported outcomes and surgical outcomes after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) versus cervical laminoplasty for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

BACKGROUND

Treatment options for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy include ACDF and cervical laminoplasty. Given that the literature has been mixed regarding the optimal approach, especially in patients without kyphosis, there is a need for additional studies investigating outcomes between ACDF and cervical laminoplasty.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of adult patients undergoing 3 or 4-level surgery. Patients with preoperative kyphosis based on C2-C7 Cobb angles were excluded. The electronic medical record and institutional databases were reviewed for baseline characteristics, surgical outcomes, and patient-reported outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 101 patients who underwent ACDF and 52 patients who underwent laminoplasty were included in the study. The laminoplasty cohort had a higher overall Charlson Comorbidity Index (3.10 ± 1.43 vs 2.39 ± 1.57, P = 0.011). Both groups had a comparable number of levels decompressed, C2-C7 lordosis, and diagnosis of myelopathy versus myeloradiculopathy. Patients who underwent laminoplasty had a longer length of stay (2.04 ± 1.15 vs 1.48 ± 0.70, P = 0.003) but readmission, complication, and revision rates were similar. Both groups had similar improvement in myelopathy scores (∆modified Japanese Orthopedic Association: 1.11 ± 3.09 vs 1.06 ± 3.37, P = 0.639). ACDF had greater improvement in Neck Disability Index (∆Neck Disability Index: -11.66 ± 19.2 vs -1.13 ± 11.2, P < 0.001), neck pain (∆Visual Analog Scale-neck: -2.69 ± 2.78 vs -0.83 ± 2.55, P = 0.003), and arm pain (∆Visual Analog Scale-arm: -2.47 ± 3.15 vs -0.48 ± 3.19, P = 0.010). These findings persisted in multivariate analysis except for Neck Disability Index.

CONCLUSION

ACDF and cervical laminoplasty appear equally efficacious at halting myelopathic progression. However, patients who underwent ACDF had greater improvements in arm pain at 1 year postoperatively. Longitudinal studies evaluating the efficacy of laminoplasty to mitigate adjacent segment disease are indicated to establish a robust risk-benefit assessment for these 2 procedures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

The Significance of Odontoid Incidence in Patients With Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy

STUDY DESIGN

Observational study.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the cervical sagittal parameters for standing Digital radiography (DR) and supine Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and to further clarify the relationship between odontoid incidence (OI) and cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM).

METHODS

52 CSM patients aged 54.46 ± 2.89 years underwent both standing DR and supine MRI scans of cervical spine between November 2021 and November 2022. OI, odontoid tilt (OT), C2 slope (C2S), T1 slope (T1S), C0-2 angle, C2-7 angle (cervical lordosis [CL]), and T1S-CL were measured in both DR and MRI images using Surgimap (Version 2.3.2.1). Pearson correlation and linear regression were used to compare these parameters between the two modalities.

RESULTS

Cervical sagittal parameters, including OI, OT, C2S, C0-2 angle, T1S, C2-7 angle (CL) and T1S-CL, showed no significant differences in the measurements between the two modalities. Based on the DR images, OI was related to OT (r = .386, P < .01), C2S (r = .505, P < .01), CL (r = -.412, P < .01), and T1S-CL (r = .320, P < .05), and OI was matched with CL (r2 = .170) and T1S-CL (r2 = .102). Based on MRI images, OI was related to OT (r = .433, P < .01), C2S (r = .516, P < .01), CL (r = -.355, P < .01), and T1S-CL (r = .271, P < .05), and OI matched with C2-7 (r2 = .126) and T1S-CL (r2 = .073).

CONCLUSION

OI is an independent parameter related to cervical anatomy and its measurement is unaffected by external factors. In patients with CSM, odontoid parameters may effectively describe the sagittal alignment of the cervical spine on DR and MRI images.

