Robot-navigated pedicle screw insertion can reduce intraoperative blood loss and length of hospital stay: analysis of 1,633 patients utilizing propensity score matching

Pelvic Fixation Technique Using the Ilio-Sacral Screw for 173 Neuromuscular Scoliosis Patients

Pelvic fixation remains one of the main challenging issues in non-ambulatory neuromuscular scoliosis (NMS) patients, between clinical effectiveness and a high complication rate. The objective of this multicenter and retrospective study was to evaluate the outcomes of a technique that was applied to treat 173 NMS patients. The technique is not well-known but promising; it uses the ilio-sacral screw, combined with either the posterior spinal fusion or fusionless bipolar technique, with a minimum follow-up of two years. The mean operative age of the patients was 13 ± 7 years. The mean preoperative main coronal curve was 64° and improved by a mean of -39° postoperatively. The mean preoperative pelvic obliquity was 23°, which improved by a mean of -14° postoperatively. No decrease in the frontal or sagittal correction was observed during the last follow-up. The sitting posture improved in all cases. Twenty-nine patients (17%) had a postoperative infection: twenty-six were treated with local debridement and antibiotics, and three required hardware removal. Fourteen mechanical complications (8%) occurred: screw malposition (n = 6), skin prominence (n = 1), and connector failure (n = 1). This type of surgery is associated with a high risk for infection. Comorbidities, rather than the surgery itself, were the main risk factors that led to complications. The ilio-sacral screw was reliable and effective in correcting pelvic obliquity in NMS patients. The introduction of intraoperative navigation should minimize the risk of screw misplacement and facilitate revision or primary fixation.

Comparison of Radiographic and Patient-Reported Outcomes After Surgery in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Between Robotics and Navigation: An Analysis Using Propensity Score Matching

Purpose This study aimed to compare the radiographic and patient-reported outcomes after surgery in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) between robotics and navigation using propensity score matching. Methods This retrospective study involved 50 patients undergoing posterior spinal fusion for AIS between October 2016 and August 2022, utilizing navigation or robotic systems, analyzing them using propensity score matching. The evaluations included assessments using X-ray, Scoliosis Research Society 22-Item (SRS-22) Questionnaire, and CT, considering variables such as age, gender, BMI, and Lenke type. Results Post matching, 13 cases each from robotics and navigation groups were compared. No significant differences were found in the demographic variables, preoperative X-ray parameters, and preoperative SRS-22 scores between the two groups. The robotics group demonstrated a higher perfect accuracy rate (94.0% vs. 84.7%, p=0.005) and a lower deviation rate in pedicle screw placements (1.6% vs. 4.1%, p=0.223). At one year postoperatively, there were no significant differences in the X-ray parameters between both groups. Likewise, no significant differences were found in each domain of SRS-22, but function, self-image, mental health, and satisfaction scores were numerically higher in the robotics group. Conclusion The application of a spinal robotic system in AIS surgery presented enhanced screw accuracy and lower deviation rates, compared to navigation, with no significant differences observed in the X-ray parameters and each domain of SRS-22 at one year postoperatively. This suggests that, to improve patient quality of life (QOL), it is essential for robotic-assisted spine surgery to focus not only on screw accuracy but also on the development of novel robotic-assisted techniques.