Zero-profile implant system versus novel plate systems after ACDF for comparison of sagittal balance parameters and clinical efficacy analysis

BACKGROUND

The zero-profile implant system (Zero-P) and conventional plates have been widely used in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) to treat cervical spondylosis. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of the application of Zero-P and new conventional plates (ZEVO, Skyline) in ACDF on the sagittal imaging parameters of cervical spondylosis patients and to analyze their clinical efficacy.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study on 119 cervical spondylosis patients from January 2018 to December 2021, comparing outcomes between those receiving the Zero-P device (n = 63) and those receiving a novel conventional plate (n = 56, including 46 ZEVO and 10 Skyline plates) through ACDF. Cervical sagittal alignment was assessed pre- and postoperatively via lateral radiographs. The Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA), Neck Disability Index (NDI), and visual analog scale (VAS) scores were recorded at baseline, after surgery, and at the 2-year follow-up to evaluate patient recovery and intervention success.

RESULTS

There were significant differences in the postoperative C0-C2 Cobb angle and postoperative sagittal segmental angle (SSA) between patients in the novel conventional plate group and those in the Zero-P group (P < 0.05). Postoperatively, there were significant changes in the C2‒C7 Cobb angle, C0‒C2 Cobb angle, SSA, and average surgical disc height (ASDH) compared to the preoperative values in both patient groups (P < 0.05). Dysphagia in the immediate postoperative period was lower in the Zero-P group than in the new conventional plate group (0% in the Zero-P group, 7.14% in the novel conventional plate group, P = 0.046), and the symptoms disappeared within 2 years in both groups. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of complications of adjacent spondylolisthesis (ASD) at 2 years postoperatively (3.17% in the Zero-P group, 8.93% in the novel conventional plate group; P = 0.252). According to the subgroup analysis, there were significant differences in the postoperative C2‒C7 Cobb angle, C0‒C2 Cobb angle, T1 slope, and ASDH between the ZEVO group and the Skyline group (P < 0.05). Compared with the preoperative scores, the JOA, NDI, and VAS scores of all groups significantly improved at the 2-year follow-up (P < 0.01). According to the subgroup analysis, the immediate postoperative NDI and VAS scores of the ZEVO group were significantly better than those of the Skyline group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

In ACDF, both novel conventional plates and Zero-P can improve sagittal parameters and related scale scores. Compared to the Zero-P plate, the novel conventional plate has a greater advantage in correcting the curvature of the surgical segment, but the Zero-P plate is less likely to produce postoperative dysphagia.

Impact of Frailty and Cervical Radiographic Parameters on Postoperative Dysphagia Following Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review of a prospectively collected registry.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the impact of frailty and radiographical parameters on postoperative dysphagia after anterior cervical spine surgery (ACSS).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

There is a growing body of literature indicating an association between frailty and increased postoperative complications following various surgeries. However, few studies have investigated the relationship between frailty and postoperative dysphagia after anterior cervical spine surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent anterior cervical spine surgery for the treatment of degenerative cervical pathology were included. Frailty and dysphagia were assessed by the modified Frailty Index-11 (mFI-11) and Eat Assessment Tool 10 (EAT-10), respectively. We also collected clinical demographics and cervical alignment parameters previously reported as risk factors for postoperative dysphagia. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify the odds ratio (OR) of postoperative dysphagia at early (2-6 weeks) and late postoperative time points (1-2 years).

RESULTS

Ninety-five patients who underwent ACSS were included in the study. Postoperative dysphagia occurred in 31 patients (32.6%) at the early postoperative time point. Multivariable logistic regression identified higher mFI-11 score (OR, 4.03; 95% CI: 1.24-13.16; P =0.021), overcorrection of TS-CL after surgery (TS-CL, T1 slope minus C2-C7 lordosis; OR, 0.86; 95% CI: 0.79-0.95; P =0.003), and surgery at C3/C4 (OR, 12.38; 95% CI: 1.41-108.92; P =0.023) as factors associated with postoperative dysphagia.

CONCLUSIONS

Frailty, as assessed by the mFI-11, was significantly associated with postoperative dysphagia after ACSS. Additional factors associated with postoperative dysphagia were overcorrection of TS-CL and surgery at C3/C4. These findings emphasize the importance of assessing frailty and cervical alignment in the decision-making process preceding ACSS.

Patients with radiculopathy have worse baseline disability and greater improvements following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion compared to patients with myelopathy

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is commonly performed in patients with radiculopathy and myelopathy. Although the goal of surgery in patients with radiculopathy is to improve function and reduce pain, patients with myelopathy undergo surgery to halt disease progression. Although the expectations between these preoperative diagnoses are generally understood to be disparate by spine surgeons, there is limited literature demonstrating their discordant outcomes.

PURPOSE

To compare improvements in patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) for patients undergoing ACDF for myelopathy or radiculopathy. Secondarily, we analyzed the proportion of patients who attain the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) postoperatively using thresholds derived from radiculopathy, myelopathy, and mixed cohort studies.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Single institution retrospective cohort study PATIENT SAMPLE: Patients undergoing primary, elective ACDF with a preoperative diagnosis of radiculopathy or myelopathy and a complete set of preoperative and one-year postoperative PROMs.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Outcome measures included the following PROMs: Short-Form 12 Physical Component (PCS-12) and Mental Component (MCS-12) scores, the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Arm score, and the Neck Disability Index (NDI). Hospital readmissions and revision surgery were also collected and evaluated.

METHODS

Patients undergoing an ACDF from 2014 to 2020 were identified and grouped based on preoperative diagnosis (radiculopathy or myelopathy). We utilized "general MCID" thresholds from a cohort of patients with degenerative spine conditions, and "specific MCID" thresholds generated from cohorts of patients with myelopathy or radiculopathy, respectively. Multivariate linear regressions were performed for delta (∆) PROMs and multivariate logistic regressions were performed for both general and specific MCID improvements.

RESULTS

A total of 798 patients met inclusion criteria. Patients with myelopathy had better baseline function and arm pain (MCS-12: 49.6 vs 47.6, p=.018; VAS Arm: 3.94 vs 6.02, p<.001; and NDI: 34.1 vs 41.9, p<.001), were older (p<.001), had more comorbidities (p=.014), more levels fused (p<.001), and had decreased improvement in PROMs following surgery compared to patients with radiculopathy (∆PCS-12: 4.76 vs 7.21, p=.006; ∆VAS Arm: -1.69 vs -3.70, p<.001; and ∆NDI: -11.94 vs -18.61, p<.001). On multivariate analysis, radiculopathy was an independent predictor of increased improvement in PCS-12 (β=2.10, p=.019), ∆NDI (β=-5.36, p<.001), and ∆VAS Arm (β=-1.93, p<.001). Radiculopathy patients were more likely to achieve general MCID improvements following surgery (NDI: Odds ratio (OR): 1.42, p=.035 and VAS Arm: OR: 2.98, p<.001), but there was no difference between patients with radiculopathy or myelopathy when using radiculopathy and myelopathy specific MCID thresholds (MCS-12: p=.113, PCS-12: p=.675, NDI: p=.108, and VAS Arm: p=.314).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing ACDF with myelopathy or radiculopathy represent two distinct patient populations with differing treatment indications and clinical outcomes. Compared to radiculopathy, patients with myelopathy have better baseline function, decreased improvement in PROMs, and are less likely to reach MCID using general threshold values, but there is no difference in the proportion reaching MCID when using specific threshold values.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IRB.

Clinical significance of the C2 slope after multilevel cervical spine fusion

OBJECTIVE

The C2 slope (C2S) is one of the parameters that can determine cervical sagittal alignment, but its clinical significance is relatively unexplored. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical significance of the C2S after multilevel cervical spine fusion.

METHODS

A total of 111 patients who underwent multilevel cervical spine fusion were included in this study. The C2S, cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA), C2-7 lordosis, and T1 slope (T1S) were measured in standing lateral cervical spine radiographs preoperatively and 2 years after the surgery. Clinical outcome measures were visual analog scale (VAS) neck and arm pain scores, Neck Disability Index (NDI), Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scale score, and patient-reported subjective improvement rate (IR) percentage. Statistical analysis was performed using a paired-samples t-test and Pearson's correlation, and a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to determine the cutoff values of C2S.

RESULTS

C2S demonstrated a significant correlation with the cSVA, C2-7 lordosis, T1S, and T1S minus cervical lordosis. C2S revealed a significant correlation with the JOA, neck pain VAS, and NDI scores at 2 years after surgery. Change in the C2S correlated with postoperative neck pain and NDI scores. ROC curves demonstrated the cutoff values of C2S as 18.8°, 22.25°, and 25.35°, according to a cSVA of 40 mm, severe disability expressed by NDI, and severe myelopathy, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

C2S can be an additional cervical sagittal alignment parameter that can be a useful prognostic factor after multilevel cervical spine fusion.

Clinical Impact and Correlations of Odontoid Parameters Following Multilevel Posterior Cervical Fusion Surgery

OBJECTIVE

C2 slope (C2S), a cervical parameter mathematically approximated as T1 slope minus cervical lordosis (T1S-CL), predicts functional improvement in cervical deformity patients. Nonetheless, C2S is a positional parameter based only on the horizontal axis. The current study aims to introduce novel odontoid parameters and establish their relationships with patient-reported health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

METHODS

Lateral plain radiographs of 32 adults who underwent multilevel posterior cervical fusion were analyzed. The odontoid parameters included odontoid incidence (OI), C2S, odontoid tilt (OT), and gravity line-C2 distance (GL-C2), while the cervical parameters were the Cobb angle at C0-1, C1-2, C0-2, C2-7, C2-7 sagittal vertical axis (cSVA), T1 slope, and T1S-CL. The range of motion (ROM) of the occipito-atlantoaxial complex was measured in flexion and extension plain radiographs. Scores on the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and visual analogue scale (VAS) for axial neck (VASn) and arm pain were measured.

RESULTS

Compared to asymptomatic subjects, patients had larger C2S, cSVA, and T1S-CL, and smaller OT. Preoperatively, OI was significantly correlated with the ROM of C1-2 (r = 0.37, p < 0.05) and C0-2 (r = 0.46, p < 0.01). OT and C2S had significant correlations with the C0-1, C1-2, and C0-2 angles, GL-C2, and T1S-CL. Postoperative NDI scores were significantly correlated with OI (r = -0.40, p < 0.05) and OT (ρ = -0.37, p < 0.05). VASn was significantly correlated with GL-C2 (r = -0.35, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The odontoid parameters were significantly correlated with established cervical parameters and HRQoL measures. OI is a constant parameter representing the individual's compensatory reservoir at the upper cervical spine.

Radiographic Parameters in Cervical Myelopathy: Review of Current Literature

STUDY DESIGN

This was a narrative review.

OBJECTIVES

Provide a comprehensive review of radiographic alignment parameters and their effect on procedure selection, surgical decision-making, and clinical outcomes for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The use of radiographic parameters to predict prognosis and surgical outcomes in patients with CSM is an evolving field given the complex presentation of patients with this condition.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted using PubMed for surgical treatment of CSM, with an emphasis on cervical radiographic parameters and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

The principal goals of spine surgery can be broken down into decompression, stabilization, and restoration of alignment. The principle of restoring balance takes careful preoperative planning and attention to radiographic parameters including cervical lordosis, C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis, neck tilt, thoracic inlet angle, T1 slope, K-line, and modified K-line. Surgical interventions for CSM include anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, posterior cervical fusion, or laminoplasty and careful consideration of radiographic measures guide surgical decision-making is essential to ensure optimal outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Utilization of key radiographic parameters in surgical planning and decision-making allows surgeons to optimize clinical outcomes for CSM.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level V.

Sagittal alignment differences on the operating room table compared to preoperative and postoperative imaging in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion

Study Design

The study design used was a retrospective cohort.

Objective

The objective of this study is to determine if intraoperative improvements in sagittal alignment on the operating table persisted on postoperative standing radiographs.

Summary of Background Data

Cervical sagittal alignment may be correlated to postoperative outcomes. Since anterior cervical discectomy and fusions (ACDFs) can restore some cervical lordosis through intervertebral grafts/cages, it is important to understand if intraoperative radiographic measurements correlate with persistent postoperative radiographic changes.

Materials and Methods

Patients undergoing elective primary ACDF were screened for the presence of lateral cervical radiographs preoperatively, intraoperatively, and postoperatively. Patients were excluded if their first postoperative radiograph was more than 3 months following the procedure or if cervical lordosis was not able to be measured at each time point. Paired t-tests were utilized to compare differences in measurements between time points. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.

Results

Of 46 included patients, 26 (56.5%) were female, and the mean age was 55.2 ± 11.6 years. C0-C2 lordosis significantly increased from the preoperative to intraoperative time point (delta [Δ] = 4.49, P = 0.029) and significantly decreased from the intraoperative to postoperative time period (Δ = -6.57, P < 0.001), but this resulted in no significant preoperative to postoperative change (Δ = -2.08, P = 0.096). C2 slope decreased from the preoperative to the intraoperative time point (Δ = -3.84, P = 0.043) and significantly increased from the intraoperative to the postoperative time point (Δ = 3.68, P = 0.047), which also resulted in no net change in alignment between the preoperative and postoperative periods (Δ = -0.16, P = 0.848). There was no significant difference in the C2-C7 SVA from the preoperative to intraoperative (Δ = 0.85, P = 0.724) or intraoperative to postoperative periods (Δ = 2.04, P = 0.401); however, the C2-C7 SVA significantly increased from the preoperative to postoperative period (Δ = 2.88, P = 0.006).

Conclusions

Intraoperative positioning predominantly affects the mobile upper cervical spine, particularly C0-C2 lordosis and C2 slope, but these changes do not persist postoperatively.

Do the newly proposed realignment targets for C2 and T1 slope bridge the gap between radiographic and clinical success in corrective surgery for adult cervical deformity?

OBJECTIVE

Surgical correction of cervical deformity (CD) has been associated with superior alignment and functional outcomes. It has not yet been determined whether baseline or postoperative T1 slope (T1S) and C2 slope (C2S) correlate with health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) metrics and radiographic complications, such as distal junctional kyphosis (DJK) and distal junctional failure (DJF). The objective of this study was to determine the impact of T1S and C2S deformity severity on HRQoL metrics and DJF development in patients with CD who underwent a cervical fusion procedure.

METHODS

All operative CD patients with upper instrumented vertebra above C7 and preoperative (baseline) and up to 2-year postoperative radiographic and HRQoL data were included. CD was defined as meeting at least one of the following radiographic parameters: C2-7 lordosis < -15°, TS1-cervical lordosis mismatch > 35°, segmental cervical kyphosis > 15° across any 3 vertebrae between C2 and T1, C2-7 sagittal vertical axis > 4 cm, McGregor's slope > 20°, or chin-brow vertical angle > 25°. Spearman's rank-order correlation and linear regression analysis assessed the impact of T1S and C2S on HRQoL metrics (Neck Disability Index [NDI], modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association [mJOA] scale, EuroQOL 5-Dimension Questionnaire [EQ-5D] visual analog scale [VAS] score, and numeric rating scale [NRS]-neck) and complications (DJK, DJF, reoperation). Logistic regression and a conditional inference tree (CIT) were used to determine radiographic thresholds for achieving optimal clinical outcome, defined as meeting good clinical outcome criteria (≥ 2 of the following: NDI < 20 or meeting minimal clinically important difference, mild myelopathy [mJOA score ≥ 14], and NRS-neck ≤ 5 or improved by ≥ 2 points), not undergoing reoperation, or developing DJF or mechanical complication by 2 years.

RESULTS

One hundred five patients with CD met inclusion criteria. By surgical approach, 14.7% underwent an anterior-only approach, 46.1% a posterior-only approach, and 39.2% combined anterior and posterior approaches. The mean baseline radiographic parameters were T1S 28.3° ± 14.5° and C2S 25.9° ± 17.5°. Significant associations were found between 3-month C2S and mJOA score (r = -0.248, p = 0.034), NDI (r = 0.399, p = 0.001), EQ-5D VAS (r = -0.532, p < 0.001), NRS-neck (r = 0.239, p = 0.040), and NRS-back (r = 0.264, p = 0.021), while significant correlation was also found between 3-month T1S and mJOA score (r = -0.314, p = 0.026), NDI (r = 0.445, p = 0.001), EQ-5D VAS (r = -0.347, p = 0.018), and NRS-neck (r = 0.269, p = 0.049). A significant correlation was also found between development of DJF and 3-month C2S (odds ratio [OR] 1.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.1, p = 0.015) as well as for T1S (OR 1.1, 95% CI 1.01-1.1, p = 0.023). Logistic regression with CIT identified thresholds for optimal outcome by 2 years: optimal 3-month T1S < 26° (OR 5.6) and C2S < 10° (OR 10.4), severe 3-month T1S < 45.5° (OR 0.2) and C2S < 38.0° (no patient above this threshold achieved optimal outcome; all p < 0.05). Patients below both optimal thresholds achieved rates of 0% for DJK and DJF, and 100% met optimal outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

The severity of CD, defined by T1S and C2S at baseline and especially at 3 months, can be predictive of postoperative functional improvement and occurrence of worrisome complications in patients with CD, necessitating the use of thresholds in surgical planning to achieve optimal outcomes.

Odontoid Incidence: A Novel Cervical Parameter Influencing Cervical Alignment From Top to Bottom

Objective

By using angulation of the axis itself, this study aims to define and analyze odontoid incidence (OI) and odontoid tilt (OT) as novel cervical alignment parameters and investigate their correlations with cervical alignment.

Methods

Novel and existing parameters were measured with whole-spine lateral plain radiographs and EOS images of 42 adults without cervical symptoms. The correlations of OI, OT, C2 slope (C2S), and T1 slope (T1S) were calculated.

Results

The OI, OT, and C2S showed significant correlations with C2–7 angle (r = 0.43, r = -0.42, r = 0.62, respectively) and C0–2 angle (r = -0.33, r = 0.48, r = -0.61, respectively). OI, OT, T1S were independent predictors of the C2–7 angle in univariate regression analysis (adjusted-R² = 0.17, R² = 0.15, R² = 0.28, respectively). OI, OT, and T1S were independent predictors in the multivariable regression analysis with estimated standardized coefficients of 0.36, -0.67, -0.69, respectively (adjusted- R² = 0.80, p < 0.001). Regarding the C0–2 angle, OI and OT were independent predictors in the univariate regression analysis (adjusted-R² = 0.08, R² = 0.21, respectively).

Conclusion

OI, OT, and C2S had significant correlations with cervical alignment. As the pelvic incidence, the OI is the only anatomical and constant parameter that could be used as a reference point related to the cervical spine from the rostral end. The study results may serve as baseline data for further studies on the alignment and balance of the cervical spine.

The Effect of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Procedure Duration on Patient-Reported Outcome Measures

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether operative duration of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) significantly affects patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) 90 days after surgery and at 1-year follow-up.

METHODS

Patients who underwent primary 1-level to 4-level ACDF were retrospectively identified. Demographic data and PROMs were collected through chart review. Patients were split into short, medium, and long tertiles based on procedure duration. PROM surveys were administered preoperatively as baseline measurements, at initial follow-up (between 60 and 120 days postoperatively), and at 1 year postoperatively. Outcomes included Neck Disability Index, Short-Form 12 Physical Component Score (PCS-12), Short-Form 12 Mental Component Score, visual analog scale (VAS) neck score, and VAS arm score.

RESULTS

Significant short-term improvements were found across all groups for all PROMs. All groups showed long-term improvements in Short-Form 12 Mental Component Score, PCS-12, Neck Disability Index, VAS neck score, and VAS arm score, with the exception of the medium-duration group in PCS-12 (P = 0.093). On multivariate analysis, short-duration procedures predicted better improvement in VAS neck score (β = -1.01; P = 0.012) and VAS arm score (β = -1.38; P = 0.002) compared with long-duration procedures, whereas medium-duration procedures resulted in better improvement in VAS arm score (β = -1.00; P = 0.011). Further, short and medium duration was a predictor of decreased length of hospital stay (β = -0.67, P = 0.001 and β = -0.59, P = 0.001, respectively) compared with long-duration procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

All groups improved after ACDF regardless of surgical duration. Further, surgical duration was not a predictor of differing improvement in physical function or disability.